Saranidia wrote:Frievolk wrote:Pretty hypocritical of you to call me a troll, when your sole and only argument regarding anything you don't like in Islam is denying it exists, going on a "LALALALALA CAN'T HEAR YOU' spree. Not surprising, but still hypocritical.
I want you to stop posting on this thread -or any thread, really- and think for 5 minutes, and try to put the pieces together:
1- "I know of at least five Shia scholars"
2- "a penal code that was derived from one of those opinions"
How many countries do you know with a penal code written based on Shia Islam?
(No need to think. it's Iran, though Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain also have similar laws, or at least similar judicial interpretation of their laws, despite two of them not being Shia countries.
Of course, inb4 we get the "No true Islamsman" fallacy again)
Does it explicitly say "even if the woman is raped"? or something of that nature because I thought that in addition to the death penalty rapists can be forced to pay the victims Mahr.
No, it explicitly says the "Maf'ul" (to use a rather derogatory term here) in a case of Lawaat (homosexual sex) will be executed regardless of whether the act was of his own free will or not (that's literally in the penal code), and similarly, the female in a case of Zina gets whipped (or if its a Muhsen situation, will be punished with Rajm)



