NATION

PASSWORD

2018 FIFA World Cup Megathread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

World Cup?

Great World Cup!
24
50%
Good World Cup!
11
23%
Meh
5
10%
Bad World Cup!
1
2%
Awful World Cup!
7
15%
 
Total votes : 48

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54394
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:11 pm

Latest memes are out

Image

User avatar
Chan Island
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6824
Founded: Nov 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Chan Island » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:12 pm

Esternial wrote:Latest memes are out



Glorious
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=513597&p=39401766#p39401766
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.

User avatar
HC Eredivisie
Senator
 
Posts: 3828
Founded: Antiquity
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby HC Eredivisie » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:13 pm

I like that Brasil is out of the wC, but on the other hand I don't want Belgium to win. :unsure:

And who said that UEFA is overrepresented in the WC?
Hail Richard, Chief Warlock of the Brothers of Darkness, Lord of the Thirteen Hells, Master of the Bones, Emperor of the Black, Lord of the Undead and the mayor of a little village up the coast.
+7656 posts, Joined 16 april 2003

Het Vijfde Nederlandse Topic met 1461 stemmen, 8070 posts en 144.700 views.
25-01-2005 - 08-06-2009

User avatar
Omerica
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 440
Founded: Nov 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Omerica » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:24 pm

Risottia wrote:Football is the Europeans' game.
Fifth World Cup in a row.

*cough* fourth *cough*

Funnily enough, none of the top four from the last tournament have reached the semifinals this time. The last time that happened: 1966. Yet more proof that football is indeed coming home. :P

2018: (none)
2014: Germany, Netherlands
2010: Germany
2006: Germany
2002: Brazil
1998: Brazil
1994: Italy
1990: West Germany
1986: West Germany, France
1982: Italy
1978: Netherlands, Brazil
1974: West Germany, Brazil
1970: West Germany
1966: (none)
1962: Brazil
1958: West Germany
1954: Uruguay
1950: Brazil
1938: Italy
1934: (none)
Last edited by Omerica on Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TLA: OME, HUClavia
iTLD: .or
Demonym: Rubbish Omerican
Every Omerica football match
This nation does not necessarily reflect my actual political views
Discontinue use if rash develops
Don’t ⬋ play ⬋ with ⬋ fire
Omerica – 27/09/2017
Any further and our feet will probably be in our stomachs
Kanoria - 27/09/2017
I for one love the reflux uniquely generated by self-gluttony of limbs, where the flesh meets the acid
This space intentionally left
⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕
CONCORDIA VNIVERSALIS
⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:27 pm

Scottish Socialists wrote:Belgium 2K18
Coming home status: it’s not


Don't worry, we'll put the cup on display so the other, lesser, home nations can come and look at it. :)

User avatar
Geisenfried
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Apr 02, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Geisenfried » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:31 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:When we reconvene in Qatar in 4 years' time, it will have been 20 years since a South American team last won a World Cup.

Much as I'm enjoying this version, I'm not remotely convinced that's a good thing.


To be fair, the only non-European team to win a European World Cup featured Pelé, so... it's not exactly unexpected for there to be struggles.
Last edited by Geisenfried on Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Royal Federation of Geisenfried / der Königsbund von Geisenfried
Proper demonym: Geisen

- Two-time quarterfinalist, six-time qualifier, and former host (XXXII) of the NationStates Football World Cup

User avatar
Minoa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6079
Founded: Oct 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minoa » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:38 pm

I think it is going to be a toss-up for Russia vs. Croatia: based on the Elo and FIFA rankings, Croatia may have an advantage, but any host nations (e.g. South Korea in 2002 and France in 1998) tend to perform well.
Mme A. d'Oiseau, B.A. (State of Minoa)

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30594
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:40 pm

Geisenfried wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:When we reconvene in Qatar in 4 years' time, it will have been 20 years since a South American team last won a World Cup.

Much as I'm enjoying this version, I'm not remotely convinced that's a good thing.


To be fair, the only non-European team to win a European World Cup featured Pelé, so... it's not exactly unexpected for there to be struggles.


I know; but the same principle didn't apply to South Africa or Brazil.

User avatar
Geisenfried
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Apr 02, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Geisenfried » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:46 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:
Geisenfried wrote:
To be fair, the only non-European team to win a European World Cup featured Pelé, so... it's not exactly unexpected for there to be struggles.


