by Anti-Social Darwinism » Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:59 pm
by Conserative Morality » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:02 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:03 pm
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:This person takes issue with Obama stating that we are not a Judeo-Christian nation. Though I am neither Jew nor Christian, I do too. I just don't believe that the President of the US has the right to make a blanket statement concerning the beliefs and values of an entire nation.
Personally, I think this person is an idiot. But then, I'm beginning to think that OBama is, perhaps, not as bright as I once did. I'm beginning to think that he'll tell people what they want to hear, regardless of whether it's true or not - but then, he's a politician and the definition of politician is liar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpQOCvthw-o
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Khadgar » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:03 pm
by Sarkhaan » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:05 pm
by Bottle » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:06 pm
by The Tofu Islands » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:07 pm
by Phenia » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:07 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:09 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by The Cat-Tribe » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:23 pm
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:This person takes issue with Obama stating that we are not a Judeo-Christian nation. Though I am neither Jew nor Christian, I do too. I just don't believe that the President of the US has the right to make a blanket statement concerning the beliefs and values of an entire nation.
Personally, I think this person is an idiot. But then, I'm beginning to think that OBama is, perhaps, not as bright as I once did. I'm beginning to think that he'll tell people what they want to hear, regardless of whether it's true or not - but then, he's a politician and the definition of politician is liar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpQOCvthw-o
by The Cat-Tribe » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:23 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Depends if he's talking culturally, or who founded this nation.
by Maurepas » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:24 pm
by Conserative Morality » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:26 pm
The Cat-Tribe wrote:Under which would be be a "Judeo-Christian nation"?
by UNIverseVERSE » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:43 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Upon reflection, neither, although we have taken a few Judeo-Christian influences in our culture, I wouldn't say that we were. I blame the reduced quality of my posts on the Communists.
by Conserative Morality » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:46 pm
UNIverseVERSE wrote:Scapegoats for everything, I tell you. How we are supposed to plan the glorious revolution when we keep getting hauled up in court because someone blamed us for their traffic ticket, I don't know.
by UNIverseVERSE » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:06 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:You know, you could always blame the fact that everyone blames the Communists on the Communists.
by Autumn Wind » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:28 pm
by Osgarna » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:33 pm
Autumn Wind wrote:I love the use of the phrase "Judeo-Christian."
It makes them sound more intellectual than just "Christian" which is what they actually want to say.
Is Judeo-Christian values a combination of "Death to Amelekites" and "Love your neighbors?"
by Letat » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:35 pm
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:This person takes issue with Obama stating that we are not a Judeo-Christian nation. Though I am neither Jew nor Christian, I do too. I just don't believe that the President of the US has the right to make a blanket statement concerning the beliefs and values of an entire nation.
Personally, I think this person is an idiot. But then, I'm beginning to think that OBama is, perhaps, not as bright as I once did. I'm beginning to think that he'll tell people what they want to hear, regardless of whether it's true or not - but then, he's a politician and the definition of politician is liar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpQOCvthw-o
by Maurepas » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:39 pm
Letat wrote:
So should he say that the nation is Judeo-Christian? That would seem unfair to those of us who do not subscribe to those faiths. Or should he say nothing on the topic at all?
Further: What precisely is a Judeo-Christian nation? How are our values formed by Christianity more than Enlightenment-era secularism?
by Osgarna » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:47 pm
Maurepas wrote:Letat wrote:
So should he say that the nation is Judeo-Christian? That would seem unfair to those of us who do not subscribe to those faiths. Or should he say nothing on the topic at all?
Further: What precisely is a Judeo-Christian nation? How are our values formed by Christianity more than Enlightenment-era secularism?
Well, the short, yet correct answer is, Yes, and theyre not,
by Uiri » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:52 pm
Osgarna wrote:Autumn Wind wrote:I love the use of the phrase "Judeo-Christian."
It makes them sound more intellectual than just "Christian" which is what they actually want to say.
Is Judeo-Christian values a combination of "Death to Amelekites" and "Love your neighbors?"
Yeah, you've got to go to the Torah for all the fire and brimstone, which is what fundies really want.
<Franberry> a WA condemnation is more useless than an irl UN sanction
by Osgarna » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:00 pm
Uiri wrote:Osgarna wrote:Autumn Wind wrote:I love the use of the phrase "Judeo-Christian."
It makes them sound more intellectual than just "Christian" which is what they actually want to say.
Is Judeo-Christian values a combination of "Death to Amelekites" and "Love your neighbors?"
Yeah, you've got to go to the Torah for all the fire and brimstone, which is what fundies really want.
Torah = Old Testament of the Bible.
by Maurepas » Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:01 pm
Osgarna wrote: Or did you mean say nothing about it at all? That hardly seems appropriate considering he needs to repair the damage from all of Bush's talk of "crusades" and things like that.
by Greed and Death » Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:08 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Card Cleaver, Cyptopir, Likhinia, Singaporen Empire, Soul Reapers
Advertisement