Please tell me your joking. Rape and incest don’t involve family planning. What a totally asinine response
Advertisement

by Gospel Power » Tue May 29, 2018 7:40 am

by Ifreann » Tue May 29, 2018 7:41 am
Claorica wrote:The V O I D wrote:
Self-defense law does. If I threaten you with bodily harm, you are entirely justified to defend yourself by any means necessary - up to and including killing me, if necessary.
Unfortunately, in the case of unwanted pregnancy, the woman only has one means to end the unwanted pregnancy the moment it is unwanted and thus to defend herself/enact her bodily sovereignty: removing the fetus. The fetus dying is a rather unfortunate side effect.
Luckily, the US biotechnology industry is getting better with artificial wombs, so eventually, that death will be preventable by transplanting the fetus into an artificial womb and then sending the resultant baby into adoptive care. But until that time, the death is unavoidable as it is the only way to end an unwanted pregnancy immediately and to enact/uphold bodily sovereignty.
What then do you say to laws (which pro-choicers hate) that require an abortionist to attempt to save a child which, through chance, survives an abortion?

by Petrasylvania » Tue May 29, 2018 7:42 am

by Greater Arab State » Tue May 29, 2018 7:42 am

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Tue May 29, 2018 7:44 am
Claorica wrote:The V O I D wrote:
Self-defense law does. If I threaten you with bodily harm, you are entirely justified to defend yourself by any means necessary - up to and including killing me, if necessary.
Unfortunately, in the case of unwanted pregnancy, the woman only has one means to end the unwanted pregnancy the moment it is unwanted and thus to defend herself/enact her bodily sovereignty: removing the fetus. The fetus dying is a rather unfortunate side effect.
Luckily, the US biotechnology industry is getting better with artificial wombs, so eventually, that death will be preventable by transplanting the fetus into an artificial womb and then sending the resultant baby into adoptive care. But until that time, the death is unavoidable as it is the only way to end an unwanted pregnancy immediately and to enact/uphold bodily sovereignty.
What then do you say to laws (which pro-choicers hate) that require an abortionist to attempt to save a child which, through chance, survives an abortion?

by Claorica » Tue May 29, 2018 7:44 am

by Vassenor » Tue May 29, 2018 7:45 am

by The V O I D » Tue May 29, 2018 7:45 am
Claorica wrote:Ifreann wrote:Sounds like a pointless law that was only passed as propaganda.
Or, you know, a law passed after several widely-reported cases of abortionists literally leaving survivors out to die, throwing them in the trash, and otherwise treating them with none of the dignity afforded human life?

by Napkiraly » Tue May 29, 2018 7:50 am
The V O I D wrote:Napkiraly wrote:It's also worth noting that the fetus (specifically the role of the placenta) and the body of the mother have a complex cooperative relationship, trying to get the best outcome for the survival of both. It's not a simple "it harms the mother".
And the fetus is occupying her bodily space/uterus, it is using her bodily resources and dumping waste into her body. That makes it one step away from being a parasite.
A woman has the right to reject such from her body.

by Vassenor » Tue May 29, 2018 7:51 am
Afreena wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:I respectfully disagree with that sir/ma'am on the founds that the pro life community values the potential of human life and wishes to benefit society. Sorry about this.
I've seen Pro-Life people who shot up an abortion clinic and killed a couple of women just because they were Aborting.

by The V O I D » Tue May 29, 2018 7:51 am
Napkiraly wrote:The V O I D wrote:
And the fetus is occupying her bodily space/uterus, it is using her bodily resources and dumping waste into her body. That makes it one step away from being a parasite.
A woman has the right to reject such from her body.
>Tfw you didn't comment on the morality or immorality of abortion
Try again, buckerino.

