NATION

PASSWORD

Would you give your kids to Trump?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Would you give your kids to Trump?

Postby Infected Mushroom » Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:57 pm

You have a new kid. Donald Trump wants your kid (he would like to be a good father).

So let’s say, the law allows you to give your newborn kid to Donald Trump. The Donald would become the legal father under the law (and the sole recognized guardian).

He’s rich as a Lannister, President of a powerful nation, and has powerful allies in all sectors of society. Clearly, he can provide the kid with far more economic resources and social opportunities. In strict material terms, he can offer the kid a “better” future.

However, he might not necessarily be the best moral guide. Furthermore, he would be very busy as President. And having said this, there’s the obvious con that you won’t see your kid again.

Having said this, please discuss:

1. Would you give your kid to the Donald? Why or why not?
2. Objectively speaking, if you truly loved your kid and wanted the best for them... should you give them to Trump?

I believe that after a great deal of deliberation, I would be forced to conclude that giving to Trump is the way to go.

Love means giving the kid d the best shot they have to be “successful” in life. And sometimes, that means going with different parents.

I mean think about it. He’s a president, he’s rich as a Lannister, he’s got allies everywhere. The kid will go to very high places with him. I must let go.
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:59 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
The Burke Islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 309
Founded: Apr 25, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Burke Islands » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:01 pm

Erm, no, nothing against Trump’s parenting skills, but I want to actually raise my own child.
❤️~Remember, no one will ever be able to hate you more than you already hate yourself~❤️

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:03 pm

The Burke Islands wrote:Erm, no, nothing against Trump’s parenting skills, but I want to actually raise my own child.


Erm, no, a lot against Trump's parenting skills, but I want to actually raise my own child.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Collatis
Minister
 
Posts: 2702
Founded: Aug 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Collatis » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:03 pm

No, but I can definitely see myself in a situation where I’d have to kill my own child in self-defense.

Social Democrat | Humanist | Progressive | Internationalist | New Dealer

PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump


User avatar
The Burke Islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 309
Founded: Apr 25, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Burke Islands » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:04 pm

Telconi wrote:
The Burke Islands wrote:Erm, no, nothing against Trump’s parenting skills, but I want to actually raise my own child.


Erm, no, a lot against Trump's parenting skills, but I want to actually raise my own child.

His children seemed to turn out ok.
❤️~Remember, no one will ever be able to hate you more than you already hate yourself~❤️

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:05 pm

The Burke Islands wrote:Erm, no, nothing against Trump’s parenting skills, but I want to actually raise my own child.


So you think it’s in the child’s best interest to be raised by YOU and not by the POTUS?

Or maybe you care less about the child and more about your own need to be a parent of said child?

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:06 pm

Collatis wrote:No, but I can definitely see myself in a situation where I’d have to kill my own child in self-defense.


Well that sucks.

The Burke Islands wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Erm, no, a lot against Trump's parenting skills, but I want to actually raise my own child.

His children seemed to turn out ok.


If they turned out okay I doubt it was by much of his doing.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Yami-Chan
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Apr 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Yami-Chan » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:07 pm

Mixed feelings about the guy, but that doesn't matter since I'd like to raise my own kid, and this isn't Crusader Kings II where I can ship him off so I'm not bothered by him anymore.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:08 pm

No I don't want my kids being spoiled. Thats why my kid is only getting a BMW when he turns 16 let him earn a Bugatti with his own money likely his old man did.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:09 pm

Are you fucking high?

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:10 pm

Genivaria wrote:Are you fucking high?

OP is named mushroom.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:10 pm

Yami-Chan wrote:Mixed feelings about the guy, but that doesn't matter since I'd like to raise my own kid, and this isn't Crusader Kings II where I can ship him off so I'm not bothered by him anymore.


You’d like to raise the kid, but is it in the kid’s best interest?

Economically, socially, opportunity-wise

I would invite you to not reach a quick conclusion based on parental instinct

It’s not about you, it’s about the kid

If you really think the kid is better off with you then the President if the USA, then explain how

User avatar
Xadufell
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1179
Founded: Mar 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Xadufell » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:10 pm

I'm not giving my kids to anyone, because they're mine, if I've done something to have them taken away it's either because it's really bad or really unfortunate. Say, for instance, my kids get taken because I'm a shit father who can't actually care for them; I probably deserve it. But if me and my wife are hospitalized and my kids have to go with someone, then so be it.
28 Year old autistic twat.
!!!WE MADE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Pro: Right Wing, Israel, The Donald, Guns, Free Speech, Capitalism, Switzerland, Germany, Britain leaving the EU, TEMPORARY ban on Muslims until everything gets sorted out, Republicans, Russia.
Anti: Hillary, Sanders, Democrats, Radical Islam, ISIS, Illegal Immigration, BLM (Because they obviously do.), Obama, MSNBC, Left Wing, Radical Anything (Virtually), Turkey, Trump Protesters who have no valid points.

Grinning Dragon wrote:Why would anyone waste a good bullet on the likes of CNN anyway? I don't understand why anyone would get that worked up over a bunch of dipshits, christ if their shit show is getting you that worked up, just turn the damn thing off and go for a walk/run/ride.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:12 pm

You know what I'll go a step further.
Not only is the answer no but I think that people like Trump should be investigated by CPS.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:12 pm

Xadufell wrote:I'm not giving my kids to anyone, because they're mine, if I've done something to have them taken away it's either because it's really bad or really unfortunate. Say, for instance, my kids get taken because I'm a shit father who can't actually care for them; I probably deserve it. But if me and my wife are hospitalized and my kids have to go with someone, then so be it.


So it’s about what you can/can’t have and not really about what is best for the infant?

User avatar
Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1235
Founded: Jun 02, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:13 pm

Xadufell wrote:I'm not giving my kids to anyone, because they're mine, if I've done something to have them taken away it's either because it's really bad or really unfortunate. Say, for instance, my kids get taken because I'm a shit father who can't actually care for them; I probably deserve it. But if me and my wife are hospitalized and my kids have to go with someone, then so be it.


Yeah, I don’t think Trump has any intrest in adopting anyone’s kids. Gonna have to give them to Hilary I guess. :p ;) :lol2:
Officially retired as of 8/10/2018. Don’t bother sending TG’s since I’m not coming back.

User avatar
The Burke Islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 309
Founded: Apr 25, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Burke Islands » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:14 pm

Telconi wrote:
Collatis wrote:No, but I can definitely see myself in a situation where I’d have to kill my own child in self-defense.


Well that sucks.

The Burke Islands wrote:His children seemed to turn out ok.


If they turned out okay I doubt it was by much of his doing.

That’s a little unfair to say in my opinion.
Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Burke Islands wrote:Erm, no, nothing against Trump’s parenting skills, but I want to actually raise my own child.


So you think it’s in the child’s best interest to be raised by YOU and not by the POTUS?

Or maybe you care less about the child and more about your own need to be a parent of said child?

Perhaps, but I feel I have the means to give that child a good life, with a good moral upbringing. Not all kids like being in the spotlight, being the child of the POTUS automatically brings a ton of publicity. There’s also the possibility of being spoiled or naive as a result, which is never good. The president also, understandably, doesn’t have much time for family bonding, and a child of theirs could easily feel neglected by their father’s absence.
❤️~Remember, no one will ever be able to hate you more than you already hate yourself~❤️

User avatar
Nouveau Yathrib
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1031
Founded: Jul 27, 2016
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Nouveau Yathrib » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:14 pm

I can't see myself being unable to provide for my hypothetical children's basic material needs, nor would I want them to be raised by a self-absorbed celebrity billionaire.
I still can't believe that Brazil lost to Germany 1:7. Copy and paste onto your sig if you were alive when this happened.

This account is the predecessor state of Jamilkhuze and Syfenq. This is how they're different, and this is why they exist.

We are currently in the year 2181. About Us | Factbooks | Past and Future History | OOC Info | Public Relations | iiWiki | Q&A

"I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something.
And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do."

-Edward Everett Hale

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:14 pm

Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol wrote:
Xadufell wrote:I'm not giving my kids to anyone, because they're mine, if I've done something to have them taken away it's either because it's really bad or really unfortunate. Say, for instance, my kids get taken because I'm a shit father who can't actually care for them; I probably deserve it. But if me and my wife are hospitalized and my kids have to go with someone, then so be it.


Yeah, I don’t think Trump has any intrest in adopting anyone’s kids. Gonna have to give them to Hilary I guess. :p ;) :lol2:


The premise says he does (first sentence of op)

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:15 pm

Genivaria wrote:You know what I'll go a step further.
Not only is the answer no but I think that people like Trump should be investigated by CPS.


You probably think that about a lot of people tho.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Xadufell
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1179
Founded: Mar 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Xadufell » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:15 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Xadufell wrote:I'm not giving my kids to anyone, because they're mine, if I've done something to have them taken away it's either because it's really bad or really unfortunate. Say, for instance, my kids get taken because I'm a shit father who can't actually care for them; I probably deserve it. But if me and my wife are hospitalized and my kids have to go with someone, then so be it.


So it’s about what you can/can’t have and not really about what is best for the infant?


Что?
28 Year old autistic twat.
!!!WE MADE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Pro: Right Wing, Israel, The Donald, Guns, Free Speech, Capitalism, Switzerland, Germany, Britain leaving the EU, TEMPORARY ban on Muslims until everything gets sorted out, Republicans, Russia.
Anti: Hillary, Sanders, Democrats, Radical Islam, ISIS, Illegal Immigration, BLM (Because they obviously do.), Obama, MSNBC, Left Wing, Radical Anything (Virtually), Turkey, Trump Protesters who have no valid points.

Grinning Dragon wrote:Why would anyone waste a good bullet on the likes of CNN anyway? I don't understand why anyone would get that worked up over a bunch of dipshits, christ if their shit show is getting you that worked up, just turn the damn thing off and go for a walk/run/ride.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:15 pm

The Burke Islands wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Well that sucks.



If they turned out okay I doubt it was by much of his doing.

That’s a little unfair to say in my opinion.
Infected Mushroom wrote:
So you think it’s in the child’s best interest to be raised by YOU and not by the POTUS?

Or maybe you care less about the child and more about your own need to be a parent of said child?

Perhaps, but I feel I have the means to give that child a good life, with a good moral upbringing. Not all kids like being in the spotlight, being the child of the POTUS automatically brings a ton of publicity. There’s also the possibility of being spoiled or naive as a result, which is never good. The president also, understandably, doesn’t have much time for family bonding, and a child of theirs could easily feel neglected by their father’s absence.


Good thing I said it in my opinion then eh? ;)
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Cruciland
Senator
 
Posts: 4659
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Cruciland » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:16 pm

Hmm... Nah, Trump has enough on his plate as it is; it would be wrong to detract from his responsibilities when I am perfectly capable of providing everything my child needs to reach the upper echelons of his/her own merit. Plus, I'd rather not have people talking about locking my kid in a room full of pedophiles just because he's being raised by Trump.
Last edited by Cruciland on Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
THREADS SINGLE-HANDEDLY KILLED: 29 | Beliefs IBeliefs IIBeliefs III
Crucilandians - Old Capital - New Capital | A 4.8 civilization, according to this index.
Socialdemokraterne wrote:If the absence of secularism wasn't enough to scare our people, the rate of which the doomsday button is pressed by them sure settled the matter.

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Cruciland, I just want to say, your nation is frightening.

The Inevitable Syndicate wrote:My advice to you, dear Gordano-Lysandus, is to run. Or hide. Maybe not hiding, because the Crucilandians will find you, and by their god, you will be assimilated.

User avatar
The Burke Islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 309
Founded: Apr 25, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Burke Islands » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:16 pm

Telconi wrote:
The Burke Islands wrote:That’s a little unfair to say in my opinion.

Perhaps, but I feel I have the means to give that child a good life, with a good moral upbringing. Not all kids like being in the spotlight, being the child of the POTUS automatically brings a ton of publicity. There’s also the possibility of being spoiled or naive as a result, which is never good. The president also, understandably, doesn’t have much time for family bonding, and a child of theirs could easily feel neglected by their father’s absence.


Good thing I said it in my opinion then eh? ;)

Lol fair enough.
❤️~Remember, no one will ever be able to hate you more than you already hate yourself~❤️

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39285
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:17 pm

The Burke Islands wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Well that sucks.



If they turned out okay I doubt it was by much of his doing.

That’s a little unfair to say in my opinion.
Infected Mushroom wrote:
So you think it’s in the child’s best interest to be raised by YOU and not by the POTUS?

Or maybe you care less about the child and more about your own need to be a parent of said child?

Perhaps, but I feel I have the means to give that child a good life, with a good moral upbringing. Not all kids like being in the spotlight, being the child of the POTUS automatically brings a ton of publicity. There’s also the possibility of being spoiled or naive as a result, which is never good. The president also, understandably, doesn’t have much time for family bonding, and a child of theirs could easily feel neglected by their father’s absence.


Would you (you personally) rather be spoiled and naive but have the benefit of a Trump upbringing... or instead be raised by a regular run of the mill parent who promises a good moral education?

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Atrito, Google [Bot], Jerzylvania, La Paz de Los Ricos, Merien, Paddy O Fernature, Plan Neonie, The Black Forrest, The Notorious Mad Jack, Tomie, Trollgaard, Tungstan, Turenia, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads