NATION

PASSWORD

The Islamic Discussion Thread ٤: It's Always Sunni In Arabia

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What denomination of Islam are you part of?

Sunni Islam
121
30%
Sunni Islam (Salafism)
16
4%
Shia Islam
29
7%
Quranist
9
2%
Ahmadiyya
4
1%
Zaydi
8
2%
Ibadist
4
1%
Sufism
22
6%
I do not ascribe to any sect, just call me a Muslim
68
17%
Other
118
30%
 
Total votes : 399

User avatar
Khataiy
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: Apr 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Khataiy » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:07 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Khataiy wrote:Your Takfeer makes you a Kafir this is why I say Shias are the sons of the Khawarij you both originate from the same camp.

We are Khawarij? It was the Khawarij that murdered Ali (P) and they are the ones who call us the Kuffar the modern Wahhabiyya are Kharijis. The Saudis, Da'esh, and all the others you obviously revere Saddam Hussein the murderer of the followers of Ahlul Bayt and father of Da'esh with the Saudis all the Kharijis are together with the Dajjal against Mahdi. It is no suprise though that you love Umar and Abu Bakr and Uthman they were like Saddam.

The Khawarij were from the army of Ali (RA) and only betrayed him because he made peace with Muawiyah whom you regard as a Kafir and just like they did and they could not stand the thought of Ali giving up his power so they killed him, in fact some ancient Shia sects would praise the Khariji who murdered Ali (RA) saying he enabled Ali (RA) to enter Jannah and gave him martyrdom.

And like the Khawarij the Shias are united against Ahlus Sunnah and call for the conquest of our land and the murder of our people who worship Allah alone and do not associate idols with him and we persist in our calls to Tawheed and our renounciation of shrines and other acts of disbelief, and yes Saddam Hussein was indeed a nobel ruler who ruled and the fact you compare him to Umar and Abu Bakr increases my love of him seeing the hatred that exists in him, and Iraq under his rule was a model state and never would anyone utter a word against the Sahaba.

User avatar
North German Realm
Senator
 
Posts: 4494
Founded: Jan 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby North German Realm » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:08 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Khataiy wrote:Your Takfeer makes you a Kafir this is why I say Shias are the sons of the Khawarij you both originate from the same camp.

We are Khawarij? It was the Khawarij that murdered Ali (P) and they are the ones who call us the Kuffar the modern Wahhabiyya are Kharijis. The Saudis, Da'esh, and all the others you obviously revere Saddam Hussein the murderer of the followers of Ahlul Bayt and father of Da'esh with the Saudis all the Kharijis are together with the Dajjal against Mahdi. It is no suprise though that you love Umar and Abu Bakr and Uthman they were like Saddam.

TIL Wahhabis are Islamic Anarchists who disagree with the concept of human arbitation, assassinate targets in broad daylight, and disagree with the concept of hereditary monarchy.
-----------------
-----------------
-----------------
North German Confederation
NationStates Flag Bracket II - 6th place!

Norddeutscher Bund
Homepage || Overview | Sovereign | Chancellor | Military | Legislature || The World
5 Nov, 2020
Die Morgenpost: "We will reconsider our relationship with Poland" Reichskanzler Lagenmauer says after Polish president protested North German ultimatum that made them restore reproductive freedom. | European Society votes not to persecute Hungary for atrocities committed against Serbs, "Giving a rogue state leave to commit genocide as it sees fit." North German delegate bemoans. | Negotiations still underway in Rome, delegates arguing over the extent of indemnities Turkey might be made to pay, lawful status of Turkish collaborators during occupation of Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Syria.

User avatar
The Husseini State
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Feb 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Husseini State » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:14 am

Khataiy wrote:
The Husseini State wrote:We are Khawarij? It was the Khawarij that murdered Ali (P) and they are the ones who call us the Kuffar the modern Wahhabiyya are Kharijis. The Saudis, Da'esh, and all the others you obviously revere Saddam Hussein the murderer of the followers of Ahlul Bayt and father of Da'esh with the Saudis all the Kharijis are together with the Dajjal against Mahdi. It is no suprise though that you love Umar and Abu Bakr and Uthman they were like Saddam.

The Khawarij were from the army of Ali (RA) and only betrayed him because he made peace with Muawiyah whom you regard as a Kafir and just like they did and they could not stand the thought of Ali giving up his power so they killed him, in fact some ancient Shia sects would praise the Khariji who murdered Ali (RA) saying he enabled Ali (RA) to enter Jannah and gave him martyrdom.

And like the Khawarij the Shias are united against Ahlus Sunnah and call for the conquest of our land and the murder of our people who worship Allah alone and do not associate idols with him and we persist in our calls to Tawheed and our renounciation of shrines and other acts of disbelief, and yes Saddam Hussein was indeed a nobel ruler who ruled and the fact you compare him to Umar and Abu Bakr increases my love of him seeing the hatred that exists in him, and Iraq under his rule was a model state and never would anyone utter a word against the Sahaba.

This is a joke right? The Khawarij and Wahhabiya are the same and are the ones united against Islam and you should know that "shrines" are not Polytheism even Sunnis have shrines! You just hate our shrines because they are from Ahlul Bayt and the Wahhabiya have the biggest problem with Ahlul Bayt like the Khawarij.

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:22 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:And you are wrong. Anyone who recites kalima, and believes in Allah is God and Muhammad (saw) is His Messenger is automatically Muslim.

Yes Ali (ra) was a true caliph, but so was Abu Bakr (ra). That doesn't make Zizou a disbelievers. And yes, you are a Takfiri if you pass takfir. You are literally declaring him a disbeliever because you said he supports Abu Bakr.

As for the rest of your claims, this hadith debunks these:


Abu Bakr had no right to usurp the title of Khilafah from Ali (P) and Ahlul Bayt the crimes of Umar, Abu Bakr and Aisha are undeniable they were total oppressors and enemies of Islam. Part of the Kalima is declaring Ali is the Wali of Allah and declaring the authority of the Imams and the superiorty of Ahlul Bayt only then can you be a Muslim, and quoting a Sunni Hadith does not help you.

No it is not the kalima.

And yes it does help me because it goes back to the Sunnah of Muhammad (saw), and in turn, the Quran. This makes your argument invalid.

The rest of what you said is nonsense that's already been refuted.
Last edited by Jolthig on Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
Khataiy
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: Apr 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Khataiy » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:24 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Khataiy wrote:The Khawarij were from the army of Ali (RA) and only betrayed him because he made peace with Muawiyah whom you regard as a Kafir and just like they did and they could not stand the thought of Ali giving up his power so they killed him, in fact some ancient Shia sects would praise the Khariji who murdered Ali (RA) saying he enabled Ali (RA) to enter Jannah and gave him martyrdom.

And like the Khawarij the Shias are united against Ahlus Sunnah and call for the conquest of our land and the murder of our people who worship Allah alone and do not associate idols with him and we persist in our calls to Tawheed and our renounciation of shrines and other acts of disbelief, and yes Saddam Hussein was indeed a nobel ruler who ruled and the fact you compare him to Umar and Abu Bakr increases my love of him seeing the hatred that exists in him, and Iraq under his rule was a model state and never would anyone utter a word against the Sahaba.

This is a joke right? The Khawarij and Wahhabiya are the same and are the ones united against Islam and you should know that "shrines" are not Polytheism even Sunnis have shrines! You just hate our shrines because they are from Ahlul Bayt and the Wahhabiya have the biggest problem with Ahlul Bayt like the Khawarij.

The only joke here is the denial on your behalf, you can scream "Wahhabi" all day but the facts are evident in the Quran and Sunnah but you wont even accept one Hadith from the Sunnah because you hate the companions of the Prophet that much, there is a saying and that saying is "you can choose your friends not your family" He chose from amongst everyone Abu Bakr, Aisha, Umar, Uthman, Khalid Ibn Walid, Qaqa Ibn Amr, Muthanna and the rest. Abu Bakr was the first man to accept Islam and second person after Khadijah and he stood by the Prophet and kept the Khilafah united during the wars of Ridda against the Murtadeen rebels had it not been for Abu Bakr As-Sadiq (RA) Ali (RA) would have had no state to rule,

And you forget he willingly gave up power, he had no issues with the rule of Abu Bakr or his predacessors only those who renounced Islam did, and you also forget it was the sons of Abu Bakr who died with Hussein at Karbala and it is Jafar As-Sadiq you claim as one of the Imams in your Imamah and he is from the blood of Abu Bakr and a student of Abu Hanfia, the Great Imam, and he said it in his books that the Shia are not Muslims.

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:30 am

I cant wait for Khosro to come in here and have a blast looking at this takfir war in here. I know for a fact, I am enjoying it. I pass takfir on no one.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
The Husseini State
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Feb 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Husseini State » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:31 am

Jolthig wrote:
The Husseini State wrote:Abu Bakr had no right to usurp the title of Khilafah from Ali (P) and Ahlul Bayt the crimes of Umar, Abu Bakr and Aisha are undeniable they were total oppressors and enemies of Islam. Part of the Kalima is declaring Ali is the Wali of Allah and declaring the authority of the Imams and the superiorty of Ahlul Bayt only then can you be a Muslim, and quoting a Sunni Hadith does not help you.

No it is not the kalima.

And yes it does help me because it goes back to the Sunnah of Muhammad (saw), and in turn, the Quran. This makes your argument invalid.

The rest of what you said is nonsense that's already been refuted.

You must accept the Wilayah of Ali and the Imams to be a Muslim.

User avatar
Khataiy
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: Apr 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Khataiy » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:32 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:No it is not the kalima.

And yes it does help me because it goes back to the Sunnah of Muhammad (saw), and in turn, the Quran. This makes your argument invalid.

The rest of what you said is nonsense that's already been refuted.

You must accept the Wilayah of Ali and the Imams to be a Muslim.

Where in the Quran is this said?

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:33 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:No it is not the kalima.

And yes it does help me because it goes back to the Sunnah of Muhammad (saw), and in turn, the Quran. This makes your argument invalid.

The rest of what you said is nonsense that's already been refuted.

You must accept the Wilayah of Ali and the Imams to be a Muslim.

What Khaity said.

And you are wrong. Once again, I will ask you, show me a hadith with an outstanding isnad to support your viewpoints or I will take your arguments as fabricated nonsense.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
North German Realm
Senator
 
Posts: 4494
Founded: Jan 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby North German Realm » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:36 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:No it is not the kalima.

And yes it does help me because it goes back to the Sunnah of Muhammad (saw), and in turn, the Quran. This makes your argument invalid.

The rest of what you said is nonsense that's already been refuted.

You must accept the Wilayah of Ali and the Imams to be a Muslim.

... No
You have to say the Shahadatayn. "اشهد انّا لااله الّی الله و اشهد انّا محمداً رسول الله".
(Which means you have to believe there is only one god and that Muhammad is his prophet). Even the most staunch of the shia agree on that. Wtf are you on?
-----------------
-----------------
-----------------
North German Confederation
NationStates Flag Bracket II - 6th place!

Norddeutscher Bund
Homepage || Overview | Sovereign | Chancellor | Military | Legislature || The World
5 Nov, 2020
Die Morgenpost: "We will reconsider our relationship with Poland" Reichskanzler Lagenmauer says after Polish president protested North German ultimatum that made them restore reproductive freedom. | European Society votes not to persecute Hungary for atrocities committed against Serbs, "Giving a rogue state leave to commit genocide as it sees fit." North German delegate bemoans. | Negotiations still underway in Rome, delegates arguing over the extent of indemnities Turkey might be made to pay, lawful status of Turkish collaborators during occupation of Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Syria.

User avatar
The Husseini State
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Feb 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Husseini State » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:37 am

Khataiy wrote:
The Husseini State wrote:You must accept the Wilayah of Ali and the Imams to be a Muslim.

Where in the Quran is this said?

The Quran favors Ali (P), Ali (P) is our master and he is the Wali of Allah and the best of human creation after the Prophet (P) and Mahdi is from his household, there is no Quranic basis for your theology.

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:37 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Khataiy wrote:Where in the Quran is this said?

The Quran favors Ali (P), Ali (P) is our master and he is the Wali of Allah and the best of human creation after the Prophet (P) and Mahdi is from his household, there is no Quranic basis for your theology.

Lel, alright.
Last edited by Jolthig on Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
The Husseini State
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Feb 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Husseini State » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:38 am

North German Realm wrote:
The Husseini State wrote:You must accept the Wilayah of Ali and the Imams to be a Muslim.

... No
You have to say the Shahadatayn. "اشهد انّا لااله الّی الله و اشهد انّا محمداً رسول الله".
(Which means you have to believe there is only one god and that Muhammad is his prophet). Even the most staunch of the shia agree on that. Wtf are you on?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XUQcxsZSKpM

It can be clearly seen here with the repentance of a Palestinian brother

الحمدلله

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:41 am

I'll give you one more chance, show us verses from the Quran and a hadith with a strong isnad to support your views, or I will have you put on my ignore list.

This is your last chance, The Husseini State, before i have you blocked on here. Because you have no arguments, and your continued strawmans and Shi'ite fundamentalist nonsense proves this.

It is clearly stated in hadith that Muhammad (saw) did not appoint Ali (ra) as his successor, and Ali (ra) did not object to Abu Bakr's succession. All of them were righteous enough to not be arrogant. If you cannot grasp this, then I will no longer take you seriously.

Show us authentic sources for your claims or I will have you put on ignore.
Last edited by Jolthig on Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
Khataiy
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: Apr 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Khataiy » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:44 am

Jolthig wrote:I'll give you one more chance, show us verses from the Quran and a hadith with a strong isnad to support your views, or I will have you put on my ignore list.

This is your last chance, The Husseini State, before i have you blocked on here. Because you have no arguments, and your continued strawmans and Shi'ite fundamentalist nonsense proves this.

It is clearly stated in hadith that Muhammad (saw) did bot appoint Ali (ra) as his successor, and Ali (ra) did not object to Abu Bakr's succession. All of them were righteous enough to not be arrogant. If you cannot grasp this, then I will no longer take you seriously.

Show us authentic sources for your claims or I will have you put on ignore.

I will be fair here as the way the Sahaba were he will quote a Shia Hadith to prove it and if we quote books like Sahih Bukhari or Sahih Muslim he will deny it, Shias do not accept our Hadiths, so we should rely solely on Quranic evidence for this to be a fair arguement.

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:48 am

Khataiy wrote:
Jolthig wrote:I'll give you one more chance, show us verses from the Quran and a hadith with a strong isnad to support your views, or I will have you put on my ignore list.

This is your last chance, The Husseini State, before i have you blocked on here. Because you have no arguments, and your continued strawmans and Shi'ite fundamentalist nonsense proves this.

It is clearly stated in hadith that Muhammad (saw) did bot appoint Ali (ra) as his successor, and Ali (ra) did not object to Abu Bakr's succession. All of them were righteous enough to not be arrogant. If you cannot grasp this, then I will no longer take you seriously.

Show us authentic sources for your claims or I will have you put on ignore.

I will be fair here as the way the Sahaba were he will quote a Shia Hadith to prove it and if we quote books like Sahih Bukhari or Sahih Muslim he will deny it, Shias do not accept our Hadiths, so we should rely solely on Quranic evidence for this to be a fair arguement.

This isnt about what sources the hadith come from. What I'm asking for, is the isnad. This is what Bukhari did when he had dialogue with people on hadith.

Yes. Quran too, but he presented no evidence for his beliefs.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
The Husseini State
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Feb 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Husseini State » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:49 am

Jolthig wrote:I'll give you one more chance, show us verses from the Quran and a hadith with a strong isnad to support your views, or I will have you put on my ignore list.

This is your last chance, The Husseini State, before i have you blocked on here. Because you have no arguments, and your continued strawmans and Shi'ite fundamentalist nonsense proves this.

It is clearly stated in hadith that Muhammad (saw) did not appoint Ali (ra) as his successor, and Ali (ra) did not object to Abu Bakr's succession. All of them were righteous enough to not be arrogant. If you cannot grasp this, then I will no longer take you seriously.

Show us authentic sources for your claims or I will have you put on ignore.

Muhammad (P) said:

"O people, Allah the Most Kind the Omniscient has told me that no apostle lives to more than half the age of him who had preceded him. I think I am about to be called (to die) and thus I must respond. I am responsible and you are responsible, then what do you say?' They said, 'We witness that you have informed, advised and striven. May Allah bless you.' He said, 'Do you not bear witness that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His servant and Apostle, and that His Heaven is true, His Hell is true, death is true, the Resurrection after death is true, that there is no doubt that the Day of Judgment will come, and that Allah will resurrect the dead from their graves?' They said, 'Yes, we bear witness.' He said, 'O Allah, bear witness.' Then he said, 'O people, Allah is my Lord and I am the lord of the believers. I am worthier of believers than themselves. Of whomsoever I had been Mawla, Ali here is to be his Mawla."

User avatar
Khataiy
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: Apr 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Khataiy » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:51 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:I'll give you one more chance, show us verses from the Quran and a hadith with a strong isnad to support your views, or I will have you put on my ignore list.

This is your last chance, The Husseini State, before i have you blocked on here. Because you have no arguments, and your continued strawmans and Shi'ite fundamentalist nonsense proves this.

It is clearly stated in hadith that Muhammad (saw) did not appoint Ali (ra) as his successor, and Ali (ra) did not object to Abu Bakr's succession. All of them were righteous enough to not be arrogant. If you cannot grasp this, then I will no longer take you seriously.

Show us authentic sources for your claims or I will have you put on ignore.

Muhammad (P) said:

"O people, Allah the Most Kind the Omniscient has told me that no apostle lives to more than half the age of him who had preceded him. I think I am about to be called (to die) and thus I must respond. I am responsible and you are responsible, then what do you say?' They said, 'We witness that you have informed, advised and striven. May Allah bless you.' He said, 'Do you not bear witness that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His servant and Apostle, and that His Heaven is true, His Hell is true, death is true, the Resurrection after death is true, that there is no doubt that the Day of Judgment will come, and that Allah will resurrect the dead from their graves?' They said, 'Yes, we bear witness.' He said, 'O Allah, bear witness.' Then he said, 'O people, Allah is my Lord and I am the lord of the believers. I am worthier of believers than themselves. Of whomsoever I had been Mawla, Ali here is to be his Mawla."

This proves nothing

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:51 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:I'll give you one more chance, show us verses from the Quran and a hadith with a strong isnad to support your views, or I will have you put on my ignore list.

This is your last chance, The Husseini State, before i have you blocked on here. Because you have no arguments, and your continued strawmans and Shi'ite fundamentalist nonsense proves this.

It is clearly stated in hadith that Muhammad (saw) did not appoint Ali (ra) as his successor, and Ali (ra) did not object to Abu Bakr's succession. All of them were righteous enough to not be arrogant. If you cannot grasp this, then I will no longer take you seriously.

Show us authentic sources for your claims or I will have you put on ignore.

Muhammad (P) said:

"O people, Allah the Most Kind the Omniscient has told me that no apostle lives to more than half the age of him who had preceded him. I think I am about to be called (to die) and thus I must respond. I am responsible and you are responsible, then what do you say?' They said, 'We witness that you have informed, advised and striven. May Allah bless you.' He said, 'Do you not bear witness that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His servant and Apostle, and that His Heaven is true, His Hell is true, death is true, the Resurrection after death is true, that there is no doubt that the Day of Judgment will come, and that Allah will resurrect the dead from their graves?' They said, 'Yes, we bear witness.' He said, 'O Allah, bear witness.' Then he said, 'O people, Allah is my Lord and I am the lord of the believers. I am worthier of believers than themselves. Of whomsoever I had been Mawla, Ali here is to be his Mawla."

Source, and who narrated this hadith?
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
The Husseini State
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Feb 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Husseini State » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:56 am

Jolthig wrote:
The Husseini State wrote:Muhammad (P) said:

"O people, Allah the Most Kind the Omniscient has told me that no apostle lives to more than half the age of him who had preceded him. I think I am about to be called (to die) and thus I must respond. I am responsible and you are responsible, then what do you say?' They said, 'We witness that you have informed, advised and striven. May Allah bless you.' He said, 'Do you not bear witness that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His servant and Apostle, and that His Heaven is true, His Hell is true, death is true, the Resurrection after death is true, that there is no doubt that the Day of Judgment will come, and that Allah will resurrect the dead from their graves?' They said, 'Yes, we bear witness.' He said, 'O Allah, bear witness.' Then he said, 'O people, Allah is my Lord and I am the lord of the believers. I am worthier of believers than themselves. Of whomsoever I had been Mawla, Ali here is to be his Mawla."

Source, and who narrated this hadith?

This is the event of Ghadir Khumm during the Farewell Sermon of Muhammad (P)

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:56 am

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Source, and who narrated this hadith?

This is the event of Ghadir Khumm during the Farewell Sermon of Muhammad (P)

Yes, but I am asking for who narrated the hadith. The individual.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
The Husseini State
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Feb 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Husseini State » Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:01 pm

Jolthig wrote:
The Husseini State wrote:This is the event of Ghadir Khumm during the Farewell Sermon of Muhammad (P)

Yes, but I am asking for who narrated the hadith. The individual.

This is in your books Sahih Bukhari and Tirmidhi

User avatar
Khataiy
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: Apr 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Khataiy » Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:05 pm

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Yes, but I am asking for who narrated the hadith. The individual.

This is in your books Sahih Bukhari and Tirmidhi

You seem to think we hate Ali (RA) we don't so your argument style is not working well for you

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:06 pm

The Husseini State wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Yes, but I am asking for who narrated the hadith. The individual.

This is in your books Sahih Bukhari and Tirmidhi

Ah, taqiyya.

I'm starting to be convinced you are Khaity, and not a legitimate Shiite tbh. I've been pretty convinced for a while you aren't legitimate. Because I myself have done that in the past. I'm pretty sure you are Khaity. Otherwise why would Khaity suddenly come out of nowhere when you post?

Why is your founding date only Feb. 18?
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
Khataiy
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: Apr 22, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Khataiy » Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:09 pm

Jolthig wrote:
The Husseini State wrote:This is in your books Sahih Bukhari and Tirmidhi

Ah, taqiyya.

I'm starting to be convinced you are Khaity, and not a legitimate Shiite tbh. I've been pretty convinced for a while you aren't legitimate. Because I myself have done that in the past. I'm pretty sure you are Khaity. Otherwise why would Khaity suddenly come out of nowhere when you post?

Why is your founding date only Feb. 18?

Why would I post the stuff he is posting? He is posting stuff that Allah will see and ask me about the day of judgement and it is nothing but slander and blaspheme.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Necroghastia, Stellar Colonies, The Archregimancy, The Most Grand Feline Empire

Advertisement

Remove ads