NATION

PASSWORD

Should Rural Votes be Weighted Against Urban Votes?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81310
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 22, 2018 9:19 am

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Because those in the legislative chamber understand they are not the only people in the state.


They don't care about me. Me being present doesn't make a single iota of difference.

Legislators are supposed to represent everyone not just those who voted for them. When whoever you vote for in November goes to Sacramento they will not just be representing your community but everyone in the district. They will not be making decisions for only for you but the entire state. This is basic civics dude.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 22, 2018 9:19 am

Sungai Pusat wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Most small businesses are actually started by bootstrapping resources, not loans.

Also, yes, "earn more than". But the bank for a business also makes you put collateral before lending you anything. In the case of a personal loan, they won't even consider you with a bad credit record or no credit record, which many poor people have.

I don't think you understand how credit works.

In other words, the world's more complicated than what we tend to assume it is. News at whenever.

Rural credit could absolutely be made easier to get, that would be one way to help kickstart more entrepreneurial individuals living in the are who don't have any other means to do so.


Well, rural credit would not be good to kickstart entrepreneurial endeavors.

I'd rather do grants as economic relief for rural areas.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 22, 2018 9:19 am

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:I'm aware your side is doing plenty of things even when you seem to want to seem virtuous.

It's the only way you seem to want to win elections nowadays.

So you admit that your point is wrong. Glad to see you're capable. :)
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 22, 2018 9:21 am

Conserative Morality wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:I'm aware your side is doing plenty of things even when you seem to want to seem virtuous.

It's the only way you seem to want to win elections nowadays.

So you admit that your point is wrong. Glad to see you're capable. :)


Oh, no, my point is not at all wrong. You seem to misunderstand me calling your politicians and your party on your side of the aisle hypocrites as opposed to me pointing specifics.

Which your side has plenty of shit to deserve the description.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Tue May 22, 2018 9:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Tue May 22, 2018 9:21 am

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Sungai Pusat wrote:In other words, the world's more complicated than what we tend to assume it is. News at whenever.

Rural credit could absolutely be made easier to get, that would be one way to help kickstart more entrepreneurial individuals living in the are who don't have any other means to do so.


Well, rural credit would not be good to kickstart entrepreneurial endeavors.

I'd rather do grants as economic relief for rural areas.

Whatever works; I don't think desiring to have factories or mines returning is the best option (or really the not worst option), so anything that helps to make moving on a less painful process would be good.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81310
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 22, 2018 9:21 am

Snowman wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
How would their votes be worth more? You already have testimony from experts in committee and then there is debate on the floor.

Would the legislators from urban areas not be allowed to vote on a farm bill?

Well I mean I could give a number of idiotic laws where experts were obviously not consulted (like WOTUS saying puddles belong to the government & unrealistic changes requested in unrealistic time frames)

but to the main point, they should vote, the urban legislators, just that they would have less weight. Maybe till the rural legislators' votes were closer to the total value of the urban ones. It doesn't affect the people they represent as much. Coincides with the question you've dodged twice, reverse the situation, what if your area was decided by rural people? I can infer from your tone towards rural people, you would not like that.

I dont understand how would their votes have less weight?

to answer your question Tyranny of the minority is no better than tyranny of the majority. That is why the principle of one man, one vote was created.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 22, 2018 9:22 am

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Oh, no, my point is not at all wrong. You seem to misunderstand me calling your politicians on your side of the aisle hypocrites as opposed to me pointing specifics.

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:If it was your side doing it and getting away with it you'd probably be singing a different tune, considering your desire to push people out of political discourse.

I suppose this must be a new form of code or conlang indecipherable from English. :)
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 22, 2018 9:24 am

Conserative Morality wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Oh, no, my point is not at all wrong. You seem to misunderstand me calling your politicians on your side of the aisle hypocrites as opposed to me pointing specifics.

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:If it was your side doing it and getting away with it you'd probably be singing a different tune, considering your desire to push people out of political discourse.

I suppose this must be a new form of code or conlang indecipherable from English. :)


Oh no. See, if Lumen's side was getting away with it, he would be like "hell yea gerrymandering is good! Is keeping those ignorant assholes in line!"

After all, that's all he seems to talk about.

But clearly, it is indecipherable to you, provided you admit to the fact you can't read.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 22, 2018 9:26 am

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Oh no. See, if Lumen's side was getting away with it, he would be like "hell yea gerrymandering is good! Is keeping those ignorant assholes in line!"

