Religion and the LGBTQ community.

[Kaiserreich irl]

Yet you won't apply the same logic to Islam. Why?

1. Personal reasons.
2. Because I have reason to believe Islam is just more accepting.

They also beat up women,Jews, Christian Minorities, and much much more.

[Geneviev]

1. Personal reasons.
2. Because I have reason to believe Islam is just more accepting.

Your reasons are, objectively, wrong. Muslim groups who are separated by thousands of miles carry out the same punishments for homosexuality.

To go back to another point of yours, where in the New Testament does it even say that gays should be stoned?

That's in Leviticus. The New Testament doesn't revoke that statement anywhere and still says LGBTQ+ is a sin.

[The Black Forrest]

There are a lot of Catholics in America.

That is certainly true and deeply troubling

ok master of distraction; let's not take away from the topic unless of course you can tie back into the topic the amount of Catholics in the US.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Your reasons are, objectively, wrong. Muslim groups who are separated by thousands of miles carry out the same punishments for homosexuality.

To go back to another point of yours, where in the New Testament does it even say that gays should be stoned?

That's in Leviticus. The New Testament doesn't revoke that statement anywhere and still says LGBTQ+ is a sin.

For having supposedly studied Christianity for years you don't seem very familiar with the New Covenant and such things.

[The Ozark Frontier]

Your reasons are, objectively, wrong. Muslim groups who are separated by thousands of miles carry out the same punishments for homosexuality.

To go back to another point of yours, where in the New Testament does it even say that gays should be stoned?

That's in Leviticus. The New Testament doesn't revoke that statement anywhere and still says LGBTQ+ is a sin.

Yeah, Homosexuality is a Sin, but Jesus said that their Punishment shall not be carried out by the hands of Sinners. And since everyone is a Sinner...

[Geneviev]

That's in Leviticus. The New Testament doesn't revoke that statement anywhere and still says LGBTQ+ is a sin.

For having supposedly studied Christianity for years you don't seem very familiar with the New Covenant and such things.

Three years, to be specific, and I'm assuming Romans and 1 Timothy do count, as much as I disagree.

[United Muscovite Nations]

Yet you won't apply the same logic to Islam. Why?

1. Personal reasons.
2. Because I have reason to believe Islam is just more accepting.

Here's a graphic of opinions of the public in various countries, with letters signifying if they are Muslim, Christian, Jewish, or some combination.

[Geneviev]

1. Personal reasons.
2. Because I have reason to believe Islam is just more accepting.

Here's a graphic of opinions of the public in various countries, with letters signifying if they are Muslim, Christian, Jewish, or some combination.

Most of the countries marked as Christian aren't actually Christian. If they were, the numbers would be different.

[Washington Resistance Army]

For having supposedly studied Christianity for years you don't seem very familiar with the New Covenant and such things.

Three years, to be specific, and I'm assuming Romans and 1 Timothy do count, as much as I disagree.

There's some debate whether Timothy is even an original work or if it was added later and when taken in context Romans pretty much just says that yes homosexuality is a sin but so is a bunch of other stuff and it never mentions stoning.

[United Muscovite Nations]

Here's a graphic of opinions of the public in various countries, with letters signifying if they are Muslim, Christian, Jewish, or some combination.

Most of the countries marked as Christian aren't actually Christian. If they were, the numbers would be different.

No True Scotsman.

[New Emeline]

Most of the countries marked as Christian aren't actually Christian. If they were, the numbers would be different.

No True Scotsman.

ay, beat me to it

[Geneviev]

Three years, to be specific, and I'm assuming Romans and 1 Timothy do count, as much as I disagree.

There's some debate whether Timothy is even an original work or if it was added later and when taken in context Romans pretty much just says that yes homosexuality is a sin but so is a bunch of other stuff and it never mentions stoning.

Do not inherit the kingdom of God.
Nowhere does it say "Oh never mind, I decided that maybe their blood is on their own hands is too harsh so still follow the rule here but be nice about it."

[Geneviev]

Most of the countries marked as Christian aren't actually Christian. If they were, the numbers would be different.

No True Scotsman.

As in, not a theocracy.

[New Emeline]

No True Scotsman.

As in, not a theocracy.

Right, and not all of the countries marked Muslim are theocracies either.

[United Muscovite Nations]

No True Scotsman.

As in, not a theocracy.

It's Islam, not Christianity, that calls for a theocracy as one of its main tenets.

[Washington Resistance Army]

There's some debate whether Timothy is even an original work or if it was added later and when taken in context Romans pretty much just says that yes homosexuality is a sin but so is a bunch of other stuff and it never mentions stoning.

Do not inherit the kingdom of God.
Nowhere does it say "Oh never mind, I decided that maybe their blood is on their own hands is too harsh so still follow the rule here but be nice about it."

Yeah, they won't inherit the kingdom of God, meaning they're sinners. That's why you repent for whatever sin is in question. This is really basic Christianity.

[Geneviev]

As in, not a theocracy.

It's Islam, not Christianity, that calls for a theocracy as one of its main tenets.

Romans 13:1-7.

[United Muscovite Nations]

It's Islam, not Christianity, that calls for a theocracy as one of its main tenets.

Romans 13:1-7.

That's not calling for a theocracy, it's telling Christians to submit to the Roman Empire, which wasn't Christian.

[Geneviev]

Do not inherit the kingdom of God.
Nowhere does it say "Oh never mind, I decided that maybe their blood is on their own hands is too harsh so still follow the rule here but be nice about it."

Yeah, they won't inherit the kingdom of God, meaning they're sinners. That's why you repent for whatever sin is in question. This is really basic Christianity.

Some sins you can not repent for because they're an essential part of who you are, meaning you can't make it go away.

[The Ozark Frontier]

It's Islam, not Christianity, that calls for a theocracy as one of its main tenets.

Romans 13:1-7.

First Commandment: Thou shalt have no Gods Before me.

You should respect the Authority of a Nation’s Leader, but Never Follow someone who claims to be appointed by God via Elections or inhereitance.

[New Emeline]

Yeah, they won't inherit the kingdom of God, meaning they're sinners. That's why you repent for whatever sin is in question. This is really basic Christianity.

Some sins you can not repent for because they're an essential part of who you are, meaning you can't make it go away.

You can still repent for them, can't you?

[Geneviev]

Romans 13:1-7.

That's not calling for a theocracy, it's telling Christians to submit to the Roman Empire, which wasn't Christian.

It does depend on interpretation.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Some sins you can not repent for because they're an essential part of who you are, meaning you can't make it go away.

You can still repent for them, can't you?

Yes you can. That's kinda the whole point.

That's not calling for a theocracy, it's telling Christians to submit to the Roman Empire, which wasn't Christian.

It does depend on interpretation.

It absolutely does not. That's exactly what it means. It's also why Jesus says "Render unto Caesar what is Caesars and unto God what is Gods".

[Dylar]

Yeah, they won't inherit the kingdom of God, meaning they're sinners. That's why you repent for whatever sin is in question. This is really basic Christianity.

Some sins you can not repent for because they're an essential part of who you are, meaning you can't make it go away.

No, you can repent for homosexual acts. We've been over this before. Homosexuality in of itself is not a sin, but the homosexual acts are. Gay sex, gay marriage, etc.

[Geneviev]

Some sins you can not repent for because they're an essential part of who you are, meaning you can't make it go away.

You can still repent for them, can't you?

Repentance means you change whatever you're repenting from.