Right Wing Discussion Thread XI: It's Okay To Be Right

[Cekoviu]

So?

So he doesn't like government, apparently.

I don't like expansion of government spending towards nonvital welfare programs when we're already loaded up on deficits and unfunded liabilities.

Solution: stop spending money on providing government to people.

[The East Marches II]

Fellow libertarian right-ers unite!

we do not unite

we go our separate ways mostly, occasionally teaming up when it is profitable to do so

Using we is a mistake. I've more claim to being libertarian than you do

[Northeast American Federation]

So he doesn't like government, apparently.

I don't like expansion of government spending towards nonvital welfare programs when we're already loaded up on deficits and unfunded liabilities.

It's a loan, not spending

Well the funds for a loan don't just materialize from thin air. Disbursement of the loan would be a form of spending. Sure, it would hopefully be reimbursed by the person/people who took the loan, but it's still spending.

[The Liberated Territories]

we do not unite

we go our separate ways mostly, occasionally teaming up when it is profitable to do so

Using we is a mistake. I've more claim to being libertarian than you do

The democrats want you back. They need useful working class people to vote for the Hill-dawg

[The Parkus Empire]

we do not unite

we go our separate ways mostly, occasionally teaming up when it is profitable to do so

Using we is a mistake. I've more claim to being libertarian than you do

This I would concur with, at least if "libertarian" is intended to mean early American liberty-ism

[Reikoku]

we do not unite

we go our separate ways mostly, occasionally teaming up when it is profitable to do so

Using we is a mistake. I've more claim to being libertarian than you do

Oh please, you would sell Hoppe out for thirty pieces of silver.

I, on the other hand, would do it for five.

[The East Marches II]

Using we is a mistake. I've more claim to being libertarian than you do

The democrats want you back. They need useful working class people to vote for the Hill-dawg

They need you to vote for open borders and the expropriation of property to pay for this so called market efficiency! Herr Hoppe was right :^]

[The Parkus Empire]

It's a loan, not spending

Well the funds for a loan don't just materialize from thin air. Disbursement of the loan would be a form of spending. Sure, it would hopefully be reimbursed by the person/people who took the loan, but it's still spending.

That's correct. Here in California, the program would be absolutely out of the question until we got our house in order.

[The East Marches II]

Using we is a mistake. I've more claim to being libertarian than you do

Oh please, you would sell Hoppe out for thirty pieces of silver.

I, on the other hand, would do it for five.

To quote Enoch Powell

Judas was paid! I am making a sacrifice

[The Liberated Territories]

The democrats want you back. They need useful working class people to vote for the Hill-dawg

They need you to vote for open borders and the expropriation of property to pay for this so called market efficiency! Herr Hoppe was right :^]

No if I wanted to expropriate property, I'd vote Republican so more houses would be destroyed for both the Keystone Pipeline and the border wall. Don't you know anything?

[Northeast American Federation]

The democrats want you back. They need useful working class people to vote for the Hill-dawg

They need you to vote for open borders and the expropriation of property to pay for this so called market efficiency! Herr Hoppe was right :^]

Well, if you don't support wide open borders and unlimited migration, you're not a real libertarian.

Well the funds for a loan don't just materialize from thin air. Disbursement of the loan would be a form of spending. Sure, it would hopefully be reimbursed by the person/people who took the loan, but it's still spending.

That's correct. Here in California, the program would be absolutely out of the question until we got our house in order.

I wouldn't hold your breath on that.

[The East Marches II]

Using we is a mistake. I've more claim to being libertarian than you do

This I would concur with, at least if "libertarian" is intended to mean early American liberty-ism

It is but alas liberty these days means something else entirely, as exemplified by our dear friend

[The East Marches II]

They need you to vote for open borders and the expropriation of property to pay for this so called market efficiency! Herr Hoppe was right :^]

No if I wanted to expropriate property, I'd vote Republican so more houses would be destroyed for both the Keystone Pipeline and the border wall. Don't you know anything?

I thought you'd be all for that, trampling on property for the greater good is your MO! But please go advocate murder and revolution elsewhere, your Jacobinism grows old.

[The Liberated Territories]

No if I wanted to expropriate property, I'd vote Republican so more houses would be destroyed for both the Keystone Pipeline and the border wall. Don't you know anything?

I thought you'd be all for that, trampling on property for the greater good is your MO! But please go advocate murder and revolution elsewhere, your Jacobinism grows old.

Sorry famalam if I wanted to advocate murder I'd unironically shill for Pinochet whilst calling myself "libertarian."

[Bienenhalde]

Daily reminder protestants stopped being protestants the moment they reconciled with Catholicism and stopped trying to kill them.

Another daily reminder that true Catholicism hasn't existed since they failed to reunify the faith, and exterminate all protestants down to a minority.

Non-denominationalism ftw. Reunify the faith by removing all organization. :^)

That is borderline heresy. Organization and hierarchy is a key aspect of traditional Christianity. And Christianity is being re-unified - through ecumenicalism.

[Reikoku]

Non-denominationalism ftw. Reunify the faith by removing all organization. :^)

That is borderline heresy. Organization and hierarchy is a key aspect of traditional Christianity. And Christianity is being re-unified - through ecumenicalism.

Aren't you a Lutheran? It seems rather ironic if you are.

[The Parkus Empire]

This I would concur with, at least if "libertarian" is intended to mean early American liberty-ism

It is but alas liberty these days means something else entirely, as exemplified by our dear friend

That's why I said land is connected to it. When property's primary political existence is in the form of shares and accounts, Lady Liberty turns into Miley Cyrus

[The East Marches II]

I thought you'd be all for that, trampling on property for the greater good is your MO! But please go advocate murder and revolution elsewhere, your Jacobinism grows old.

Sorry famalam if I wanted to advocate murder I'd unironically shill for Pinochet whilst calling myself "libertarian."

I distinctly remember you crying for blood in a previous incarnation of this thread. The blood of tyrants, revolutions left unfinished. For all my faults, I've never advocated for such a terror and banditry as you. You are a crypto-Bolshevist and certainly no friend of liberty or property.

[The Liberated Territories]

Sorry famalam if I wanted to advocate murder I'd unironically shill for Pinochet whilst calling myself "libertarian."

I distinctly remember you crying for blood in a previous incarnation of this thread. The blood of tyrants, revolutions left unfinished. For all my faults, I've never advocated for such a terror and banditry as you. You are a crypto-Bolshevist and certainly no friend of liberty or property.

My friend, there is a world of a difference in disposing of a tyrant and murdering innocent people for their political views. McCarthyists like you are all too willing use violence against your perceived communist menace, even at the expense of people's rights.

[Ceolophysia]

Still government.

So?

We need less government, not more. Also, the government giving out loans is quite risky and can cause crises, as evident by the issue of student loans.

[Conserative Morality]

tbh I'm the only true defender of property in this thread.

[Reikoku]

tbh I'm the only true defender of property in this thread.

No, you're literally Lenin, at least according to Parkus.

[Genivaria]

tbh I'm the only true defender of property in this thread.

I unashamedly consider property to be a secondary concern.

[Genivaria]

tbh I'm the only true defender of property in this thread.

No, you're literally Lenin, at least according to Parkus.

Everyone is Lenin according to Parkus, including Parkus from 6 months ago.

[The Parkus Empire]

I distinctly remember you crying for blood in a previous incarnation of this thread. The blood of tyrants, revolutions left unfinished. For all my faults, I've never advocated for such a terror and banditry as you. You are a crypto-Bolshevist and certainly no friend of liberty or property.

My friend, there is a world of a difference in disposing of a tyrant and murdering innocent people for their political views. McCarthyists like you are all too willing use violence against your perceived communist menace, even at the expense of people's rights.

I don't really approve of murdering dissidents, but when they collectively threaten to topple order if they aren't checked, then (and only then) extraordinary action is called for, as with the Alien and Sedition Acts