Gun Control III - the Gunnening

[Chernoslavia]

Oh look, another lying bint. Such things are typical of anti gunners, lying, cooked data, made up stats, etc.
“I Lied”: Anti-gun Democrat Ex-Candidate Elizabeth McCarthy’s Problems Grow…

From Florida Politics


Anything to push the anti gun agenda, lie, lie like a motherfucker.

Jesus Christ dude, you could've warned us that we'd need eyebleach for the Florida Politics link!

Anyway, I really hope the pro-gun side goes on the offensive next election, just come out swinging and throw shit like this in the grabbers' faces.

But what about the 1 Gorillion school shootings??

[Dacoromanian]

You all should check the NS issue: A Gun in Every Hand and a Tank in Every Garage?

The Issue

It’s no secret that [nation] is one of the most gun-happy nations in [region]. While guns are legal, a few restrictions do exist. Now, gun-toting citizens are demanding that the government expand gun rights to include bazookas, tanks, and other military-grade weapons. Naturally, the proposal has some concerned citizens up in arms.

The Debate

1 . “It is the right of every patriotic citizen to own any kind of weapon they desire,” explains conservative actor and gun activist Charles Hester, who recently starred in the anti-war film Planet of the [...]. “Why should the military be the only ones trusted with these weapons? The fact that we can’t have them is nothing short of government tyranny and a liberal conspiracy to take our guns away! Some will say that this will be dangerous, but I doubt anyone will be talking smack when they see that well-polished tank on my front lawn!”

Accept / No

2 . “Damn right only the military should have these weapons!” firmly states Commander Ronald Moore, while twirling the keys to a tank around his finger. “Do you really want to trust the average [citizen] with these dangerous weapons? We’d have people blowing each other up the moment there’s an argument over wind chimes, for Violet’s sake! In fact, what you need to do is provide more military funding so we can better secure these weapons before they fall into the wrong hands.” The keys slip from the commander’s grasp and fly out an open window.

Accept / No

3 . “You want to bring MORE weapons into [nation]?” despairs your ultra-liberal teenage niece, who is busy painting an anti-gun placard for her fifth march this year. “If anything, we need LESS weapons! The only thing guns are good for is killing people. Just look at all the statistics linking easily accessible guns to violent crime. Take a look at Brancaland’s sensible gun control legislation. They haven’t had a mass shooting in decades. We had one last week. If you have any compassion left in your body, you’d ban all guns now! Pry them out of their cold, dead fingers if you have to!”

Accept / No

4 . “Military grade weaponry doesn’t kill people, ignorance kills people,” counters the chairperson of the Responsible Gun Owners Association. “If all [citizen] were taught how to responsibly shoot, drive a tank, and fire an anti-aircraft rocket launcher, there’d be none of these so-called accidents you hear about. I don’t have a problem with the average citizen driving a tank as long as they’ve completed proper education and safety training. Then all those gun-grabbers can stop trying to infringe on our right to self-defense, and let us own whatever weapons we like.”

Accept / No

5 . “As my dear mother always said: ‘every problem has a compromise. Or in failing a compromise, a loophole,’” quotes your Minister of Compromises. “Citizens want to have machine guns, bazookas, and tanks? Let them have as many as they want, but let’s make sure that only the police and military have access to ammunition for military-grade weapons. This way they still get their precious weapons of war while we protect public safety. Maybe they can open up a museum or something. Quite frankly, I wouldn’t trust any of the idiots in this country with anything more dangerous than string.”

Accept / No

Perhaps this may help you decide on gun control.

[Grinning Dragon]

You all should check the NS issue: A Gun in Every Hand and a Tank in Every Garage?

The Issue

It’s no secret that [nation] is one of the most gun-happy nations in [region]. While guns are legal, a few restrictions do exist. Now, gun-toting citizens are demanding that the government expand gun rights to include bazookas, tanks, and other military-grade weapons. Naturally, the proposal has some concerned citizens up in arms.

The Debate

1 . “It is the right of every patriotic citizen to own any kind of weapon they desire,” explains conservative actor and gun activist Charles Hester, who recently starred in the anti-war film Planet of the [...]. “Why should the military be the only ones trusted with these weapons? The fact that we can’t have them is nothing short of government tyranny and a liberal conspiracy to take our guns away! Some will say that this will be dangerous, but I doubt anyone will be talking smack when they see that well-polished tank on my front lawn!”

Accept / No

2 . “Damn right only the military should have these weapons!” firmly states Commander Ronald Moore, while twirling the keys to a tank around his finger. “Do you really want to trust the average [citizen] with these dangerous weapons? We’d have people blowing each other up the moment there’s an argument over wind chimes, for Violet’s sake! In fact, what you need to do is provide more military funding so we can better secure these weapons before they fall into the wrong hands.” The keys slip from the commander’s grasp and fly out an open window.

Accept / No

3 . “You want to bring MORE weapons into [nation]?” despairs your ultra-liberal teenage niece, who is busy painting an anti-gun placard for her fifth march this year. “If anything, we need LESS weapons! The only thing guns are good for is killing people. Just look at all the statistics linking easily accessible guns to violent crime. Take a look at Brancaland’s sensible gun control legislation. They haven’t had a mass shooting in decades. We had one last week. If you have any compassion left in your body, you’d ban all guns now! Pry them out of their cold, dead fingers if you have to!”

Accept / No

4 . “Military grade weaponry doesn’t kill people, ignorance kills people,” counters the chairperson of the Responsible Gun Owners Association. “If all [citizen] were taught how to responsibly shoot, drive a tank, and fire an anti-aircraft rocket launcher, there’d be none of these so-called accidents you hear about. I don’t have a problem with the average citizen driving a tank as long as they’ve completed proper education and safety training. Then all those gun-grabbers can stop trying to infringe on our right to self-defense, and let us own whatever weapons we like.”

Accept / No

5 . “As my dear mother always said: ‘every problem has a compromise. Or in failing a compromise, a loophole,’” quotes your Minister of Compromises. “Citizens want to have machine guns, bazookas, and tanks? Let them have as many as they want, but let’s make sure that only the police and military have access to ammunition for military-grade weapons. This way they still get their precious weapons of war while we protect public safety. Maybe they can open up a museum or something. Quite frankly, I wouldn’t trust any of the idiots in this country with anything more dangerous than string.”

Accept / No

Perhaps this may help you decide on gun control.

I remember that one. I chose to accept option #1
Fuck legislative gun control.

[The Chuck]

You all should check the NS issue: A Gun in Every Hand and a Tank in Every Garage?

The Issue

It’s no secret that [nation] is one of the most gun-happy nations in [region]. While guns are legal, a few restrictions do exist. Now, gun-toting citizens are demanding that the government expand gun rights to include bazookas, tanks, and other military-grade weapons. Naturally, the proposal has some concerned citizens up in arms.

The Debate

1 . “It is the right of every patriotic citizen to own any kind of weapon they desire,” explains conservative actor and gun activist Charles Hester, who recently starred in the anti-war film Planet of the [...]. “Why should the military be the only ones trusted with these weapons? The fact that we can’t have them is nothing short of government tyranny and a liberal conspiracy to take our guns away! Some will say that this will be dangerous, but I doubt anyone will be talking smack when they see that well-polished tank on my front lawn!”

Accept / No

2 . “Damn right only the military should have these weapons!” firmly states Commander Ronald Moore, while twirling the keys to a tank around his finger. “Do you really want to trust the average [citizen] with these dangerous weapons? We’d have people blowing each other up the moment there’s an argument over wind chimes, for Violet’s sake! In fact, what you need to do is provide more military funding so we can better secure these weapons before they fall into the wrong hands.” The keys slip from the commander’s grasp and fly out an open window.

Accept / No

3 . “You want to bring MORE weapons into [nation]?” despairs your ultra-liberal teenage niece, who is busy painting an anti-gun placard for her fifth march this year. “If anything, we need LESS weapons! The only thing guns are good for is killing people. Just look at all the statistics linking easily accessible guns to violent crime. Take a look at Brancaland’s sensible gun control legislation. They haven’t had a mass shooting in decades. We had one last week. If you have any compassion left in your body, you’d ban all guns now! Pry them out of their cold, dead fingers if you have to!”

Accept / No

4 . “Military grade weaponry doesn’t kill people, ignorance kills people,” counters the chairperson of the Responsible Gun Owners Association. “If all [citizen] were taught how to responsibly shoot, drive a tank, and fire an anti-aircraft rocket launcher, there’d be none of these so-called accidents you hear about. I don’t have a problem with the average citizen driving a tank as long as they’ve completed proper education and safety training. Then all those gun-grabbers can stop trying to infringe on our right to self-defense, and let us own whatever weapons we like.”

Accept / No

5 . “As my dear mother always said: ‘every problem has a compromise. Or in failing a compromise, a loophole,’” quotes your Minister of Compromises. “Citizens want to have machine guns, bazookas, and tanks? Let them have as many as they want, but let’s make sure that only the police and military have access to ammunition for military-grade weapons. This way they still get their precious weapons of war while we protect public safety. Maybe they can open up a museum or something. Quite frankly, I wouldn’t trust any of the idiots in this country with anything more dangerous than string.”

Accept / No

Perhaps this may help you decide on gun control.

I remember that one. I chose to accept option #1
Fuck legislative gun control.

Fuck dude... I've been waiting for this issue for ages! I'm at 65 WPP NS stat wise and haven't gotten it yet I will reach #1 for weaponization eventually...

[Hurtful Thoughts]

Speaking of which... what part of an M1911A1 would need to be banned to prevent it from being bump-fired yet still functional?

... Not sure if you could bump-fire a double action revolver, but I'm sure nature will find a way.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

Speaking of which... what part of an M1911A1 would need to be banned to prevent it from being bump-fired yet still functional?

... Not sure if you could bump-fire a double action revolver, but I'm sure nature will find a way.

The gun part

[The Chuck]

Speaking of which... what part of an M1911A1 would need to be banned to prevent it from being bump-fired yet still functional?

... Not sure if you could bump-fire a double action revolver, but I'm sure nature will find a way.

The gun part

Hurtful Thoughts, fan that hammer cowboy!

[Hurtful Thoughts]

The gun part

Hurtful Thoughts, fan that hammer cowboy!

Good luck fanning an Enfield hammerless.

[East Ustya]

I still think it is a good thing that I don't own a firearm, not because of political reasons, or the fact that loud noises scare me without ear protection.

I just wouldn't be able to hit the broad side of a barn.

[The Chuck]

Hurtful Thoughts, fan that hammer cowboy!

Good luck fanning an Enfield hammerless.

Soldering torch and a piece of scrap metal...

[Solarist VZ]

I still think it is a good thing that I don't own a firearm, not because of political reasons, or the fact that loud noises scare me without ear protection.

I just wouldn't be able to hit the broad side of a barn.

Practice makes the master!.

[East Ustya]

I still think it is a good thing that I don't own a firearm, not because of political reasons, or the fact that loud noises scare me without ear protection.

I just wouldn't be able to hit the broad side of a barn.

Practice makes the master!.

LOL

With a BB at the Carnival.

[Hurtful Thoughts]

Practice makes the master!.

LOL

With a BB at the Carnival.

That actually does work... can even resistance-train by wieghing the gun down with sandbags to encourage proper stance/form of supporting the firearm with your strong bone-structure rather than your twitchy little puny muscles.

If you can shoot straight with a 40 pound .177 cal air rifle from a knee, you can shoot with a five pound .22LR.

[East Ustya]

LOL

With a BB at the Carnival.

That actually does work... can even resistance-train by wieghing the gun down with sandbags to encourage proper stance/form of supporting the firearm with your strong bone-structure rather than your twitchy little puny muscles.

If you can shoot straight with a 40 pound .177 cal air rifle from a knee, you can shoot with a five pound .22LR.

Logical, though I do not think I will ever be able to fire a real gun.

I just dream about it a lot for some reason.

[Hurtful Thoughts]

That actually does work... can even resistance-train by wieghing the gun down with sandbags to encourage proper stance/form of supporting the firearm with your strong bone-structure rather than your twitchy little puny muscles.

If you can shoot straight with a 40 pound .177 cal air rifle from a knee, you can shoot with a five pound .22LR.

Logical, though I do not think I will ever be able to fire a real gun.

I just dream about it a lot for some reason.

Various powders/propellants smell different... Surplus Mosin ammo has a certain odor different from all the rest.

[Kernen]

That actually does work... can even resistance-train by wieghing the gun down with sandbags to encourage proper stance/form of supporting the firearm with your strong bone-structure rather than your twitchy little puny muscles.

If you can shoot straight with a 40 pound .177 cal air rifle from a knee, you can shoot with a five pound .22LR.

Logical, though I do not think I will ever be able to fire a real gun.

I just dream about it a lot for some reason.

Thats because guns are awesome and everybody should have one. or six.

[Tarsonis]

Active shooter at some Garlic festival in CA

[East Ustya]

Logical, though I do not think I will ever be able to fire a real gun.

I just dream about it a lot for some reason.

Thats because guns are awesome and everybody should have one. or six.

If you live in the USA, I do not see it happening here.

[Grinning Dragon]

Active shooter at some Garlic festival in CA

Damn vampires..
Quite interesting in the various accounts of the alleged shooter. Wearing fatigues(bdu), was dressed like a policeman, was wearing blue jeans, green shirt and a red handkerchief over his face.
Of the injured, how many were injured due to stampede effect vs. being shot?
Then we have the issue of all of those wondrous anti gun laws that were designed to keep everybody safe and sound, like unicorns dancing on rainbows.
Gun free zones.
Red flag laws.
Evil black rifle ban
So called large capacity mag ban.
Universal background checks
Background checks on ammo purchases.
And the list goes on and on of laws to mitigate their made up coined phrase "gun violence" as if guns were the problem here or anywhere.

[Greater vakolicci haven]

Active shooter at some Garlic festival in CA

I know I shouldn't be focussing on this bit but...

What happens at a 'garlic festival?'

[Chernoslavia]

Active shooter at some Garlic festival in CA

I know I shouldn't be focussing on this bit but...

What happens at a 'garlic festival?'

I assume people getting together to eat dishes involving garlic?

[Greater vakolicci haven]

I know I shouldn't be focussing on this bit but...

What happens at a 'garlic festival?'

I assume people getting together to eat dishes involving garlic?

I suppose I have attended a fried chicken festival in new orleans.

[Solarist VZ]

Thats because guns are awesome and everybody should have one. or six.

If you live in the USA, I do not see it happening here.

Then fight so your people can also be armed. I do not live in the US and i try to teach the wonders of armed freedom when ever i can.

[East Ustya]

If you live in the USA, I do not see it happening here.

Then fight so your people can also be armed. I do not live in the US and i try to teach the wonders of armed freedom when ever i can.

No thanks, Dutch ppl can not even handle firworks, plus crime would probably increase, I got that from a valid source.

[Solarist VZ]

Then fight so your people can also be armed. I do not live in the US and i try to teach the wonders of armed freedom when ever i can.

No thanks, Dutch ppl can not even handle firworks, plus crime would probably increase, I got that from a valid source.

The education is what matters.
>crime would probably increase
>would
>probably
>valid source
eeeeeh. I'm a bit curious for that source. I have a pretty basic one on my side, and some infographics on my harddrive that i'm too lazy to bring in.