NATION

PASSWORD

Mass killer becomes incel hero

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32099
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:21 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
I won't. It's one thing to have grown up to become like that. It's another to purposely pass it on.

Only if you presume that I am so horrible another thing like me ought not to exist. I think it's important to feel your feelings, to process them, and to understand them in a logical way but I don't think expression particularly public is important or desirable. The person you are in a moment of intense emotion is almost certainly not the version of yourself you want to be forward facing. Boys don't cry may be facile but "be your best you on your worst day" crystallizes many of the same elements and is, I'd argue, a fine standard.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:21 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
And that is very sad. That you feel that your emotions should be muted out of how you were raised. You are a victim of the system in that way.


Everyone has a tale of sorrow. I do well in hospitals, I do well at police stations, I got hit by a car walking to work and I put in overtime. I'm very capable and that capability is directly tied to the fact that my reactions to gifts are less than stellar.


I don't doubt you're a capable individual. But it's still sad that you were raised that way. There's no harm in showing emotions.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:22 pm

Canada so far as I can tell, has that retarded: "Legal to sell sex, illegal to buy sex" standard. Either all sex work should be legal or all of it should be illegal. You can't logically have it both ways.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:23 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Reformed Houn wrote:Of course it is. If you cry in a traditional household as a boy, your father will tell you to stop. If you cry as a boy on a playground, the boys will bully you. Women do ofc enforce the norms because society dictates that this is what a man is supposed to be, but it's toxic masculintiy that's causing it.


I think that what Ostro objects is that it's called ''toxic masculinity''. When in reality is just toxicity in general. We do it to men, we do it to women. You have no idea how many times my choice not to have children when I'm in my late 30s has been seen as bad and selfish by other women, and other men. My desire to focus on career and my partner only have been seen as meek and very un-feminine by other women I know. Or as mean by some men. I dare say it's the same thing men go through when they're told that ''men don't cry'', ''only girls cry'', ''man up'', etc.


Exactly, I don't think it keeps the focus where it belongs to call it toxic mas/fem, especially as that raises the notion of there being functional and healthy forms of both, which is dubious compared to just being a healthy well adjusted person.

It distracts the focus away from perpetrators toward victims and is a form of victim blaming, even if it suggests that they should be restructured to be more healthy, it doesn't put the focus on the people making other people ill.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:25 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
I think that what Ostro objects is that it's called ''toxic masculinity''. When in reality is just toxicity in general. We do it to men, we do it to women. You have no idea how many times my choice not to have children when I'm in my late 30s has been seen as bad and selfish by other women, and other men. My desire to focus on career and my partner only have been seen as meek and very un-feminine by other women I know. Or as mean by some men. I dare say it's the same thing men go through when they're told that ''men don't cry'', ''only girls cry'', ''man up'', etc.


Exactly, I don't think it keeps the focus where it belongs to call it toxic mas/fem, especially as that raises the notion of there being functional and healthy forms of both, which is dubious compared to just being a healthy well adjusted person.

It distracts the focus away from perpetrators toward victims and is a form of victim blaming, even if it suggests that they should be restructured to be more healthy, it doesn't put the focus on the people making other people ill.


I agree. Toxicity is not healthy in any way. There aren't healthy levels of it.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32099
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:26 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I don't doubt you're a capable individual. But it's still sad that you were raised that way. There's no harm in showing emotions.


There's no harm in showing emotions:

Your expression of uncertainty causes a mugger to pick up on the fact you aren't local or likely to fight back and target you.

Your big broad smile leads the other party in a negotiation to realize you aren't being as put out by the terms they're offering as you suggest.

On the witness stand you express anger at a mischaracterization of events and in closing opposing counsel says "you saw how irrational they were in the box"

These are not harms?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:26 pm

Saiwania wrote:Canada so far as I can tell, has that retarded: "Legal to sell sex, illegal to buy sex" standard. Either all sex work should be legal or all of it should be illegal. You can't logically have it both ways.

The Nordic Model, which presumes women can't control themselves so the best way to crack down on prostitution is to punish the demand end of the chain.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Reformed Houn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 383
Founded: Apr 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Reformed Houn » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:27 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Reformed Houn wrote:Of course it is. If you cry in a traditional household as a boy, your father will tell you to stop. If you cry as a boy on a playground, the boys will bully you. Women do ofc enforce the norms because society dictates that this is what a man is supposed to be, but it's toxic masculintiy that's causing it.


