NATION

PASSWORD

Capital Punishment for Abortion? Yes.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81250
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 29, 2018 7:40 am

Gospel Power wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Are you going to adopt the unwanted children? Should a victim of rape or incest be forced to carry the child to term?

Before that act, women and men need to think carefully if they want children or not

Please tell me your joking. Rape and incest don’t involve family planning. What a totally asinine response

User avatar
Gospel Power
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: Sep 03, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Gospel Power » Tue May 29, 2018 7:40 am

Petrasylvania wrote:
Gospel Power wrote:Before that act, women and men need to think carefully if they want children or not

Because rape needs to involve family planning.

Women don't need to walk alone in the darkness, men need to protect women
"Traditionalism is the most revolutionary ideology of our times" ~ Julius Evola
PolitiScales:
http://www.politiscales.net/en_US/resul ... 67&reli=67

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159069
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue May 29, 2018 7:41 am

Claorica wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
Self-defense law does. If I threaten you with bodily harm, you are entirely justified to defend yourself by any means necessary - up to and including killing me, if necessary.

Unfortunately, in the case of unwanted pregnancy, the woman only has one means to end the unwanted pregnancy the moment it is unwanted and thus to defend herself/enact her bodily sovereignty: removing the fetus. The fetus dying is a rather unfortunate side effect.

Luckily, the US biotechnology industry is getting better with artificial wombs, so eventually, that death will be preventable by transplanting the fetus into an artificial womb and then sending the resultant baby into adoptive care. But until that time, the death is unavoidable as it is the only way to end an unwanted pregnancy immediately and to enact/uphold bodily sovereignty.


What then do you say to laws (which pro-choicers hate) that require an abortionist to attempt to save a child which, through chance, survives an abortion?

Sounds like a pointless law that was only passed as propaganda.

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Tue May 29, 2018 7:42 am

Ifreann wrote:
Claorica wrote:
What then do you say to laws (which pro-choicers hate) that require an abortionist to attempt to save a child which, through chance, survives an abortion?

Sounds like a pointless law that was only passed as propaganda.

A step down from pre-abortion guilt trip ultrasound.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Greater Arab State
Senator
 
Posts: 3878
Founded: Jul 12, 2017
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Greater Arab State » Tue May 29, 2018 7:42 am

Afreena wrote:
Petrasylvania wrote:Amusingly, anti-abortionists also oppose contraception which makes abortions unnecessary to begin with. Seems less about protecting life and more about punishing sex and reducing women to baby factories.


Anti Abortionists are just stupid

I respectfully disagree with that sir/ma'am on the founds that the pro life community values the potential of human life and wishes to benefit society. Sorry about this.
Moggmentum
Trump 2024
This nation does not represent my political views.

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25021
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Tue May 29, 2018 7:44 am

Claorica wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
Self-defense law does. If I threaten you with bodily harm, you are entirely justified to defend yourself by any means necessary - up to and including killing me, if necessary.

Unfortunately, in the case of unwanted pregnancy, the woman only has one means to end the unwanted pregnancy the moment it is unwanted and thus to defend herself/enact her bodily sovereignty: removing the fetus. The fetus dying is a rather unfortunate side effect.

Luckily, the US biotechnology industry is getting better with artificial wombs, so eventually, that death will be preventable by transplanting the fetus into an artificial womb and then sending the resultant baby into adoptive care. But until that time, the death is unavoidable as it is the only way to end an unwanted pregnancy immediately and to enact/uphold bodily sovereignty.


What then do you say to laws (which pro-choicers hate) that require an abortionist to attempt to save a child which, through chance, survives an abortion?

Can we divert medical resources towards goals actually useful to humanity?

User avatar
Claorica
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Claorica » Tue May 29, 2018 7:44 am

Ifreann wrote:
Claorica wrote:
What then do you say to laws (which pro-choicers hate) that require an abortionist to attempt to save a child which, through chance, survives an abortion?

Sounds like a pointless law that was only passed as propaganda.


Or, you know, a law passed after several widely-reported cases of abortionists literally leaving survivors out to die, throwing them in the trash, and otherwise treating them with none of the dignity afforded human life?
Pros Localism, Subsidiarity, Distributism, Traditionalism, Conservatism, Christian Democracy, Ruralism, Southern Agrarianism, Regionalism, State's Rights, Monarchism, Federalism, Rerum Novarum, Christian Monarchy, Christian conservatism, Boers, Presbyterianism (PCA) Aristocracy, Catholicism, the Subsidiarity Principle

Dues-Paying Member of the American Solidarity Party.

User avatar
Dominara
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 113
Founded: Apr 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Dominara » Tue May 29, 2018 7:45 am

Cranborne wrote:And the logical conclusion of being pro-abortion is to eventually lead to the legalization of infanticide.

Nice slippery slope fallacy.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66773
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue May 29, 2018 7:45 am

Greater Arab State wrote:
Afreena wrote:
Anti Abortionists are just stupid

I respectfully disagree with that sir/ma'am on the founds that the pro life community values the potential of human life and wishes to benefit society. Sorry about this.


