NATION

PASSWORD

UK Rape Gang scandal, up to 1000 victims.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57852
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:39 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:is dangerous.
It doesn't completely rob you of your ability to say no to sex and turn you into a whore.


Of course it doesn't. But alcohol most certainly does inhibit one's judgement and degrade their ability to give proper consent to just about anything, especially sexual activity. The ability of alcohol to lower one's inhibitions is rather well documented throughout history. Surely you don't deny that it is contributing to the situations we witness on college campuses?


College campuses are safer than the wider population, they're merely louder and more organized on this topic.
So no, sorry, it sounds like you've got shit exactly backwards.

Probably because younger folk are more aware of issues like consent.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:40 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:That doesn't justify the idea that Western women are a go-go for a good ol' gang rape.


Did I say that? Like, did I say that anywhere? Rape is prohibited in Islam.

So you wouldn't mind if the West trashed the culture of these issue places to hell and back on our own turf and gave a stern "assimilate or leave" message?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57852
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:41 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:That doesn't justify the idea that Western women are a go-go for a good ol' gang rape.


Did I say that? Like, did I say that anywhere? Rape is prohibited in Islam.


The issue is muslims viewing it as not rape because western women are whores who are up for anything.
That view stems from the dysfunctional view of sex and consent Islam cultivates that one is either chaste or a whore and a sinner.
Some may be different and be more nuanced in their teaching and understanding.

But the trend is there. Denying or ignoring it rather than confronting it and dealing with it merely because it's uncomfortable for some/many muslims to admit their community is ethically in the wrong over something is perpetuating mistreatment and prejudice of others.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Aillyria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5026
Founded: Sep 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aillyria » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:42 pm

Asinus Canadiensis wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:A marriage.


She was, at most, 13 when Mohammed had sex with her.

That's not marriage, that's pedophilia.

By modern standards, 600s Arabia wasn't modern progressive Western in culture. The idea of Aisha (ra) being that young are questionable in the first place, as it depends on taking the hadith at face value, which is unadvisable.
Last edited by Aillyria on Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist

West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

L/R: -5.38 L/A: +2.36 8values: Theocratic Distributist
I am female, Sorelianist, Sufi Muslim, Biracial, Murican
USN Vet, Semper Fortis dirtbags!!!

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:42 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Did I say that? Like, did I say that anywhere? Rape is prohibited in Islam.

So you wouldn't mind if the West trashed the culture of these issue places to hell and back on our own turf and gave a stern "assimilate or leave" message?


Muslims aren't asking for Britain to become a Muslim country. Muslims are asking simply to be allowed to be Muslim (something which, France, for instance, makes obscenely difficult).
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:43 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Did I say that? Like, did I say that anywhere? Rape is prohibited in Islam.


The issue is muslims viewing it as not rape because western women are whores who are up for anything.
That view stems from the dysfunctional view of sex and consent Islam cultivates that one is either chaste or a whore and a sinner.
Some may be different and be more nuanced in their teaching and understanding.

But the trend is there.

That is effing rape, ok! Rape is rape, period, which is haram, period!
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:43 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:So you wouldn't mind if the West trashed the culture of these issue places to hell and back on our own turf and gave a stern "assimilate or leave" message?


Muslims aren't asking for Britain to become a Muslim country. Muslims are asking simply to be allowed to be Muslim (something which, France, for instance, makes obscenely difficult).

I didn't say they couldn't be Muslim. I've been rather clear in saying that it's a problem primarily among certain cultural groups, with the issue not nearly among other ones even if they are majority Muslim as well. I'm saying any ounce of Pakistan other than some culinary dishes is prohibited.
Last edited by Napkiraly on Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:44 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:So you wouldn't mind if the West trashed the culture of these issue places to hell and back on our own turf and gave a stern "assimilate or leave" message?


Muslims aren't asking for Britain to become a Muslim country. Muslims are asking simply to be allowed to be Muslim (something which, France, for instance, makes obscenely difficult).

But da'wah nice tho. It's a good thing when someone converts into Al-Islam.
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66767
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:45 pm

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Muslims aren't asking for Britain to become a Muslim country. Muslims are asking simply to be allowed to be Muslim (something which, France, for instance, makes obscenely difficult).

But da'wah nice tho. It's a good thing when someone converts into Al-Islam.


What happened to the whole "Islam cannot be compelled upon a person" thing?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57852
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:46 pm

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
The issue is muslims viewing it as not rape because western women are whores who are up for anything.
That view stems from the dysfunctional view of sex and consent Islam cultivates that one is either chaste or a whore and a sinner.
Some may be different and be more nuanced in their teaching and understanding.

But the trend is there.

That is effing rape, ok! Rape is rape, period, which is haram, period!


You may say that, but not enough Muslims are. Or enough aren't listening.
Next time you see someone preaching about the evils of liquor, take a look around and think about if any of your peers there will walk away thinking these things about western women.

If your preacher says rape is rape and wrong, but simultaneously that alcohol makes people incapable of controlling their sexual desires or saying no, what does that amount to?

These rape gangs were tolerated. These people felt confident enough that they could go around recruiting their peers to form gangs to rape people.
That is the extent of the rot in these communities.

If you were to try and round up a posse to go raping, how many of your friends do you think would be up for it?
What would it say about where you lived and their attitudes that you thought you could get away with that, and in fact did?

The culture in these communities is broken and anti-western, they have to be dealt with.
I felt exactly the same about the catholic church, by the way. I argued for the pope to be detained and questioned.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:48 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Aillyria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5026
Founded: Sep 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aillyria » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:47 pm

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Muslims aren't asking for Britain to become a Muslim country. Muslims are asking simply to be allowed to be Muslim (something which, France, for instance, makes obscenely difficult).

But da'wah nice tho. It's a good thing when someone converts into Al-Islam.

Only when it is of their own free will, inshallah.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist

West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

L/R: -5.38 L/A: +2.36 8values: Theocratic Distributist
I am female, Sorelianist, Sufi Muslim, Biracial, Murican
USN Vet, Semper Fortis dirtbags!!!

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:47 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:But da'wah nice tho. It's a good thing when someone converts into Al-Islam.


What happened to the whole "Islam cannot be compelled upon a person" thing?

I said "da'wah" not "convert or die".
Last edited by Kubumba Tribe on Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Asinus Canadiensis
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Mar 11, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Asinus Canadiensis » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:49 pm

Aillyria wrote:
Asinus Canadiensis wrote:
She was, at most, 13 when Mohammed had sex with her.

That's not marriage, that's pedophilia.

By modern standards, 600s Arabia wasn't modern progressive Western in culture. The idea of Aisha (ra) being that young are questionable in the first place, as it depends on taking the hadith and face value, which is unadvisable.


Frankly, I'm being pretty generous in saying that she was 13. Most of Mohammed's early biographers estimated her age as being between ten and twelve when her marriage was consummated.

Granted, there's a certain bit of leeway that can be given to cultural relevance and the circumstances of the timeframe in question, but chalking it up to merely those factors is really missing the point, because by that logic, the Aztecs could get a pass for all the people they brutally murdered on their sacrificial altars since they thought doing otherwise would cause the world to end.

Point being, Mohammed's pedophilia is a black mark on his record. It's not reputation shattering given the context, no, but it's sufficient to call into question the typical Islamic attitude of him being some kind of perfect idealization of humanity. He very clearly was not.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:49 pm

Asinus Canadiensis wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:A marriage.


She was, at most, 13 when Mohammed had sex with her.

That's not marriage, that's pedophilia.

José de San Martín married a fourteen-year-old, but we don't blame him or our idolization of him as a national hero for our child molestation problems today.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Asinus Canadiensis
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Mar 11, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Asinus Canadiensis » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:51 pm

Liriena wrote:
Asinus Canadiensis wrote:
She was, at most, 13 when Mohammed had sex with her.

That's not marriage, that's pedophilia.

José de San Martín married a fourteen-year-old, but we don't blame him or our idolization of him as a national hero for our child molestation problems today.


He also typically isn't lauded for his conduct in his private life as being something others should strive for, so... kind of missing the point.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57852
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:54 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:That is effing rape, ok! Rape is rape, period, which is haram, period!


You may say that, but not enough Muslims are. Or enough aren't listening.
Next time you see someone preaching about the evils of liquor, take a look around and think about if any of your peers there will walk away thinking these things about western women.

If your preacher says rape is rape and wrong, but simultaneously that alcohol makes people incapable of controlling their sexual desires or saying no, what does that amount to?

These rape gangs were tolerated. These people felt confident enough that they could go around recruiting their peers to form gangs to rape people.
That is the extent of the rot in these communities.

If you were to try and round up a posse to go raping, how many of your friends do you think would be up for it?
What would it say about where you lived and their attitudes that you thought you could get away with that, and in fact did?

The culture in these communities is broken and anti-western, they have to be dealt with.
I felt exactly the same about the catholic church, by the way. I argued for the pope to be detained and questioned.


I mean shit.
I argued to bring back fucking mccarthyism to deal with Holywood, and to drag each and every one of the fuckers before a senate committe and get them to say on the damn record how much they knew, and jail the ones found to be liars for perjury, while condemning, ridiculing, and vilifying the ones who admitted they knew what was going on and trashing their careers.

This isn't me being anti-muslim.
I just cannot fucking stand rape culture.
The issue is not just the rapists. It's the people who tolerated it. The culture that fostered it. It all needs to be dealt with.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16625
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:57 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Kramanica wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't something similar to this happen a few years ago where English police attempted to cover up immigrant tapes in some town?


It did. The Rotherham scandal. This is showing that nothing has changed.

Does it? How so? I mean, with the new revelations dating back 30 years, Operation Chalice taking place in 2013, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse being launched recently, and the Home Office and Ofsted conducting inspections to see how agencies in Telford are working to tackle the issue?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57852
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:00 pm

Gravlen wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
It did. The Rotherham scandal. This is showing that nothing has changed.

Does it? How so? I mean, with the new revelations dating back 30 years, Operation Chalice taking place in 2013, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse being launched recently, and the Home Office and Ofsted conducting inspections to see how agencies in Telford are working to tackle the issue?


Fair point, i'll clarify.
The efforts to uncover the problem are making progress in exposing the problem and dealing with it, however, the Rotherham scandal and its prevalence in the media, as well as the knowledge that there were investigations underway, did nothing to prompt Telford police to come forward of their own volition or reform in the meantime.
The police have not changed, they are simply under investigation. There has been no institutional reform, unless we are to believe that these investigations into police misconduct on this issue will exist in perpetuity as a measure to combat the problem.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16625
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:04 pm

Chernoslavia wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Who's "you people"?

What's the fault in that?


Again, because they supported bringing them here undocumented and bashed anyone who warned them of the consequences for doing so.

"Undocumented"? Who are you talking about?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41246
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:12 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Gravlen wrote:Does it? How so? I mean, with the new revelations dating back 30 years, Operation Chalice taking place in 2013, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse being launched recently, and the Home Office and Ofsted conducting inspections to see how agencies in Telford are working to tackle the issue?


Fair point, i'll clarify.
The efforts to uncover the problem are making progress in exposing the problem and dealing with it, however, the Rotherham scandal and its prevalence in the media, as well as the knowledge that there were investigations underway, did nothing to prompt Telford police to come forward of their own volition or reform in the meantime.
The police have not changed, they are simply under investigation. There has been no institutional reform, unless we are to believe that these investigations into police misconduct on this issue will exist in perpetuity as a measure to combat the problem.


How does an institution reform when it's barely making ends meet doing what it already does? Reform costs money and the police are fucking broke.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:14 pm

Gravlen wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
Again, because they supported bringing them here undocumented and bashed anyone who warned them of the consequences for doing so.

"Undocumented"? Who are you talking about?

Isn't it amazing when someone is so consumed by ideology that they just reflexively lump everyone they disagree with into one amorphous blob, and start incoherently mixing up places and groups?
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:14 pm

Chernoslavia wrote:
Albrenia wrote:
That's a pretty long bow you're pulling there, dude.

Supporting immigration is not the same as supporting the actions of these fucking monsters who attack children.


No it isn’t. But leftists letting undocumented refugees in and ignoring our warnings has lead to this. And then I see people like Vassenor trying to lay this shit on us when it blows up in their face as usual...


I think even most of us lefties want immigration to have proper documentation and procedure, with serious criminals and the like getting a great big DENIED stamp. At least I bloody hope so.

I want compassion, not outright stupidity, in immigration.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66767
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:15 pm

Gravlen wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
Again, because they supported bringing them here undocumented and bashed anyone who warned them of the consequences for doing so.

"Undocumented"? Who are you talking about?


Apparently there are no Muslims who came in through the normal immigration channels or, heaven forbid, were born in the UK.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Kramanica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5369
Founded: Jan 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Kramanica » Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:19 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Kramanica wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't something similar to this happen a few years ago where English police attempted to cover up immigrant tapes in some town?


It did. The Rotherham scandal. This is showing that nothing has changed.

Don't know if it's general incompetent or political pressure.

Whatever it is it needs to end.
Running out of nation names faster than I can think of them
American National Syndicalist
"B-but gun control works in Australia..."

User avatar
Kramanica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5369
Founded: Jan 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Kramanica » Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:19 pm

Liriena wrote:
Gravlen wrote:"Undocumented"? Who are you talking about?

Isn't it amazing when someone is so consumed by ideology that they just reflexively lump everyone they disagree with into one amorphous blob, and start incoherently mixing up places and groups?

You mean like you do with right-wingers?
Running out of nation names faster than I can think of them
American National Syndicalist
"B-but gun control works in Australia..."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, El Lazaro, Greater Miami Shores 3, Hrofguard, Juansonia, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Selkie, Thermodolia, Vistulange

Advertisement

Remove ads