Don’t worry. If you pass a fortitude save, you can take half damage.
Advertisement

by West Leas Oros » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:27 pm
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Oros, no. Please. You were the chosen one. You were meant to debunk the tankies, not join them. Bring balance to the left, not leave it in darkness.
WLO Public News: Protest turns violent as Orosian Anarchists burn building. 2 found dead, 8 injured. Investigation continues.

by Thermodolia » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:27 pm
Russoslava wrote:Mallorea and Riva wrote:You're several hundred years behind the rest of the US jurisprudentially and several dozen pages behind this thread.
I'm not. And Again, If one baker won't bake a damn cake for you, find another baker. a PRIVATE Business has the right to decline anyone from services because it's a private business. However, no one is forcing you to shop at one place. It's called a Free, Competitive market. Where One Baker won't serve you for one reason there is another that will. Forcing them won't help matters.

by Russoslava » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:33 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Russoslava wrote:
I'm not. And Again, If one baker won't bake a damn cake for you, find another baker. a PRIVATE Business has the right to decline anyone from services because it's a private business. However, no one is forcing you to shop at one place. It's called a Free, Competitive market. Where One Baker won't serve you for one reason there is another that will. Forcing them won't help matters.
That’s not how the law works bud. Also fuck the free market

by Mallorea and Riva » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:37 pm
Russoslava wrote:Thermodolia wrote:That’s not how the law works bud. Also fuck the free market
That's the law where I live and how it should be everywhere else. Also, the same free market that gave you the Internet you're using to say "Fuck Free Market"? Or the same free market that gave you that Computer or Phone you're using to post this on? Wow, you smart.

by Internationalist Bastard » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:37 pm
Russoslava wrote:Thermodolia wrote:That’s not how the law works bud. Also fuck the free market
That's the law where I live and how it should be everywhere else. Also, the same free market that gave you the Internet you're using to say "Fuck Free Market"? Or the same free market that gave you that Computer or Phone you're using to post this on? Wow, you smart.

by The New California Republic » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:41 pm

by Thermodolia » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:42 pm
Russoslava wrote:Thermodolia wrote:That’s not how the law works bud. Also fuck the free market
That's the law where I live and how it should be everywhere else. Also, the same free market that gave you the Internet you're using to say "Fuck Free Market"? Or the same free market that gave you that Computer or Phone you're using to post this on? Wow, you smart.

by Russoslava » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:42 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Russoslava wrote:
That's the law where I live and how it should be everywhere else. Also, the same free market that gave you the Internet you're using to say "Fuck Free Market"? Or the same free market that gave you that Computer or Phone you're using to post this on? Wow, you smart.
Like I said, you're several hundred years behind the US jurisprudentially, and several dozen pages behind this thread. The decision from SCOTUS was not based on the idea that the baker has a fundamental right to deny service to anyone. It was based around the way the state's proceedings failed to offer a neutral application of the law.

by Thermodolia » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:43 pm

by Vassenor » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:45 pm
Russoslava wrote:Mallorea and Riva wrote:Like I said, you're several hundred years behind the US jurisprudentially, and several dozen pages behind this thread. The decision from SCOTUS was not based on the idea that the baker has a fundamental right to deny service to anyone. It was based around the way the state's proceedings failed to offer a neutral application of the law.
In the State of Maine (If I remember Correctly) A Private Business has the right to Deny anyone Service base on Religious Reason because of the "PRESERVATION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT" under PERSON which means an individual, corporate body or religious organization.

by Ethel mermania » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:45 pm

by The New California Republic » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:46 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Also before you try I’m not a communist.
Thermodolia wrote:What is the Civil Rights Act of 1961?

by Thermodolia » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:46 pm

by Thermodolia » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:47 pm

by Ethel mermania » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:47 pm
Vassenor wrote:Russoslava wrote:
In the State of Maine (If I remember Correctly) A Private Business has the right to Deny anyone Service base on Religious Reason because of the "PRESERVATION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT" under PERSON which means an individual, corporate body or religious organization.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."

by The New California Republic » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:48 pm
Russoslava wrote:Mallorea and Riva wrote:Like I said, you're several hundred years behind the US jurisprudentially, and several dozen pages behind this thread. The decision from SCOTUS was not based on the idea that the baker has a fundamental right to deny service to anyone. It was based around the way the state's proceedings failed to offer a neutral application of the law.
In the State of Maine (If I remember Correctly) A Private Business has the right to Deny anyone Service base on Religious Reason because of the "PRESERVATION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT" under PERSON which means an individual, corporate body or religious organization.

by Ethel mermania » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:49 pm

by Russoslava » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:49 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Russoslava wrote:
That's the law where I live and how it should be everywhere else. Also, the same free market that gave you the Internet you're using to say "Fuck Free Market"? Or the same free market that gave you that Computer or Phone you're using to post this on? Wow, you smart.
The law where you live isn’t the law everywhere and shouldn’t be. Also the free market didn’t give us the internet, that was the US DOD. Computers and phones are also not because of the free market fairy.
The free market isn’t the end all be all. It’s kinda stupid to say that without the free market nothing would exist, because it obviously doesn’t work that way.
Also before you try I’m not a communist.

by Russoslava » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:51 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Russoslava wrote:
In the State of Maine (If I remember Correctly) A Private Business has the right to Deny anyone Service base on Religious Reason because of the "PRESERVATION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT" under PERSON which means an individual, corporate body or religious organization.
Nonsense. That doesn't magically override the prohibition on refusing service to people on the basis of race. If you think that it does, then you are sorely mistaken...

by West Leas Oros » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:52 pm
Russoslava wrote:Mallorea and Riva wrote:You're several hundred years behind the rest of the US jurisprudentially and several dozen pages behind this thread.
I'm not. And Again, If one baker won't bake a damn cake for you, find another baker. a PRIVATE Business has the right to decline anyone from services because it's a private business. However, no one is forcing you to shop at one place. It's called a Free, Competitive market. Where One Baker won't serve you for one reason there is another that will. Forcing them won't help matters.
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Oros, no. Please. You were the chosen one. You were meant to debunk the tankies, not join them. Bring balance to the left, not leave it in darkness.
WLO Public News: Protest turns violent as Orosian Anarchists burn building. 2 found dead, 8 injured. Investigation continues.

by The New California Republic » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:52 pm


by Russoslava » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:53 pm
Vassenor wrote:Russoslava wrote:
In the State of Maine (If I remember Correctly) A Private Business has the right to Deny anyone Service base on Religious Reason because of the "PRESERVATION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT" under PERSON which means an individual, corporate body or religious organization.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."

by Telconi » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:53 pm

by Mallorea and Riva » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:54 pm
Russoslava wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Nonsense. That doesn't magically override the prohibition on refusing service to people on the basis of race. If you think that it does, then you are sorely mistaken...
No, not race. But it allows a Christian Baker to refuse to make a Cake for a Same-Sex Couple. Which is what I thought this thread was about.

by Russoslava » Tue Jun 05, 2018 3:54 pm
West Leas Oros wrote:Russoslava wrote:
I'm not. And Again, If one baker won't bake a damn cake for you, find another baker. a PRIVATE Business has the right to decline anyone from services because it's a private business. However, no one is forcing you to shop at one place. It's called a Free, Competitive market. Where One Baker won't serve you for one reason there is another that will. Forcing them won't help matters.
All the more reasons to oppose capitalism then.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Juansonia, The Most Grand Feline Empire, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement