The Chuck wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
Yeah, that Nuclear power was not without issue. And it’s not. Why is that such a contentious statement?
Tarsonis. I have a 200 Kw nuclear reactor that is literally behind my main classrooms and department on my college campus. My department of studies shares the building with the nuclear engineering department and I see nukers (nickname for nuclear engineers) coming and going all the time. I might be getting a couple more rads then normal due to usually being a more indoorsy person but at the end of the day I'm still getting less radiation from them carrying nuclear samples past me and sitting in a building with nuclear samples then if I were to stand outside and sunbath from dawn till dusk on a sunny day. Sure humanity has had issues with nuclear power like Chernobyl but it's this same kind of fear mongering that affects all of us here who enjoy our rights to bear arms. Sure firearms and nuclear power is dangerous if not properly taken care of and used. However if properly used, both are quite safe and beneficial to society.
It’s not fear mongering if it’s true. It’s not fear mongering to point out that when the fuel rods in that reactor are spent, we have nowhere to reliably store them, because it’s true. It’s not fear mongering to point out that the whole the chances of a critical situation are slim, the consequences of said situation would vastly put strip the consequences of any other form of energy having a critical issue, because it’s fucking true. We can acknowledge that nuclear energy has both its perks and drawbacks.









