Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol wrote:I want to wish a happy Eid to all the Muslims on NSG.
Thank you, my deist brother
Advertisement
by Jolthig » Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:58 pm
Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol wrote:I want to wish a happy Eid to all the Muslims on NSG.
by Jolthig » Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:00 pm
Alsheb wrote:Jolthig wrote:The reason why I do not reject the authority of the Quran is because the fact that it claims that God has taken unto Himself to be its Guardian. The companions agreed with the arrangement of the Quran by Zaid bin That it. This we agree on.
But with Hadith, all six books of Hadith; not a single one says they're divinely protected.
Ahmadi scholars accept the six authentic books of Hadith, but they take the same views I have on hadith. Mirza Bashirideen Ahmad, who made a Tafsir on the Quran rejected certain Hadith classified as authentic by Sunni scholars.
I suppose we have no common ground on the subject of hadith. So we'll leave it at that?
Interesting. Would it be correct to say the Ahmadis take a similar approach to Hadith as the Zaydis do, being refraining from the Sahih label and instead relying on scrutiny for every single hadith individually?
by Povolzhye Khaganate » Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:03 pm
<Moka> Is it wrong to look at the Khaganate and feel like a disappointed parent... "Where did we go wrong?"
by El Hamidah » Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:51 pm
by Jolthig » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:59 pm
Povolzhye Khaganate wrote:I echo Delta-9 with an Eid Mubarak from the agnostic me, who is one with a lot of respect for Islam and Muslims! It's a beautiful religion, with beautiful culture. Respect from an island so small, that it's not even properly drawn onto the world map I have in my room.
by Geneviev » Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:15 pm
Jolthig wrote:Geneviev wrote:Could I please get a helpful summary of what I missed here? I don't have time to read through. Thanks.
Me returning, a debate between myself and someone on here on Hadith, and Pilarcrafts return as well and his wishing of us of eid Mubarak and criticizing Iran's enforcement of Ramadan
by Alsheb » Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:15 am
by Pilarcraft » Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:19 am
The Shia problem with Aisha is beyond her old enmity with Ali. The Shia are the only people who have a Hadd for 'Sabb-i-Nabi' (insulting the prophet), and Aisha was like, the only one of Muhammad's wives (aside from Khadijja, who's an exception) who openly questioned him when he did something dumb and then hid it behind 'But I'm the prophet!"Alsheb wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Against Ali out of all people (I mean, she kinda had a grudge towards him), hence the primary reason why Shi'as have a negative opinion of her.
Although I have read she and Ali actually mended their differences right before the battle, but their forces still clashed due to infiltrators within her army attacking Ali's troops.
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.
by Western Vale Confederacy » Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:22 am
Pilarcraft wrote:The Shia problem with Aisha is beyond her old enmity with Ali. The Shia are the only people who have a Hadd for 'Sabb-i-Nabi' (insulting the prophet), and Aisha was like, the only one of Muhammad's wives (aside from Khadijja, who's an exception) who openly questioned him when he did something dumb and then hid it behind 'But I'm the prophet!"Alsheb wrote:
Although I have read she and Ali actually mended their differences right before the battle, but their forces still clashed due to infiltrators within her army attacking Ali's troops.
You see this repeated to the cultural enmity between The Banu-Israeil and The Shia (who, for the same reason, hate the Jews too. 'They questioned authority')
by Pilarcraft » Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:31 am
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:The Shia problem with Aisha is beyond her old enmity with Ali. The Shia are the only people who have a Hadd for 'Sabb-i-Nabi' (insulting the prophet), and Aisha was like, the only one of Muhammad's wives (aside from Khadijja, who's an exception) who openly questioned him when he did something dumb and then hid it behind 'But I'm the prophet!"
You see this repeated to the cultural enmity between The Banu-Israeil and The Shia (who, for the same reason, hate the Jews too. 'They questioned authority')
So Shi'as dislike people "questioning authority", even though as a wife, it would be kind of expected that she'd argue with her own husband?
