RWDT XII - 12 Step program to get Right.

[Luminesa]

...Why? I mean, adultery is awful, for example, but if a couple can settle it out-of-court then it would be a waste of prison-space.

If someone I knew were disloyal towards their partner then I'd refuse to speak to them again, they just proved that they're a trash person and their word means nothing.

That also works as settling out-of-court. Kinda.

[Oil exporting People]

I support summary firing squads to resolve the matter; cheap and effective.

[Mladorossiya]

I support summary firing squads to resolve the matter; cheap and effective.

>Not privatized Catholic death squads

Are you even right wing?

[Luminesa]

I support summary firing squads to resolve the matter; cheap and effective.

Firing squads to resolve what?

[Oil exporting People]

I support summary firing squads to resolve the matter; cheap and effective.

Firing squads to resolve what?

The matter of adultery.

[Oil exporting People]

I support summary firing squads to resolve the matter; cheap and effective.

>Not privatized Catholic death squads

Are you even right wing?

La Sombra Negra FTW

[Reikoku]

Also daily reminder incel rebellions happened before

Yeah, I remember. One happened in Italy in the 1920's, and another happened in Germany in the 30's.

[Luminesa]

Firing squads to resolve what?

The matter of adultery.

What the heck? Seriously? For a matter that can be settled privately, or even in a civil manner without prison, you’d just shoot them?

[Reikoku]

The matter of adultery.

What the heck? Seriously? For a matter that can be settled privately, or even in a civil manner without prison, you’d just shoot them?

I remember the part of the Bible where Jesus machine gunned the adultress in front of the Pharisees.

[Dumb Ideologies]

...Why? I mean, adultery is awful, for example, but if a couple can settle it out-of-court then it would be a waste of prison-space.

If someone I knew were disloyal towards their partner then I'd refuse to speak to them again, they just proved that they're a trash person and their word means nothing.

Understandable. I remember the shocked expression when a friend at work told me that she was cheating on her husband with someone from work. My response was "that's not a very good idea, you have children and your husband is a nice guy who doesn't deserve that". She asked why I didn't want her to be happy and I just said "you and your whole family will be happier if you don't split in favour of a quick bit of shallow excitement lusting after a pervert in the IT department".

I was utterly baffled that she expected me to respond positively.

[Oil exporting People]

The matter of adultery.

What the heck? Seriously? For a matter that can be settled privately, or even in a civil manner without prison, you’d just shoot them?

Yes, given sufficient evidence to warrant it. Otherwise I think a trial would be in order.

[Dumb Ideologies]

What the heck? Seriously? For a matter that can be settled privately, or even in a civil manner without prison, you’d just shoot them?

I remember the part of the Bible where Jesus machine gunned the adultress in front of the Pharisees.

Ah yes, just after the driveby on the moneylenders at the temple.

[Mladorossiya]

Understandable. I remember the shocked expression when a friend at work told me that she was cheating on her husband with someone from work. My response was "that's not a very good idea, you have children and your husband is a nice guy who doesn't deserve that". She asked why I didn't want her to be happy and I just said "you and your whole family will be happier if you don't split in favour of a quick bit of shallow excitement lusting after a pervert in the IT department".

I was utterly baffled that she expected me to respond positively.

I wonder how prevalent that sort of 'me first' attitude is in western society. It's been heavily encouraged by bullshit self-esteem and 'I'm special' programs in schools.

[Luminesa]

If someone I knew were disloyal towards their partner then I'd refuse to speak to them again, they just proved that they're a trash person and their word means nothing.

Understandable. I remember the shocked expression when a friend at work told me that she was cheating on her husband with someone from work. My response was "that's not a very good idea, you have children and your husband is a nice guy who doesn't deserve that". She asked why I didn't want her to be happy and I just said "you and your whole family will be happier if you don't split in favour of a quick bit of shallow excitement lusting after a pervert in the IT department".

I was utterly baffled that she expected me to respond positively.

“Why don’t you want me to be happy?”
“Because it isn’t happiness you’re feeling, it’s a little giddiness after doing it with someone. See how happy you are when you’re stuck in court and fighting for custody of the children.”

[FelrikTheDeleted]

Firing squads to resolve what?

The matter of adultery.

Jesus Christ, mate. I understand how much you detest adultery, and trust me, I do too, but I think that’s a bit harsh.

[Oil exporting People]

The matter of adultery.

Jesus Christ, mate. I understand how much you detest adultery, and trust me, I do too, but I think that’s a bit harsh.

By this logic, should we not have the Death Penalty at all?

[Aellex]

Jesus Christ, mate. I understand how much you detest adultery, and trust me, I do too, but I think that’s a bit harsh.

Yeah, that's rather stupid indeed. Give the cheated on spouse 75% of the assets and the custody of the children in the divorce, that's plenty enough.
No need to go around killing people.

[Luminesa]

Jesus Christ, mate. I understand how much you detest adultery, and trust me, I do too, but I think that’s a bit harsh.

By this logic, should we not have the Death Penalty at all?

I’d say we don’t need the death penalty, yes. But we could start a whole thread on the death penalty.

[Aellex]

By this logic, should we not have the Death Penalty at all?

"You don't want us to institute death squads to murder every petty thief? Well I suppose that means you must hate Justice!"

[FelrikTheDeleted]

Jesus Christ, mate. I understand how much you detest adultery, and trust me, I do too, but I think that’s a bit harsh.

By this logic, should we not have the Death Penalty at all?

Well yeah, I’m pretty much against the death penalty in most if not all situations.

[Oil exporting People]

By this logic, should we not have the Death Penalty at all?

"You don't want us to institute death squads to murder every petty thief? Well I suppose that means you must hate Justice!"

[Reikoku]

By this logic, should we not have the Death Penalty at all?

Well yeah, I’m pretty much against the death penalty in most if not all situations.

While I'm not for it, I wouldn't lose much sleep over a murderer being hanged and can understand why people would support that. But if you believe adulterers ought to be executed by Einsatzgruppen, it says a lot about your mental health and lack of morals.

[Aellex]

(Image)

If anything, that rather apply to your argument that opposing the creation of Death Squads for the sake of assassinating cheaters means that you must automatically oppose the Death Penalty itself in all its forms.

[Oil exporting People]

(Image)

If anything, that rather apply to your argument that opposing the creation of Death Squads for the sake of assassinating cheaters means that you must automatically oppose the Death Penalty itself in all its forms.

That would be an accurate assessment if it matched what the argument has been; point was if the death penalty is too extreme a punishment for a crime, why have it at all?

[Dumb Ideologies]

Understandable. I remember the shocked expression when a friend at work told me that she was cheating on her husband with someone from work. My response was "that's not a very good idea, you have children and your husband is a nice guy who doesn't deserve that". She asked why I didn't want her to be happy and I just said "you and your whole family will be happier if you don't split in favour of a quick bit of shallow excitement lusting after a pervert in the IT department".

I was utterly baffled that she expected me to respond positively.

I wonder how prevalent that sort of 'me first' attitude is in western society. It's been heavily encouraged by bullshit self-esteem and 'I'm special' programs in schools.

Hyper-individualist ideology makes people see the world like they're the protagonist of a book or film. Their character arc is "the point" of the story, the supporting cast is disposable, and other people and communities only matter inasmuch as performance of a few collective rituals and posting about it on social media declares something about the individual's "identity".