Gun Control III - the Gunnening

[Kubrath]

When the other guy has drones, tanks and bombers, you'll find those odds shrinking rapidly to the point of insignificance. But hey, at least you'll go out with a fight.

I mean, in that situation I’d be screwed either way. At least that way I could maintain some image of dignity.

In the grand scheme of things, no one would really care if you were blown off while you were carrying an iPhone or if it was blown off carrying an AR-15.

[Kramanica]

If a person can be trusted with one gun why not multiple? That’s just ridiculous.

How many guns do people need to defend themselves outside of a warzone or zombie apocalypse? Never heard of a shooter stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo.

So what?

[Sovaal]

If a person can be trusted with one gun why not multiple? That’s just ridiculous.

How many guns do people need to defend themselves outside of a warzone or zombie apocalypse? Never heard of a shooter stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo.

And how is having multiple guns any worse then having one?

[Sovaal]

How many guns do people need to defend themselves outside of a warzone or zombie apocalypse? Never heard of a shooter stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo.

So what?

No you see you own one gun over the limit so you must be a child murderer.

[Petrasylvania]

How many guns do people need to defend themselves outside of a warzone or zombie apocalypse? Never heard of a shooter stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo.

So what?

You don't give a shit, but most people don't need a stocked armory to protect themselves and their homes.

[Valgora]

If a person can be trusted with one gun why not multiple? That’s just ridiculous.

How many guns do people need to defend themselves outside of a warzone or zombie apocalypse? Never heard of a shooter stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo.

I should be able to get as many guns as I fuckin' want.
This "never heard of a shoot stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo" doesn't fuckin' matter.

[Kubrath]

I'll just tell you what I told the other person:
"What I want to do here is to point out to those who cry "muh freedoms" to stop and think about how well they practice what they preach. The "it was a long time ago, it doesn't concern me" argument is the weakest shit one can come up with. Instead of running around pretending to be a victim, how about one goes and asks their granddaddy or their daddy about how well they used their 2nd Amendment rights to curtail government oppression during their lifetime."

Uh huh. Tell me, how am I supposed to right atrocities made years ago?
And I fail to see how I’m “pretending to be a victim”. But hey, you just want to insult me that’s fine too I guess.

Go ahead and get triggered, see if I care. Nobody's asking you to time travel. I'm just making an observation about the inaction of people with very similar views on their "freedoms" and how one should check their principles (as opposed to their privilege) before they opine about said "freedoms".

[Kramanica]

So what?

You don't give a shit, but most people don't need a stocked armory to protect themselves and their homes.

So you literally just want to restrict the number of guns you can own for fucking arbitrary reasons.

Sounds about right.

[Petrasylvania]

How many guns do people need to defend themselves outside of a warzone or zombie apocalypse? Never heard of a shooter stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo.

I should be able to get as many guns as I fuckin' want.
This "never heard of a shoot stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo" doesn't fuckin' matter.

The problem is when your side insists the same right to get as many dakka as you want also applies to people who have a history of disturbing messages on social media and/or have mental issues that make them dangerous to self and others.

[Kubrath]

You can wield one gun. Great. That's no reason why you should be allowed to have 100. You see, when you assert something, the burden of proof is on you to prove that assertion. So you assert you need 100 guns. If your only justification is "because I want them", well, that's not really an argument, now is it? I want a lot of things, too. Doesn't mean I should get them.

[Sovaal]

Uh huh. Tell me, how am I supposed to right atrocities made years ago?
And I fail to see how I’m “pretending to be a victim”. But hey, you just want to insult me that’s fine too I guess.

Go ahead and get triggered, see if I care. Nobody's asking you to time travel. I'm just making an observation about the inaction of people with very similar views on their "freedoms" and how one should check their principles (as opposed to their privilege) before they opine about said "freedoms".

Uh huh. Still fail to see how that relates to me but that’s cool.

[Sovaal]

You can wield one gun. Great. That's no reason why you should be allowed to have 100. You see, when you assert something, the burden of proof is on you to prove that assertion. So you assert you need 100 guns. If your only justification is "because I want them", well, that's not really an argument, now is it? I want a lot of things, too. Doesn't mean I should get them.

I fail to see how some one is fit for one gun but not multiple.

[Kubrath]

You don't give a shit, but most people don't need a stocked armory to protect themselves and their homes.

So you literally just want to restrict the number of guns you can own for fucking arbitrary reasons.

Sounds about right.

Nothing arbitrary about that, mate. You don't need that many guns for self-defense. Jesus, where the hell do you guys live, Syria?

[Kramanica]

I should be able to get as many guns as I fuckin' want.
This "never heard of a shoot stopped by someone wielding two guns akimbo" doesn't fuckin' matter.

The problem is when your side insists the same right to get as many dakka as you want also applies to people who have a history of disturbing messages on social media and/or have mental issues that make them dangerous to self and others.

And how many mass shootings recently have occurred where the perp used more than one gun?

Do you think they're just gonna go full Terminator and carry one rifle in each hand?

Again, arbitrary and bullshit.

[Valgora]

So you literally just want to restrict the number of guns you can own for fucking arbitrary reasons.

Sounds about right.

Nothing arbitrary about that, mate. You don't need that many guns for self-defense. Jesus, where the hell do you guys live, Syria?

I don't need to justify the number of guns I own.... want to own.

[Kubrath]

Go ahead and get triggered, see if I care. Nobody's asking you to time travel. I'm just making an observation about the inaction of people with very similar views on their "freedoms" and how one should check their principles (as opposed to their privilege) before they opine about said "freedoms".

Uh huh. Still fail to see how that relates to me but that’s cool.

That's your problem, mate, not mine.

[Sovaal]

You don't give a shit, but most people don't need a stocked armory to protect themselves and their homes.

So you literally just want to restrict the number of guns you can own for fucking arbitrary reasons.

Sounds about right.

And I still fail to see why there should be one.

[Sovaal]

So you literally just want to restrict the number of guns you can own for fucking arbitrary reasons.

Sounds about right.

Nothing arbitrary about that, mate. You don't need that many guns for self-defense. Jesus, where the hell do you guys live, Syria?

Yah no thats pretty fucking arbitrary. What if I want to do skeet shooting or duck or game hunting or target shooting or even competition shooting?
And a gun best for home defense isn’t going to be the one best for personal carry.

So yah pretty fucking arbitrary.

[Sovaal]

Uh huh. Still fail to see how that relates to me but that’s cool.

That's your problem, mate, not mine.

Uh huh, sure thing.

[Kubrath]

You can wield one gun. Great. That's no reason why you should be allowed to have 100. You see, when you assert something, the burden of proof is on you to prove that assertion. So you assert you need 100 guns. If your only justification is "because I want them", well, that's not really an argument, now is it? I want a lot of things, too. Doesn't mean I should get them.

I fail to see how some one is fit for one gun but not multiple.

Every additional gun is an additional hazard. Thinking that you're too responsible and careful for anything to happen is just asking for trouble.

[Mujahidah]

I fail to see how some one is fit for one gun but not multiple.

Every additional gun is an additional hazard. Thinking that you're too responsible and careful for anything to happen is just asking for trouble.

If you trust someone with one gun theres no reason to not trust them with five. You just aren't making sense right now.

[Kramanica]

So you literally just want to restrict the number of guns you can own for fucking arbitrary reasons.

Sounds about right.

Nothing arbitrary about that, mate. You don't need that many guns for self-defense. Jesus, where the hell do you guys live, Syria?

I'm not hurting anyone so why do you care?

[Sovaal]

I fail to see how some one is fit for one gun but not multiple.

Every additional gun is an additional hazard. Thinking that you're too responsible and careful for anything to happen is just asking for trouble.

You realize most gun safes are made for multiple guns, right?

Anyway, they already got a fucking gun, if they wanted to cause damage they could.

[Kubrath]

Nothing arbitrary about that, mate. You don't need that many guns for self-defense. Jesus, where the hell do you guys live, Syria?

Yah no thats pretty fucking arbitrary. What if I want to do skeet shooting or duck or game hunting or target shooting or even competition shooting?
And a gun best for home defense isn’t going to be the one best for personal carry.

So yah pretty fucking arbitrary.

What, you need 100 Kalashnikovs to go duck hunting? Get real, mate. A shotgun would suffice.

[Valgora]

Yah no thats pretty fucking arbitrary. What if I want to do skeet shooting or duck or game hunting or target shooting or even competition shooting?
And a gun best for home defense isn’t going to be the one best for personal carry.

So yah pretty fucking arbitrary.

What, you need 100 Kalashnikovs to go duck hunting? Get real, mate. A shotgun would suffice.

No one is going to go duck hunting with a Kalashnikov.
Get your facts right.