NATION

PASSWORD

California to Vote on Splitting in Three in November

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Thermodolia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58704
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Fri Apr 13, 2018 6:48 pm

Herskerstad wrote:Would even the divisions give one Red block for two blue ones, or would it just accomplish giving Cali 6 senators?

You would have one red block, one purple, and one solid blue. To in effect it would be pretty balanced. Nor Cal would be the purple or light blue.
Male, Titoist cultural nationalist, lives somewhere in the Deep South, give me any good Irish, Canadian, or Scottish whiskey and I will be your friend for life. I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies
Click Here for RP Info Embassy Program
Ambassadors to the WA:
Ambassador to the GA Jon Æthr
Ambassador to the SC Eve Šanœ

RIP Dya

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16059
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Cekoviu » Fri Apr 13, 2018 7:34 pm

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Smaller states already have more power. This proposal wouldn't give any minority a voice.

See: Northern California.

Oooooorrrr we could make elections based on popular vote.
RWDT - REST IN POWER
Market socialist, David Hume fangirl, and massive Tuvaboo. Moderate SWERF & traditionalist SJW. Non-denominational Christian, influenced by Orthodoxy and certain Protestant currents.
/tʃɛ'koʊ.vi:.ju:/ (check-OH-vee-you)

User avatar
Thermodolia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58704
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:23 pm

Cekoviu wrote:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA wrote:See: Northern California.

Oooooorrrr we could make elections based on popular vote.

To bad some in this thread hate the idea of a PR system
Male, Titoist cultural nationalist, lives somewhere in the Deep South, give me any good Irish, Canadian, or Scottish whiskey and I will be your friend for life. I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies
Click Here for RP Info Embassy Program
Ambassadors to the WA:
Ambassador to the GA Jon Æthr
Ambassador to the SC Eve Šanœ

RIP Dya

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41792
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby San Lumen » Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:57 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Oooooorrrr we could make elections based on popular vote.

To bad some in this thread hate the idea of a PR system

What's wrong with simple popular vote?
Last edited by San Lumen on Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Salus Maior
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18835
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Salus Maior » Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:16 pm

Good.

B A L K A N I Z E.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic.

This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief. -1 Timothy 1:15

“My entire endeavor has always been to clearly recognize the Will of God in all things and to follow it as completely as possible.” -Blessed Charles of Austria, last Habsburg Emperor

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:39 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:To bad some in this thread hate the idea of a PR system

What's wrong with simple popular vote?


If we're talking about the Presidency I'd say nothing. Though do note that the popular vote in a Popular Vote System will not be the same as the popular vote numbers from these electoral college elections. Voting patterns would change.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41792
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby San Lumen » Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:37 am

Mujahidah wrote:
San Lumen wrote:What's wrong with simple popular vote?


If we're talking about the Presidency I'd say nothing. Though do note that the popular vote in a Popular Vote System will not be the same as the popular vote numbers from these electoral college elections. Voting patterns would change.

I dont understand what you mean

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4234
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:52 am

New Emeline wrote:Why do they want to do this?

I'm betting it's about increased division between rural and urban America as of the 2016 election. Not unlike how people have been talking about splitting up Texas.

Whether this division is justified depends on to what extent you blame rural America, urban America, or their refusal to work together. Perhaps splitting them up might serve as a social experiment as to whose ideas work better, and then they can work together on the ideas of the winner, but social experiments are known for sources of error...
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41792
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby San Lumen » Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:54 am

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:
New Emeline wrote:Why do they want to do this?

I'm betting it's about increased division between rural and urban America as of the 2016 election. Not unlike how people have been talking about splitting up Texas.

Whether this division is justified depends on to what extent you blame rural America, urban America, or their refusal to work together. Perhaps splitting them up might serve as a social experiment as to whose ideas work better, and then they can work together on the ideas of the winner, but social experiments are known for sources of error...

Many of the rural parts of the state would unable to sustain themselves without the populous coastal counties.

User avatar
Benjabobaria
Envoy
 
Posts: 260
Founded: Nov 04, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Benjabobaria » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:02 am

San Lumen wrote:A billionaire from Silicon Valley has supposedly submitted 600,000 signatures to the Secretary of State's office for a referendum to split California into three states. It's not officially on the ballot as signatures must still be verified.

Not verified yet I see.

San Lumen wrote:Water rights could be another sticking point.

Yeah, California doesn't have enough water to split up or secede for that matter.

Overall pretty silly.

Edit: the article says the guy originally wanted 6 states lol
Last edited by Benjabobaria on Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Benja Karimi, formerly cosmopolitan raider kid
Former Moshir of Osiris's Sekhmet Legion, now retired from GP

Zizou wrote:it's the natives fault for getting beat the fuck up by raiders because the founder cted or they were dumb enough to make the del exec

Altino wrote:The number of "Benja this is amazing, I love it!!!" conversations and also "Benja wtf were you thinking, you're ruining my life" conversations we've had go so hard.

American libtard
Polandball fanatic
Deist of Jewish descent
It's really hard for me to respect anyone who ignores the obvious evidence that climate change is caused by humans.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41792
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby San Lumen » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:06 am

Benjabobaria wrote:
San Lumen wrote:A billionaire from Silicon Valley has supposedly submitted 600,000 signatures to the Secretary of State's office for a referendum to split California into three states. It's not officially on the ballot as signatures must still be verified.

Not verified yet I see.

San Lumen wrote:Water rights could be another sticking point.

Yeah, California doesn't have enough water to split up or secede for that matter.

Overall pretty silly.

Edit: the article says the guy originally wanted 6 states lol


It will take several weeks for the Secretary of State's office to verify them. Last time he claimed to have 1.3 million signatures but fell well short during the verification process.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32408
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Telconi » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:10 am

Benjabobaria wrote:
San Lumen wrote:A billionaire from Silicon Valley has supposedly submitted 600,000 signatures to the Secretary of State's office for a referendum to split California into three states. It's not officially on the ballot as signatures must still be verified.

Not verified yet I see.

San Lumen wrote:Water rights could be another sticking point.

Yeah, California doesn't have enough water to split up or secede for that matter.

Overall pretty silly.

Edit: the article says the guy originally wanted 6 states lol


Northern CA has loads of water. People that would be in trouble would be the southern folks.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5340
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:16 am

I don't care about Politics anymore, California needs to die

Whether that be Politically or Geographically, the state needs to die (not the people though, no dead people pls)
The FN FAL fetishist, Bisexual Libertarian Pagan, 28-year-old Boomer your mom warned you about
Supreme Dictator WA delegate of The Labyrinth. Please join, we have memes
Discord Server (Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!)

User avatar
Geneviev
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13178
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Geneviev » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:32 am

Hammer Britannia wrote:I don't care about Politics anymore, California needs to die

Whether that be Politically or Geographically, the state needs to die (not the people though, no dead people pls)

Yeah, um, as one of the people there, I quite like California. Maybe leave it until June 15. Then I'll be back at home and you can do what you want.
"An intelligent heart acquires knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge." Proverbs 18:15

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5340
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:43 am

Geneviev wrote:
Hammer Britannia wrote:I don't care about Politics anymore, California needs to die

Whether that be Politically or Geographically, the state needs to die (not the people though, no dead people pls)

Yeah, um, as one of the people there, I quite like California. Maybe leave it until June 15. Then I'll be back at home and you can do what you want.

I didn't say it would happen immediately

And Geographically is the worst case scenario
The FN FAL fetishist, Bisexual Libertarian Pagan, 28-year-old Boomer your mom warned you about
Supreme Dictator WA delegate of The Labyrinth. Please join, we have memes
Discord Server (Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!)

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41792
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby San Lumen » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:47 am

Hammer Britannia wrote:
Geneviev wrote:Yeah, um, as one of the people there, I quite like California. Maybe leave it until June 15. Then I'll be back at home and you can do what you want.

I didn't say it would happen immediately

And Geographically is the worst case scenario

How?

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5340
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:48 am

San Lumen wrote:
Hammer Britannia wrote:I didn't say it would happen immediately

And Geographically is the worst case scenario

How?

California is OK when it comes to nature.
The FN FAL fetishist, Bisexual Libertarian Pagan, 28-year-old Boomer your mom warned you about
Supreme Dictator WA delegate of The Labyrinth. Please join, we have memes
Discord Server (Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!)

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41792
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby San Lumen » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:50 am

Hammer Britannia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:How?

California is OK when it comes to nature.

It is beautiful but there is no reason to break up the state.
Last edited by San Lumen on Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5340
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:52 am

San Lumen wrote:
Hammer Britannia wrote:California is OK when it comes to nature.

It is beautiful but there is no reason to break up the state.

Other than the fact that it's filled with innocent people oppressed by the rich elite and corrupt idiots?
Last edited by Hammer Britannia on Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
The FN FAL fetishist, Bisexual Libertarian Pagan, 28-year-old Boomer your mom warned you about
Supreme Dictator WA delegate of The Labyrinth. Please join, we have memes
Discord Server (Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!)

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41792
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby San Lumen » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:53 am

Hammer Britannia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:It is beautiful but there is no reason to break up the state.

Other than the fact that it's filled with innocent people oppressed by the rich elite and corrupt idiots?


I wouldn't say that.

User avatar
Geneviev
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13178
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Geneviev » Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:58 am

Hammer Britannia wrote:
Geneviev wrote:Yeah, um, as one of the people there, I quite like California. Maybe leave it until June 15. Then I'll be back at home and you can do what you want.

I didn't say it would happen immediately

And Geographically is the worst case scenario

I don't think it will happen or that it should happen. Keep California together.
"An intelligent heart acquires knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge." Proverbs 18:15

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4234
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:10 am

San Lumen wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:I'm betting it's about increased division between rural and urban America as of the 2016 election. Not unlike how people have been talking about splitting up Texas.

Whether this division is justified depends on to what extent you blame rural America, urban America, or their refusal to work together. Perhaps splitting them up might serve as a social experiment as to whose ideas work better, and then they can work together on the ideas of the winner, but social experiments are known for sources of error...

Many of the rural parts of the state would unable to sustain themselves without the populous coastal counties.

Well, let's test that theory!
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4234
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:10 am

San Lumen wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:I'm betting it's about increased division between rural and urban America as of the 2016 election. Not unlike how people have been talking about splitting up Texas.

Whether this division is justified depends on to what extent you blame rural America, urban America, or their refusal to work together. Perhaps splitting them up might serve as a social experiment as to whose ideas work better, and then they can work together on the ideas of the winner, but social experiments are known for sources of error...

Many of the rural parts of the state would unable to sustain themselves without the populous coastal counties.

Well, let's test that theory!
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41792
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby San Lumen » Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:13 am

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Many of the rural parts of the state would unable to sustain themselves without the populous coastal counties.

Well, let's test that theory!

id rather not.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 51290
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:15 am

Hammer Britannia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:It is beautiful but there is no reason to break up the state.

Other than the fact that it's filled with innocent people oppressed by the rich elite and corrupt idiots?


And what oppression would that be?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aclion, Alien Overlord, Ausinia, Australian rePublic, Google Adsense [Bot], Greed and Death, Kannap, Kenmoria, Mzeusia, Nakena, Nobel Hobos 2, Philjia, The Alma Mater, The Huskar Social Union, VVerkia

Advertisement

Remove ads