NATION

PASSWORD

Diversity and Multiculturalism II:Make Diversity Great Again

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon May 07, 2018 12:45 pm

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Except history disagrees with that notion. It was a from of segregation.

Not really, If racism didn't need exist the suburbs would've been created still, albeit slower.


But it did exist and they were founded on racism.

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Mon May 07, 2018 12:50 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Holy Tedalonia wrote:Not really, If racism didn't need exist the suburbs would've been created still, albeit slower.


But it did exist and they were founded on racism.

Hardly, the founding of the suburbs was founded on comfortable living. I've lived in both worlds and without a doubt will say the suburbs make good on comfortable living. Now a racists idea of "comfortable living" might be color free, but my opinion and verdict is the promise of comfortability was made possible due to a persons economic status- something that black folks had difficulty climbing due to racism. Making suburbs relatively difficult, but possible to enter. Safe to say, I conclude that it is moreso a coincidence.
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon May 07, 2018 12:53 pm

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
But it did exist and they were founded on racism.

Hardly, the founding of the suburbs was founded on comfortable living. I've lived in both worlds and without a doubt will say the suburbs make good on comfortable living. Now a racists idea of "comfortable living" might be color free, but my opinion and verdict is the promise of comfortability was made possible due to a persons economic status- something that black folks had difficulty climbing due to racism. Making suburbs relatively difficult, but possible to enter. Safe to say, I conclude that it is moreso a coincidence.


They might call it comfort but to most others it would be called racism. The Levitt Brothers who founded Levittown said "No person not of the Caucasian race shall own a home in this community" That is the definition of racism.

White flight is a from of racism too.

User avatar
El-Amin Caliphate
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15282
Founded: Apr 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby El-Amin Caliphate » Mon May 07, 2018 12:54 pm

It's not that suburbia was founded on racism, but that racism became a part of suburban planning.
Kubumba Tribe's sister nation. NOT A PUPPET! >w< In fact, this one came 1st.
Proud Full Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation!^u^
I'm a (Pan) Islamist ;)
CLICK THIS
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people

Democracy and Freedom Index
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon May 07, 2018 12:55 pm

El-Amin Caliphate wrote:It's not that suburbia was founded on racism, but that racism became a part of suburban planning.


What's the difference? It it was part of planning how can you say it wasn't founded on racism?

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Mon May 07, 2018 12:57 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Holy Tedalonia wrote:Hardly, the founding of the suburbs was founded on comfortable living. I've lived in both worlds and without a doubt will say the suburbs make good on comfortable living. Now a racists idea of "comfortable living" might be color free, but my opinion and verdict is the promise of comfortability was made possible due to a persons economic status- something that black folks had difficulty climbing due to racism. Making suburbs relatively difficult, but possible to enter. Safe to say, I conclude that it is moreso a coincidence.


They might call it comfort but to most others it would be called racism. The Levitt Brothers who founded Levittown said "No person not of the Caucasian race shall own a home in this community" That is the definition of racism.

White flight is a from of racism too.

The correct definition is racial segregation. ;)
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:It's not that suburbia was founded on racism, but that racism became a part of suburban planning.

Spot on.
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Mon May 07, 2018 1:02 pm

San Lumen wrote:
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:It's not that suburbia was founded on racism, but that racism became a part of suburban planning.


What's the difference? It it was part of planning how can you say it wasn't founded on racism?

The original intent lies behind comfortable living. The suburbs were only created due to economic opportunity, and those with wealth originally wanted to get out of the city, while not being in the countryside. Have you lived in a city before?
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
El-Amin Caliphate
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15282
Founded: Apr 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby El-Amin Caliphate » Mon May 07, 2018 1:03 pm

San Lumen wrote:
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:It's not that suburbia was founded on racism, but that racism became a part of suburban planning.


What's the difference? It it was part of planning how can you say it wasn't founded on racism?

Because maybe they didn't take into account that people of color would want to move into the suburbs. Levington did, but not all.
Kubumba Tribe's sister nation. NOT A PUPPET! >w< In fact, this one came 1st.
Proud Full Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation!^u^
I'm a (Pan) Islamist ;)
CLICK THIS
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people

Democracy and Freedom Index
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Mon May 07, 2018 1:03 pm

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
What's the difference? It it was part of planning how can you say it wasn't founded on racism?

The original intent lies behind comfortable living. The suburbs were only created due to economic opportunity, and those with wealth originally wanted to get out of the city, while not being in the countryside. Have you lived in a city before?


Yes i currently live in a city.

User avatar
Conservative Feminism
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 57
Founded: May 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative Feminism » Mon May 07, 2018 4:26 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Conservative Feminism wrote:It's not good or bad, but it can be a positive or negative thing for any society, so pretending it can't be a negative thing or that it is always a positive is just as naive and delusional in my opinion.


It can be negative but the benefits outweigh the negatives in my view.

Good for you. Simply restating your position is not going to change mine, so I'm not sure why you quoted me.
Strive to be the best you you can. Anything less is cheating not only yourself, but the world.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 08, 2018 8:50 am

Conservative Feminism wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
It can be negative but the benefits outweigh the negatives in my view.

Good for you. Simply restating your position is not going to change mine, so I'm not sure why you quoted me.



No one was pretending anything

User avatar
El-Amin Caliphate
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15282
Founded: Apr 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby El-Amin Caliphate » Tue May 08, 2018 12:20 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Conservative Feminism wrote:Good for you. Simply restating your position is not going to change mine, so I'm not sure why you quoted me.



No one was pretending anything

She/he never said you were.
Kubumba Tribe's sister nation. NOT A PUPPET! >w< In fact, this one came 1st.
Proud Full Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation!^u^
I'm a (Pan) Islamist ;)
CLICK THIS
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people

Democracy and Freedom Index
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

User avatar
Conservative Feminism
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 57
Founded: May 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative Feminism » Tue May 08, 2018 11:14 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Conservative Feminism wrote:Good for you. Simply restating your position is not going to change mine, so I'm not sure why you quoted me.


No one was pretending anything

Stop desperately bumping your thread and let the conversation flow organically or address my post in depth by doing more than restating your original position.
Last edited by Conservative Feminism on Tue May 08, 2018 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Strive to be the best you you can. Anything less is cheating not only yourself, but the world.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed May 09, 2018 8:41 am

Conservative Feminism wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
No one was pretending anything

Stop desperately bumping your thread and let the conversation flow organically or address my post in depth by doing more than restating your original position.


What negatives do you think diversity and multiculturalism has then?

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Wed May 09, 2018 8:44 am

San Lumen wrote:
Conservative Feminism wrote:Stop desperately bumping your thread and let the conversation flow organically or address my post in depth by doing more than restating your original position.


What negatives do you think diversity and multiculturalism has then?

Conflicts between various groups.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed May 09, 2018 8:46 am

Sovaal wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
What negatives do you think diversity and multiculturalism has then?

Conflicts between various groups.


Conflict in what way? Do you mean ethnic strife?

User avatar
Senegalboy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1521
Founded: Jun 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Senegalboy » Thu May 10, 2018 8:14 am

San Lumen wrote:
Sovaal wrote:Conflicts between various groups.


Conflict in what way? Do you mean ethnic strife?

Self segregation is a major problem

This nation is a Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation! Come join us today!

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu May 10, 2018 8:31 am

Senegalboy wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Conflict in what way? Do you mean ethnic strife?

Self segregation is a major problem


Why is it a problem? I dont see anything wrong with having a Chinatown in a major municipality.

User avatar
Pilarcraft
Senator
 
Posts: 3826
Founded: Dec 19, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilarcraft » Thu May 10, 2018 8:35 am

San Lumen wrote:
Senegalboy wrote:Self segregation is a major problem


Why is it a problem? I dont see anything wrong with having a Chinatown in a major municipality.

Why though? I mean, it'd be the same as a white-only neighborhood in also a major municipality, and that's normally not seen as a good thing.
The Confederal Alliance of Pilarcraft ✺ That world will cease to be
Led by The Triumvirate.
OOC | Military | History |Language | Overview | Parties | Q&A | Factbooks
Proud Civic Persian Nationalist
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu May 10, 2018 8:38 am

Pilarcraft wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Why is it a problem? I dont see anything wrong with having a Chinatown in a major municipality.

Why though? I mean, it'd be the same as a white-only neighborhood in also a major municipality, and that's normally not seen as a good thing.


Are you talking a white neighborhood by law or by choice? If a neighborhood is almost all white or entirely so by choice and not because of a ordinance or a racist board in the development I dont see a problem.

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Thu May 10, 2018 12:04 pm

Pilarcraft wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Why is it a problem? I dont see anything wrong with having a Chinatown in a major municipality.

Why though? I mean, it'd be the same as a white-only neighborhood in also a major municipality, and that's normally not seen as a good thing.

It's kinda like isolationism. It doesn't benefit anyone if you close yourself off to the world, and makes you vulnerable to discrimination. Regardless chinatowns are ok, since no-ones really suffering, however I'd argue it's not ideal. The ideal is that we end chinatowns, white suburbs, and etc in due time, but forcefully ending them.
Last edited by Holy Tedalonia on Thu May 10, 2018 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
Pilarcraft
Senator
 
Posts: 3826
Founded: Dec 19, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilarcraft » Thu May 10, 2018 12:05 pm

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
Pilarcraft wrote:Why though? I mean, it'd be the same as a white-only neighborhood in also a major municipality, and that's normally not seen as a good thing.

It's kinda like isolationism. It doesn't benefit anyone if you close yourself off to the world, and makes you vulnerable to discrimination. Regardless chinatowns are ok, since no-ones really suffering, however I'd argue it's not ideal. The ideal is that we end chinatowns, white suburbs, and etc in due time, but forcefully ending them.

I agree that self-isolationism is not a good thing, though.
The Confederal Alliance of Pilarcraft ✺ That world will cease to be
Led by The Triumvirate.
OOC | Military | History |Language | Overview | Parties | Q&A | Factbooks
Proud Civic Persian Nationalist
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu May 10, 2018 12:06 pm

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
Pilarcraft wrote:Why though? I mean, it'd be the same as a white-only neighborhood in also a major municipality, and that's normally not seen as a good thing.

It's kinda like isolationism. It doesn't benefit anyone if you close yourself off to the world, and makes you vulnerable to discrimination. Regardless chinatowns are ok, since no-ones really suffering, however I'd argue it's not ideal. The ideal is that we end chinatowns, white suburbs, and etc in due time, but forcefully ending them.


Well suburbs were founded on racism and some seem intent on keeping them majority white. How would you end Chinatowns and white suburbs?

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Thu May 10, 2018 12:20 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Holy Tedalonia wrote:It's kinda like isolationism. It doesn't benefit anyone if you close yourself off to the world, and makes you vulnerable to discrimination. Regardless chinatowns are ok, since no-ones really suffering, however I'd argue it's not ideal. The ideal is that we end chinatowns, white suburbs, and etc in due time, but forcefully ending them.


Well suburbs were founded on racism and some seem intent on keeping them majority white. How would you end Chinatowns and white suburbs?

Suburbs were founded on the idea of comfortable living, accelerated by racism. You could say the "advertising" during that time was that's it was "color free". However without the economic status or rise of the medium class, the suburbs would be no more than a fantasy.

Based on how things are going our culture is going to kill white suburbs and chinatowns fairly quickly. The would surmise the last few stragglers won't survive the next generation.
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu May 10, 2018 12:23 pm

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Well suburbs were founded on racism and some seem intent on keeping them majority white. How would you end Chinatowns and white suburbs?

Suburbs were founded on the idea of comfortable living, accelerated by racism. You could say the "advertising" during that time was that's it was "color free". However without the economic status or rise of the medium class, the suburbs would be no more than a fantasy.

Based on how things are going our culture is going to kill white suburbs and chinatowns fairly quickly. The would surmise the last few stragglers won't survive the next generation.


The Levitt brothers, the founders of Levittown, the birthplace of suburbia founded it on racism.

I dont think Chinatowns are going anywhere but I agree white suburbs will be gone within a generation or less with changing demographics and populations trends toward cities.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Apocalyst Italy, Askusia, Celritannia, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Diarcesia, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Giovanniland, Hungarian Great State, Imperatorskiy Rossiya, LFPD Soveriegn, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, The Xaaj Corporation, Vikanias, West Meadow, Zhiyouguo

Advertisement

Remove ads