NATION

PASSWORD

Tommy Robinson, grooming gang, wtf

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Fri Jun 01, 2018 2:18 am

Herskerstad wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
Tommy would just be an unknown dishwasher if someone didn't finance his Nazi propaganda campaigns.

For the audiences, ask Rupert Murdoch.


A conspiracy between the Crown, Rupert Murdoch and Nazis, opposed to the British judicial system? You've got all the makings of a great B-movie there.


Almost all the islamophobic media in the anglosphere is owned by Murdoch. But there is also a bunch of other investors who contribute to the protection of Judeo-Christian civilization.
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Fri Jun 01, 2018 2:26 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
A conspiracy between the Crown, Rupert Murdoch and Nazis, opposed to the British judicial system? You've got all the makings of a great B-movie there.


Almost all the islamophobic media in the anglosphere is owned by Murdoch. But there is also a bunch of other investors who contribute to the protection of Judeo-Christian civilization.


Perhaps so, but you've yet to establish any links between them or why the courts, which operate under her majesty then in a twist seemingly thwart. You'll forgive me if I see that outline as a bit of a kabuki theatre in the guise of an actual argument.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Fri Jun 01, 2018 2:31 am

Herskerstad wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
Almost all the islamophobic media in the anglosphere is owned by Murdoch. But there is also a bunch of other investors who contribute to the protection of Judeo-Christian civilization.


Perhaps so, but you've yet to establish any links between them or why the courts, which operate under her majesty then in a twist seemingly thwart. You'll forgive me if I see that outline as a bit of a kabuki theatre in the guise of an actual argument.


I never mentioned the courts. Surely the security and judicial system of UK can't be considered completely "unbiased" (see the Prevent Inquisition).
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Fri Jun 01, 2018 2:40 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
Perhaps so, but you've yet to establish any links between them or why the courts, which operate under her majesty then in a twist seemingly thwart. You'll forgive me if I see that outline as a bit of a kabuki theatre in the guise of an actual argument.


I never mentioned the courts. Surely the security and judicial system of UK can't be considered completely "unbiased" (see the Prevent Inquisition).


You did however mention crown, and you are quite right. The security and judicial system of the UK are not unbiased. They are very much a national appendage of the crown in which power is ultimately vested.

Which means, that if the crown was supporting white supremacy or Tommy Robinson, there would be little reason, short of the judiciary rebelling against them in this grand plot, of them acting in the manner as they did. They arrested him after all, it's not as if they handed him the George Cross.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Fri Jun 01, 2018 2:57 am

Herskerstad wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
I never mentioned the courts. Surely the security and judicial system of UK can't be considered completely "unbiased" (see the Prevent Inquisition).


You did however mention crown, and you are quite right. The security and judicial system of the UK are not unbiased. They are very much a national appendage of the crown in which power is ultimately vested.

Which means, that if the crown was supporting white supremacy or Tommy Robinson, there would be little reason, short of the judiciary rebelling against them in this grand plot, of them acting in the manner as they did. They arrested him after all, it's not as if they handed him the George Cross.


I think the British judiciary acts independently from the Crown. The Crown can agree or disagree with a specific action but the judiciary has to follow the law regardless of the Crown's opinion. I could be wrong but this is my impression.
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Fri Jun 01, 2018 7:29 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
You did however mention crown, and you are quite right. The security and judicial system of the UK are not unbiased. They are very much a national appendage of the crown in which power is ultimately vested.

Which means, that if the crown was supporting white supremacy or Tommy Robinson, there would be little reason, short of the judiciary rebelling against them in this grand plot, of them acting in the manner as they did. They arrested him after all, it's not as if they handed him the George Cross.


I think the British judiciary acts independently from the Crown. The Crown can agree or disagree with a specific action but the judiciary has to follow the law regardless of the Crown's opinion. I could be wrong but this is my impression.


The Crown Prosecution Service would have to be the prosecuting body since it is related to a criminal offence.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Nunavutialand
Diplomat
 
Posts: 922
Founded: Jul 05, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Nunavutialand » Fri Jun 01, 2018 7:35 am

Robinson is a whiny little [EXPLETIVE].
At a "free speech" rally in London, Ali Dawah, a Muslim, was due to speak.
Tommy threw a hissy fit since Dawah had literally obliterated him in a debate and caused Jayda Fransen to start crying.
Then Tommy's EDL goons attacked Dawah and his friend.

Deserves more than 13 months with all the blatant lies coming out of his mouth. Now he's a martyr for the far-right.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: El Lazaro, Fahran, Goi Arauaren Erresuma, Neu California, Shrillland, States of Glory, Stellar Colonies, Tinhampton

Advertisement

Remove ads