Gun Control III - the Gunnening

[Big Jim P]

I can try, but I get the feeling that I'm one of the only pro gun people in my area.

You'd be surprised by how many people are pro gun, but just keep it to themselves. I've ran into quite a few people at work who are pro gun but kept to themselves because a majority of the other employees are either anti gun or are fudds, and they don't like being put down or ostracized, I'm not one of those people, I'm pro 2nd Amendment and the whole work place knows it and I refuse to cower because it offends their sensibilities.

I've worn my NRA t-shirt to work. Come to find out, my immediate supervisor and the plant manager are both life members as well.

[Gun Manufacturers]

You'd be surprised by how many people are pro gun, but just keep it to themselves. I've ran into quite a few people at work who are pro gun but kept to themselves because a majority of the other employees are either anti gun or are fudds, and they don't like being put down or ostracized, I'm not one of those people, I'm pro 2nd Amendment and the whole work place knows it and I refuse to cower because it offends their sensibilities.

I've worn my NRA t-shirt to work. Come to find out, my immediate supervisor and the plant manager are both life members as well.

I'm not really supposed to talk about firearms at work. I honestly don't know why the USPS doesn't like its employees talking about firearms at work.

[Grinning Dragon]

I've worn my NRA t-shirt to work. Come to find out, my immediate supervisor and the plant manager are both life members as well.

I'm not really supposed to talk about firearms at work. I honestly don't know why the USPS doesn't like its employees talking about firearms at work.

Perhaps the going "postal" is still fresh on their minds?

[Sovaal]

I’m glad to have gone from staunchly anti-gun to being pro-gun.

Now you just need to build up an arsenal of the weapons of the people’s liberation, comrade!

[Telconi]

You'd be surprised by how many people are pro gun, but just keep it to themselves. I've ran into quite a few people at work who are pro gun but kept to themselves because a majority of the other employees are either anti gun or are fudds, and they don't like being put down or ostracized, I'm not one of those people, I'm pro 2nd Amendment and the whole work place knows it and I refuse to cower because it offends their sensibilities.

I've worn my NRA t-shirt to work. Come to find out, my immediate supervisor and the plant manager are both life members as well.

There's so many NRA member stickers on trucks at my work you could mistake it for the SHOT show...

[Hurtful Thoughts]

I've worn my NRA t-shirt to work. Come to find out, my immediate supervisor and the plant manager are both life members as well.

There's so many NRA member stickers on trucks at my work you could mistake it for the SHOT show...

"Bring SHOT show to work day"

[The Two Jerseys]

I had a thought on the way to work this morning: if guns were regulated "like cars", does that mean that getting caught with an automatic weapon/high capacity magazine/weapon that violates the Cosmetic Features Ban would be treated as a trivial matter like illegal window tints and punishable by a small fine?

Or is the pendulum going to swing the other way and tapping someone's bumper will be upgraded to a felony?

[Grinning Dragon]

I had a thought on the way to work this morning: if guns were regulated "like cars", does that mean that getting caught with an automatic weapon/high capacity magazine/weapon that violates the Cosmetic Features Ban would be treated as a trivial matter like illegal window tints and punishable by a small fine?

Or is the pendulum going to swing the other way and tapping someone's bumper will be upgraded to a felony?

Well if they were treated like cars, that would mean, you need to have muffler (sound suppressor), also you can buy and drive any type of vehicle, trick it out till your hearts content, etc.

[Gun Manufacturers]

I had a thought on the way to work this morning: if guns were regulated "like cars", does that mean that getting caught with an automatic weapon/high capacity magazine/weapon that violates the Cosmetic Features Ban would be treated as a trivial matter like illegal window tints and punishable by a small fine?

Or is the pendulum going to swing the other way and tapping someone's bumper will be upgraded to a felony?

Well if they were treated like cars, that would mean, you need to have muffler (sound suppressor), also you can buy and drive any type of vehicle, trick it out till your hearts content, etc.

I'd put underglow lighting on mine.

[Grinning Dragon]

Well if they were treated like cars, that would mean, you need to have muffler (sound suppressor), also you can buy and drive any type of vehicle, trick it out till your hearts content, etc.

I'd put underglow lighting on mine.

A single color or the type that changes?
How about some dangling truck nuts?

[Grinning Dragon]

So the house passed H.R 8 pretty much along party lines with 8 repubs where it will die in the senate, one thing that has stood out about this bill if it were to be signed into law is the fact that it will bar those 18-21 yr olds from exercising their enumerated right to bear arms in states that have passed laws to raised the age to 21 to buy long guns.
In how the bill is written all transfers must be run through an FFL, an FFL will have to abide by federal law that bars those under 21 to purchase handguns, now in a lot of states, those under 21 may acquire and or possess a handgun if it was a gift, traded or bought privately. I could see a challenge on the constitutionality on this basis in how it would bar those individuals that live in states that raised their long gun purchases to 21, since they would have no way to exercise their right to keep and bear arms without breaking the law.

[Pax Nerdvana]

So the house passed H.R 8 pretty much along party lines with 8 repubs where it will die in the senate, one thing that has stood out about this bill if it were to be signed into law is the fact that it will bar those 18-21 yr olds from exercising their enumerated right to bear arms in states that have passed laws to raised the age to 21 to buy long guns.
In how the bill is written all transfers must be run through an FFL, an FFL will have to abide by federal law that bars those under 21 to purchase handguns, now in a lot of states, those under 21 may acquire and or possess a handgun if it was a gift, traded or bought privately. I could see a challenge on the constitutionality on this basis in how it would bar those individuals that live in states that raised their long gun purchases to 21, since they would have no way to exercise their right to keep and bear arms without breaking the law.

That sounds awfully unconstitutional, but they would say,"It's all for safety!". That brings a certain Ben Franklin quote to mind.

[Crockerland]

So the house passed H.R 8 pretty much along party lines with 8 repubs where it will die in the senate, one thing that has stood out about this bill if it were to be signed into law is the fact that it will bar those 18-21 yr olds from exercising their enumerated right to bear arms in states that have passed laws to raised the age to 21 to buy long guns.
In how the bill is written all transfers must be run through an FFL, an FFL will have to abide by federal law that bars those under 21 to purchase handguns, now in a lot of states, those under 21 may acquire and or possess a handgun if it was a gift, traded or bought privately. I could see a challenge on the constitutionality on this basis in how it would bar those individuals that live in states that raised their long gun purchases to 21, since they would have no way to exercise their right to keep and bear arms without breaking the law.

H.R. 8, and of course they called it the "Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019". You can usually tell a bill will be scummy if its creators feel the need to preemptively defend it by giving it an overly positive name. "UWU, would you pwease consider calling your representative and urging them to support the Mandatory Organ Harvesting act- OOPS, sorry, I mean, the Democratic People's Bipartisan Patriotic Anti-Terrorism Act?"

Also, a list of the Republican (In Name Only) serpents who voted for the bill:

• Vern Buchanan (Florida)
• Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)
• Mario Diaz-Balart (Florida)
• Will Hurd (Texas)
• Peter King (New York)
• Brian Mast (Florida)
• Chris Smith (New Joisey)
• Fred Upton (Michigan)

I have put in bold the names of the pond scum who co-sponsored the bill. Be sure you do not forget this occurrence when it comes time to vote in the next round of primary elections.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll099.xml
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/27/politics ... index.html

[Arengin Union]

So the house passed H.R 8 pretty much along party lines with 8 repubs where it will die in the senate, one thing that has stood out about this bill if it were to be signed into law is the fact that it will bar those 18-21 yr olds from exercising their enumerated right to bear arms in states that have passed laws to raised the age to 21 to buy long guns.
In how the bill is written all transfers must be run through an FFL, an FFL will have to abide by federal law that bars those under 21 to purchase handguns, now in a lot of states, those under 21 may acquire and or possess a handgun if it was a gift, traded or bought privately. I could see a challenge on the constitutionality on this basis in how it would bar those individuals that live in states that raised their long gun purchases to 21, since they would have no way to exercise their right to keep and bear arms without breaking the law.

H.R. 8, and of course they called it the "Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019". You can usually tell a bill will be scummy if its creators feel the need to preemptively defend it by giving it an overly positive name. "UWU, would you pwease consider calling your representative and urging them to support the Mandatory Organ Harvesting act- OOPS, sorry, I mean, the Democratic People's Bipartisan Patriotic Anti-Terrorism Act?"

Also, a list of the Republican (In Name Only) serpents who voted for the bill:

• Vern Buchanan (Florida)
• Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)
• Mario Diaz-Balart (Florida)
• Will Hurd (Texas)
• Peter King (New York)
• Brian Mast (Florida)
• Chris Smith (New Joisey)
• Fred Upton (Michigan)

I have put in bold the names of the pond scum who co-sponsored the bill. Be sure you do not forget this occurrence when it comes time to vote in the next round of primary elections.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll099.xml
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/27/politics ... index.html

Bunch of rats! All of em!

Both democrats and republican lawmakers are coward anti constitutional tyrants who wish to make us the common folk into their state slaves. BITCH I DON'T THINK SO!

[Grinning Dragon]

H.R. 8, and of course they called it the "Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019". You can usually tell a bill will be scummy if its creators feel the need to preemptively defend it by giving it an overly positive name. "UWU, would you pwease consider calling your representative and urging them to support the Mandatory Organ Harvesting act- OOPS, sorry, I mean, the Democratic People's Bipartisan Patriotic Anti-Terrorism Act?"

Also, a list of the Republican (In Name Only) serpents who voted for the bill:

• Vern Buchanan (Florida)
• Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)
• Mario Diaz-Balart (Florida)
• Will Hurd (Texas)
• Peter King (New York)
• Brian Mast (Florida)
• Chris Smith (New Joisey)
• Fred Upton (Michigan)

I have put in bold the names of the pond scum who co-sponsored the bill. Be sure you do not forget this occurrence when it comes time to vote in the next round of primary elections.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll099.xml
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/27/politics ... index.html

Bunch of rats! All of em!

Both democrats and republican lawmakers are coward anti constitutional tyrants who wish to make us the common folk into their state slaves. BITCH I DON'T THINK SO!

It only goes to show, that after a few reports and stories even by left leaning rags that delved into UBC and in how it wouldn't do anything nor do what they want it to that those who voted on it only care about control while hiding behind the mask of illusionary safety.

[Phoenix2012]

I had a thought on the way to work this morning: if guns were regulated "like cars", does that mean that getting caught with an automatic weapon/high capacity magazine/weapon that violates the Cosmetic Features Ban would be treated as a trivial matter like illegal window tints and punishable by a small fine?

Or is the pendulum going to swing the other way and tapping someone's bumper will be upgraded to a felony?

Would that come with the whole Title/ registration/ licensing system?

[The Empire of Pretantia]

I had a thought on the way to work this morning: if guns were regulated "like cars", does that mean that getting caught with an automatic weapon/high capacity magazine/weapon that violates the Cosmetic Features Ban would be treated as a trivial matter like illegal window tints and punishable by a small fine?

Or is the pendulum going to swing the other way and tapping someone's bumper will be upgraded to a felony?

Would that come with the whole Title/ registration/ licensing system?

Do we need gun insurance too? I feel like I'm less likely to fuck up somebody else's gun with mine.

[Gun Manufacturers]

I'd put underglow lighting on mine.

A single color or the type that changes?
How about some dangling truck nuts?

Probably single color, either blue or white. And truck nuts are idiotic IMO, so I wouldn't put them on my firearms, either.

[The Two Jerseys]

A single color or the type that changes?
How about some dangling truck nuts?

Probably single color, either blue or white. And truck nuts are idiotic IMO, so I wouldn't put them on my firearms, either.

What about fuzzy dice for your gun?

[Big Jim P]

A single color or the type that changes?
How about some dangling truck nuts?

Probably single color, either blue or white. And truck nuts are idiotic IMO, so I wouldn't put them on my firearms, either.

I've seen forward grips on ARs in the form of testicles. Why? Who knows.

[Big Jim P]

Oklahoma just became the 16th Constitutional Carry state. We are slowly but surely coming around. Now if only the Texas lege would get off their asses and pass it here.

[Hurtful Thoughts]

Probably single color, either blue or white. And truck nuts are idiotic IMO, so I wouldn't put them on my firearms, either.

I've seen forward grips on ARs in the form of testicles. Why? Who knows.

Best way to control your gun is to grab it by the balls?

[Das Schmutzige Huhn]

I've seen forward grips on ARs in the form of testicles. Why? Who knows.

Best way to control your gun is to grab it by the balls?

no the best way to control your gun is a firm grip on the pistol grip and fore grip as well as not going full Rambo.

[Grinning Dragon]

Best way to control your gun is to grab it by the balls?

no the best way to control your gun is a firm grip on the pistol grip and fore grip as well as not going full Rambo.

But they drew "First Blood"

[Grinning Dragon]

Oklahoma just became the 16th Constitutional Carry state. We are slowly but surely coming around. Now if only the Texas lege would get off their asses and pass it here.

Well done Oklahoma, well done.