Personal choice has to be a factor. We know it's a factor in STEM as there is evidence of a inverse relationship between gender equality and % of women in STEM. Is there a similar correlative factor in politics? Probably not. But as we approach genuine equality, you have to accept that women may simply not want to enter politics. I'd be interested to find out if anyone has looked at the numbers.Imperializt Russia wrote:Women fail to reach political office for a long list of reasons. Your phrasing makes it sound like you believe this is due to personal factors and choices - not running, not being good enough, doubting their own self-confidence.
As for doubting their own self-confidence...that's entirely possible, and there might be factors that play into that. I'd submit telling women (who apparently according to you have a lack of confidence) that the big bad boogey-patriarch living under their bed is going to come out at night and rape them is not going to be a good way to help resolve that.
But lets actually look at what I said:
Hirota wrote:No, I want to "destroy" AWSL because - like I already said - it is patronising, regressive, undemocratic and implies most women are incapable of reaching political office without handouts.
It's patronising for a number of reasons, not just because it asks the question why shortlist advocates consider women incapable of getting elected on their own merits. It's also patronising because it considers the electorate - most of whom are women - so stupid they wouldn’t elect a woman even if she was the best candidate. It's patronising because it considers the local constituency members incapable of choosing a woman to stand even if she was the best candidate.
It's regressive because it assumes women are infantile, unable to get to the top without help, yet we've had 2 women Prime Ministers - from the only mainstream party not to impose shortlists.
It's undemocratic because it eliminates the freedom of choice from constituents to choose the best candidate.
Any how many MP's are trans? From ethnic minorities? From other religions? What makes women so deserving of special protections and a leg up, more so than these other demographics? Do you have evidence that women need shortlists but the others do not?25% of all women MPs ever elected to the UK Parliament are currently sitting MPs.
Heck, you have socialist leanings, why are there no quota for lower income candidates? Are they more or less worthy of special protections than your average female Labour candidate?
It's almost like I'm more forward thinking and progressive and don't see the need to obsessively dwell on the past and instead focus on the future.It's almost like there are centuries of imbalances in society that we have only recently begun to try and redress.