This is a narrative gynocentric feminism has asserted because of the prejudice of its founders, it is not based in fact, it is merely asserted dogmatically based on an anti-male framework. Study and evidence shows this isn't the case.
Men are lax about enforcing norms around other men.
Women enforce them everywhere.
When you mix the groups, men start enforcing them.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 5711000321

Feminists made these generalizations? Every single one? Sorry if I have a hard time believing that.
Yeah, like I said they get looser. It's just sillying around with the bois. Women face loads more enforcement about what it means to be a woman still, though the women's movement unlike the men's realised long ago that they should combat this.

Yes you've shown me this before and that's what I gathered from it. Men get looser, women tend to stay stressful about their surrounding.
I'm an illegalist, insurrectionary anarchist, egoist and a turbo-individualist. Positive violence is good
political thing
im a 23 years old chef, thats about it. oh also the USA shouldnt exist

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:27 pm

The whole 'legal to sell, illegal to buy' shit is moronic, in my opinion.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:28 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You have no idea how many times my choice not to have children when I'm in my late 30s has been seen as bad and selfish by other women, and other men. My desire to focus on career and my partner only have been seen as meek and very un-feminine by other women I know. Or as mean by some men. I dare say it's the same thing men go through when they're told that ''men don't cry'', ''only girls cry'', ''man up'', etc.


It is primarily because realistically speaking, it'll be too late for you to have children when you're in your early to late 40s. Menopause is right around the corner and time stops for no woman. It is them hinting to you that it is "now or never." It probably won't get a good reaction if you in some way, have failed to complete or do your gendered role.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:30 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You have no idea how many times my choice not to have children when I'm in my late 30s has been seen as bad and selfish by other women, and other men. My desire to focus on career and my partner only have been seen as meek and very un-feminine by other women I know. Or as mean by some men. I dare say it's the same thing men go through when they're told that ''men don't cry'', ''only girls cry'', ''man up'', etc.


It is primarily because realistically speaking, it'll be too late for you to have children when you're in your early to late 40s. Menopause is right around the corner and time stops for no woman. It is them hinting to you that it is "now or never." It probably won't get a good reaction if you in some way, have failed to complete or do your gendered role.


Not really. I have been hearing the same spiel since I turned 18. It's this idea that, from where I'm from, women should want to be moms. If you deviate from that, you're an oddity. Apply it to men. A man that shows emotions is seen as defective. That's bullshit.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Reformed Houn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 383
Founded: Apr 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Reformed Houn » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:30 pm

Petrasylvania wrote:
Saiwania wrote:Canada so far as I can tell, has that retarded: "Legal to sell sex, illegal to buy sex" standard. Either all sex work should be legal or all of it should be illegal. You can't logically have it both ways.

The Nordic Model, which presumes women can't control themselves so the best way to crack down on prostitution is to punish the demand end of the chain.

Yeah. I think prostitutes should just beat up their pimps collectively. Arm prostitutes.
I'm an illegalist, insurrectionary anarchist, egoist and a turbo-individualist. Positive violence is good
political thing
im a 23 years old chef, thats about it. oh also the USA shouldnt exist

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:30 pm

anyways, we're all probably in agreement that strict gender roles are harmful and should probably go away

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:31 pm

Reformed Houn wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
This is a narrative gynocentric feminism has asserted because of the prejudice of its founders, it is not based in fact, it is merely asserted dogmatically based on an anti-male framework. Study and evidence shows this isn't the case.
Men are lax about enforcing norms around other men.
Women enforce them everywhere.
When you mix the groups, men start enforcing them.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 5711000321

Feminists made these generalizations? Every single one? Sorry if I have a hard time believing that.
Yeah, like I said they get looser. It's just sillying around with the bois. Women face loads more enforcement about what it means to be a woman still, though the women's movement unlike the men's realised long ago that they should combat this.

Yes you've shown me this before and that's what I gathered from it. Men get looser, women tend to stay stressful about their surrounding.


I specified gynocentric feminists. That they appear to have been the principal founders of the movement and massively influenced almost all of its discourse doesn't change things.

Then on what basis do you call it toxic masculinity. Are you suggesting men only behave like men around women? Ridiculous. It's a nonsensical view of the situation.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:31 pm

New Emeline wrote:anyways, we're all probably in agreement that strict gender roles are harmful and should probably go away


I'm down with that. Although the 'classical liberal' types will no doubt take issue.

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:31 pm

Albrenia wrote:The whole 'legal to sell, illegal to buy' shit is moronic, in my opinion.

It also puts sex workers at the mercy of the few willing to obtain their services.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:32 pm

There probably still is a place for gendered roles to exist. It was and probably still will be, crucial to the continued success of our species.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:32 pm

Albrenia wrote:
New Emeline wrote:anyways, we're all probably in agreement that strict gender roles are harmful and should probably go away


I'm down with that. Although the 'classical liberal' types will no doubt take issue.

Why?

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:33 pm

Saiwania wrote:There probably still is a place for gendered roles to exist. It was and probably still will be, crucial to the continued success of our species.


What we need to understand is that gender roles are there for those who feel they want them. They're not something everyone has to subscribe to. They're not a requirement. No one should be subjected to them.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:33 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
It is primarily because realistically speaking, it'll be too late for you to have children when you're in your early to late 40s. Menopause is right around the corner and time stops for no woman. It is them hinting to you that it is "now or never." It probably won't get a good reaction if you in some way, have failed to complete or do your gendered role.


Not really. I have been hearing the same spiel since I turned 18. It's this idea that, from where I'm from, women should want to be moms. If you deviate from that, you're an oddity. Apply it to men. A man that shows emotions is seen as defective. That's bullshit.


It sucks you have to put up with this. It's a significant life decision and the notion of someones couple of sentences changing your mind is ridiculous, the only context it makes sense in is if there's a normalized and concerted effort to wear you down, and it's without consideration for the child in the end as well. Unwanted children and such.

If someone wants kids, they'll have them if they're able.

Do you ever fuck with people on the topic? I'd be tempted to go "You're five words have changed my decades old conviction!"
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:33 pm

New Emeline wrote:
Albrenia wrote:
I'm down with that. Although the 'classical liberal' types will no doubt take issue.

Why?


Because it'll be 'PC gone mad' or 'white genocide destroying our culture' and so on.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:34 pm

I would like to take this back to the incel community. What do you feel can be done to improve your situation?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Reformed Houn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 383
Founded: Apr 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Reformed Houn » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:34 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Reformed Houn wrote:Feminists made these generalizations? Every single one? Sorry if I have a hard time believing that.
Yeah, like I said they get looser. It's just sillying around with the bois. Women face loads more enforcement about what it means to be a woman still, though the women's movement unlike the men's realised long ago that they should combat this.

Yes you've shown me this before and that's what I gathered from it. Men get looser, women tend to stay stressful about their surrounding.


I specified gynocentric feminists. That they appear to have been the principal founders of the movement and massively influenced almost all of its discourse doesn't change things.

Then on what basis do you call it toxic masculinity. Are you suggesting men only behave like men around women? Ridiculous. It's a nonsensical view of the situation.

Well, the terminology atleast. Feminists today rarely cite them for a good reason. They were deeply flawed and extremely selfish.

I'm suggesting it's poisoning masculinity on the basis of "masculinity" as seen by contemporary cultures. Men should behave like whatever the fuck they want to. Men behave like what society has decreed them to be around women because of societal and cultural pressures on men to act that way.
I'm an illegalist, insurrectionary anarchist, egoist and a turbo-individualist. Positive violence is good
political thing
im a 23 years old chef, thats about it. oh also the USA shouldnt exist

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:34 pm

Albrenia wrote:
New Emeline wrote:Why?


Because it'll be 'PC gone mad' or 'white genocide destroying our culture' and so on.

hmmmmm

User avatar
Reformed Houn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 383
Founded: Apr 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Reformed Houn » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:35 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I would like to take this back to the incel community. What do you feel can be done to improve your situation?

Instead of taking down their reddit for the Nth time, schedule therapists.
I'm an illegalist, insurrectionary anarchist, egoist and a turbo-individualist. Positive violence is good
political thing
im a 23 years old chef, thats about it. oh also the USA shouldnt exist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Halberd Savannah, Skelleftella, Spirit of Hope, Verkhoyanska

Advertisement

Remove ads