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.
by Alsheb » Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:34 am
Pilarcraft wrote:The Shia problem with Aisha is beyond her old enmity with Ali. The Shia are the only people who have a Hadd for 'Sabb-i-Nabi' (insulting the prophet), and Aisha was like, the only one of Muhammad's wives (aside from Khadijja, who's an exception) who openly questioned him when he did something dumb and then hid it behind 'But I'm the prophet!"Alsheb wrote:
Although I have read she and Ali actually mended their differences right before the battle, but their forces still clashed due to infiltrators within her army attacking Ali's troops.
You see this repeated to the cultural enmity between The Banu-Israeil and The Shia (who, for the same reason, hate the Jews too. 'They questioned authority')
by Pilarcraft » Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:42 am
Tfw the day that Umar (one of the three most important members of the SAHABA) died is literally a Shia religious holiday supported by the IRI Government but "Senpai Khamenei banned cussing The Prophet's companions"Alsheb wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:The Shia problem with Aisha is beyond her old enmity with Ali. The Shia are the only people who have a Hadd for 'Sabb-i-Nabi' (insulting the prophet), and Aisha was like, the only one of Muhammad's wives (aside from Khadijja, who's an exception) who openly questioned him when he did something dumb and then hid it behind 'But I'm the prophet!"
You see this repeated to the cultural enmity between The Banu-Israeil and The Shia (who, for the same reason, hate the Jews too. 'They questioned authority')
That is making a mockery of the fundamental Shia-Sunni disagreement. Especially considering the fact that insulting the companions of the Prophet has been condemned and banned by Imam Khamenei himself.
The Twelvers don't dislike Aisha over her disagreements with the Prophet. They dislike her for her open rebellion against Ali and indirectly empowering Muawiyah.
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.
by Western Vale Confederacy » Sat Jun 16, 2018 6:17 am
Pilarcraft wrote:Tfw the day that Umar (one of the three most important members of the SAHABA) died is literally a Shia religious holiday supported by the IRI Government but "Senpai Khamenei banned cussing The Prophet's companions"Alsheb wrote:
That is making a mockery of the fundamental Shia-Sunni disagreement. Especially considering the fact that insulting the companions of the Prophet has been condemned and banned by Imam Khamenei himself.
The Twelvers don't dislike Aisha over her disagreements with the Prophet. They dislike her for her open rebellion against Ali and indirectly empowering Muawiyah.
The Fundemental Shia-Sunni problem itself started when The Shia faked a Hadith (well, faked the 'meaning' of a Hadith, as the hadith itself is actually Muhiwaater) to cause a bifurcation in Islam's unified face (and then continued to fuck Islam in the ass until modern age, basically screwing all Muslims every time the Muslims were about to get a victory on Europe). Come back when you actually know what The Twelvers hate Aisha for, will you? I'm pretty sure as a person who's been one of them for 18 years, and has had experience dealing with them on a regular basis for even longer, I have a much more accurate understanding than you do.
by Frievolk » Sat Jun 16, 2018 6:57 am
The Reason the Reconquista started was because the Shia sided with a rogue faction to rebel against the Umawids. The Umawids were terrible, sure, but they were still the major faction in the Islamic Civilization at that point.Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:Tfw the day that Umar (one of the three most important members of the SAHABA) died is literally a Shia religious holiday supported by the IRI Government but "Senpai Khamenei banned cussing The Prophet's companions"
The Fundemental Shia-Sunni problem itself started when The Shia faked a Hadith (well, faked the 'meaning' of a Hadith, as the hadith itself is actually Muhiwaater) to cause a bifurcation in Islam's unified face (and then continued to fuck Islam in the ass until modern age, basically screwing all Muslims every time the Muslims were about to get a victory on Europe). Come back when you actually know what The Twelvers hate Aisha for, will you? I'm pretty sure as a person who's been one of them for 18 years, and has had experience dealing with them on a regular basis for even longer, I have a much more accurate understanding than you do.
