MAGAThread XIII: The Summit of Putin

[Washington Resistance Army]

Everyone should ignore unconstitutional laws tbh

[Northern Davincia]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/08/06/politics/brett-kavanaugh-president-ignore-laws-unconstitutional/index.html

Under that argument, states can ignore the Law...

We have the 10th Amendment for a reason.

[Triassica]

Everyone should ignore unconstitutional laws tbh

I find laws that restrict abortion to be unconstitutional. So women should ignore that.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Everyone should ignore unconstitutional laws tbh

I find laws that restrict abortion to be unconstitutional. So women should ignore that.

I'm curious Flutters, under what parts of the constitution do you base your argument?

[Northern Davincia]

Everyone should ignore unconstitutional laws tbh

I find laws that restrict abortion to be unconstitutional. So women should ignore that.

Care to show us where in the constitution you get that opinion from?

[Triassica]

I find laws that restrict abortion to be unconstitutional. So women should ignore that.

I'm curious Flutters, under what parts of the constitution do you base your argument?

Nothing. I just think they are unconstitutional. If Kavanaugh argues that the president can ignore laws he thinks are unconstitutional, we should be able to do the same.

[Freezic Vast]

I'm curious Flutters, under what parts of the constitution do you base your argument?

Nothing. I just think they are unconstitutional. If Kavanaugh argues that the president can ignore laws he thinks are unconstitutional, we should be able to do the same.

Then both of you would be wrong then.

[Northern Davincia]

I'm curious Flutters, under what parts of the constitution do you base your argument?

Nothing. I just think they are unconstitutional. If Kavanaugh argues that the president can ignore laws he thinks are unconstitutional, we should be able to do the same.

Ignoring the constitution is the first step to chaos.

[Washington Resistance Army]

I'm curious Flutters, under what parts of the constitution do you base your argument?

Nothing. I just think they are unconstitutional.

That's a damn weak argument, c'mon now. At least we can say why we think laws are unconstitutional and why we shouldn't follow them.

[Triassica]

Nothing. I just think they are unconstitutional. If Kavanaugh argues that the president can ignore laws he thinks are unconstitutional, we should be able to do the same.

Ignoring the constitution is the first step to chaos.

Tell that to Kavanaugh.

[Freezic Vast]

Ignoring the constitution is the first step to chaos.

Tell that to Kavanaugh.

We're telling that to you because of how oblivious and arrogant you are being.

[Triassica]

Tell that to Kavanaugh.

We're telling that to you because of how oblivious and arrogant you are being.

Just putting Kavanaugh's logic to it's conclusion...

[Northern Davincia]

Ignoring the constitution is the first step to chaos.

Tell that to Kavanaugh.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, does it not?

[Telconi]

We're telling that to you because of how oblivious and arrogant you are being.

Just putting Kavanaugh's logic to it's conclusion...

Well I think Title II of the CA '34 is unconstitutional, so I'mma disconnect anyone who visits any website related to My Little Pony and is a grown ass man.

having said that, he's functionally correct, executives can essentially not enforce laws they don't wanna enforce, we saw this with drug laws, immigration laws, etc.

[Bombadil]

The inevitable from the same people who scream at disrespect to the flag.. https://twitter.com/kasparov63/status/1 ... 51808?s=21

[Petrasylvania]

Paul Manafort's Ex-Partner Rick Gates Testifies They Broke The Law Together

Looking like Divide And Conquer.

[Luminesa]

The inevitable from the same people who scream at disrespect to the flag.. https://twitter.com/kasparov63/status/1 ... 51808?s=21

This also implying that Russian democrats somehow don’t exist...

[Luminesa]

I'm curious Flutters, under what parts of the constitution do you base your argument?

Nothing. I just think they are unconstitutional. If Kavanaugh argues that the president can ignore laws he thinks are unconstitutional, we should be able to do the same.

...If you’re not basing your argument from the constitution...you can’t say it’s unconstitutional. Because whatever you’re rambling off is not coming from the constitution.

[Grenartia]

Nothing. I just think they are unconstitutional. If Kavanaugh argues that the president can ignore laws he thinks are unconstitutional, we should be able to do the same.

...If you’re not basing your argument from the constitution...you can’t say it’s unconstitutional. Because whatever you’re rambling off is not coming from the constitution.

Then here's an argument based on the constitution. The executive branch shouldn't ignore laws it thinks are unconstitutional, since it is not the executive's purview to decide constitutionality. That's the judicial branch's job.

[Senkaku]

I find laws that restrict abortion to be unconstitutional. So women should ignore that.

I'm curious Flutters, under what parts of the constitution do you base your argument?

I find laws that restrict abortion to be unconstitutional. So women should ignore that.

Care to show us where in the constitution you get that opinion from?

"This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."

[Cannot think of a name]

...If you’re not basing your argument from the constitution...you can’t say it’s unconstitutional. Because whatever you’re rambling off is not coming from the constitution.

Then here's an argument based on the constitution. The executive branch shouldn't ignore laws it thinks are unconstitutional, since it is not the executive's purview to decide constitutionality. That's the judicial branch's job.

The song wasn't catchy enough.

[Washington Resistance Army]

I'm curious Flutters, under what parts of the constitution do you base your argument?

Care to show us where in the constitution you get that opinion from?

"This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."

The 14A argument is total bunk but at least you can quote something relevant lol, I was just trying to see what Flutters had.

[Bombadil]

Can so skip to last 15 seconds to see if sheriff Joe Arpiao would accept the offer of a blowjob from Donald Trump - https://youtu.be/Iz0TA9MWiJg

..but you know the answer already don't you?

[Senkaku]

"This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."

The 14A argument is total bunk but at least you can quote something relevant lol, I was just trying to see what Flutters had.

"or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people"


If I were you I'd also tread carefully around saying that arguments based on certain amendments are BS

[Washington Resistance Army]

The 14A argument is total bunk but at least you can quote something relevant lol, I was just trying to see what Flutters had.

"or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people"


If I were you I'd also tread carefully around saying that arguments based on certain amendments are BS

The 9A argument is a bit better but like all that are dependent on that particular amendment is always comes across as kinda weak. Tbqh we should just overturn Roe and Casey and make a new amendment protecting abortion rights.