I know; but the same principle didn't apply to South Africa or Brazil.


Well, there'd never been an African cup, and Spain was probably the best team in the world at the time.

Brazil was a surprise, but I don't think anyone expected 7-1. Argentina still was basically 5 minutes from a tossup penalty shootout at the end.
The Royal Federation of Geisenfried / der Königsbund von Geisenfried
Proper demonym: Geisen

- Two-time quarterfinalist, six-time qualifier, and former host (XXXII) of the NationStates Football World Cup

User avatar
Scottish Socialists
Diplomat
 
Posts: 695
Founded: Dec 27, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Scottish Socialists » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:51 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Scottish Socialists wrote:Belgium 2K18
Coming home status: it’s not


Don't worry, we'll put the cup on display so the other, lesser, home nations can come and look at it. :)

Why would we want to travel to England to see a cup that’s in Belgium?
☭ People's Republic of Scotland ☭
"I detest the Tories and everything they stand for." - Nicola Sturgeon
MON THE RANGERS!

“Did I miss the train or did the train miss me?” - Gary Brannan

Click here for advice.

Pro: The EU, The SNP, Independent Kurdistan, Scottish Nationalism, Social Democracy, Rangers F.C
Anti: British nationalism, Brexit, the UK, Conservatives, the Labour Party, Putin, Celtic F.C, Liz Truss
iSideWith results | 8values Results

User avatar
Yaana Noore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Mar 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yaana Noore » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:56 pm

Minoa wrote:I think it is going to be a toss-up for Russia vs. Croatia: based on the Elo and FIFA rankings, Croatia may have an advantage, but any host nations (e.g. South Korea in 2002 and France in 1998) tend to perform well.

FIFA rankings aren't a very good measure of how good a team really is, Croatia are rated worse than the Netherlands, Chile and Wales for some reason. Russia is also rated lower than they should be because they'd only played 3 competitive games in the past 2 years prior to the World Cup.

Minoa wrote:I think it is going to be a toss-up for Russia vs. Croatia: based on the Elo and FIFA rankings, Croatia may have an advantage, but any host nations (e.g. South Korea in 2002 and France in 1998) tend to perform well.

France were a really good side anyway to be fair. Home advantage helped them for sure but they were really strong anyway.
I'm not going to comment on Korea as I'm of the tinfoil belief that their run to the semis was rigged by FIFA to encourage the popularity of the WC in Asia.

Scottish Socialists wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Don't worry, we'll put the cup on display so the other, lesser, home nations can come and look at it. :)

Why would we want to travel to England to see a cup that’s in Belgium?

If you guys gave your own team anywhere near the level of support you give the team playing England you may be able to watch them at a tournament at some point. :p

User avatar
Scottish Socialists
Diplomat
 
Posts: 695
Founded: Dec 27, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Scottish Socialists » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:00 pm

Yaana Noore wrote:If you guys gave your own team anywhere near the level of support you give the team playing England you may be able to watch them at a tournament at some point. :p

We gave up supporting our own team a while ago.
At least we’ve qualified more than Finland, though.
☭ People's Republic of Scotland ☭
"I detest the Tories and everything they stand for." - Nicola Sturgeon
MON THE RANGERS!

“Did I miss the train or did the train miss me?” - Gary Brannan

Click here for advice.

Pro: The EU, The SNP, Independent Kurdistan, Scottish Nationalism, Social Democracy, Rangers F.C
Anti: British nationalism, Brexit, the UK, Conservatives, the Labour Party, Putin, Celtic F.C, Liz Truss
iSideWith results | 8values Results

User avatar
Yaana Noore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Mar 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yaana Noore » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:08 pm

Scottish Socialists wrote:
Yaana Noore wrote:If you guys gave your own team anywhere near the level of support you give the team playing England you may be able to watch them at a tournament at some point. :p

We gave up supporting our own team a while ago.
At least we’ve qualified more than Finland, though.

Done just as well as Finland at them though.

User avatar
Riemstagrad
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1088
Founded: Antiquity
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Riemstagrad » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:17 pm

Again a game on the edge for Belgium!

