Based Groyper wrote:Len Hyet wrote:Sure we are.
I'm saying I made an argument. You're saying I didn't. We're debating an empirical fact.
Of course, you're also trying to use this to distract from the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about and are desperately trying to use shock and edginess to replace an argument, and filling in the blanks with meaningless babble in an attempt to sound smart.
Which is also an empirical fact.
"you don't know what you're talking abou wah"
You don't, you've made that fairly clear.
Based Groyper wrote:I have made a reasonably detailed and not too long post
No details were provided.
Based Groyper wrote:outlining in clear English
Debatable.
Based Groyper wrote:my argument. You have not responded to it
Sure I did. I said you were wrong, and at that point we'd provided the same amount of evidence in support of our arguments.
Based Groyper wrote:and you are now running away from the facts
Of which you have provided none.
Based Groyper wrote:because I am using logic here
I sure as shit haven't seen any.
Based Groyper wrote:while you're just having an emotional reaciton, throwing round tropes about 'edgyness' and making incoherent insults in place of structured premises.
I thought it was plenty coherent. Kvatchdom, was my argument incoherent? I'd like a second opinion.
Based Groyper wrote:Should'nt of messed with the BASED Groyper!
Like I said, edgy nonsense.