I'd argue that Islam failing to consolidate in Europe aside from the Iberian Peninsula and the Balkans (and even then, they lost Iberia) is the reason our modern Western world exists.
Then again, had they won at Tours...
♔ The Frievolker Empire || Frievolker Kaiserreik ♔
♔ The Realm in the Sun || De Reik in de Sonne ♔
♔ Led by Kaiser Johann, Part of the Erstwelt ♔
Never forget that the Muslims literally made up a new meaningless name for him when they forgot the name of Adam's Firstborn.
by True Alimeria » Sat Jun 16, 2018 8:40 am
by Salus Maior » Sat Jun 16, 2018 9:13 am
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:Tfw the day that Umar (one of the three most important members of the SAHABA) died is literally a Shia religious holiday supported by the IRI Government but "Senpai Khamenei banned cussing The Prophet's companions"
The Fundemental Shia-Sunni problem itself started when The Shia faked a Hadith (well, faked the 'meaning' of a Hadith, as the hadith itself is actually Muhiwaater) to cause a bifurcation in Islam's unified face (and then continued to fuck Islam in the ass until modern age, basically screwing all Muslims every time the Muslims were about to get a victory on Europe). Come back when you actually know what The Twelvers hate Aisha for, will you? I'm pretty sure as a person who's been one of them for 18 years, and has had experience dealing with them on a regular basis for even longer, I have a much more accurate understanding than you do.
I'd argue that Islam failing to consolidate in Europe aside from the Iberian Peninsula and the Balkans (and even then, they lost Iberia) is the reason our modern Western world exists.
Then again, had they won at Tours...
by Internationalist Bastard » Sat Jun 16, 2018 9:50 am
by Aulus Maximus » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:13 am
Pilarcraft wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
So Shi'as dislike people "questioning authority", even though as a wife, it would be kind of expected that she'd argue with her own husband?
I can't answer for the Sunnis (I'm not a sunni and don't know enough about their more subtle cultural elements in Islam) but The Shia basically don't believe in any form of questioning authority. It kind of goes against their very nature (and boy was this a troubling thing for me to learn as a 14 year old with growing skeptic tendencies asking questions in my religious class)
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:The Shia problem with Aisha is beyond her old enmity with Ali. The Shia are the only people who have a Hadd for 'Sabb-i-Nabi' (insulting the prophet), and Aisha was like, the only one of Muhammad's wives (aside from Khadijja, who's an exception) who openly questioned him when he did something dumb and then hid it behind 'But I'm the prophet!"
You see this repeated to the cultural enmity between The Banu-Israeil and The Shia (who, for the same reason, hate the Jews too. 'They questioned authority')
So Shi'as dislike people "questioning authority", even though as a wife, it would be kind of expected that she'd argue with her own husband?
by Frievolk » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:19 am
Please. Hussayn Ibn Ali was as far from a protest and questioning of authority as anything can be. It was just one pretender to the throne of the Caliphate challenging another. Hussayn was the pretender to Ali's throne and did not recognize Muawiyye's decision to let Yazid Success him. Whether or not his cause was just is another topic, but it was in no way a form of questioning authority in the form I am talking about.Aulus Maximus wrote:I disagree. Zaydis for example demand to remove an unjust leader. One could say that the actions of Hussayn ibn Ali for example also is a form of questioning authority, if not simply demanding its removal.
But then again there are teachers who don't like specific questions, usually because they do not know the answer and are too proud to admit that. I see it with colleagues and sometimes myself as well (middle school teacher in religion and philosophy here)..
♔ The Frievolker Empire || Frievolker Kaiserreik ♔
♔ The Realm in the Sun || De Reik in de Sonne ♔
♔ Led by Kaiser Johann, Part of the Erstwelt ♔
Never forget that the Muslims literally made up a new meaningless name for him when they forgot the name of Adam's Firstborn.
by Khataiy » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:22 am
Pilarcraft wrote:Tfw the day that Umar (one of the three most important members of the SAHABA) died is literally a Shia religious holiday supported by the IRI Government but "Senpai Khamenei banned cussing The Prophet's companions"Alsheb wrote:
That is making a mockery of the fundamental Shia-Sunni disagreement. Especially considering the fact that insulting the companions of the Prophet has been condemned and banned by Imam Khamenei himself.
The Twelvers don't dislike Aisha over her disagreements with the Prophet. They dislike her for her open rebellion against Ali and indirectly empowering Muawiyah.
The Fundemental Shia-Sunni problem itself started when The Shia faked a Hadith (well, faked the 'meaning' of a Hadith, as the hadith itself is actually Muhiwaater) to cause a bifurcation in Islam's unified face (and then continued to fuck Islam in the ass until modern age, basically screwing all Muslims every time the Muslims were about to get a victory on Europe). Come back when you actually know what The Twelvers hate Aisha for, will you? I'm pretty sure as a person who's been one of them for 18 years, and has had experience dealing with them on a regular basis for even longer, I have a much more accurate understanding than you do.
by Khataiy » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:23 am
True Alimeria wrote:I know that sounds a little weird,
but could someone please write a Latin translation
for the Surah El-Fatiha for me? (use Deus for Allah please)
Just wanna know how it looks like.
Thanks in advance!
by Aulus Maximus » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:23 am
Frievolk wrote:Please. Hussayn Ibn Ali was as far from a protest and questioning of authority as anything can be. It was just one pretender to the throne of the Caliphate challenging another. Hussayn was the pretender to Ali's throne and did not recognize Muawiyye's decision to let Yazid Success him. Whether or not his cause was just is another topic, but it was in no way a form of questioning authority in the form I am talking about.
Frievolk wrote:And I'm not sure about Zaydis, since I'm not one, but I have been a shia for a long time and I can say that the Shia have the tendency to anti-republicanism and a view of "The Caliph is The Representative of God on Earth (Zallullah, meaning "Shadow of God") and therefore not questioned by anyone. Of course, that only worked for the ones they had given the title to but that's more of a hypocrisy thing than anything.
by True Alimeria » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:25 am
Khataiy wrote:True Alimeria wrote:I know that sounds a little weird,
but could someone please write a Latin translation
for the Surah El-Fatiha for me? (use Deus for Allah please)
Just wanna know how it looks like.
Thanks in advance!
Bismillah Irahman Iraheem
Alhamdulillahi Rab al Ala'meen Maliki Yawm id Deen
Ihdin as sirahtul mustaqeen
Siratul ladheen am amta alayhim
Ghayrilmakhidoobi alayhim walladhaaaaleen
by Khataiy » Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:26 am
Aulus Maximus wrote:Eid Mubarak everyone
Wa iyyaq ya akhi.Pilarcraft wrote:I can't answer for the Sunnis (I'm not a sunni and don't know enough about their more subtle cultural elements in Islam) but The Shia basically don't believe in any form of questioning authority. It kind of goes against their very nature (and boy was this a troubling thing for me to learn as a 14 year old with growing skeptic tendencies asking questions in my religious class)
I disagree. Zaydis for example demand to remove an unjust leader. One could say that the actions of Hussayn ibn Ali for example also is a form of questioning authority, if not simply demanding its removal.
But then again there are teachers who don't like specific questions, usually because they do not know the answer and are too proud to admit that. I see it with colleagues and sometimes myself as well (middle school teacher in religion and philosophy here).Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
So Shi'as dislike people "questioning authority", even though as a wife, it would be kind of expected that she'd argue with her own husband?
That's a gross generalization of Shias in general.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: ARIsyan-, Eahland, Google [Bot], Ineva, Kannap, Kostane, New Temecula, Oceanic Socialist Republics, Port Myreal, Rusozak, Rusza, Siluvia, South Neviersia, Statesburg, The Two Jerseys, The Vooperian Union, Trollgaard, Verkhoyanska, Zantalio
Advertisement