After all, that's all he seems to talk about.

But we are getting away with it. And you've admitted it. But hey, anything to keep from admitting you fucked up. Maybe beating your chest will even convince someone that you are a Detached Observer and Brave Moderate unlike those fanatics on either side. :)
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81310
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 22, 2018 9:26 am

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:
I suppose this must be a new form of code or conlang indecipherable from English. :)


Oh no. See, if Lumen's side was getting away with it, he would be like "hell yea gerrymandering is good! Is keeping those ignorant assholes in line!"

After all, that's all he seems to talk about.

But clearly, it is indecipherable to you, provided you admit to the fact you can't read.

I have said many times that gerrymandering should be outlawed.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue May 22, 2018 9:27 am

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
They don't care about me. Me being present doesn't make a single iota of difference.

Legislators are supposed to represent everyone not just those who voted for them. When whoever you vote for in November goes to Sacramento they will not just be representing your community but everyone in the district. They will not be making decisions for only for you but the entire state. This is basic civics dude.


It's fundamentally impossible for them to represent me and their own voters.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 22, 2018 9:27 am

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Legislators are supposed to represent everyone not just those who voted for them. When whoever you vote for in November goes to Sacramento they will not just be representing your community but everyone in the district. They will not be making decisions for only for you but the entire state. This is basic civics dude.


It's fundamentally impossible for them to represent me and their own voters.

In that case more representation for you will not solve that fundamental problem; only bring government into deadlock.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81310
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 22, 2018 9:28 am

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Legislators are supposed to represent everyone not just those who voted for them. When whoever you vote for in November goes to Sacramento they will not just be representing your community but everyone in the district. They will not be making decisions for only for you but the entire state. This is basic civics dude.


It's fundamentally impossible for them to represent me and their own voters.

How is it impossible or do you have a complete and utter lack of understanding of how your government works?

User avatar
Cranborne
Envoy
 
Posts: 253
Founded: May 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cranborne » Tue May 22, 2018 9:28 am

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
They don't care about me. Me being present doesn't make a single iota of difference.

Legislators are supposed to represent everyone not just those who voted for them. When whoever you vote for in November goes to Sacramento they will not just be representing your community but everyone in the district. They will not be making decisions for only for you but the entire state. This is basic civics dude.

Legislators almost never try to represent those that did not vote for them.

Also will you answer my question regarding the Standing Rock reservation?
American-British. Wealthy. A bit of a Francophile.

Pro: Toryism, conservative Democrats, life, wine, champagne, veganism, rich people, poor people, universal healthcare, feminism, LGBTQ rights, deregulation.

Anti: Liberalism, Republicans, 2nd Amendment, non-veganism, abortion, the middle class, privatized healthcare.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 22, 2018 9:28 am

Conserative Morality wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Oh no. See, if Lumen's side was getting away with it, he would be like "hell yea gerrymandering is good! Is keeping those ignorant assholes in line!"

After all, that's all he seems to talk about.

But we are getting away with it. And you've admitted it. But hey, anything to keep from admitting you fucked up. Maybe beating your chest will even convince someone that you are a Detached Observer and Brave Moderate unlike those fanatics on either side. :)


Oh, no, I don't make myself any fantasies of being a detached observer and brave moderate.

You seem to misunderstand the fact I am an asshole with the perceived notion of yours that I am some detached observer. I really am not.

I'm just some disenchanted asshole who likes to point out your bullshit when I see it. I'm not brave, nor some kind of hero, and I don't think I've ever pretended to be such. In fact, I've said plenty of times in these forums that I am, indeed, a prick. That you can't read is not my problem.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Tue May 22, 2018 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue May 22, 2018 9:29 am

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
It's fundamentally impossible for them to represent me and their own voters.

How is it impossible or do you have a complete and utter lack of understanding of how your government works?


They can't vote both ways?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81310
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 22, 2018 9:29 am

Cranborne wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Legislators are supposed to represent everyone not just those who voted for them. When whoever you vote for in November goes to Sacramento they will not just be representing your community but everyone in the district. They will not be making decisions for only for you but the entire state. This is basic civics dude.

Legislators almost never try to represent those that did not vote for them.

Also will you answer my question regarding the Standing Rock reservation?


The pipeline should not have been built through Indian reservations.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue May 22, 2018 9:29 am

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Oh, no, I don't make myself any fantasies of being a detached observer and brave moderate.

You seem to misunderstand the fact I am an asshole with the perceived notion of yours that I am some detached observer. I really am not.

I'm just some disenchanted asshole who likes to point out your bullshit when I see it.

You're doing a bad job considering you fucked up so badly on such a basic issue. I mean really, the posts were *right* there, and clearly you knew about gerrymandering in Maryland.

Step up your game, my man, it's low-quality right now.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft
Minister
 
Posts: 3373
Founded: Jul 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Tue May 22, 2018 9:29 am

San Lumen wrote:Ive seen multiple comments suggesting that legislatures should be redrawn and instead of being done by population it should be weighted in favor of rural communities. For example in my state of New York, Hamilton County (the least populous county) should have more representation than someone in the Bronx.

This was the case in many state legislatures prior to a Supreme Court decision entitled Reynolds V Sims in 1964 which established one man one vote and drawing state legislatures to favor rural communities over urban areas was unconstitutional and that electoral districts must be roughly equal in population. Chief Justice Earl Warren famously wrote “Legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests."

I have even heard some suggest that statewide elections should be determined not by how many votes a candidate receives but how many counties they carry. How that is even remotely fair or democratic is beyond me.

The concept of weighted votes is why I oppose the Electoral College as it makes land area count more than raw votes.

However this is not just a United States issue it could certainly be applied to other countries as well. Canada for example. The current government won its majority by sweeping urban areas.

The concept of one man one vote is very important in any democracy. No person's vote should count more than someone else's because of where they reside.

What's your take NSG?

Electoral college votes also aren't proportional to the population of states. If they were, California would have 12 more votes and Idaho would have 1 vote instead of 4.

User avatar
Cranborne
Envoy
 
Posts: 253
Founded: May 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cranborne » Tue May 22, 2018 9:29 am

San Lumen wrote:
Cranborne wrote:Legislators almost never try to represent those that did not vote for them.

Also will you answer my question regarding the Standing Rock reservation?


The pipeline should not have been built through Indian reservations.

But what if the people of North Dakota wanted it built? The majority that is.
American-British. Wealthy. A bit of a Francophile.

Pro: Toryism, conservative Democrats, life, wine, champagne, veganism, rich people, poor people, universal healthcare, feminism, LGBTQ rights, deregulation.

Anti: Liberalism, Republicans, 2nd Amendment, non-veganism, abortion, the middle class, privatized healthcare.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81310
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 22, 2018 9:31 am

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:How is it impossible or do you have a complete and utter lack of understanding of how your government works?


They can't vote both ways?

How many times does it have to be explained to you that your community is not the center of the state?

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue May 22, 2018 9:31 am

Conserative Morality wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Oh, no, I don't make myself any fantasies of being a detached observer and brave moderate.

You seem to misunderstand the fact I am an asshole with the perceived notion of yours that I am some detached observer. I really am not.

I'm just some disenchanted asshole who likes to point out your bullshit when I see it.

You're doing a bad job considering you fucked up so badly on such a basic issue. I mean really, the posts were *right* there, and clearly you knew about gerrymandering in Maryland.

Step up your game, my man, it's low-quality right now.


I'm actually not paying that much attention to this, if I can be honest. I actually have a life to care about instead of trying to win an argument with some stranger on the internet that seems to think I give that much of a shit about this forum, and who truly believes his "gotchas" are going to stop me from somehow being an asshole.

But I mean, if you want me to spend more effort into this, that actually says more about how much free time you got on your hands to argue with some stranger online in a "serious" manner than it does about me.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Tue May 22, 2018 9:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81310
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 22, 2018 9:31 am

Cranborne wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
The pipeline should not have been built through Indian reservations.

But what if the people of North Dakota wanted it built? The majority that is.


This is why compromise and negotiation is important

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Tue May 22, 2018 9:31 am

Cranborne wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
The pipeline should not have been built through Indian reservations.

But what if the people of North Dakota wanted it built? The majority that is.

Rural people are all vulgar white fascists. There are no non-white rural people, not in the United States or anywhere. They live in Urban areas and write Urban music.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue May 22, 2018 9:32 am

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
They can't vote both ways?

How many times does it have to be explained to you that your community is not the center of the state?


You can beat your dead horse as long as you want, I'll wait for you to get back to the conversation.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Eahland, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fahran, Google [Bot], Major-Tom, Perikuresu, Phage, Prosperoi, The Jamesian Republic, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads