Look at your own sig, my cracka
Advertisement

by United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:10 am
Napkiraly wrote:>When Muhammad is described as white af
and Arabs and turks consider themselves white (especially in their own countries)

by United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:11 am

by Negarakita » Thu May 31, 2018 1:14 am
United States of Oceania wrote:Napkiraly wrote:>When Muhammad is described as white af
False. Muhammad SAWS is described as dark-skinned.
Al-Tirmidhī (d. 279/892) in his Jami’ al-Ṣāḥīḥ reports on the authority of the famous Companion of the Prophet, Anas b. Malik:
“The Messenger of Allah was of medium stature, neither tall nor short, [with] a beautiful, dark brown-complexioned body (ḥasan al-jism asmar al-lawn). His hair was neither curly nor completely straight and when he walked he leant forward.” (VI:69 no. 1754)
Ibn Manzur reports in his Lisān al-arab (s.v. سمر IV:376) that
“al-sumra [is] a degree between white (al-bayād) and black (al-aswad), and it is that in the context of human complexions, camels, etc.”
According to Ibn Athīr, al-sumra’s ‘blackness’ predominates over its ‘whiteness’ (al-sumra alladhī yaghlibu sawāduhu alā bayādihi), and al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390) reports in his al-Tahdhīd:
‘al-sumra…is a color inclining to a faint blackness (sawadin khafiyin), as in the description of the Prophet: he was brown complexioned (kāna asmar al-lawn)…”
Asmar/sumra is thus a shade of black. Linguistic scholar Abū Mansūr al-Tha’labī (d. 427/1036), enumerating the different “classifications of human blackness (fī tartīb sawād al-insān),” explains:
“if his maximum [blackness] (alāhu) is less than sawad (black), then he is asmar (brown). If his blackness is greater with yellow enhancing it then he is aṣham. If his blackness exceeds al-sumra then he is ādam. If it exceeds that, then it is asḥam. If his blackness is intense, then he is adlam. [Fiqh al-lugha, 82]
This suggests a hierarchy of intensifying blackness: asmar / sumra → sawad/ādam → aṣham → asḥam → adlam. It also implies that, while at the bottom of the hierarchy, asmar / sumra still falls within the category ‘black’. The Prophet Muhammad, according to a number of reports, was asmar.and Arabs and turks consider themselves white (especially in their own countries)
Some stupid ultranationalist Turks, (mostly secularists, wannabe westerners and admirers of the accursed Ataturk) describe themselves white, but not all of them. I am of Azeri Turkish background.
As for Arabs, that's simply plain false. I have yet to meet an Arab who considers himself white, and if we did, I'm sure they would laugh at him day and night in his country.

by United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:14 am

by United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:15 am
Negarakita wrote:United States of Oceania wrote:
False. Muhammad SAWS is described as dark-skinned.
Al-Tirmidhī (d. 279/892) in his Jami’ al-Ṣāḥīḥ reports on the authority of the famous Companion of the Prophet, Anas b. Malik:
“The Messenger of Allah was of medium stature, neither tall nor short, [with] a beautiful, dark brown-complexioned body (ḥasan al-jism asmar al-lawn). His hair was neither curly nor completely straight and when he walked he leant forward.” (VI:69 no. 1754)
Ibn Manzur reports in his Lisān al-arab (s.v. سمر IV:376) that
“al-sumra [is] a degree between white (al-bayād) and black (al-aswad), and it is that in the context of human complexions, camels, etc.”
According to Ibn Athīr, al-sumra’s ‘blackness’ predominates over its ‘whiteness’ (al-sumra alladhī yaghlibu sawāduhu alā bayādihi), and al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390) reports in his al-Tahdhīd:
‘al-sumra…is a color inclining to a faint blackness (sawadin khafiyin), as in the description of the Prophet: he was brown complexioned (kāna asmar al-lawn)…”
Asmar/sumra is thus a shade of black. Linguistic scholar Abū Mansūr al-Tha’labī (d. 427/1036), enumerating the different “classifications of human blackness (fī tartīb sawād al-insān),” explains:
“if his maximum [blackness] (alāhu) is less than sawad (black), then he is asmar (brown). If his blackness is greater with yellow enhancing it then he is aṣham. If his blackness exceeds al-sumra then he is ādam. If it exceeds that, then it is asḥam. If his blackness is intense, then he is adlam. [Fiqh al-lugha, 82]
This suggests a hierarchy of intensifying blackness: asmar / sumra → sawad/ādam → aṣham → asḥam → adlam. It also implies that, while at the bottom of the hierarchy, asmar / sumra still falls within the category ‘black’. The Prophet Muhammad, according to a number of reports, was asmar.
Some stupid ultranationalist Turks, (mostly secularists, wannabe westerners and admirers of the accursed Ataturk) describe themselves white, but not all of them. I am of Azeri Turkish background.
As for Arabs, that's simply plain false. I have yet to meet an Arab who considers himself white, and if we did, I'm sure they would laugh at him day and night in his country.
The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a) was reported to have said:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ
O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no virtue of an Arab over a foreigner nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness (Taqwa). Have I not delivered the message? [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 22978].
Also, he (s.a.w.a) said:
انْظُرْ فَإِنَّكَ لَيْسَ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْ أَحْمَرَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ إِلَّا أَنْ تَفْضُلَهُ بِتَقْوَى
“Behold! Verily, there is no good in red skin or black skin, but rather only by virtue of righteousness”. [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 20885].
I too can quote scripture to validate my beliefs.

by Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas » Thu May 31, 2018 1:15 am
WIP
The Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas
Population: TBD
Capital: TBD
Area: ??? km²

by Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas » Thu May 31, 2018 1:18 am
United States of Oceania wrote:Negarakita wrote:The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a) was reported to have said:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ
O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no virtue of an Arab over a foreigner nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness (Taqwa). Have I not delivered the message? [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 22978].
Also, he (s.a.w.a) said:
انْظُرْ فَإِنَّكَ لَيْسَ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْ أَحْمَرَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ إِلَّا أَنْ تَفْضُلَهُ بِتَقْوَى
“Behold! Verily, there is no good in red skin or black skin, but rather only by virtue of righteousness”. [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 20885].
I too can quote scripture to validate my beliefs.
I'm not a supremacist.
AGAINST: White people

WIP
The Federation of Islamic Tribal Areas
Population: TBD
Capital: TBD
Area: ??? km²

by Negarakita » Thu May 31, 2018 1:18 am
United States of Oceania wrote:Negarakita wrote:The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a) was reported to have said:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى أَبَلَّغْتُ
O people, your Lord is one and your father Adam is one. There is no virtue of an Arab over a foreigner nor a foreigner over an Arab, and neither white skin over black skin nor black skin over white skin, except by righteousness (Taqwa). Have I not delivered the message? [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 22978].
Also, he (s.a.w.a) said:
انْظُرْ فَإِنَّكَ لَيْسَ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْ أَحْمَرَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ إِلَّا أَنْ تَفْضُلَهُ بِتَقْوَى
“Behold! Verily, there is no good in red skin or black skin, but rather only by virtue of righteousness”. [Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 20885].
I too can quote scripture to validate my beliefs.
I'm not a supremacist.

by Pilarcraft » Thu May 31, 2018 1:20 am
Martune wrote:Opinions on the mystical "sufism"
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

by United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:21 am
Negarakita wrote:United States of Oceania wrote:
I'm not a supremacist.
Hitler wasn't a supremacist he just hated the non-aryans.
I mean, I'm white, I have no great love of this race and in many ways dislike it, both aesthetically and historically, but I can't change it. I don't want to be hated because of something Allah has given me, for it wasn't my own choice. Allah had a prupose when he gave me this skin, and you shouldn't hate his works. By all means, hate the achievements of my race. But not it, for it is his work not ours.

by Pilarcraft » Thu May 31, 2018 1:21 am
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

by Tebuh » Thu May 31, 2018 1:22 am
United States of Oceania wrote:Negarakita wrote:Hitler wasn't a supremacist he just hated the non-aryans.
I mean, I'm white, I have no great love of this race and in many ways dislike it, both aesthetically and historically, but I can't change it. I don't want to be hated because of something Allah has given me, for it wasn't my own choice. Allah had a prupose when he gave me this skin, and you shouldn't hate his works. By all means, hate the achievements of my race. But not it, for it is his work not ours.
Look, when I say "White People" I don't really mean the skin color, I actually mean Western White Civilization.
I have nothing against Whites as individuals, I have many white friends.

by United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:24 am

by Pilarcraft » Thu May 31, 2018 1:24 am
Their Idea of Living Religion (Most of them have a Qutb, so to speak, that they see as a pseudo-prophet in charge of religion). Which is mostly because I see clergy as a stupid concept in the first place.
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

by Negarakita » Thu May 31, 2018 1:25 am

by Napkiraly » Thu May 31, 2018 1:35 am
United States of Oceania wrote:Negarakita wrote:Hitler wasn't a supremacist he just hated the non-aryans.
I mean, I'm white, I have no great love of this race and in many ways dislike it, both aesthetically and historically, but I can't change it. I don't want to be hated because of something Allah has given me, for it wasn't my own choice. Allah had a prupose when he gave me this skin, and you shouldn't hate his works. By all means, hate the achievements of my race. But not it, for it is his work not ours.
Look, when I say "White People" I don't really mean the skin color, I actually mean Western White Civilization.
I have nothing against Whites as individuals, I have many white friends.

by Sahansahiye Iran » Thu May 31, 2018 1:39 am

by United States of Oceania » Thu May 31, 2018 1:41 am

by Azadistan-land of the free » Thu May 31, 2018 1:42 am

by Sahansahiye Iran » Thu May 31, 2018 1:46 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Drop Your Pants, Thermodolia
Advertisement