Gun Control III - the Gunnening

[Mujahidah]

What, you need 100 Kalashnikovs to go duck hunting? Get real, mate. A shotgun would suffice.

No one is going to go duck hunting with a Kalashnikov.
Get your facts right.

Is that a challenge?

[Kubrath]

Every additional gun is an additional hazard. Thinking that you're too responsible and careful for anything to happen is just asking for trouble.

If you trust someone with one gun theres no reason to not trust them with five. You just aren't making sense right now.

Yes, because you live in a vacuum and no one else will ever have access to your guns, even by accident. I wouldn't completely trust anyone with a gun no matter how well-behaved they are. Incidentally, I apply the same reasoning to drivers and it has saved me from being run over multiple times.

[Sovaal]

Yah no thats pretty fucking arbitrary. What if I want to do skeet shooting or duck or game hunting or target shooting or even competition shooting?
And a gun best for home defense isn’t going to be the one best for personal carry.

So yah pretty fucking arbitrary.

What, you need 100 Kalashnikovs to go duck hunting? Get real, mate. A shotgun would suffice.

And what ignore aim also into deer hunting? And target shooting? And competitive shooting? And what about for conceal carry? And a duck shotgun probably isn’t the best shotgun for home defense.

“Get real” lol

[Kubrath]

What, you need 100 Kalashnikovs to go duck hunting? Get real, mate. A shotgun would suffice.

No one is going to go duck hunting with a Kalashnikov.
Get your facts right.

Woosh.

[Sovaal]

No one is going to go duck hunting with a Kalashnikov.
Get your facts right.

Is that a challenge?

Saiga 12 could probably do it.

[Valgora]

No one is going to go duck hunting with a Kalashnikov.
Get your facts right.

Is that a challenge?

If someone can kill a flying duck with a rifle, they are undoubtedly a great shot - or very lucky.

[Sovaal]

What, you need 100 Kalashnikovs to go duck hunting? Get real, mate. A shotgun would suffice.

No one is going to go duck hunting with a Kalashnikov.
Get your facts right.

Don’t fall for the bait dude.

[Valgora]

Is that a challenge?

Saiga 12 could probably do it.

Shit.
I forgot about the Saiga 12.

[Sovaal]

Saiga 12 could probably do it.

Shit.
I forgot about the Saiga 12.

Honestly if I could only have one gun that would probably be it.

[Kubrath]

So a handgun for self defense and a shotgun for hunting aren't enough for you? You need a dozen variants to satisfy your particular needs? People used to hunt with bows and arrows. You people are pathetic if you need more than that to hunt.

[Valgora]

So a handgun for self defense and a shotgun for hunting aren't enough for you? You need a dozen variants to satisfy your particular needs? People used to hunt with bows and arrows. You people are pathetic if you need more than that to hunt.

I'm justifying the number of guns I want based on need, I'm justifying it on the fact that I want a bunch of guns.

[Kubrath]

So a handgun for self defense and a shotgun for hunting aren't enough for you? You need a dozen variants to satisfy your particular needs? People used to hunt with bows and arrows. You people are pathetic if you need more than that to hunt.

I'm justifying the number of guns I want based on need, I'm justifying it on the fact that I want a bunch of guns.

You can't always get what you want.

[Sovaal]

So a handgun for self defense and a shotgun for hunting aren't enough for you? You need a dozen variants to satisfy your particular needs? People used to hunt with bows and arrows. You people are pathetic if you need more than that to hunt.

Coming from the guy throwing a hissy fit on the internet.

Anyway, yes, that’s why people made different variants. Most are fairly decent at killing, but they each usually succeed in areas others don’t. For example unless it’s fucking slugs I wouldn’t go big game hunting with a shotgun, just as I wouldn’t go a rifle. Same with target shooting.

[Ors Might]

So a handgun for self defense and a shotgun for hunting aren't enough for you? You need a dozen variants to satisfy your particular needs? People used to hunt with bows and arrows. You people are pathetic if you need more than that to hunt.

Bows and arrows weren’t exactly efficient. Kinda why almost no one ever uses them beyond archery competitions. And yeah, different guns can be useful for different situations. What part of that don't you get?

[Mujahidah]

So a handgun for self defense and a shotgun for hunting aren't enough for you? You need a dozen variants to satisfy your particular needs? People used to hunt with bows and arrows. You people are pathetic if you need more than that to hunt.

That's your opinion, and I call BS. Hunting with firearms isn't pathetic, otherwise everyone since the invention of gunpowder is pathetic.

Please leave before you hurt yourself with your mental gymnastics

[Sovaal]

I'm justifying the number of guns I want based on need, I'm justifying it on the fact that I want a bunch of guns.

You can't always get what you want.

You’re right there. Guns are expensive. Choices have to be made. (:

[Valgora]

I'm justifying the number of guns I want based on need, I'm justifying it on the fact that I want a bunch of guns.

You can't always get what you want.

And how does quoting a Rolling Stones song help your argument?

[Sovaal]

So a handgun for self defense and a shotgun for hunting aren't enough for you? You need a dozen variants to satisfy your particular needs? People used to hunt with bows and arrows. You people are pathetic if you need more than that to hunt.

Bows and arrows weren’t exactly efficient. Kinda why almost no one ever uses them beyond archery competitions. And yeah, different guns can be useful for different situations. What part of that don't you get?

And what’s so special about those bow hunters anyway? People used I hunt with pontes sticks. Bow hunters are P A T H E T I C.

[Ors Might]

Bows and arrows weren’t exactly efficient. Kinda why almost no one ever uses them beyond archery competitions. And yeah, different guns can be useful for different situations. What part of that don't you get?

And what’s so special about those bow hunters anyway? People used I hunt with pontes sticks. Bow hunters are P A T H E T I C.

Real men hunt with rocks. No slings. Just your hand and the biggest fucking rock you can find.

[Valgora]

And what’s so special about those bow hunters anyway? People used I hunt with pontes sticks. Bow hunters are P A T H E T I C.

Real men hunt with rocks. No slings. Just your hand and the biggest fucking rock you can find.

Just reminded me about the time I played a hunting game... and made the decision to hunt deer... with a knife. Then survive a bear attack... using only a knife.

[Kubrath]

So a handgun for self defense and a shotgun for hunting aren't enough for you? You need a dozen variants to satisfy your particular needs? People used to hunt with bows and arrows. You people are pathetic if you need more than that to hunt.

Bows and arrows weren’t exactly efficient. Kinda why almost no one ever uses them beyond archery competitions. And yeah, different guns can be useful for different situations. What part of that don't you get?

They were less efficient in comparison to modern firearms. Doesn't mean they didn't get the job done. You don't use wagons in place of cars, right? They can still get you from point A to point B within reason. The part that I don't get is why you need to have an armory just to "hunt". In Germany, for example, every weapon you own has to be justified, including for hunting. "I want one" doesn't fly there.

[Ors Might]

Real men hunt with rocks. No slings. Just your hand and the biggest fucking rock you can find.

Just reminded me about the time I played a hunting game... and made the decision to hunt deer... with a knife. Then survive a bear attack... using only a knife.

Is Rock not good enough for you? Wussy video games.

[Mujahidah]

Bows and arrows weren’t exactly efficient. Kinda why almost no one ever uses them beyond archery competitions. And yeah, different guns can be useful for different situations. What part of that don't you get?

They were less efficient in comparison to modern firearms. Doesn't mean they didn't get the job done. You don't use wagons in place of cars, right? They can still get you from point A to point B within reason. The part that I don't get is why you need to have an armory just to "hunt". In Germany, for example, every weapon you own has to be justified, including for hunting. "I want one" doesn't fly there.

While America and Germany are both lovely places, they aren't the same country. Germany is irrelevant to US law.

[Valgora]

Bows and arrows weren’t exactly efficient. Kinda why almost no one ever uses them beyond archery competitions. And yeah, different guns can be useful for different situations. What part of that don't you get?

They were less efficient in comparison to modern firearms. Doesn't mean they didn't get the job done. You don't use wagons in place of cars, right? They can still get you from point A to point B within reason. The part that I don't get is why you need to have an armory just to "hunt". In Germany, for example, every weapon you own has to be justified, including for hunting. "I want one" doesn't fly there.

Well this ain't fuckin' Germany.
I want one is a justifiable reason to own a gun.

[Ors Might]

Bows and arrows weren’t exactly efficient. Kinda why almost no one ever uses them beyond archery competitions. And yeah, different guns can be useful for different situations. What part of that don't you get?

They were less efficient in comparison to modern firearms. Doesn't mean they didn't get the job done. You don't use wagons in place of cars, right? They can still get you from point A to point B within reason. The part that I don't get is why you need to have an armory just to "hunt". In Germany, for example, every weapon you own has to be justified, including for hunting. "I want one" doesn't fly there.

Poor Germans. They need a good liberating, I’ll tell ya.