Libertarian Discussion Thread II - Don't Thread on Me

[Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol]

I don’t believe that private property should be abolished. I would love to see left-libertarians(or the alt-right) try to take my land away from me.

*Homeless Uprising intensifies*

Heh, see, I’m an American, and the stereotype of Americans loving guns most definitely applies to me.

[Torrocca]

*Homeless Uprising intensifies*

Heh, see, I’m an American, and the stereotype of Americans loving guns most definitely applies to me.

I'm also American, with enough arms to seize your properties :^)

[Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol]

Heh, see, I’m an American, and the stereotype of Americans loving guns most definitely applies to me.

I'm also American, with enough arms to seize your properties :^)

Ohhh, I would love to see anyone try. It would make my day.

[Torrocca]

I'm also American, with enough arms to seize your properties :^)

Ohhh, I would love to see anyone try. It would make my day.

You'd only see the decoy property-seizers :^)))

[New Visayan Islands]

Haven't noticed the Foundation for Economic Education website as suggested by the OP.

*Homeless Uprising intensifies*

Heh, see, I’m an American, and the stereotype of Americans loving guns most definitely applies to me.

Wait, so you're Nobunaga Oda?

[Pilarcraft]

Ohhh, I would love to see anyone try. It would make my day.

You'd only see the decoy property-seizers :^)))

The Right to Arms is the one thing that unites the farthest left and the farthest right. The Authoritarian equally hate it, the Libertarians equally love it... for different reasons.

[Great Minarchistan]

You'd only see the decoy property-seizers :^)))

The Right to Arms is the one thing that unites the farthest left and the farthest right. The Authoritarian equally hate it, the Libertarians equally love it... for different reasons.

Mutually assured threat is the best way to prevent MAD ;')

[Taihei Tengoku]

"eliminating" landlords is just code for making a single leviathan landlord to which all are enserfed

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

You'd only see the decoy property-seizers :^)))

The Right to Arms is the one thing that unites the farthest left and the farthest right. The Authoritarian equally hate it, the Libertarians equally love it... for different reasons.

Those different reasons being?...

[Great Minarchistan]

"eliminating" landlords is just code for making a single leviathan landlord to which all are enserfed

Or creating a general disorder in the society and economy but they can't notice it apparently

[Pilarcraft]

The Right to Arms is the one thing that unites the farthest left and the farthest right. The Authoritarian equally hate it, the Libertarians equally love it... for different reasons.

Mutually assured threat is the best way to prevent MAD ;')

I have an entire Genre of Science-Fiction that says otherwise

[Great Minarchistan]

Mutually assured threat is the best way to prevent MAD ;')

I have an entire Genre of Science-Fiction that says otherwise

"1984" :^)

[Pilarcraft]

I have an entire Genre of Science-Fiction that says otherwise

"1984" :^)

That counts too, technically.

[Sovaal]

Heh, see, I’m an American, and the stereotype of Americans loving guns most definitely applies to me.

I'm also American, with enough arms to seize your properties :^)

But I like my properties. Especially my arms.

[Torrocca]

"eliminating" landlords is just code for making a single leviathan landlord to which all are enserfed

false, free homes for everyone :^)

I'm also American, with enough arms to seize your properties :^)

But I like my properties. Especially my arms.

*Seizes ur arms anyway*

"eliminating" landlords is just code for making a single leviathan landlord to which all are enserfed

Or creating a general disorder in the society and economy but they can't notice it apparently

>implying giving everyone a free home to live in is social disorder

[Aeedaavia]

And who will build those free homes?

[Torrocca]

And who will build those free homes?

Who needs to build free homes when the unoccupied homes in America alone outnumber the homeless three to one? :^)

[Aeedaavia]

And who will build those free homes?

Who needs to build free homes when the unoccupied homes in America alone outnumber the homeless three to one? :^)

But those unoccupies homes are mostly in places where no one wants them, like in Detroit or the Rust Belt, aren't they? Meanwhile there are giant housing shortages at the West Coast, with no one really tackling the homelessness problems, as local governments are unwilling to build new houses and restrictive zoning laws and other ordinances prevent private investors from building new housing themselves.

[Torrocca]

Who needs to build free homes when the unoccupied homes in America alone outnumber the homeless three to one? :^)

But those unoccupies homes are mostly in places where no one wants them, like in Detroit or the Rust Belt, aren't they? Meanwhile there are giant housing shortages at the West Coast, with no one really tackling the homelessness problems, as local governments are unwilling to build new houses and restrictive zoning laws and other ordinances prevent private investors from building new housing themselves.

A fuckton of the unoccupied structures across America is privately-owned property that's going unused. They'd be better used as homes, even the less-than-satisfactory ones.

[Aeedaavia]

But those unoccupies homes are mostly in places where no one wants them, like in Detroit or the Rust Belt, aren't they? Meanwhile there are giant housing shortages at the West Coast, with no one really tackling the homelessness problems, as local governments are unwilling to build new houses and restrictive zoning laws and other ordinances prevent private investors from building new housing themselves.

A fuckton of the unoccupied structures across America is privately-owned property that's going unused. They'd be better used as homes, even the less-than-satisfactory ones.

You don't understand. I said these don't exist where housing is needed, where the homeless live. They exist mostly in places people have moved away from.

[Torrocca]

A fuckton of the unoccupied structures across America is privately-owned property that's going unused. They'd be better used as homes, even the less-than-satisfactory ones.

You don't understand. I said these don't exist where housing is needed, where the homeless live. They exist mostly in places people have moved away from.

Then enact government programs to assist the homeless in relocating (if they so wish) to these new, free homes.

And besides that, there's plenty of structures that could be converted into housing units that aren't being used in places where homelessness is more rampant.

[Aeedaavia]

You don't understand. I said these don't exist where housing is needed, where the homeless live. They exist mostly in places people have moved away from.

Then enact government programs to assist the homeless in relocating (if they so wish) to these new, free homes.

And besides that, there's plenty of structures that could be converted into housing units that aren't being used in places where homelessness is more rampant.

As I said, these empty homes are mostly in regions people moved away from, and for good reasons, as they have huge unemployment problems, lack infrastructure and/or important services nearby and often therefore aren't very desirable. You will not find many people willing to move to them.

In the Bay Area, where homelessness and housing shortage is among the worst, which structures could be converted? Why not just loosen the laws regarding zoning etc. so more housing could be built by the private sector? Your ideas would seem to increase the size of the government rather than reduce it, and for no good reason.

[Benuty]

I don’t believe that private property should be abolished. I would love to see left-libertarians(or the alt-right) try to take my land away from me.

*Homeless Uprising intensifies*

Can't rise up if you have been deported from existence.

[Pilarcraft]

Who needs to build free homes when the unoccupied homes in America alone outnumber the homeless three to one? :^)

But those unoccupies homes are mostly in places where no one wants them, like in Detroit or the Rust Belt, aren't they? Meanwhile there are giant housing shortages at the West Coast, with no one really tackling the homelessness problems, as local governments are unwilling to build new houses and restrictive zoning laws and other ordinances prevent private investors from building new housing themselves.

Ok. Say, imagine the US Legislates a law that gives every unoccupied home (that has been one for, say, 5 years) to the homeless. It just assigns them to a home and says "Here. You own this house now.", and gives them a stipend to buy a bus ticket there.
Are you saying those homeless people will be like 'nah. It's in Detroit. Fuck Detroit, I'd rather be homeless' and remain where they are???

[Benuty]

Heh, see, I’m an American, and the stereotype of Americans loving guns most definitely applies to me.

I'm also American, with enough arms to seize your properties :^)

Hardly, and you have no power to seize anything here so go, and fly away.