Perhaps only economically, then.
Advertisement
by The Conez Imperium » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:08 pm
by The Parkus Empire » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:08 pm
The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Interpreting a law according to the reason it was made is perfectly sensible.
Nah, it’s not, it ignores what’s written and replaces it with the opinions (which may or may not even be correct) of people who are long dead and renders the text of law meaningless.
by The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:09 pm
Irona wrote:The East Marches II wrote:
Nah, you don't. Its cool though, I didn't mind Clinton talking about free movement with Latin America among those bankers. Wages need to be kept down afterall :^]
That doesn't really make sense. Maybe rewrite that?
Also: Wtf is with the crying face? It's so childish.
by Canstan II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:09 pm
Irona wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Free trade is beneficial if you hate environmental regulations, child labor laws and worker comp, and want to move our production to where those can't touch it
I mean if all you care about is production. But it benefits consumers, and the wider economy. Comparative Advantage shows that free trade allows specialisation that benefits both sides. Cheap steel from China allows US construction firms to build more, grow more, etc.
by Irona » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:10 pm
The East Marches II wrote:Irona wrote:That doesn't really make sense. Maybe rewrite that?
Also: Wtf is with the crying face? It's so childish.
Thats the friendly smiley, I got it from Gauth, my sig explains it.
Here is the source, you can read what she said in private to the bankers. Control F hemispheric common market, I don't care enough to spoon feed, that should be good enough.
by Liriena » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:11 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Liriena » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:11 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm
The Conez Imperium wrote:
A sidestep of the issue. I would argue that the growing middle class of China is the potential signal of a Chinese liberalisation. The middle class' of countries are the driving forces of change and factionalism. Now the Chinese government is bound in a social contract with the people, continue high living standards for apathy to political conditions. The ability for Chinese citizens to own their own business is an example of the government reducing their control - liberalisation (one definition).
by Irona » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm
Canstan II wrote:Irona wrote:I mean if all you care about is production. But it benefits consumers, and the wider economy. Comparative Advantage shows that free trade allows specialisation that benefits both sides. Cheap steel from China allows US construction firms to build more, grow more, etc.
It also makes the country more reliant upon a foreign hostile entity. It's one thing if it's coming from an ally or at least a country that shares similar values, a different entirely for one that has been quite open about wishing to take the place of the USA and be rid of Western hegemony.
by The Parkus Empire » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm
The Conez Imperium wrote: Now the Chinese government is bound in a social contract with the people,
by The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm
Irona wrote:The East Marches II wrote:
Thats the friendly smiley, I got it from Gauth, my sig explains it.
Here is the source, you can read what she said in private to the bankers. Control F hemispheric common market, I don't care enough to spoon feed, that should be good enough.
Wikileaks isn't a very trustworthy source
by Ifreann » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Well I hate to break it to you but Thurston County is blue county and that wont change anytime soon. It will vote to reelect your senator in November and send Democrats to Olympia.
Our state senator is actually surprisingly moderate on a number of issues for a Dem from such a blue area, I'm happy to vote for him. I will be trying my best to kick Mr. Heck out of office though.Ifreann wrote:I think you're underestimating the value of making soldiers parade around Washington on their day off.
Of course, we need to beat Russia and China at their own game.
by Canstan II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm
Irona wrote:The East Marches II wrote:
Thats the friendly smiley, I got it from Gauth, my sig explains it.
Here is the source, you can read what she said in private to the bankers. Control F hemispheric common market, I don't care enough to spoon feed, that should be good enough.
Wikileaks isn't a very trustworthy source
by Canstan II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:13 pm
Irona wrote:Canstan II wrote:It also makes the country more reliant upon a foreign hostile entity. It's one thing if it's coming from an ally or at least a country that shares similar values, a different entirely for one that has been quite open about wishing to take the place of the USA and be rid of Western hegemony.
That's a political and not an economic argument against free trade. Economically free trade is far superior to protectionism.
by Liriena » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:13 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:The Conez Imperium wrote: Now the Chinese government is bound in a social contract with the people,
Tfw progressives think China is "one people", not myriad and very different peoples
Tfw liberals now think the government of China has gone through a Glorious Revolution and follows western social contract theory
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by The Conez Imperium » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:14 pm
Canstan II wrote:Irona wrote:I mean if all you care about is production. But it benefits consumers, and the wider economy. Comparative Advantage shows that free trade allows specialisation that benefits both sides. Cheap steel from China allows US construction firms to build more, grow more, etc.
It also makes the country more reliant upon a foreign hostile entity. It's one thing if it's coming from an ally or at least a country that shares similar values, a different entirely for one that has been quite open about wishing to take the place of the USA and be rid of Western hegemony.
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:15 pm
by The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:16 pm
Liriena wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Tfw progressives think China is "one people", not myriad and very different peoples
Tfw liberals now think the government of China has gone through a Glorious Revolution and follows western social contract theory
The underlined is particularly out of place given that the constitutional changes being proposed include an "ethnic harmony" bit that's basically multiculturalism enshrined into law.
by The Conez Imperium » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:16 pm
by Canstan II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:17 pm
Liriena wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Tfw progressives think China is "one people", not myriad and very different peoples
Tfw liberals now think the government of China has gone through a Glorious Revolution and follows western social contract theory
The underlined is particularly out of place given that the constitutional changes being proposed include an "ethnic harmony" bit that's basically multiculturalism enshrined into law.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bear Stearns, Corrian, Ethel mermania, Eurocom, General TN, Jerzylvania, Keltionialang, Kreushia, Lans Isles, Likhinia, Statesburg, Tiami, Trollgaard, Yasuragi
Advertisement