Advertisement
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Wed Mar 21, 2018 8:44 pm
by Ism » Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:29 pm
Albrenia wrote:These forums are about as close as I get to social media, besides watching Youtube videos sometimes.
Facebook and so on just never really appealed to me.
by New Emeline » Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:31 pm
Ism wrote:Albrenia wrote:These forums are about as close as I get to social media, besides watching Youtube videos sometimes.
Facebook and so on just never really appealed to me.
I share this sentiment, though from the sound of it I might watch more videos on Youtube. The whole nonsense with fake news on Facebook is not making me regret this position.
by Ism » Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:37 pm
by New Emeline » Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:39 pm
Ism wrote:New Emeline wrote:What aspect of the nonsense?
Not sure what you mean. Probably because I'm getting tired. But what I meant was that Facebook and, by extension, other social media platforms, became mechanisms for the mass propagation of propaganda and false/misleading news. For that reason, I am glad that I never payed it much attention, and thus do not regret largely ignoring these platforms.
by Bombadil » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:19 am
by The Knockout Gun Gals » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:34 am
Bombadil wrote:A $1.3T spending bill has been put together to avoid the now quarterly shutdown issue..
No Dreamers.. though I thought that was sorted by March 5th, even Trump said it would..
Reduced budget for the Wall.. I guess Mexico will need to chip in
More on defence.. who'd have guessed
However..
The bill states that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can do research on gun violence, though not advocacy, an idea Democrats pushed.
Trump will need to sign it off.. Paul Ryan's in whirring gerbil mode.
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:35 am
Bombadil wrote:A $1.3T spending bill has been put together to avoid the now quarterly shutdown issue..
No Dreamers.. though I thought that was sorted by March 5th, even Trump said it would..
Reduced budget for the Wall.. I guess Mexico will need to chip in
More on defence.. who'd have guessed
However..
The bill states that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can do research on gun violence, though not advocacy, an idea Democrats pushed.
Trump will need to sign it off.. Paul Ryan's in whirring gerbil mode.
by Myrensis » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:35 am
by Bombadil » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:39 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Bombadil wrote:A $1.3T spending bill has been put together to avoid the now quarterly shutdown issue..
No Dreamers.. though I thought that was sorted by March 5th, even Trump said it would..
Reduced budget for the Wall.. I guess Mexico will need to chip in
More on defence.. who'd have guessed
However..
The bill states that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can do research on gun violence, though not advocacy, an idea Democrats pushed.
Trump will need to sign it off.. Paul Ryan's in whirring gerbil mode.
That's literally already what they can do lol, the Democrats don't even know what the fuck they're talking about anymore.
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:42 am
Bombadil wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
That's literally already what they can do lol, the Democrats don't even know what the fuck they're talking about anymore.
Is that right, I thought they weren't allowed to do any research on guns given it was to do with control, including violence and etc - I doubt they've put in a request that is already allowed. It must change something.
by Bombadil » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:46 am
Myrensis wrote:For the moment it seems like Trump is onboard with the spending bill. But that's two days McConnell and Ryan have to keep anyone else from getting to him with something shiny.
Washington Resistance Army wrote:No that's what they're allowed to do, the only thing the CDC was ever banned from doing is advocating gun control policies because back in the day it came out that some people in the CDC wanted to cook the numbers to support a handgun ban.
In the years since they've done plenty of things on the topic. Probably the two biggest that jump to mind for me are they established that defensive gun usage is at least as common as gun crime and probably even more prevalent and that suppressors are the only truly effective way to support hearing around firearms.
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:24 am
Albrenia wrote:Wait, why would the research into the effects of guns be part of Disease Control?
by The Empire of Pretantia » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:27 am
Albrenia wrote:Wait, why would the research into the effects of guns be part of Disease Control?
by Conserative Morality » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:32 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Bombadil wrote:
Is that right, I thought they weren't allowed to do any research on guns given it was to do with control, including violence and etc - I doubt they've put in a request that is already allowed. It must change something.
No that's what they're allowed to do, the only thing the CDC was ever banned from doing is advocating gun control policies because back in the day it came out that some people in the CDC wanted to cook the numbers to support a handgun ban.
In the years since they've done plenty of things on the topic. Probably the two biggest that jump to mind for me are they established that defensive gun usage is at least as common as gun crime and probably even more prevalent and that suppressors are the only truly effective way to support hearing around firearms.
by Albrenia » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:46 am
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:46 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
No that's what they're allowed to do, the only thing the CDC was ever banned from doing is advocating gun control policies because back in the day it came out that some people in the CDC wanted to cook the numbers to support a handgun ban.
In the years since they've done plenty of things on the topic. Probably the two biggest that jump to mind for me are they established that defensive gun usage is at least as common as gun crime and probably even more prevalent and that suppressors are the only truly effective way to support hearing around firearms.
Technically it didn't stop gun research for near twenty years. Practically, in the political climate that was created because of it, and because of the climate that led to it? It sure as hell did.
by The Flutterlands » Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:54 am
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:55 am
The Flutterlands wrote:https://lincolnsoldati.com/time-to-impeach/
This guy is crazy. No matter what Russia did, we are not at war with Russia. Therefore Russia is is not our enemy. So treason is out of the question.
by Vassenor » Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:57 am
The Flutterlands wrote:https://lincolnsoldati.com/time-to-impeach/
This guy is crazy. No matter what Russia did, we are not at war with Russia. Therefore Russia is is not our enemy. So treason is out of the question.
by The Flutterlands » Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:59 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:https://lincolnsoldati.com/time-to-impeach/
This guy is crazy. No matter what Russia did, we are not at war with Russia. Therefore Russia is is not our enemy. So treason is out of the question.
Russia absolutely is our enemy and has been since the 40's.
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 22, 2018 5:02 am
The Flutterlands wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Russia absolutely is our enemy and has been since the 40's.
Are we at war with Russia? Have been dropping bombs and shooting bullets at each other? No we have not. An enemy country is whatever country we are in direct war with. Cold wars don't count. The constitution is quite clear on this.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Basshobia, Camtropia, Cinnaa, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fauxia, Ifreann, Philjia, Port Carverton, Rusozak, Statesburg
Advertisement