To be honest, i always believed in it, but the closer to the kick-off, the less certain i was...
Probably having to do with reading loads of comments about how Martinez can't organise a defense or how a 3-4-3 would be a terrible idea against Brazil, or De Bruyne playing too deep, or Belgium never been tested in a real game or whatever...

But damn, we did it! We pulled it off!

Next is France-Belgium. I expect another nailbiter. France flooded with talent, but not at their top as a team yet. Can crush everyone on a good day, but so can Belgium.
Whoever wins that semi will be favourite in the final. But the final is quite another story. Half the world is watching, the stakes are high, the nerves are breaking... Anything can happen in a final.

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18711
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:24 pm

Yaana Noore wrote:
Bombadil wrote:Well.. unless some miracle happens..

I've gone out on a limb to say Belgium will beat Brazil.. to be honest they're not off France in that they don't have a good coach. De Bruyne is too far back generally given their system but I don't know exactly how they should play - I'd like to think a 3-4-1-2 system might work but I think they play 4-3-3.. and might go 5-3-2 for this game..

..none particularly works against Brazil but I think Brazil are nervous.. maybe an early goal for Belgium and they'd crack.. but it's a 2am game for me so I'll just wake up and see what happened. If I was Belgium I'd go classic 4-4-2 but who knows.. football eh?

No chance Belgium will play 4-4-2 or 4-3-3, they've played a three-man defence throughout.


Seems they played 4-3-3 then switched to 4-4-2.. though technically I am wrong in that they won the first half with 4-3-3 but lost the second with 4-4-2.

..oh it was Brazil that switched to 4-4-2.. seems Belgium played 4-3-3 throughout.. I didn't see the game so just going off the reports.
Last edited by Bombadil on Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Yaana Noore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Mar 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yaana Noore » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:37 pm

Bombadil wrote:
Yaana Noore wrote:No chance Belgium will play 4-4-2 or 4-3-3, they've played a three-man defence throughout.


Seems they played 4-3-3 then switched to 4-4-2.. though technically I am wrong in that they won the first half with 4-3-3 but lost the second with 4-4-2.

..oh it was Brazil that switched to 4-4-2.. seems Belgium played 4-3-3 throughout.. I didn't see the game so just going off the reports.

They played 3-4-3. Alderweireld-Kompany-Vertonghen backline, Meunier and Chadli as wing-backs. Witsel and Fellaini in the middle, Hazard and De Bruyne just ahead of them with Lukaku up top (but kept going onto the wings). Chadli went off for Vermaelen late on and I think Vertonghen then moved further left. At no point did they play a conventional back four.

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18711
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:38 pm

Yaana Noore wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
Seems they played 4-3-3 then switched to 4-4-2.. though technically I am wrong in that they won the first half with 4-3-3 but lost the second with 4-4-2.

..oh it was Brazil that switched to 4-4-2.. seems Belgium played 4-3-3 throughout.. I didn't see the game so just going off the reports.

They played 3-4-3. Alderweireld-Kompany-Vertonghen backline, Meunier and Chadli as wing-backs. Witsel and Fellaini in the middle, Hazard and De Bruyne just ahead of them with Lukaku up top (but kept going onto the wings). Chadli went off for Vermaelen late on and I think Vertonghen then moved further left. At no point did they play a conventional back four.


Ah well I didn't watch so maybe.. I went off the report..

Marouane Fellaini and Nacer Chadli, heroes of that comeback, were included and the system was a surprising one: a 4-3-3 with De Bruyne deployed as a false nine and Romelu Lukaku pulling right, seemingly to try to attack the space between Miranda and Marcelo.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:41 pm

Yaana Noore wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
Seems they played 4-3-3 then switched to 4-4-2.. though technically I am wrong in that they won the first half with 4-3-3 but lost the second with 4-4-2.

..oh it was Brazil that switched to 4-4-2.. seems Belgium played 4-3-3 throughout.. I didn't see the game so just going off the reports.

They played 3-4-3. Alderweireld-Kompany-Vertonghen backline, Meunier and Chadli as wing-backs. Witsel and Fellaini in the middle, Hazard and De Bruyne just ahead of them with Lukaku up top (but kept going onto the wings). Chadli went off for Vermaelen late on and I think Vertonghen then moved further left. At no point did they play a conventional back four.


Not sure about that. They seemed to switch formations in the first half depending on whether they had the ball. A back 3 with wingbacks when in possession and a back 4 with fullbacks without, with Kompany stepping forward out of the line to protect the back 4.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55270
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:42 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:When we reconvene in Qatar in 4 years' time, it will have been 20 years since a South American team last won a World Cup.

Much as I'm enjoying this version, I'm not remotely convinced that's a good thing.

Idk.
Anyway, if the Cup must leave the UEFA eventually, I'd prefer it to go to Africa rather than South America. African football is more fun.
.

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:42 pm

>We lost to a non-country
TrIGGeREd, now I'll have to study for a history exam and a biology exam (both will happen in tuesday) because my country won't be playing anymore :(
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55270
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:43 pm

Esternial wrote:Latest memes are out


Quit it with the memes, it's not a pissing contest...

...oh wait...
.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55270
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:45 pm

Yaana Noore wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
Seems they played 4-3-3 then switched to 4-4-2.. though technically I am wrong in that they won the first half with 4-3-3 but lost the second with 4-4-2.

..oh it was Brazil that switched to 4-4-2.. seems Belgium played 4-3-3 throughout.. I didn't see the game so just going off the reports.

They played 3-4-3. Alderweireld-Kompany-Vertonghen backline, Meunier and Chadli as wing-backs. Witsel and Fellaini in the middle, Hazard and De Bruyne just ahead of them with Lukaku up top (but kept going onto the wings). Chadli went off for Vermaelen late on and I think Vertonghen then moved further left. At no point did they play a conventional back four.

I think I saw them going WM during the second half sometimes.
.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:45 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:>We lost to a non-country
TrIGGeREd, now I'll have to study for a history exam and a biology exam (both will happen in tuesday) because my country won't be playing anymore :(

fuck me, I have to agree with you

thats almost as bad as this loss

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55270
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:47 pm

Anyway, Brazil put, Argentina out, Uruguay out, Spain out, Portugal out... If it weren't for the minor facts that Germany's out too and Italy didn't even qualify, it would be my dreams coming true.
.

User avatar
Yaana Noore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Mar 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yaana Noore » Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:48 pm

Bombadil wrote:
Yaana Noore wrote:They played 3-4-3. Alderweireld-Kompany-Vertonghen backline, Meunier and Chadli as wing-backs. Witsel and Fellaini in the middle, Hazard and De Bruyne just ahead of them with Lukaku up top (but kept going onto the wings). Chadli went off for Vermaelen late on and I think Vertonghen then moved further left. At no point did they play a conventional back four.


Ah well I didn't watch so maybe.. I went off the report..

Marouane Fellaini and Nacer Chadli, heroes of that comeback, were included and the system was a surprising one: a 4-3-3 with De Bruyne deployed as a false nine and Romelu Lukaku pulling right, seemingly to try to attack the space between Miranda and Marcelo.

Dunno where that is but it's incorrect, if you watch the game back you can see Chadli is the LWB. World Cup twitter has them lining up like so.

Could easily be wrong but Martinez has literally had them playing the back-three for whole time he has been there. No chance was he playing a regular back four with Vertonghen the left-back for a whole game.

Fartsniffage wrote:Not sure about that. They seemed to switch formations in the first half depending on whether they had the ball. A back 3 with wingbacks when in possession and a back 4 with fullbacks without, with Kompany stepping forward out of the line to protect the back 4.

The three/five at the back is pretty fluid which is one of its main advantages. Kompany just advances further without the ball as the covering defender for the other two and then falls back in once they have got the ball. He's going forwards yes but his actual position is a CB in-between A and V there. If you look at their line they are always looking to stay co-ordinated he is just closing in faster with the one who has the ball allowing the other two to watch the movement of the Brazil's other attacking players. It's a back three just working together not a change in formation, Meunier and Chadli never tracked back far enough or for long enough for one of them to slot into a back four anyway.

I give him a lot of flak for his poor defensive tactics but Martinez got this one almost spot on, fair play.
Last edited by Yaana Noore on Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Gallia-, Google [Bot], Hammer Britannia, Ifreann, Port Carverton, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The Vooperian Union, United States Of Alpha, Western Theram, Zancostan

Advertisement

Remove ads