So how does abolishing bodily sovereignty benefit society?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16375
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Tue May 29, 2018 7:45 am

Claorica wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Sounds like a pointless law that was only passed as propaganda.


Or, you know, a law passed after several widely-reported cases of abortionists literally leaving survivors out to die, throwing them in the trash, and otherwise treating them with none of the dignity afforded human life?


Literally, at most, none of that happens. What sources do you have?

I'll give you a hint: if they are a pro-life source or lean pro-life or are otherwise conservative, they are likely biased and lying, or just plain lying for the sake of anti-abortion propaganda.

User avatar
Afreena
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Mar 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Afreena » Tue May 29, 2018 7:47 am

Greater Arab State wrote:
Afreena wrote:
Anti Abortionists are just stupid

I respectfully disagree with that sir/ma'am on the founds that the pro life community values the potential of human life and wishes to benefit society. Sorry about this.


I've seen Pro-Life people who shot up an abortion clinic and killed a couple of women just because they were Aborting.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue May 29, 2018 7:50 am

The V O I D wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:It's also worth noting that the fetus (specifically the role of the placenta) and the body of the mother have a complex cooperative relationship, trying to get the best outcome for the survival of both. It's not a simple "it harms the mother".


And the fetus is occupying her bodily space/uterus, it is using her bodily resources and dumping waste into her body. That makes it one step away from being a parasite.

A woman has the right to reject such from her body.

>Tfw you didn't comment on the morality or immorality of abortion

Try again, buckerino.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66773
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue May 29, 2018 7:51 am

Afreena wrote:
Greater Arab State wrote:I respectfully disagree with that sir/ma'am on the founds that the pro life community values the potential of human life and wishes to benefit society. Sorry about this.


I've seen Pro-Life people who shot up an abortion clinic and killed a couple of women just because they were Aborting.


It's quite common, sadly.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16375
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Tue May 29, 2018 7:51 am

Napkiraly wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
And the fetus is occupying her bodily space/uterus, it is using her bodily resources and dumping waste into her body. That makes it one step away from being a parasite.

A woman has the right to reject such from her body.

>Tfw you didn't comment on the morality or immorality of abortion

Try again, buckerino.


I wasn't trying to suggest you were. But the relationship between fetus and woman doesn't matter beyond whether the woman decides she wants to be pregnant and goes through with the entire pregnancy. That's what I was trying to illustrate.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue May 29, 2018 7:53 am

The V O I D wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:>Tfw you didn't comment on the morality or immorality of abortion

Try again, buckerino.


I wasn't trying to suggest you were. But the relationship between fetus and woman doesn't matter beyond whether the woman decides she wants to be pregnant and goes through with the entire pregnancy. That's what I was trying to illustrate.

And I'm trying to illustrate that calling them parasites is not helpful (for those pushing the pro-choice arguments) and not accurate according to a lot of biologists.

I dunno, guys, like ya know don't use that terminology? Whowouldathunk that it's a good idea to not shackle your own end.

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19945
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Tue May 29, 2018 7:55 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Alvecia wrote:I'm trying to get a definitive answer on which criteria it fails, and you've given me nothing but two criteria that don't seem to matter.
If there exists necessary criteria for defining a parasite that a foetus does not pass that excludes it from being defined as such, as you so very heavily imply, then I would very much like to know what they are.

Inherently detrimental to the host in some capacity, and actually far more constrained according to some textbooks than I even I thought (limiting it between two different species). https://books.google.ca/books?dq=Cheng,+T.C.,+General+Parasitology,+p.+7,+1973&hl=en&id=d4GQlYzode8C&lr=&oi=fnd&ots=l6EmR3PEvV&pg=PP1&sig=wr-51nFxVEYVcWvVnLhfGq8jVls&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Cheng%2C%20T.C.%2C%20General%20Parasitology%2C%20p.%207%2C%201973&f=false Page 2 offers the rough, generalized definition.

The only criteria of note that I can find it violates is that of heterospecific organisms (different species), which:
1) you've already provided an example of a parasite that violates said criteria
2) this book points out these definitions are not universal, but rather "brief", "general", and "often" (not always) used.

User avatar
Lamur
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Apr 11, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamur » Tue May 29, 2018 7:55 am

Vassenor wrote:
Greater Arab State wrote:I respectfully disagree with that sir/ma'am on the founds that the pro life community values the potential of human life and wishes to benefit society. Sorry about this.


So how does abolishing bodily sovereignty benefit society?


The whole idea that antiabortionists believe the unborn also has bodily sovereignty, that it is not a thing or parasite or tumor to be removed, but has its own unique DNA sequence, its own human lineage, and is not a property that parents own. Pro-choice people don't even consider that there is another human being in the picture.

To acknowledge the rights of the unborn who are at the mercy of the abortionist is considered to be of higher moral value than an adult woman's right over what she chooses to do with her body. Antiabortionists don't care what a woman does with her body, it is the body/life of the unborn they're concerned about. I feel like a lot of pro-choice people don't understand this bit.
Last edited by Lamur on Tue May 29, 2018 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159069
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue May 29, 2018 7:55 am

Claorica wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Sounds like a pointless law that was only passed as propaganda.


Or, you know, a law passed after several widely-reported cases of abortionists literally leaving survivors out to die, throwing them in the trash, and otherwise treating them with none of the dignity afforded human life?

Yes, I'm sure there were many scary stories accompanying the passing of such laws. The better to win the support of pro-life voters. Of course, even if those stories are true, they'd just be one out of billions.

User avatar
Western-Ukraine
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1163
Founded: Oct 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Western-Ukraine » Tue May 29, 2018 7:56 am

At a certain point in development, an embryo is human enough already. That is to say, it has a right to life just like everyone else does. Abortion at that point should only be permitted in certain circumstances, such as incest, rape or danger to the mother's life. A jail sentence would be appropriate for crimes in this regard.
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N

Politics is a zero-sum game.

User avatar
New Greater Netherlands
Envoy
 
Posts: 342
Founded: Feb 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby New Greater Netherlands » Tue May 29, 2018 7:56 am

In my opinion abortion is child murder and i think it should be illegal and the person who wants to basically kill her unborn baby that she should be put in jail
Name: Dave Hagen
Born: February 17, 1997
Gender: Male
Political orientation: Conservative
Country: the Netherlands
Religion: Christianity (Protestant)

Current date: 1 augustus 1918
De Telegraaf: In Brussels there were violent protests against the current government and against the Christian Conservative policy between 19:00 and 21:30. Minister of the Belgian States Kees van der Staaij says he wants to have a talk with the rebels, since this has to be arranged through the House of Representatives and / or the King (with other officials: The Ministers have little to say) van der Staaij  is going to have between 23:00 and 4:00 a debate in the Lower House with Minister-President Dave Hagen and the other Political Parties

User avatar
Claorica
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Claorica » Tue May 29, 2018 7:57 am

The V O I D wrote:
Claorica wrote:
Or, you know, a law passed after several widely-reported cases of abortionists literally leaving survivors out to die, throwing them in the trash, and otherwise treating them with none of the dignity afforded human life?


Literally, at most, none of that happens. What sources do you have?

I'll give you a hint: if they are a pro-life source or lean pro-life or are otherwise conservative, they are likely biased and lying, or just plain lying for the sake of anti-abortion propaganda.


I could say the same about most pro-choice or left wing sources.
Pros Localism, Subsidiarity, Distributism, Traditionalism, Conservatism, Christian Democracy, Ruralism, Southern Agrarianism, Regionalism, State's Rights, Monarchism, Federalism, Rerum Novarum, Christian Monarchy, Christian conservatism, Boers, Presbyterianism (PCA) Aristocracy, Catholicism, the Subsidiarity Principle

Dues-Paying Member of the American Solidarity Party.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81250
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 29, 2018 7:58 am

New Greater Netherlands wrote:In my opinion abortion is child murder and i think it should be illegal and the person who wants to basically kill her unborn baby that she should be put in jail

So a victim of a rape or incest should be forced to carry the child to term?

User avatar
Fordorsia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20431
Founded: Oct 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fordorsia » Tue May 29, 2018 7:58 am

New Greater Netherlands wrote:In my opinion abortion is child murder and i think it should be illegal and the person who wants to basically kill her unborn baby that she should be put in jail


hahaha
Pro: Swords
Anti: Guns

San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.

Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad

Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.

Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.

Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16375
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Tue May 29, 2018 7:59 am

Napkiraly wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
I wasn't trying to suggest you were. But the relationship between fetus and woman doesn't matter beyond whether the woman decides she wants to be pregnant and goes through with the entire pregnancy. That's what I was trying to illustrate.

And I'm trying to illustrate that calling them parasites is not helpful (for those pushing the pro-choice arguments) and not accurate according to a lot of biologists.

I dunno, guys, like ya know don't use that terminology? Whowouldathunk that it's a good idea to not shackle your own end.


It is one step away from parasitism, by definition:

Merriam-Webster: an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism...


The fetus is an organism living in another organism and parasitizing by stealing her bodily space, resources, etc. for its own benefit while causing likely permanent bodily changes to the host, causing a risk of death should any complications arise, and using the host as a waste disposal mechanism by pumping her full of its waste.

It is, in function, a parasite. The fact they are of the same species is irrelevant.

User avatar
Western-Ukraine
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1163
Founded: Oct 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Western-Ukraine » Tue May 29, 2018 7:59 am

San Lumen wrote:
New Greater Netherlands wrote:In my opinion abortion is child murder and i think it should be illegal and the person who wants to basically kill her unborn baby that she should be put in jail

So a victim of a rape or incest should be forced to carry the child to term?

Not that incest implies anyone being a victim. It's still an abomination though.
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N

Politics is a zero-sum game.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alternate Garza, Dayganistan, Eahland, Fahran, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Kenmoria, Myrensis, The Archregimancy, The North Polish Union, Timemovee

Advertisement

Remove ads