NATION

PASSWORD

The Islamic Discussion Thread ٤: It's Always Sunni In Arabia

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What denomination of Islam are you part of?

Sunni Islam
121
30%
Sunni Islam (Salafism)
16
4%
Shia Islam
29
7%
Quranist
9
2%
Ahmadiyya
4
1%
Zaydi
8
2%
Ibadist
4
1%
Sufism
22
6%
I do not ascribe to any sect, just call me a Muslim
68
17%
Other
118
30%
 
Total votes : 399

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu May 31, 2018 1:10 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:I like how there's an openly racist guy here even though his religion would forbid it.


Racist? Why would you call me that? I don't remember saying anywhere that a race is superior to others.

Look at your own sig, my cracka

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:10 am

Napkiraly wrote:>When Muhammad is described as white af


False. Muhammad SAWS is described as dark-skinned.

Al-Tirmidhī (d. 279/892) in his Jami’ al-Ṣāḥīḥ reports on the authority of the famous Companion of the Prophet, Anas b. Malik:

“The Messenger of Allah was of medium stature, neither tall nor short, [with] a beautiful, dark brown-complexioned body (ḥasan al-jism asmar al-lawn). His hair was neither curly nor completely straight and when he walked he leant forward.” (VI:69 no. 1754)

Ibn Manzur reports in his Lisān al-arab (s.v. سمر IV:376) that

“al-sumra [is] a degree between white (al-bayād) and black (al-aswad), and it is that in the context of human complexions, camels, etc.”

According to Ibn Athīr, al-sumra’s ‘blackness’ predominates over its ‘whiteness’ (al-sumra alladhī yaghlibu sawāduhu alā bayādihi), and al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390) reports in his al-Tahdhīd:

‘al-sumra…is a color inclining to a faint blackness (sawadin khafiyin), as in the description of the Prophet: he was brown complexioned (kāna asmar al-lawn)…”

Asmar/sumra is thus a shade of black. Linguistic scholar Abū Mansūr al-Tha’labī (d. 427/1036), enumerating the different “classifications of human blackness (fī tartīb sawād al-insān),” explains:

“if his maximum [blackness] (alāhu) is less than sawad (black), then he is asmar (brown). If his blackness is greater with yellow enhancing it then he is aṣham. If his blackness exceeds al-sumra then he is ādam. If it exceeds that, then it is asḥam. If his blackness is intense, then he is adlam. [Fiqh al-lugha, 82]

This suggests a hierarchy of intensifying blackness: asmar / sumra → sawad/ādam → aṣham → asḥam → adlam. It also implies that, while at the bottom of the hierarchy, asmar / sumra still falls within the category ‘black’. The Prophet Muhammad, according to a number of reports, was asmar.


and Arabs and turks consider themselves white (especially in their own countries)


Some stupid ultranationalist Turks, (mostly secularists, wannabe westerners and admirers of the accursed Ataturk) describe themselves white, but not all of them. I am of Azeri Turkish background.

As for Arabs, that's simply plain false. I have yet to meet an Arab who considers himself white, and if he did, I'm sure they would laugh at him day and night in his country.
Last edited by United States of Oceania on Thu May 31, 2018 1:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:11 am

Napkiraly wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
Racist? Why would you call me that? I don't remember saying anywhere that a race is superior to others.

Look at your own sig, my cracka


My sig doesn't support racial superiority, are you even literate dude?
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
Tebuh
Envoy
 
Posts: 207
Founded: May 04, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Tebuh » Thu May 31, 2018 1:12 am

Image

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu May 31, 2018 1:13 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Look at your own sig, my cracka


My sig doesn't support racial superiority, are you even literate dude?
Anti-White people cracka what do you think that is

User avatar
Negarakita
Diplomat
 
Posts: 902
Founded: Aug 29, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Negarakita » Thu May 31, 2018 1:14 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:>When Muhammad is described as white af


False. Muhammad SAWS is described as dark-skinned.

Al-Tirmidhī (d. 279/892) in his Jami’ al-Ṣāḥīḥ reports on the authority of the famous Companion of the Prophet, Anas b. Malik:

“The Messenger of Allah was of medium stature, neither tall nor short, [with] a beautiful, dark brown-complexioned body (ḥasan al-jism asmar al-lawn). His hair was neither curly nor completely straight and when he walked he leant forward.” (VI:69 no. 1754)

Ibn Manzur reports in his Lisān al-arab (s.v. سمر IV:376) that

“al-sumra [is] a degree between white (al-bayād) and black (al-aswad), and it is that in the context of human complexions, camels, etc.”

According to Ibn Athīr, al-sumra’s ‘blackness’ predominates over its ‘whiteness’ (al-sumra alladhī yaghlibu sawāduhu alā bayādihi), and al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390) reports in his al-Tahdhīd:

‘al-sumra…is a color inclining to a faint blackness (sawadin khafiyin), as in the description of the Prophet: he was brown complexioned (kāna asmar al-lawn)…”

Asmar/sumra is thus a shade of black. Linguistic scholar Abū Mansūr al-Tha’labī (d. 427/1036), enumerating the different “classifications of human blackness (fī tartīb sawād al-insān),” explains:

“if his maximum [blackness] (alāhu) is less than sawad (black), then he is asmar (brown). If his blackness is greater with yellow enhancing it then he is aṣham. If his blackness exceeds al-sumra then he is ādam. If it exceeds that, then it is asḥam. If his blackness is intense, then he is adlam. [Fiqh al-lugha, 82]

This suggests a hierarchy of intensifying blackness: asmar / sumra → sawad/ādam → aṣham → asḥam → adlam. It also implies that, while at the bottom of the hierarchy, asmar / sumra still falls within the category ‘black’. The Prophet Muhammad, according to a number of reports, was asmar.


and Arabs and turks consider themselves white (especially in their own countries)


Some stupid ultranationalist Turks, (mostly secularists, wannabe westerners and admirers of the accursed Ataturk) describe themselves white, but not all of them. I am of Azeri Turkish background.

As for Arabs, that's simply plain false. I have yet to meet an Arab who considers himself white, and if we did, I'm sure they would laugh at him day and night in his country.

The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a) was reported to have said:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ

O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no virtue of an Arab over a foreigner nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness (Taqwa). Have I not delivered the message? [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 22978].

Also, he (s.a.w.a) said:

انْظُرْ فَإِنَّكَ لَيْسَ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْ أَحْمَرَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ إِلَّا أَنْ تَفْضُلَهُ بِتَقْوَى

“Behold! Verily, there is no good in red skin or black skin, but rather only by virtue of righteousness”. [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 20885].

I too can quote scripture to validate my beliefs.
Muslim revert, supporting wasatiyyah for a true and moderate expression of our faith. Political centrist.

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:14 am

Tebuh wrote:


You can't bring that shaytaan as an example, because:

1) Syrians are half-Assyrians, not 100% Arabs.

2) That Ass-head pig has some Persian origin (from Isfahan).

3) Alawites are not Arabs, they are genetically more similar to Europeans.
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:15 am

Negarakita wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
False. Muhammad SAWS is described as dark-skinned.

Al-Tirmidhī (d. 279/892) in his Jami’ al-Ṣāḥīḥ reports on the authority of the famous Companion of the Prophet, Anas b. Malik:

“The Messenger of Allah was of medium stature, neither tall nor short, [with] a beautiful, dark brown-complexioned body (ḥasan al-jism asmar al-lawn). His hair was neither curly nor completely straight and when he walked he leant forward.” (VI:69 no. 1754)

Ibn Manzur reports in his Lisān al-arab (s.v. سمر IV:376) that

“al-sumra [is] a degree between white (al-bayād) and black (al-aswad), and it is that in the context of human complexions, camels, etc.”

According to Ibn Athīr, al-sumra’s ‘blackness’ predominates over its ‘whiteness’ (al-sumra alladhī yaghlibu sawāduhu alā bayādihi), and al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390) reports in his al-Tahdhīd:

‘al-sumra…is a color inclining to a faint blackness (sawadin khafiyin), as in the description of the Prophet: he was brown complexioned (kāna asmar al-lawn)…”

Asmar/sumra is thus a shade of black. Linguistic scholar Abū Mansūr al-Tha’labī (d. 427/1036), enumerating the different “classifications of human blackness (fī tartīb sawād al-insān),” explains:

“if his maximum [blackness] (alāhu) is less than sawad (black), then he is asmar (brown). If his blackness is greater with yellow enhancing it then he is aṣham. If his blackness exceeds al-sumra then he is ādam. If it exceeds that, then it is asḥam. If his blackness is intense, then he is adlam. [Fiqh al-lugha, 82]

This suggests a hierarchy of intensifying blackness: asmar / sumra → sawad/ādam → aṣham → asḥam → adlam. It also implies that, while at the bottom of the hierarchy, asmar / sumra still falls within the category ‘black’. The Prophet Muhammad, according to a number of reports, was asmar.




Some stupid ultranationalist Turks, (mostly secularists, wannabe westerners and admirers of the accursed Ataturk) describe themselves white, but not all of them. I am of Azeri Turkish background.

As for Arabs, that's simply plain false. I have yet to meet an Arab who considers himself white, and if we did, I'm sure they would laugh at him day and night in his country.

The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a) was reported to have said:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ

O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no virtue of an Arab over a foreigner nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness (Taqwa). Have I not delivered the message? [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 22978].

Also, he (s.a.w.a) said:

انْظُرْ فَإِنَّكَ لَيْسَ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْ أَحْمَرَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ إِلَّا أَنْ تَفْضُلَهُ بِتَقْوَى

“Behold! Verily, there is no good in red skin or black skin, but rather only by virtue of righteousness”. [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 20885].

I too can quote scripture to validate my beliefs.


I'm not a supremacist.
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 63
Founded: May 30, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas » Thu May 31, 2018 1:15 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Tebuh wrote:


You can't bring that shaytaan as an example, because:

1) Syrians are half-Assyrians, not 100% Arabs.

2) That Ass-head pig has some Persian origin (from Isfahan).

3) Alawites are not Arabs, they are genetically more similar to Europeans.

Woah, be careful not to cut yourself with that amount of edge.
EDERATION O ISLAMIC TRIBAL AREAS
ا ت ح ا د   ا ل م ن ا ط ق   ا ل ق ب ل ي ة   ا ل إ س ل ا م ي ة


The FITA, an independent federation of Islamic Arab tribes.
WIP
The Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas
Population: TBD
Capital: TBD
Area: ??? km²

User avatar
Tebuh
Envoy
 
Posts: 207
Founded: May 04, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Tebuh » Thu May 31, 2018 1:15 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Tebuh wrote:


You can't bring that shaytaan as an example, because:

1) Syrians are half-Assyrians, not 100% Arabs.

2) That Ass-head pig has some Persian origin (from Isfahan).

3) Alawites are not Arabs, they are genetically more similar to Europeans.

Wew lad

User avatar
Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 63
Founded: May 30, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas » Thu May 31, 2018 1:18 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Negarakita wrote:The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a) was reported to have said:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ

O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no virtue of an Arab over a foreigner nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness (Taqwa). Have I not delivered the message? [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 22978].

Also, he (s.a.w.a) said:

انْظُرْ فَإِنَّكَ لَيْسَ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْ أَحْمَرَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ إِلَّا أَنْ تَفْضُلَهُ بِتَقْوَى

“Behold! Verily, there is no good in red skin or black skin, but rather only by virtue of righteousness”. [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 20885].

I too can quote scripture to validate my beliefs.


I'm not a supremacist.


>I'm not a supermacist

AGAINST: White people


:eyebrow:
EDERATION O ISLAMIC TRIBAL AREAS
ا ت ح ا د   ا ل م ن ا ط ق   ا ل ق ب ل ي ة   ا ل إ س ل ا م ي ة


The FITA, an independent federation of Islamic Arab tribes.
WIP
The Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas
Population: TBD
Capital: TBD
Area: ??? km²

User avatar
Negarakita
Diplomat
 
Posts: 902
Founded: Aug 29, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Negarakita » Thu May 31, 2018 1:18 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Negarakita wrote:The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a) was reported to have said:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ

O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no virtue of an Arab over a foreigner nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness (Taqwa). Have I not delivered the message? [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 22978].

Also, he (s.a.w.a) said:

انْظُرْ فَإِنَّكَ لَيْسَ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْ أَحْمَرَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ إِلَّا أَنْ تَفْضُلَهُ بِتَقْوَى

“Behold! Verily, there is no good in red skin or black skin, but rather only by virtue of righteousness”. [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 20885].

I too can quote scripture to validate my beliefs.