by Napkiraly » Tue May 29, 2018 7:53 am
The V O I D wrote:Napkiraly wrote:>Tfw you didn't comment on the morality or immorality of abortion
Try again, buckerino.
I wasn't trying to suggest you were. But the relationship between fetus and woman doesn't matter beyond whether the woman decides she wants to be pregnant and goes through with the entire pregnancy. That's what I was trying to illustrate.

by Alvecia » Tue May 29, 2018 7:55 am
Napkiraly wrote:Alvecia wrote:I'm trying to get a definitive answer on which criteria it fails, and you've given me nothing but two criteria that don't seem to matter.
If there exists necessary criteria for defining a parasite that a foetus does not pass that excludes it from being defined as such, as you so very heavily imply, then I would very much like to know what they are.
Inherently detrimental to the host in some capacity, and actually far more constrained according to some textbooks than I even I thought (limiting it between two different species). https://books.google.ca/books?dq=Cheng,+T.C.,+General+Parasitology,+p.+7,+1973&hl=en&id=d4GQlYzode8C&lr=&oi=fnd&ots=l6EmR3PEvV&pg=PP1&sig=wr-51nFxVEYVcWvVnLhfGq8jVls&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Cheng%2C%20T.C.%2C%20General%20Parasitology%2C%20p.%207%2C%201973&f=false Page 2 offers the rough, generalized definition.

by Lamur » Tue May 29, 2018 7:55 am

by Ifreann » Tue May 29, 2018 7:55 am
Claorica wrote:Ifreann wrote:Sounds like a pointless law that was only passed as propaganda.
Or, you know, a law passed after several widely-reported cases of abortionists literally leaving survivors out to die, throwing them in the trash, and otherwise treating them with none of the dignity afforded human life?

by Western-Ukraine » Tue May 29, 2018 7:56 am
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N

by New Greater Netherlands » Tue May 29, 2018 7:56 am
De Telegraaf: In Brussels there were violent protests against the current government and against the Christian Conservative policy between 19:00 and 21:30. Minister of the Belgian States Kees van der Staaij says he wants to have a talk with the rebels, since this has to be arranged through the House of Representatives and / or the King (with other officials: The Ministers have little to say) van der Staaij is going to have between 23:00 and 4:00 a debate in the Lower House with Minister-President Dave Hagen and the other Political Parties

by Claorica » Tue May 29, 2018 7:57 am
The V O I D wrote:Claorica wrote:
Or, you know, a law passed after several widely-reported cases of abortionists literally leaving survivors out to die, throwing them in the trash, and otherwise treating them with none of the dignity afforded human life?
Literally, at most, none of that happens. What sources do you have?
I'll give you a hint: if they are a pro-life source or lean pro-life or are otherwise conservative, they are likely biased and lying, or just plain lying for the sake of anti-abortion propaganda.

by San Lumen » Tue May 29, 2018 7:58 am
New Greater Netherlands wrote:In my opinion abortion is child murder and i think it should be illegal and the person who wants to basically kill her unborn baby that she should be put in jail

by Fordorsia » Tue May 29, 2018 7:58 am
New Greater Netherlands wrote:In my opinion abortion is child murder and i think it should be illegal and the person who wants to basically kill her unborn baby that she should be put in jail
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

by The V O I D » Tue May 29, 2018 7:59 am
Napkiraly wrote:The V O I D wrote:
I wasn't trying to suggest you were. But the relationship between fetus and woman doesn't matter beyond whether the woman decides she wants to be pregnant and goes through with the entire pregnancy. That's what I was trying to illustrate.
And I'm trying to illustrate that calling them parasites is not helpful (for those pushing the pro-choice arguments) and not accurate according to a lot of biologists.
I dunno, guys, like ya know don't use that terminology? Whowouldathunk that it's a good idea to not shackle your own end.
Merriam-Webster: an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism...

by Western-Ukraine » Tue May 29, 2018 7:59 am
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alternate Garza, Dayganistan, Eahland, Fahran, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Kenmoria, Myrensis, The Archregimancy, The North Polish Union, Timemovee
Advertisement