The Liberated Territories wrote:I've no interest in women, OP. Can there be at least an "opt-out" system or something? Can I get a tax credit?
the opt out is being gay apparently
Advertisement

by Great Minarchistan » Fri May 25, 2018 6:13 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:I've no interest in women, OP. Can there be at least an "opt-out" system or something? Can I get a tax credit?

by The Liberated Territories » Fri May 25, 2018 6:15 pm

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 6:20 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:I've no interest in women, OP. Can there be at least an "opt-out" system or something? Can I get a tax credit?

by Costa Fierro » Fri May 25, 2018 6:26 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:You made a long post of bullshit that ended with nine entire news articles of women killing their spouses with the implication that this is a rational reason to avoid certain relationships. This complements your entire posting history. I don't have to desperately find anything.

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 6:26 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:You made a long post of bullshit that ended with nine entire news articles of women killing their spouses with the implication that this is a rational reason to avoid certain relationships. This complements your entire posting history. I don't have to desperately find anything.
So you agree with the OP then?

by The Liberated Territories » Fri May 25, 2018 6:27 pm

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 6:28 pm

by The first Galactic Republic » Fri May 25, 2018 6:29 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:I've no interest in women, OP. Can there be at least an "opt-out" system or something? Can I get a tax credit?

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri May 25, 2018 6:30 pm

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 6:30 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:I've no interest in women, OP. Can there be at least an "opt-out" system or something? Can I get a tax credit?
OP did say it was only for heterosexual people.
OP had the empathy and foresight to not force an unfair marriage on people who wouldn’t be compatible with their spouse. Obviously all heterosexual people are fine with someone being dumped on them.

by Costa Fierro » Fri May 25, 2018 6:30 pm
New Emeline wrote:Don't think that's the point

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri May 25, 2018 6:31 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:I've no interest in women, OP. Can there be at least an "opt-out" system or something? Can I get a tax credit?
OP did say it was only for heterosexual people.
OP had the empathy and foresight to not force an unfair marriage on people who wouldn’t be compatible with their spouse. Obviously all heterosexual people are fine with someone being dumped on them.

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 6:33 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:The first Galactic Republic wrote:OP did say it was only for heterosexual people.
OP had the empathy and foresight to not force an unfair marriage on people who wouldn’t be compatible with their spouse. Obviously all heterosexual people are fine with someone being dumped on them.
I’m still figuring out how I as a trans woman fit in

by Costa Fierro » Fri May 25, 2018 6:35 pm

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 6:35 pm

by Xmara » Fri May 25, 2018 6:41 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri May 25, 2018 6:41 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Fri May 25, 2018 6:43 pm

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 6:43 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:New Emeline wrote:Given that you're already married, I don't think you'd be put on the Wife Catalog or whatever
Were already assuming forcing people into marriage is a swell idea, I’m sure we can assume forcing people out of marriage and into a better one isn’t off the table

by New Emeline » Fri May 25, 2018 6:46 pm

by Katganistan » Fri May 25, 2018 6:49 pm
Cranborne wrote:Governments are also supposed to enforce rights and not let them fall into neglect. Unfortunately, as can be seen with the likes of incels and even worse, MGTOW community, this right to life has been neglected. So what is to be done by the government in such a case? The distribution of spouses.
I propose that each heterosexual person be placed into a lottery system - both male and female. Once the person is called up, they are to be paired with the other person drawn from the lottery alongside them. They are then to be man and wife, preferably for the rest of their lives. It is not too drastic of a change from arranged marriages, which have served humanity well. This would ensure that every person has a spouse and thus better further ones chances of continuing their lives than our current courtship system does. Further, the lottery system would help ensure that the rich are less able to bribe their way into being pared with high quality mates - the poor should not be punished and I consider myself to be a friend of the poor.
Agree or Disagree?
The Holy Therns wrote:Terrible idea, but if you write this dystopia into a novel I'd happily read it.
Cranborne wrote:Just as it is man's duty to utilize these tendencies to defend woman, so to is it woman's duty to calm man. In this, peace and harmony are achieved. Economically it would be quite good as well, due to the decrease in crime and improved happiness of society.

by The Liberated Territories » Fri May 25, 2018 7:05 pm

by Katganistan » Fri May 25, 2018 7:06 pm

by Xmara » Fri May 25, 2018 7:13 pm

by Katganistan » Fri May 25, 2018 7:16 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Tahar Joblis wrote:A government-sponsored lottery-based matchmaking service.
That could be amusing. Although perhaps also mostly a waste of money, but until you try it, you won't really know.
Now, if it was opt-out... these story hooks are just writing themselves at this point.![]()
Yeah, seriously. In a "typical" trajectory for someone in my socioeconomic class, if you don't hook up with someone in college, you need to put serious work into finding someone. Young people are trying to juggle a more intensive education / career time commitment during what used to be the prime years for getting married, and at the same time less help from families in getting them set up with a partner.
If it was socially acceptable to arrange marriages - or have parents go out and trade likely prospects - it would probably run more smoothly.
That said, young people still should have a veto on getting married to someone they dislike.
Yeah, essentially. Though I think there is also a lot that needs to be changed with current sexuality in culture, because we probably should encourage people to get married around 20 or so, instead of just people hooking up.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Best Mexico, Cannot think of a name, Dakran, Ethel mermania, Eurocom, Galactic Powers, Lysset, Necroghastia, Rary, Roighelm, The Astral Mandate, The Empire Of The Sutherlands, The Pirateariat, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement