NATION

PASSWORD

Diversity and Multiculturalism II:Make Diversity Great Again

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Korvale
Envoy
 
Posts: 217
Founded: Jan 31, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Korvale » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:28 am

Mujahidah wrote:
Korvale wrote:
The point is America is a white country and so is Canada too. White is another word for European native.


According to the US Census you're wrong. "White" is not just restricted to Europeans - it includes Arabs, for instance. Honestly you should just stop. You clearly have little to no idea what you are talking about and likely have never cracked a history book outside of a high school class, which I wouldn't be surprised if you slept through anyway. Seriously, you're boring us all with your lack of facts and evidence. Its trite even for this site.


Arabs are not white people, you can easily tell an arabic person with pale skin from a european by observing the difference in facial structure also arabic men have much deeper voices than european men and black hair.

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:29 am

Korvale wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
According to the US Census you're wrong. "White" is not just restricted to Europeans - it includes Arabs, for instance. Honestly you should just stop. You clearly have little to no idea what you are talking about and likely have never cracked a history book outside of a high school class, which I wouldn't be surprised if you slept through anyway. Seriously, you're boring us all with your lack of facts and evidence. Its trite even for this site.


Arabs are not white people, you can easily tell an arabic person with pale skin from a european by observing the difference in facial structure also arabic men have much deeper voices than european men and black hair.


But where do you draw the line? Are Greeks white? Some would argue no - after all they have many Mediterranean features and olivine skin, which distinguishes them from their paler European relations. Honestly "race" as you define it is a rather ludicrous concept and inherently arbitrary.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Aillyria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5026
Founded: Sep 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aillyria » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:33 am

Korvale wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Since when is America a "white" country? You can make that claim in European states, but America never had an ethnically defined identity.


It was made by europeans for europeans, the natives of this land had small city states so America is not their country its a foreign nation in their home territory. Both continents of the New World are extensions of Europe.

The New World nations were extensions of Europe when they were colonies, that isn't the case any more and hasn't been for a very long time. You're under some delusion that they should still be, which you'd have to explain why that is.
Last edited by Aillyria on Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist

West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

L/R: -5.38 L/A: +2.36 8values: Theocratic Distributist
I am female, Sorelianist, Sufi Muslim, Biracial, Murican
USN Vet, Semper Fortis dirtbags!!!

User avatar
Korvale
Envoy
 
Posts: 217
Founded: Jan 31, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Korvale » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:35 am

Mujahidah wrote:
Korvale wrote:
Arabs are not white people, you can easily tell an arabic person with pale skin from a european by observing the difference in facial structure also arabic men have much deeper voices than european men and black hair.


But where do you draw the line? Are Greeks white? Some would argue no - after all they have many Mediterranean features and olivine skin, which distinguishes them from their paler European relations. Honestly "race" as you define it is a rather ludicrous concept and inherently arbitrary.


All Europeans are white people its that simple.

The New World nations were extensions of Europe when they were colonies, that isn't the case any more and hasn't been for a very long time. You're under some delusion that they should still be, which you'd have to explain why that is.


It means America is a white country.
Last edited by Korvale on Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:37 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:37 am

Korvale wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
But where do you draw the line? Are Greeks white? Some would argue no - after all they have many Mediterranean features and olivine skin, which distinguishes them from their paler European relations. Honestly "race" as you define it is a rather ludicrous concept and inherently arbitrary.


All Europeans are white people its that simple.


So Turkish people living in that tiny bit of Turkey that is in Europe are white? Russians who live in Vladivostok are not white? You can't even geographically define it and be consistent. Besides, what defines 'Europe' itself is rather arbitrary. Sure the Urals are convenient, but there is no inherent reason why Europe isn't just part of one mega continent called "Eurasia." Its just something we've done for convenience, and so just stuck with.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:38 am

Korvale wrote:
The New World nations were extensions of Europe when they were colonies, that isn't the case any more and hasn't been for a very long time. You're under some delusion that they should still be, which you'd have to explain why that is.


It means America is a white country.


No, its not. America is inherently a country not defined on ethnicity.
Last edited by Mujahidah on Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Korvale
Envoy
 
Posts: 217
Founded: Jan 31, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Korvale » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:38 am

Mujahidah wrote:
Korvale wrote:
All Europeans are white people its that simple.


So Turkish people living in that tiny bit of Turkey that is in Europe are white? Russians who live in Vladivostok are not white? You can't even geographically define it and be consistent. Besides, what defines 'Europe' itself is rather arbitrary. Sure the Urals are convenient, but there is no inherent reason why Europe isn't just part of one mega continent called "Eurasia." Its just something we've done for convenience, and so just stuck with.


Russians are white, but turks arent look at their facial structure to tell them apart. Skin color is a bad way to distinguish human breeds.

No, its not. America is inherently a country not defined on ethnicity. If you want to unironically be a NatSoc go somewhere else.


Its a white majority country making it a white country by default.
Last edited by Korvale on Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:40 am

Korvale wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
So Turkish people living in that tiny bit of Turkey that is in Europe are white? Russians who live in Vladivostok are not white? You can't even geographically define it and be consistent. Besides, what defines 'Europe' itself is rather arbitrary. Sure the Urals are convenient, but there is no inherent reason why Europe isn't just part of one mega continent called "Eurasia." Its just something we've done for convenience, and so just stuck with.


Russians are white, but turks arent look at their facial structure to tell them apart.


Oh, I'm sorry. I thought it was based on geography and not facial structure.

Skin color is a bad way to distinguish human breeds.


And facial structure is? Also who the fuck calls human's "breeds?" Please tell me you don't talk like this to real people.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:40 am

Korvale wrote:
No, its not. America is inherently a country not defined on ethnicity. If you want to unironically be a NatSoc go somewhere else.


Its a white majority country making it a white country by default.


Thats not how this works.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Korvale
Envoy
 
Posts: 217
Founded: Jan 31, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Korvale » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:44 am

Mujahidah wrote:
Korvale wrote:
Russians are white, but turks arent look at their facial structure to tell them apart.


Oh, I'm sorry. I thought it was based on geography and not facial structure.

Skin color is a bad way to distinguish human breeds.


And facial structure is? Also who the fuck calls human's "breeds?" Please tell me you don't talk like this to real people.



Facial structure shows common ancestry which can be used to classify human groups, the same way we can genetically distinguish other animals applies to human since we are animals. I can post you pictures of albino africans to show how stupid saying race is just skin color actually is.
Image

User avatar
Aillyria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5026
Founded: Sep 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aillyria » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:46 am

Korvale wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
But where do you draw the line? Are Greeks white? Some would argue no - after all they have many Mediterranean features and olivine skin, which distinguishes them from their paler European relations. Honestly "race" as you define it is a rather ludicrous concept and inherently arbitrary.


All Europeans are white people its that simple.

The New World nations were extensions of Europe when they were colonies, that isn't the case any more and hasn't been for a very long time. You're under some delusion that they should still be, which you'd have to explain why that is.


It means America is a white country.

No, it isn't. That whole "extension of Europe" reality ended the moment the States declared independence. You're also implying that the many generations of nonwhites here aren't American.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist

West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

L/R: -5.38 L/A: +2.36 8values: Theocratic Distributist
I am female, Sorelianist, Sufi Muslim, Biracial, Murican
USN Vet, Semper Fortis dirtbags!!!

User avatar
Korvale
Envoy
 
Posts: 217
Founded: Jan 31, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Korvale » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:48 am

Aillyria wrote:
Korvale wrote:
All Europeans are white people its that simple.



It means America is a white country.

No, it isn't. That whole "extension of Europe" reality ended the moment the States declared independence. You're also implying that the many generations of nonwhites here aren't American.


Whites built America meaning its a white country, I mean yh sure non-white immigrants helped I suppose but without whites there would be no America or Canada or Australia or New Zealand or Brazil or South Africa or Nigeria or Kenya or Mexico or Argentina or Jamaica or Colombia or Tanzania or Cameroon or....
Last edited by Korvale on Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:49 am

Korvale wrote:I can post you pictures of albino africans to show how stupid saying race is just skin color actually is.


Thats not what I said. I said it was inherently arbitrary. Then you tried to say it was bounded by geography, then you brought up facial structure. You're kind of proving my point - you can't even keep what your definitions of it are straight.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Korvale
Envoy
 
Posts: 217
Founded: Jan 31, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Korvale » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:51 am

Mujahidah wrote:
Korvale wrote:I can post you pictures of albino africans to show how stupid saying race is just skin color actually is.


Thats not what I said. I said it was inherently arbitrary. Then you tried to say it was bounded by geography, then you brought up facial structure. You're kind of proving my point - you can't even keep what your definitions of it are straight.


Geography is a way to contain genes in an area so its often used to determine race. All humans with that sort of facial structure I just posted are found in Africa, all humans with european facial structure are found in Europe, West Russia and the Caucaucus countries.

User avatar
Puldania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1505
Founded: Sep 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Puldania » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:55 am

Korvale wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Thats not what I said. I said it was inherently arbitrary. Then you tried to say it was bounded by geography, then you brought up facial structure. You're kind of proving my point - you can't even keep what your definitions of it are straight.


Geography is a way to contain genes in an area so its often used to determine race. All humans with that sort of facial structure I just posted are found in Africa, all humans with european facial structure are found in Europe, West Russia and the Caucaucus countries.

Have you seen Armenians?
Or Azerbaijanis?

Georgians could pass for european, but Armenians at this point are genetically arabs or turks who speak armenian because they're christian.

Azerbaijan is just straight up turkic, and muslim, and darker than arabs.

Also, Large amount of spaniards have significant amounts of Arab blood.

Hungarians came from Siberia, so did the Finns and Estonians.

TL;DR Basques are the only true Europeans!
Learn Puldanian: https://www.memrise.com/course/1603336/puldanian/
Instrumental Art Rock Album: https://soundcloud.com/enrique-poveda-8 ... l-releases
Join the International Northwestern Union, the largest Sh!tpost based economy on NS.

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:56 am

Korvale wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Thats not what I said. I said it was inherently arbitrary. Then you tried to say it was bounded by geography, then you brought up facial structure. You're kind of proving my point - you can't even keep what your definitions of it are straight.


Geography is a way to contain genes in an area so its often used to determine race. All humans with that sort of facial structure I just posted are found in Africa, all humans with european facial structure are found in Europe, West Russia and the Caucaucus countries.

Actually, East Africans are known to have European looking facial features, if you ignore the skin color.
Also, the US and Canada were built by enslaved people too.
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Puldania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1505
Founded: Sep 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Puldania » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:57 am

Korvale wrote:
Aillyria wrote:No, it isn't. That whole "extension of Europe" reality ended the moment the States declared independence. You're also implying that the many generations of nonwhites here aren't American.


Whites built America meaning its a white country, I mean yh sure non-white immigrants helped I suppose but without whites there would be no America or Canada or Australia or New Zealand or Brazil or South Africa or Nigeria or Kenya or Mexico or Argentina or Jamaica or Colombia or Tanzania or Cameroon or....

Actually, blacks built the colonial countries. Literally. Without slavery, europeans wouldn't have been able to sustain colonies for long.
Learn Puldanian: https://www.memrise.com/course/1603336/puldanian/
Instrumental Art Rock Album: https://soundcloud.com/enrique-poveda-8 ... l-releases
Join the International Northwestern Union, the largest Sh!tpost based economy on NS.

User avatar
Puldania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1505
Founded: Sep 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Puldania » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:58 am

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Korvale wrote:
Geography is a way to contain genes in an area so its often used to determine race. All humans with that sort of facial structure I just posted are found in Africa, all humans with european facial structure are found in Europe, West Russia and the Caucaucus countries.

Actually, East Africans are known to have European looking facial features, if you ignore the skin color.
Also, the US and Canada were built by enslaved people too.

That's primarily because East Africans have semitic genes heavily infused in them.
Learn Puldanian: https://www.memrise.com/course/1603336/puldanian/
Instrumental Art Rock Album: https://soundcloud.com/enrique-poveda-8 ... l-releases
Join the International Northwestern Union, the largest Sh!tpost based economy on NS.

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:58 am

Puldania wrote:Hungarians came from Siberia, so did the Finns and Estonians.

4 reel???
Puldania wrote:TL;DR Basques are the only true Europeans!

Nah bruh, you gotta go back to the Neanderthals!
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Puldania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1505
Founded: Sep 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Puldania » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:59 am

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Puldania wrote:Hungarians came from Siberia, so did the Finns and Estonians.

4 reel???
Puldania wrote:TL;DR Basques are the only true Europeans!

Nah bruh, you gotta go back to the Neanderthals!

The Hungarian Language's closest relative geographically is Estonian, followed by Finnish, then the rest of the Siberian Uralic languages.
Learn Puldanian: https://www.memrise.com/course/1603336/puldanian/
Instrumental Art Rock Album: https://soundcloud.com/enrique-poveda-8 ... l-releases
Join the International Northwestern Union, the largest Sh!tpost based economy on NS.

User avatar
Korvale
Envoy
 
Posts: 217
Founded: Jan 31, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Korvale » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:59 am

Puldania wrote:
Korvale wrote:
Whites built America meaning its a white country, I mean yh sure non-white immigrants helped I suppose but without whites there would be no America or Canada or Australia or New Zealand or Brazil or South Africa or Nigeria or Kenya or Mexico or Argentina or Jamaica or Colombia or Tanzania or Cameroon or....

Actually, blacks built the colonial countries. Literally. Without slavery, europeans wouldn't have been able to sustain colonies for long.


Wrong, african slaves were nothing more than biological robots to pick crops which were planted and sold by europeans, without europeans there would be no agricultural sector in the New World colonies thus the colonies would collapse. Haiti is what happens you leave african slaves on their own.

Actually, East Africans are known to have European looking facial features, if you ignore the skin color.
Also, the US and Canada were built by enslaved people too.


No they dont Somali nor Ethiopians look european.
Last edited by Korvale on Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Aillyria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5026
Founded: Sep 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aillyria » Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:01 am

Korvale wrote:
Aillyria wrote:No, it isn't. That whole "extension of Europe" reality ended the moment the States declared independence. You're also implying that the many generations of nonwhites here aren't American.


Whites built America meaning its a white country, I mean yh sure non-white immigrants helped I suppose but without whites there would be no America or Canada or Australia or New Zealand or Brazil or South Africa or Nigeria or Kenya or Mexico or Argentina or Jamaica or Colombia or Tanzania or Cameroon or....

So now you're saying Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa.....which are overwhelmingly African, are white because the modern states were started by whites? That's retarded, that's like saying India is white, or Syria is white.

A white country is one grounded in an culture of a single ethnicity, Germany for Gemans, France for French...etc. The States have never had a centralized ethnic identity, even during the colonial period. Parts of the States were Dutch, French, Spanish, English at some point....then alot of German, Italian, and Irish immigration, African slaves, Chinese laborers and on and on. To claim we ever had a cultural core, is ignorant AF.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist

West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

L/R: -5.38 L/A: +2.36 8values: Theocratic Distributist
I am female, Sorelianist, Sufi Muslim, Biracial, Murican
USN Vet, Semper Fortis dirtbags!!!

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:02 am

Korvale wrote:
Puldania wrote:Actually, blacks built the colonial countries. Literally. Without slavery, europeans wouldn't have been able to sustain colonies for long.


Wrong, african slaves were nothing more than biological robots to pick crops which were planted and sold by europeans, without europeans there would be no agricultural sector in the New World colonies thus the colonies would collapse.

Native Americans never did agriculture
Korvale wrote:Haiti is what happens you leave african slaves on their own.

What's this supposed to mean?
Korvale wrote:No they dont Somali nor Ethiopians look european.

Both live in East Africa.
So you just said what I said.
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Puldania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1505
Founded: Sep 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Puldania » Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:05 am

Korvale wrote:
Puldania wrote:Actually, blacks built the colonial countries. Literally. Without slavery, europeans wouldn't have been able to sustain colonies for long.


Wrong, african slaves were nothing more than biological robots to pick crops which were planted and sold by europeans, without europeans there would be no agricultural sector in the New World colonies thus the colonies would collapse. Haiti is what happens you leave african slaves on their own.

Actually, East Africans are known to have European looking facial features, if you ignore the skin color.
Also, the US and Canada were built by enslaved people too.


No they dont Somali nor Ethiopians look european.

Why Haiti was set back:
The nascent state's future was hobbled in 1825 when France forced it to pay 150 million gold francs in reparations to French ex-slaveholders—as a condition of French political recognition and to end the nation's political and economic isolation.[16] Though the amount of the reparations was reduced in 1838, Haiti was unable to finish paying off its debt until 1947. The payments left the country's government deeply impoverished, causing long-term instability.


Inca Agriculture:
Incan Agriculture was the culmination of thousands of years of farming and herding in the high-elevation Andes mountains of South America, the coastal deserts, and the rainforests of the Amazon basin. These three radically different environments were all part of the Inca Empire (1438-1533 CE) and required different technologies for agriculture. Inca agriculture was also characterized by the variety of crops grown, the lack of a market system and money, and the unique mechanisms by which the Incas organized their society. Andean civilization was "pristine" -- one of five civilizations worldwide which were indigenous and not derivative from other civilizations.[1] Most Andean crops and domestic animals were likewise pristine -- not known to other civilizations. Potatoes and quinoa were among the unique crops and camelids (llamas and alpacas), and guinea pigs were the unique domesticated animals.

The Incan civilization was predominantly agricultural. The Incas had to overcome the adversities of the Andean terrain and weather. Their adaptation of agricultural technologies that had been developed by previous cultures allowed the Incas to organize production of a diverse range of crops from the arid coast, the high, cold mountains, and the humid jungle regions, which they were then able to redistribute to villages that did not have access to the other regions. These technological achievements in agriculture would not have been possible without the workforce that was at the disposal of the Inca emperor, called the Sapa Inca, as well as the road system and extensive storage systems (qullqas) that allowed them to harvest and store food and to distribute it throughout their place of civilization.


Aztec Agriculture:
As all Mesoamerican peoples Aztec society was organized around maize agriculture. The humid environment in the Valley of Mexico with its many lakes and swamps permitted intensive agriculture. The main crops in addition to maize were beans, squashes, chilies and amaranth. Particularly important for agricultural production in the valley was the construction of chinampas on the lake, artificial islands that allowed the conversion of the shallow waters into highly fertile gardens that could be cultivated year round. Chinampas are areas of raised land, created from alternating layers of mud from the bottom of the lake, and plant matter/other vegetation. These “raised beds” were separated by narrow canals, which allowed farmers to move between them by canoe. The chinampas were extremely fertile pieces of land, and yielded, on average, seven crops annually. On the basis of current chinampa yields, it has been estimated that 1 hectare of chinampa would feed 20 individuals and 9,000 hectares of chinampas could feed 180,000.[48]

The Aztecs further intensified agricultural production by constructing systems of artificial irrigation. While most of the farming occurred outside the densely populated areas, within the cities there was another method of (small scale) farming. Each family had their own garden plot where they grew maize, fruits, herbs, medicines and other important plants. When the city of Tenochtitlan became a major urban center, water was supplied to the city through aqueducts from springs on the banks of the lake, and they organized a system that collected human waste for use as fertilizer. Through intensive agriculture the Aztecs were able to sustain a large urbanized population. The lake was also a rich source of proteins in the form of aquatic animals such as fish, amphibians, shrimp, insects and insect eggs, and water fowl. The presence of such varied sources of protein meant that there was little use for domestic animals for meat (only turkeys and dogs were kept), and scholars have calculated that there was no shortage of protein among the inhabitants of the Valley of Mexico.[49]
Learn Puldanian: https://www.memrise.com/course/1603336/puldanian/
Instrumental Art Rock Album: https://soundcloud.com/enrique-poveda-8 ... l-releases
Join the International Northwestern Union, the largest Sh!tpost based economy on NS.

User avatar
Puldania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1505
Founded: Sep 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Puldania » Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:06 am

Aillyria wrote:
Korvale wrote:
Whites built America meaning its a white country, I mean yh sure non-white immigrants helped I suppose but without whites there would be no America or Canada or Australia or New Zealand or Brazil or South Africa or Nigeria or Kenya or Mexico or Argentina or Jamaica or Colombia or Tanzania or Cameroon or....

So now you're saying Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa.....which are overwhelmingly African, are white because the modern states were started by whites? That's retarded, that's like saying India is white, or Syria is white.

A white country is one grounded in an culture of a single ethnicity, Germany for Gemans, France for French...etc. The States have never had a centralized ethnic identity, even during the colonial period. Parts of the States were Dutch, French, Spanish, English at some point....then alot of German, Italian, and Irish immigration, African slaves, Chinese laborers and on and on. To claim we ever had a cultural core, is ignorant AF.

I can only think of a few African states that had a history of cultural sovereignty, mainly Ethiopia, Somali states, and possibly Burundi and Zimbabwe.
Learn Puldanian: https://www.memrise.com/course/1603336/puldanian/
Instrumental Art Rock Album: https://soundcloud.com/enrique-poveda-8 ... l-releases
Join the International Northwestern Union, the largest Sh!tpost based economy on NS.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Concejos Unidos, Maurnindaia, Satanic Atheists, The Ambis, Wawa Cat Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads