Possibility for Second American Civil War

[Sovaal]

As an American who has lived and traveled across the country, I would not. If anything the divide among Americans is more rural/urban than it is by geeographical region.

Well, that division simply doesn't work. And you cannot deny that there are differences. A New England Republican is no Dixie Republican, no?

No, but more often than not they have more in common than they do with a New England Democrat or Dixie Democrat, and vice versa.

And frankly the nation shouldn’t be divided up all. Long live the Union!

[Benuty]

I mean assuming a years-long civil war doesn't end with either a reactionary military dictatorship or an interim republic prone to severe trouble then things might be alright. If they result in the other two then most likely after a certain period the U.S will break apart into new nations regardless of what happens in D.C.

[Sovaal]

Shit is that real?

It’s from ww2

Welp I hope the Warsaw pack enjoyed its freedom.

[Benuty]

Well, that division simply doesn't work. And you cannot deny that there are differences. A New England Republican is no Dixie Republican, no?

No, but more often than not they have more in common than they do with a New England Democrat or Dixie Democrat, and vice versa.

And frankly the nation shouldn’t be divided up all. Long live the Union!

It probably won't, but people will only put up with things for so long before realizing D.C is just too apathetic to maintain the Union in some form.

[Ifreann]

Yes, that's what we wanted you to think.

---

Shit is that real?

I don't know, but there are several similar posters. Some may not be real.

[Sovaal]

Shit is that real?

I don't know, but there are several similar posters. Some may not be real.

The Mohave will be liberated and it will like it.

[Internationalist Bastard]

Well, that division simply doesn't work. And you cannot deny that there are differences. A New England Republican is no Dixie Republican, no?

No, but more often than not they have more in common than they do with a New England Democrat or Dixie Democrat, and vice versa.

And frankly the nation shouldn’t be divided up all. Long live the Union!

Bring back City-States

[Geneviev]

I would hope that America can avoid civil war. It's not a country that would make the same mistake twice.

[Olerand]

Well, that division simply doesn't work. And you cannot deny that there are differences. A New England Republican is no Dixie Republican, no?

No, but more often than not they have more in common than they do with a New England Democrat or Dixie Democrat, and vice versa.

And frankly the nation shouldn’t be divided up all. Long live the Union!

Well yes, that is why they are still Republicans. But the divisions are significant enough that one can legitimately say that regions do make serious differences.

From a foreign perspective, I agree, I want America to continue to be able to project its military power abroad (though I would severely curb its cultural clout). From an American perspective, I genuinely think Americans, and their psychiatric wards, would be better off more coherently divided.

[Sovaal]

No, but more often than not they have more in common than they do with a New England Democrat or Dixie Democrat, and vice versa.

And frankly the nation shouldn’t be divided up all. Long live the Union!

It probably won't, but people will only put up with things for so long before realizing D.C is just too apathetic to maintain the Union in some form.

Washington is apathetic to anything that doesn’t push their agenda or line their pockets. However the Union survived through worse times than these. Get back to me when Kansas starts to bleed.

[Sovaal]

No, but more often than not they have more in common than they do with a New England Democrat or Dixie Democrat, and vice versa.

And frankly the nation shouldn’t be divided up all. Long live the Union!

Bring back City-States

Only if I get to be Alexander.

[Sovaal]

No, but more often than not they have more in common than they do with a New England Democrat or Dixie Democrat, and vice versa.

And frankly the nation shouldn’t be divided up all. Long live the Union!

Well yes, that is why they are still Republicans. But the divisions are significant enough that one can legitimately say that regions do make serious differences.

From a foreign perspective, I agree, I want America to continue to be able to project its military power abroad (though I would severely curb its cultural clout). From an American perspective, I genuinely think Americans, and their psychiatric wards, would be better off more coherently divided.

And as an American I disagree.

[Benuty]

It probably won't, but people will only put up with things for so long before realizing D.C is just too apathetic to maintain the Union in some form.

Washington is apathetic to anything that doesn’t push their agenda or line their pockets. However the Union survived through worse times than these. Get back to me when Kansas starts to bleed.

If D.C cannot afford to keep the union together post civil war then all the millions who died will have died for nothing.

[Sovaal]

I would hope that America can avoid civil war. It's not a country that would make the same mistake twice.

Eh, humans have a bad history in that regard. Still, I don’t think a civil war is in the near future.

[Geneviev]

I would hope that America can avoid civil war. It's not a country that would make the same mistake twice.

Eh, humans have a bad history in that regard. Still, I don’t think a civil war is in the near future.

America isn't perfect, but they're not stupid. So even in the distant future, civil war seems unlikely.

[The Serbian Empire]

I would hope that America can avoid civil war. It's not a country that would make the same mistake twice.

Implying that the US also didn't screw up with both the moving of Native Americans and the internment of Japanese later.

[Geneviev]

I would hope that America can avoid civil war. It's not a country that would make the same mistake twice.

Implying that the US also didn't screw up with both the moving of Native Americans and the internment of Japanese later.

They didn't move the Native Americans again. And there haven't been internment camps since either.

[Sovaal]

Washington is apathetic to anything that doesn’t push their agenda or line their pockets. However the Union survived through worse times than these. Get back to me when Kansas starts to bleed.

If D.C cannot afford to keep the union together post civil war then all the millions who died will have died for nothing.

D.C seems to age done at least a decent enough job of that since the 1860’s.

[Thermodolia]

As an American who has lived and traveled across the country, I would not. If anything the divide among Americans is more rural/urban than it is by geographical region.

Maybe, but if the post-civil war interim government doesn't survive the critical thirty year period afterward it will most likely see mass secessionism happen anyway.

Not on my watch. I’ll install a military dictatorship and go Stalin on those traitors

[Thermodolia]

As an American who has lived and traveled across the country, I would not. If anything the divide among Americans is more rural/urban than it is by geeographical region.

Well, that division simply doesn't work. And you cannot deny that there are differences. A New England Republican is no Dixie Republican, no?

Actually republican in the rural areas of the northeast really aren’t that different from their southern counterparts

[The Serbian Empire]

Well, that division simply doesn't work. And you cannot deny that there are differences. A New England Republican is no Dixie Republican, no?

Actually republican in the rural areas of the northeast really aren’t that different from their southern counterparts

The thing is, Vermont is heavily Democrat with few cities of significant size for some unknown reason.

[Thermodolia]

No, but more often than not they have more in common than they do with a New England Democrat or Dixie Democrat, and vice versa.

And frankly the nation shouldn’t be divided up all. Long live the Union!

Well yes, that is why they are still Republicans. But the divisions are significant enough that one can legitimately say that regions do make serious differences.

From a foreign perspective, I agree, I want America to continue to be able to project its military power abroad (though I would severely curb its cultural clout). From an American perspective, I genuinely think Americans, and their psychiatric wards, would be better off more coherently divided.

Fuck that

[Khataiy]

Considering most liberals are anti-gun how would they expect to fight and win? I know ANTIFA members own guns but how about the part of the left that opposes owning guns? Would they buy guns simply for the sake of war then disown them, this is a genuine question.

[The Serbian Empire]

Implying that the US also didn't screw up with both the moving of Native Americans and the internment of Japanese later.

They didn't move the Native Americans again. And there haven't been internment camps since either.

Many tribes were moved more than once in the 1800s. Once they found gold in the Black Hills, they had to move the Sioux off their holy land after moving large numbers of Sioux to that land.

[Thermodolia]

Actually republican in the rural areas of the northeast really aren’t that different from their southern counterparts

The thing is, Vermont is heavily Democrat with few cities of significant size for some unknown reason.

I mean look at fucking Maine and their governor. That guy could definitely pass for a Southern republican