NATION

PASSWORD

Trump MAGAThread XII: A Tarriff-ic Thread!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:06 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:China is slowly liberalizing.


Eh. I heard that China is doing away with term limits to allow Xi Jingping to essentially be dictator for life.

Perhaps only economically, then.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Irona
Minister
 
Posts: 2399
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Irona » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:07 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
Irona wrote:No it isn't. The economic argument for free trade isn't based on China liberalising.


I must of forgotten that when Bush sold that pile of lies to us in the early 2000s.

Clearly you did.

User avatar
The Conez Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 3053
Founded: Nov 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Conez Imperium » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:08 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:China is slowly liberalizing.


Thats a lie.


A sidestep of the issue. I would argue that the growing middle class of China is the potential signal of a Chinese liberalisation. The middle class' of countries are the driving forces of change and factionalism. Now the Chinese government is bound in a social contract with the people, continue high living standards for apathy to political conditions. The ability for Chinese citizens to own their own business is an example of the government reducing their control - liberalisation (one definition).
Salut tout le monde, c'est moi !

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:08 pm

The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Interpreting a law according to the reason it was made is perfectly sensible.

Nah, it’s not, it ignores what’s written and replaces it with the opinions (which may or may not even be correct) of people who are long dead and renders the text of law meaningless.


You're a "strict constructionist"?
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:09 pm

Irona wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Nah, you don't. Its cool though, I didn't mind Clinton talking about free movement with Latin America among those bankers. Wages need to be kept down afterall :^]

That doesn't really make sense. Maybe rewrite that?

Also: Wtf is with the crying face? It's so childish.


Thats the friendly smiley, I got it from Gauth, my sig explains it.

Here is the source, you can read what she said in private to the bankers. Control F hemispheric common market, I don't care enough to spoon feed, that should be good enough.

User avatar
Canstan II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 127
Founded: Feb 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Canstan II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:09 pm

Irona wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Free trade is beneficial if you hate environmental regulations, child labor laws and worker comp, and want to move our production to where those can't touch it

I mean if all you care about is production. But it benefits consumers, and the wider economy. Comparative Advantage shows that free trade allows specialisation that benefits both sides. Cheap steel from China allows US construction firms to build more, grow more, etc.

It also makes the country more reliant upon a foreign hostile entity. It's one thing if it's coming from an ally or at least a country that shares similar values, a different entirely for one that has been quite open about wishing to take the place of the USA and be rid of Western hegemony.

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:10 pm

Cekoviu wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Eh. I heard that China is doing away with term limits to allow Xi Jingping to essentially be dictator for life.

Perhaps only economically, then.


No not that either

User avatar
Irona
Minister
 
Posts: 2399
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Irona » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:10 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
Irona wrote:That doesn't really make sense. Maybe rewrite that?

Also: Wtf is with the crying face? It's so childish.


Thats the friendly smiley, I got it from Gauth, my sig explains it.

Here is the source, you can read what she said in private to the bankers. Control F hemispheric common market, I don't care enough to spoon feed, that should be good enough.

Wikileaks isn't a very trustworthy source

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:11 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:China is slowly liberalizing.


Eh. I heard that China is doing away with term limits to allow Xi Jingping to essentially be dictator for life.

Pffff, if Xi was smart he would follow Wu Zetian's example and screw his way into absolute power, and then abdicate peacefully once he nears the end of his life.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:11 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Perhaps only economically, then.


No not that either

If anything, Xi is trying to bring socialism back to the menu.

The One Road, One Belt thing is cool, though.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm

The Conez Imperium wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Thats a lie.


A sidestep of the issue. I would argue that the growing middle class of China is the potential signal of a Chinese liberalisation. The middle class' of countries are the driving forces of change and factionalism. Now the Chinese government is bound in a social contract with the people, continue high living standards for apathy to political conditions. The ability for Chinese citizens to own their own business is an example of the government reducing their control - liberalisation (one definition).


You can argue that all you want. It isn't true. Its a failed idea from the heydey of victory in the Cold War. Its a bullshit statement, the rise of the middle class didn't stop Turkey from devolving into dictatorship, it hasn't stopped XI from making China even more autocratic and dystopian. Its a frankly bullshit idea.

User avatar
Irona
Minister
 
Posts: 2399
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Irona » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm

Canstan II wrote:
Irona wrote:I mean if all you care about is production. But it benefits consumers, and the wider economy. Comparative Advantage shows that free trade allows specialisation that benefits both sides. Cheap steel from China allows US construction firms to build more, grow more, etc.

It also makes the country more reliant upon a foreign hostile entity. It's one thing if it's coming from an ally or at least a country that shares similar values, a different entirely for one that has been quite open about wishing to take the place of the USA and be rid of Western hegemony.

That's a political and not an economic argument against free trade. Economically free trade is far superior to protectionism.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm

The Conez Imperium wrote: Now the Chinese government is bound in a social contract with the people,

Tfw progressives think China is "one people", not myriad and very different peoples
Tfw liberals now think the government of China has gone through a Glorious Revolution and follows western social contract theory
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm

Irona wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Thats the friendly smiley, I got it from Gauth, my sig explains it.

Here is the source, you can read what she said in private to the bankers. Control F hemispheric common market, I don't care enough to spoon feed, that should be good enough.

Wikileaks isn't a very trustworthy source


I forgot our milquetoast left only likes Wikileaks when they benefit them, how foolish of me.
Last edited by The East Marches II on Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163891
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Well I hate to break it to you but Thurston County is blue county and that wont change anytime soon. It will vote to reelect your senator in November and send Democrats to Olympia.


Our state senator is actually surprisingly moderate on a number of issues for a Dem from such a blue area, I'm happy to vote for him. I will be trying my best to kick Mr. Heck out of office though.

Ifreann wrote:I think you're underestimating the value of making soldiers parade around Washington on their day off.


Of course, we need to beat Russia and China at their own game.

Every polished boot down Pennsylvania Ave. is another win.


Camicon wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I think you're underestimating the value of making soldiers parade around Washington on their day off.

I think you're undervaluing the elimination of the Presidential election campaign refractory period.

So much campaigning you're going to be sick of campaigning.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Canstan II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 127
Founded: Feb 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Canstan II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:12 pm

Irona wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Thats the friendly smiley, I got it from Gauth, my sig explains it.

Here is the source, you can read what she said in private to the bankers. Control F hemispheric common market, I don't care enough to spoon feed, that should be good enough.

Wikileaks isn't a very trustworthy source

I agree, the Iraq War Logs were faked.

User avatar
Canstan II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 127
Founded: Feb 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Canstan II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:13 pm

Irona wrote:
Canstan II wrote:It also makes the country more reliant upon a foreign hostile entity. It's one thing if it's coming from an ally or at least a country that shares similar values, a different entirely for one that has been quite open about wishing to take the place of the USA and be rid of Western hegemony.

That's a political and not an economic argument against free trade. Economically free trade is far superior to protectionism.

Politics and economics go hand in hand. Raw economic arguments will only work if you're an an-cap.

User avatar
Irona
Minister
 
Posts: 2399
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Irona » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:13 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
Irona wrote:Wikileaks isn't a very trustworthy source


I forgot our milquetoast left only likes Wikileaks when they benefit them, how foolish of me.

Not really? It's a terrible source all around?
Last edited by Irona on Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:13 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
The Conez Imperium wrote: Now the Chinese government is bound in a social contract with the people,

Tfw progressives think China is "one people", not myriad and very different peoples
Tfw liberals now think the government of China has gone through a Glorious Revolution and follows western social contract theory

The underlined is particularly out of place given that the constitutional changes being proposed include an "ethnic harmony" bit that's basically multiculturalism enshrined into law.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
The Conez Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 3053
Founded: Nov 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Conez Imperium » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:14 pm

Canstan II wrote:
Irona wrote:I mean if all you care about is production. But it benefits consumers, and the wider economy. Comparative Advantage shows that free trade allows specialisation that benefits both sides. Cheap steel from China allows US construction firms to build more, grow more, etc.

It also makes the country more reliant upon a foreign hostile entity. It's one thing if it's coming from an ally or at least a country that shares similar values, a different entirely for one that has been quite open about wishing to take the place of the USA and be rid of Western hegemony.


Hmm yes, when the US declares war against Pakistan and Bangladesh there goes all my cheap clothing.

Also what exactly is the problem with (peacefully) removing Western hegemony? Is that not self-determination?
Salut tout le monde, c'est moi !

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7080
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:15 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:Nah, it’s not, it ignores what’s written and replaces it with the opinions (which may or may not even be correct) of people who are long dead and renders the text of law meaningless.


You're a "strict constructionist"?

I’m more of a textualist,reading the text of the law and applying it to the situation at hand instead of being beholden to the opinions of dead people since if we did that, we might as well not write down laws anymore.
Occasionally the Neo-American States
"Choke on the ashes of your hate."
Authoritarian leftist as a means to a libertarian socialist end. Civic nationalist and American patriot. Democracy is non-negotiable. Uniting humanity, fixing our planet and venturing out into the stars is the overarching goal. Jaded and broken yet I persist.

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:16 pm

Liriena wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Tfw progressives think China is "one people", not myriad and very different peoples
Tfw liberals now think the government of China has gone through a Glorious Revolution and follows western social contract theory

The underlined is particularly out of place given that the constitutional changes being proposed include an "ethnic harmony" bit that's basically multiculturalism enshrined into law.


I think you misunderstood him, he was acknowledging that reality, merely saying that our fine progressives don't. In which I agree with him.

User avatar
The Conez Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 3053
Founded: Nov 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Conez Imperium » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:16 pm

Canstan II wrote:
Irona wrote:That's a political and not an economic argument against free trade. Economically free trade is far superior to protectionism.

Politics and economics go hand in hand. Raw economic arguments will only work if you're an an-cap.


Thankfully most business are overall happy to continue trade with China and thus will lobby Congress to continue trade with China.
Salut tout le monde, c'est moi !

User avatar
Canstan II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 127
Founded: Feb 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Canstan II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:17 pm

Liriena wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Tfw progressives think China is "one people", not myriad and very different peoples
Tfw liberals now think the government of China has gone through a Glorious Revolution and follows western social contract theory

The underlined is particularly out of place given that the constitutional changes being proposed include an "ethnic harmony" bit that's basically multiculturalism enshrined into law.

The Chinese government also has the freedom of speech enshrined in its constitution. The Chinese aggressively trying to stamp out both Tibetan and Uyghur culture, increasingly the latter these days.

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:17 pm

The Conez Imperium wrote:
Canstan II wrote:Politics and economics go hand in hand. Raw economic arguments will only work if you're an an-cap.


Thankfully most business are overall happy to continue trade with China and thus will lobby Congress to continue trade with China.


Thank God thats changing.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bear Stearns, Corrian, Ethel mermania, Eurocom, General TN, Jerzylvania, Keltionialang, Kreushia, Lans Isles, Likhinia, Statesburg, Tiami, Trollgaard, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads