NATION

PASSWORD

Right Wing Discussion Thread XI: It's Okay To Be Right

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What stance do you take on immigration?

1 - Full open borders. Sweden's Feminist Initiative model. Which involves doing all one can to prevent deportation of even alien criminal elements as they remain the responsibility of the country they find themselves in.
52
6%
2 - Full open borders with border security, checks and potential for deportation of harsher criminal immigrant elements. Multicultural model.
126
15%
3 - Full open borders with border security, checks and potential for deportation of harsher criminal immigrant elements. Melting-pot model.
176
22%
4 - Limited open borders that sets priories solely on the nations labour requirements.
72
9%
5 - Limited open borders that prioritises only high skilled labour. Multicultural model.
35
4%
6 - Limited open borders that prioritises only high skilled labour. Melting-pot model.
204
25%
7 - Closed borders. Only temporary green-cards, tourism and visas. No other forms of citizenship.
76
9%
8 - Fully closed borders.
36
4%
9 - Fully closed borders. No legal emigration.
39
5%
 
Total votes : 816

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:32 pm

New Emeline wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Abortion, gambling, casual sex, use of mind-altering substances (this one rates low on my list of priorities), interest loans, etc.

Interest loans? Never heard that one described as degenerate before.


It used to be a big-time sin and all. Then god saw how much cash was in it and decided it was cool beans now. :lol:

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:32 pm

Albrenia wrote:
Questers wrote:If society was made up only of top 10 percentile IQ people then anarchy would work fine.

But.

Fully one fifth of the population has an IQ below 88. And obviously, more than half have an IQ below 100. These people need to be controlled. It's good for them and it's good for the top 50 percentile too.


People with high IQs can abuse the system and act immorally as well. They're just probably better at it.

IQ is a pretty bullshit way of actually assessing someone anyways. It only addresses certain aspects of intelligence.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:32 pm

Yes, like the useful ones.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:33 pm

New Emeline wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Abortion, gambling, casual sex, use of mind-altering substances (this one rates low on my list of priorities), interest loans, etc.

Interest loans? Never heard that one described as degenerate before.

By charging higher amounts of money than what is lent, the lender is gambling in the hope that the person they are lending to will never be able to pay off their debt, and will be a source of income forever.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:33 pm

Questers wrote:Yes, like the useful ones.

What is this in reference to?

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:33 pm

New Emeline wrote:What is this in reference to?

New Emeline wrote:It only addresses certain aspects of intelligence.

Questers wrote:Yes, like the useful ones.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:35 pm

Questers wrote:
New Emeline wrote:What is this in reference to?

New Emeline wrote:It only addresses certain aspects of intelligence.

Questers wrote:Yes, like the useful ones.

Useful how? There is no singular way to be useful.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:35 pm

Questers wrote:If society was made up only of top 10 percentile IQ people then anarchy would work fine.

But.

Fully one fifth of the population has an IQ below 88. And obviously, more than half have an IQ below 100. These people need to be controlled. It's good for them and it's good for the top 50 percentile too.


100 IQ is literally defined as the average IQ

we could evolve into a race of hyperintelligent zen questerians and more than half of people would still have an IQ below 100

the way you talk about it makes it sound like you already know this though, at which point i start to wonder why you don't think it's silly
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:35 pm

Empathetic intelligence is unmeasurable. Musical or artistic intelligence is pareto-optimal and so there's no point in measuring it. Crystallised intelligence is totally a function of investment. Fluid logical intelligence correlates highly to almost all good things and it's easy to measure.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
New Emeline
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Jan 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Emeline » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:36 pm

Questers wrote:Empathetic intelligence is unmeasurable. Musical or artistic intelligence is pareto-optimal and so there's no point in measuring it. Crystallised intelligence is totally a function of investment. Fluid logical intelligence correlates highly to almost all good things and it's easy to measure.

Just because something is immeasurable does not make it useless.
Last edited by New Emeline on Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:36 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
Questers wrote:If society was made up only of top 10 percentile IQ people then anarchy would work fine.

But.

Fully one fifth of the population has an IQ below 88. And obviously, more than half have an IQ below 100. These people need to be controlled. It's good for them and it's good for the top 50 percentile too.


100 IQ is literally defined as the average IQ

we could evolve into a race of hyperintelligent zen questerians and more than half of people would still have an IQ below 100

the way you talk about it makes it sound like you already know this though, at which point i start to wonder why you don't think it's silly
No, yes, I know this.

The number is just a substitute for how people are though. Someone at IQ 70 at the present time is just about able to use very basic tools. An IQ 80 person's not useful for anything. 100, as you say, is average: average intelligence is not that high in this country. And our country has high average intelligence.

If we quintupled intelligence then yeah ok, youd have to be like IQ 10 or something to be unable to use a spoon. That's not the point.

Btw I don't say this out of a Moldbuggian desire to imply my IQ is super high. It's not. It just isn't below 100.
Last edited by Questers on Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:36 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
New Emeline wrote:Interest loans? Never heard that one described as degenerate before.

By charging higher amounts of money than what is lent, the lender is gambling in the hope that the person they are lending to will never be able to pay off their debt, and will be a source of income forever.

It's like Animal Crossing but more depressing.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:39 pm

New Emeline wrote:
Questers wrote:

Useful how? There is no singular way to be useful.
And also I would like to see a person who has high emotional or artistic intelligence but low fluid intelligence. Doesn't seem common at all.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Republic of the Cristo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12261
Founded: Apr 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of the Cristo » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:39 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Republic of the Cristo wrote:
Which is why police actively pursue the black market.

Tell me, why did prohibition fail?


Actually, there isn't a lot of consensus that it did fail. http://www.druglibrary.org/prohibitionresults1.htm

Lot of charts and graphs there, as well as numerous local records. Pretty much, alcohol consumption rose - but deaths from alcoholism shrank. It depends on which perspective you view it from.
Orthodox Christian, Nationalist, Reactionary, Stoic


(2 Kings 2:23-25): you won't be dissappointed

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:42 pm

Republic of the Cristo wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:Tell me, why did prohibition fail?


Actually, there isn't a lot of consensus that it did fail. http://www.druglibrary.org/prohibitionresults1.htm

Lot of charts and graphs there, as well as numerous local records. Pretty much, alcohol consumption rose - but deaths from alcoholism shrank. It depends on which perspective you view it from.

I'm quite certain that increasing consumption rates are indicative of failure. The colossal failure of the drug war should cement this point.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:43 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Republic of the Cristo wrote:
Actually, there isn't a lot of consensus that it did fail. http://www.druglibrary.org/prohibitionresults1.htm

Lot of charts and graphs there, as well as numerous local records. Pretty much, alcohol consumption rose - but deaths from alcoholism shrank. It depends on which perspective you view it from.

I'm quite certain that increasing consumption rates are indicative of failure. The colossal failure of the drug war should cement this point.

All bans fail on some level or another.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:43 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:I'm quite certain that increasing consumption rates are indicative of failure. The colossal failure of the drug war should cement this point.

All bans fail on some level or another.


Ban bans?

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:44 pm

Albrenia wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:All bans fail on some level or another.


Ban bans?

No, what I'm trying to say is that the persistence of a banned activity isn't necessarily a good argument for the legalization of something.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36764
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:45 pm

Albrenia wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:All bans fail on some level or another.


Ban bans?

I suppose you could erase general knowledge of such things for the populace to get them to focus on better things.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:47 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Albrenia wrote:
Ban bans?

No, what I'm trying to say is that the persistence of a banned activity isn't necessarily a good argument for the legalization of something.
That's right.

Drunk people will always piss in the fountain. That's not a good argument for legalising it.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:57 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Republic of the Cristo wrote:
Actually, there isn't a lot of consensus that it did fail. http://www.druglibrary.org/prohibitionresults1.htm

Lot of charts and graphs there, as well as numerous local records. Pretty much, alcohol consumption rose - but deaths from alcoholism shrank. It depends on which perspective you view it from.

I'm quite certain that increasing consumption rates are indicative of failure. The colossal failure of the drug war should cement this point.


Tougher drug laws work.
Image

They may not be justified for other reasons, but they definitely work.
Last edited by Tule on Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Formerly known as Bafuria.

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:00 pm

Tule wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:I'm quite certain that increasing consumption rates are indicative of failure. The colossal failure of the drug war should cement this point.


Tougher drug laws work.
Image

They may not be justified for other reasons, but they definitely work.

Where was this chart taken from?
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:02 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Tule wrote:
Tougher drug laws work.
Image

They may not be justified for other reasons, but they definitely work.

Where was this chart taken from?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818525/
Formerly known as Bafuria.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36764
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:09 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Tule wrote:
Tougher drug laws work.
Image

They may not be justified for other reasons, but they definitely work.

Where was this chart taken from?

The peak in the early 1990s makes sense given the situation in the former soviet union.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:31 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2009/05/the-decline-of-middle-america-and-the-problem-of-meritocracy/


That was a brilliant article. This feels even more true for welfare countries like the one I live in where every conceivable hindrance a person might encounter in their life is taken care of by the state. If you don't succeed, it's entirely your own fault.
Formerly known as Bafuria.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Binafra, Black Raven Movement, Champlania, Elejamie, Hurtful Thoughts, Lackadaisia, Lativs, Paddy O Fernature, Socialistic Britain, Tarsonis, The Confederate States of America, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Urkennalaid

Advertisement

Remove ads