Most theologians don't add onto preexisting scripture for their own benefit.
The gap between Christianity and Mormonism is about as wide as the gap between us and Judaism.
Advertisement
by Northern Davincia » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:04 am
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Hakons » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:04 am
Angleter wrote:Hakons wrote:
After some feedback, list version two:
Paul the Apostle
Arius
Augustine of Hippo
John Chrysostom
Thomas Aquinas
Martin Luther
John Calvin
John Wesley
Billy Graham
Other
Arius was added because he led Arianism, a very large heretical movement. Other was added as well.
Possible adds:
Nestorius
Arminius
John Bunyan
Origen
Athanasius
Jerome
Bede the Venerable
Swingli
On and on and on...
+Joseph Smith
I don't think you'd get many votes for Arius. Also I think Eastern Christianity is a little underrepresented.
Perhaps it might be worth, given the vast number of potential candidates, having a series of polls for favourite theologians from different eras?
by Auze » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:04 am
Lord Dominator wrote:The short answer is of course that everyone is a heretic (if you include other major world religions)
by Auze » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:08 am
Hakons wrote:Angleter wrote:
I don't think you'd get many votes for Arius. Also I think Eastern Christianity is a little underrepresented.
Perhaps it might be worth, given the vast number of potential candidates, having a series of polls for favourite theologians from different eras?
Yes, that would be much better. Trying to balance the different eras of Christianity and the different interpretations during those eras makes it impossible to have one poll.
by Deltanium » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:08 am
Radio Łódź:Sabaton- To Hell And Back|Der Warzau Telegraf: BREAKING: Valentine Z says the N-word!|American troops arrive in France
by Pasong Tirad » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:10 am
by Hakons » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:11 am
by Auze » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:13 am
Stonok wrote:Also include heretical theologians so we can sort out who to burn.
by Hakons » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:14 am
Stonok wrote:Also include heretical theologians so we can sort out who to burn.
by Northern Davincia » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:15 am
Stonok wrote:Also include heretical theologians so we can sort out who to burn.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Auze » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:15 am
by Northern Davincia » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:18 am
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Angleter » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:24 am
Hakons wrote:Angleter wrote:
I don't think you'd get many votes for Arius. Also I think Eastern Christianity is a little underrepresented.
Perhaps it might be worth, given the vast number of potential candidates, having a series of polls for favourite theologians from different eras?
Yes, that would be much better. Trying to balance the different eras of Christianity and the different interpretations during those eras makes it impossible to have one poll.
by Auze » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:30 am
by Stonok » Sat Jun 30, 2018 9:31 am
Angleter wrote:I don't think you'd get many votes for Arius.
by Lord Dominator » Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:09 am
by NewLakotah » Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:15 am
Angleter wrote:Hakons wrote:
Yes, that would be much better. Trying to balance the different eras of Christianity and the different interpretations during those eras makes it impossible to have one poll.
Perhaps for the ante-Nicene era (those who flourished beforec. 300c.350):
Paul the Apostle
Justin Martyr
Irenaeus
Origen
Tertullian
MarcionIgnatiusAthanasiusPolycarpAriusClement of RomeHilary of Poitiers
Other
by Pope Joan » Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:18 am
by Stonok » Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:20 am
Pope Joan wrote:"Jesus is God".
Anybody who cannot say those three words out loud is either an Arian or an adoptionist.
Which I think would include most of the Presbyterian Church.
by Pope Joan » Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:23 am
Stonok wrote:Pope Joan wrote:"Jesus is God
Anybody who cannot say those three words out loud is either an Arian or an adoptionist.
Which I think would include most of the Presbyterian Church.
I've never met a Presbyterian who didn't believe in the Trinity. In fact I've watched some Presbyterians berate nontrinitarians.
by Stonok » Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:25 am
Pope Joan wrote:Stonok wrote:I've never met a Presbyterian who didn't believe in the Trinity. In fact I've watched some Presbyterians berate nontrinitarians.
Oh sure there is the Trinity, but there is often an implicit hierarchy. Why do we insist on always adding "Son of"? Does that not imply "lesser than"? It often does imply that, when we speak of families.
I am even one inch shorter than my own father.
by Pope Joan » Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:34 am
Stonok wrote:Pope Joan wrote:
Oh sure there is the Trinity, but there is often an implicit hierarchy. Why do we insist on always adding "Son of"? Does that not imply "lesser than"? It often does imply that, when we speak of families.
I am even one inch shorter than my own father.
Because that's the particular term used most often in the Gospels, the primary source of knowledge about Christ for the average Christian?
by Hakons » Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:40 am
Pope Joan wrote:Stonok wrote:Because that's the particular term used most often in the Gospels, the primary source of knowledge about Christ for the average Christian?
Hpw often do you hear anybody say "very God of very God"? Not often.
It is like he is a handmedown version of the Father who is the REAL God.
Muslims also call Hesus the Son of GOd, which is nice, but not quite enough.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Tillania
Advertisement