The Flutterlands wrote:Thermodolia wrote:No it didn’t. SCOTUS only ruled on the case at hand and that’s it. They didn’t say that the law is unconstitutional but that the way the Colorado Civil Rights Commission applied it was. The CCRC didn’t act as a neutral arbiter and was unfairly hostile towards the baker
Regardless, this sets precedent and if Kennedy goes and Trump replaces with him with another right wing nut, it could get worse.
"Go back and do this again" isn't really a precedent. The ruling doesn't actually say anything about religious liberties being outright violated.