I'm not a supremacist.

Hitler wasn't a supremacist he just hated the non-aryans.

I mean, I'm white, I have no great love of this race and in many ways dislike it, both aesthetically and historically, but I can't change it. I don't want to be hated because of something Allah has given me, for it wasn't my own choice. Allah had a prupose when he gave me this skin, and you shouldn't hate his works. By all means, hate the achievements of my race. But not it, for it is his work not ours.
Muslim revert, supporting wasatiyyah for a true and moderate expression of our faith. Political centrist.

User avatar
Pilarcraft
Senator
 
Posts: 3826
Founded: Dec 19, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilarcraft » Thu May 31, 2018 1:20 am

Martune wrote:Opinions on the mystical "sufism"

There are some traditions in some forms of Sufism I find hilariously dumb, but I still prefer them to Orthodox Islam
The Confederal Alliance of Pilarcraft ✺ That world will cease to be
Led by The Triumvirate.
OOC | Military | History |Language | Overview | Parties | Q&A | Factbooks
Proud Civic Persian Nationalist
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:21 am

Negarakita wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
I'm not a supremacist.

Hitler wasn't a supremacist he just hated the non-aryans.

I mean, I'm white, I have no great love of this race and in many ways dislike it, both aesthetically and historically, but I can't change it. I don't want to be hated because of something Allah has given me, for it wasn't my own choice. Allah had a prupose when he gave me this skin, and you shouldn't hate his works. By all means, hate the achievements of my race. But not it, for it is his work not ours.


Look, when I say "White People" I don't really mean the skin color, I actually mean Western White Civilization.

I have nothing against Whites as individuals, I have many white friends.
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
Pilarcraft
Senator
 
Posts: 3826
Founded: Dec 19, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilarcraft » Thu May 31, 2018 1:21 am

Tebuh wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
You can't bring that shaytaan as an example, because:

1) Syrians are half-Assyrians, not 100% Arabs.

2) That Ass-head pig has some Persian origin (from Isfahan).

3) Alawites are not Arabs, they are genetically more similar to Europeans.

Wew lad

He's not wrong in that most Alawites are Indo-Persian, which is closer to Caucasian (they're both Indo-European) than Semite.
Tho, Alawite is a sect in Islam, and not an ethnicity in the first place lol
Last edited by Pilarcraft on Thu May 31, 2018 1:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Confederal Alliance of Pilarcraft ✺ That world will cease to be
Led by The Triumvirate.
OOC | Military | History |Language | Overview | Parties | Q&A | Factbooks
Proud Civic Persian Nationalist
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

User avatar
Tebuh
Envoy
 
Posts: 207
Founded: May 04, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Tebuh » Thu May 31, 2018 1:21 am

Pilarcraft wrote:
Martune wrote:Opinions on the mystical "sufism"

There are some traditions in some forms of Sufism I find hilariously dumb, but I still prefer them to Orthodox Islam

Such as?

User avatar
Tebuh
Envoy
 
Posts: 207
Founded: May 04, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Tebuh » Thu May 31, 2018 1:22 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Negarakita wrote:Hitler wasn't a supremacist he just hated the non-aryans.

I mean, I'm white, I have no great love of this race and in many ways dislike it, both aesthetically and historically, but I can't change it. I don't want to be hated because of something Allah has given me, for it wasn't my own choice. Allah had a prupose when he gave me this skin, and you shouldn't hate his works. By all means, hate the achievements of my race. But not it, for it is his work not ours.


Look, when I say "White People" I don't really mean the skin color, I actually mean Western White Civilization.

I have nothing against Whites as individuals, I have many white friends.

Maybe you should have that instead of white people?

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:24 am

Tebuh wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
Look, when I say "White People" I don't really mean the skin color, I actually mean Western White Civilization.

I have nothing against Whites as individuals, I have many white friends.

Maybe you should have that instead of white people?


It's not triggering enough for Alt-Righters.
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
Pilarcraft
Senator
 
Posts: 3826
Founded: Dec 19, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilarcraft » Thu May 31, 2018 1:24 am

Tebuh wrote:
Pilarcraft wrote:There are some traditions in some forms of Sufism I find hilariously dumb, but I still prefer them to Orthodox Islam

Such as?
Their Idea of Living Religion (Most of them have a Qutb, so to speak, that they see as a pseudo-prophet in charge of religion). Which is mostly because I see clergy as a stupid concept in the first place.
The Confederal Alliance of Pilarcraft ✺ That world will cease to be
Led by The Triumvirate.
OOC | Military | History |Language | Overview | Parties | Q&A | Factbooks
Proud Civic Persian Nationalist
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

User avatar
Negarakita
Diplomat
 
Posts: 902
Founded: Aug 29, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Negarakita » Thu May 31, 2018 1:25 am

Tebuh wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
Look, when I say "White People" I don't really mean the skin color, I actually mean Western White Civilization.

I have nothing against Whites as individuals, I have many white friends.

Maybe you should have that instead of white people?

Yeah might be a good idea. Its like someone putting 'I hate muslims" instead of "I hate the small minority of a huge group who commit violent acts".
Muslim revert, supporting wasatiyyah for a true and moderate expression of our faith. Political centrist.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu May 31, 2018 1:35 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Negarakita wrote:Hitler wasn't a supremacist he just hated the non-aryans.

I mean, I'm white, I have no great love of this race and in many ways dislike it, both aesthetically and historically, but I can't change it. I don't want to be hated because of something Allah has given me, for it wasn't my own choice. Allah had a prupose when he gave me this skin, and you shouldn't hate his works. By all means, hate the achievements of my race. But not it, for it is his work not ours.


Look, when I say "White People" I don't really mean the skin color, I actually mean Western White Civilization.

I have nothing against Whites as individuals, I have many white friends.

"Listen when I say I hate black people, I really mean black culture. I have many black friends."

User avatar
Sahansahiye Iran
Minister
 
Posts: 2386
Founded: May 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Sahansahiye Iran » Thu May 31, 2018 1:39 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Tebuh wrote:Maybe you should have that instead of white people?


It's not triggering enough for Alt-Righters.

You mean triggering enough for rational people who find the concept of being against someone because of their ethnicity to be stupid?
Last edited by Sahansahiye Iran on Thu May 31, 2018 1:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
User formerly known as United Islamic Commonwealth and al-Ismailiyya.
Also known as Khosrow, Zarhust, or Lanian Empire.
Praetorian Prefect of EMN
Senator of EMN
Legatus of the Marian Legion
Integrator of EMN
A GCR Supreme General of the Contrarians
Iranian civic/cultural nationalist
Monarchist
Zoroastrian

User avatar
United States of Oceania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 562
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:41 am

Sahansahiye Iran wrote:
United States of Oceania wrote:
It's not triggering enough for Alt-Righters.

You mean triggering enough for rational people who find the concept of being against someone because of their ethnicity stupid?


I want to specifically trigger Alt-Righters, if others get triggered as well it's just collateral damage
PRO: Islam, Islamic Government, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Socialism

AGAINST: United States, Russia, Iran, Europe, Israel, White People, Christianity, Capitalism, Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, Secularism, Assad, Shi'ism, Sufism

User avatar
Azadistan-land of the free
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1552
Founded: May 01, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Azadistan-land of the free » Thu May 31, 2018 1:42 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Sahansahiye Iran wrote:You mean triggering enough for rational people who find the concept of being against someone because of their ethnicity stupid?


I want to specifically trigger Alt-Righters, if others get triggered as well it's just collateral damage

Could be fair enough on the other hand don't end up like America lol

User avatar
Sahansahiye Iran
Minister
 
Posts: 2386
Founded: May 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Sahansahiye Iran » Thu May 31, 2018 1:46 am

United States of Oceania wrote:
Sahansahiye Iran wrote:You mean triggering enough for rational people who find the concept of being against someone because of their ethnicity stupid?


I want to specifically trigger Alt-Righters, if others get triggered as well it's just collateral damage

Yeah. At this point, I'm just gonna go ahead and toss you on the ignore list. It's gotten beyond ridiculous.
User formerly known as United Islamic Commonwealth and al-Ismailiyya.
Also known as Khosrow, Zarhust, or Lanian Empire.
Praetorian Prefect of EMN
Senator of EMN
Legatus of the Marian Legion
Integrator of EMN
A GCR Supreme General of the Contrarians
Iranian civic/cultural nationalist
Monarchist
Zoroastrian

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Drop Your Pants, Thermodolia

Advertisement

Remove ads