most ruling philosophy leans toward more ‘Kyenes’ in words, probably not what Kyenes wished it to be (if he was teaching nowadays).
economic policies mostly follow such Keynes arrangement, even if a different meaning than original. as each doctrine has to be applied for its age.
such stay as high policies of ‘democratic’ academics (i can easely see american academy who leads is mostly self-made people of labour origin).
to contrast that, such policies get applied by people from grand estate and trust families, which then gave birth to an inept ‘chaste’.
their role is mainly to apply said policies, intended to disrupt their accumulated wealth, in a viced way so they get harmless.
practical ruling also manages to overthrow the intention and to make economic leverage a way to oppress common man, for their own inheritance.
this viced mix of more and more redistributive academy and more and more reactionary application is the cause for crisis upon christianity.
the american president shows this drift, redistributive yale and princetown idea got applied throught a shameful puppet so harmless for his wider circle.
in my regards, even ‘socialist professors’ idea not good, it scraps savings.
