Actually, they do exist. But this scheme was not for arranged: more like ASSIGNED.
Advertisement

by Katganistan » Fri May 25, 2018 7:29 pm

by The Liberated Territories » Fri May 25, 2018 7:30 pm

by Sahansahiye Iran » Fri May 25, 2018 7:31 pm
Katganistan wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Let's see those studies then.
Actually, they do exist. But this scheme was not for arranged: more like ASSIGNED.

by United Muscovite Nations » Fri May 25, 2018 7:35 pm
Katganistan wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:Yeah, essentially. Though I think there is also a lot that needs to be changed with current sexuality in culture, because we probably should encourage people to get married around 20 or so, instead of just people hooking up.
Why? Their careers strongly discourage having children young, so what's the point?

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 7:42 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:You want to know something funny? I was watching an old Molyneux video and in the context of parenting he was discussing this very exact scenario.
4:15 onwards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXMKRJyedmg

by Katganistan » Fri May 25, 2018 7:44 pm

by Katganistan » Fri May 25, 2018 7:46 pm

by United Muscovite Nations » Fri May 25, 2018 7:48 pm

by The Liberated Territories » Fri May 25, 2018 7:48 pm
New Emeline wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:You want to know something funny? I was watching an old Molyneux video and in the context of parenting he was discussing this very exact scenario.
4:15 onwards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXMKRJyedmg
What's his view on it?

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 7:49 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:New Emeline wrote:What's his view on it?
Probably against, as his argument is if spouses were assigned he'd have to work harder to get his wife to love him as there is no "dating stage" to test compatibility. I'd also imagine violence against women would skyrocket in such a system.

by Bakery Hill » Fri May 25, 2018 7:51 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:You made a long post of bullshit that ended with nine entire news articles of women killing their spouses with the implication that this is a rational reason to avoid certain relationships. This complements your entire posting history. I don't have to desperately find anything.
So you agree with the OP then?

by The Liberated Territories » Fri May 25, 2018 7:51 pm
New Emeline wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
Probably against, as his argument is if spouses were assigned he'd have to work harder to get his wife to love him as there is no "dating stage" to test compatibility. I'd also imagine violence against women would skyrocket in such a system.
Huh, I agree with Molyneux on something...

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 7:52 pm

by Katganistan » Fri May 25, 2018 8:43 pm

by New haven america » Fri May 25, 2018 9:00 pm

by Luziyca » Fri May 25, 2018 9:40 pm
The blAAtschApen wrote:I'd prefer to stay single than to randomly hook up with someone.
And marriage comes with all kinds of financial caveats as well.
Pass.
My vast preference is that the government gets out of the love lifes of its citizens as much as possible.

by United Muscovite Nations » Sat May 26, 2018 6:36 am
Katganistan wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:It was the norm until demands of capital made it not the norm.
Evolution/change happens because of environmental stresses that make the new norm a better survival strategy. Even in societal changes, rather than physical, the changes were made because that was best for survival within the society.
You want to regress, there had best be a good reason for it, other than nostalgia.

by Hurdergaryp » Sat May 26, 2018 6:48 am
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Katganistan wrote:Evolution/change happens because of environmental stresses that make the new norm a better survival strategy. Even in societal changes, rather than physical, the changes were made because that was best for survival within the society.
You want to regress, there had best be a good reason for it, other than nostalgia.
Because the current situation is dehumanizing and disadvantageous for society.

by United Muscovite Nations » Sat May 26, 2018 6:59 am

by Hurdergaryp » Sat May 26, 2018 7:18 am

by Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Sat May 26, 2018 11:15 am

by Hurdergaryp » Sat May 26, 2018 11:21 am
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:Whoever supports this idea clearly doesn't understand the emotional component of relationships/marriage

by Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Sat May 26, 2018 11:23 am

by Hurdergaryp » Sat May 26, 2018 11:25 am

by Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Sat May 26, 2018 11:27 am
Hurdergaryp wrote:Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:The couple actually loving each other and actively wanting to be together, as opposed to being forced together by some lottery
Well, that is just inefficient. Maximizing the breeding capacity of the species is the only thing that counts.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andsed, Corrian, El Lazaro, Fahran, Haganham, Heavenly Assault, Pizza Friday Forever91, Shrillland
Advertisement