Diversity and Multiculturalism II:Make Diversity Great Again

[Valgora]

So they're whipped for being homosexual.

False.

Being whipped for homosexual sex is the same thing as being whipped for being a homosexual.

[Saiwania]

They are coming to official US border crossings to apply for asylum.

They need to write an essay about why they think they can "make it" in the US but couldn't for whatever reason, in their home country?

[Valgora]

They are coming to official US border crossings to apply for asylum.

They need to write an essay about why they think they can "make it" in the US but couldn't for whatever reason, in their home country?

Because they're fleeing violence.
That's why people apply for asylum.

And if they want to come to America to live the "American Dream" (which is dead, but that's my opinion), why shouldn't they?

[San Lumen]

They are coming to official US border crossings to apply for asylum.

They need to write an essay about why they think they can "make it" in the US but couldn't for whatever reason, in their home country?

So easy for you to say when your not from Honduras or El Salvador. Since you have such a anti immigrant stance I have a question for you. Should someone whose not white be able to serve in public service job such a police officer or firefighter or in the government? FYI One must be a citizen to work for the fire/police department t.

[Saiwania]

And if they want to come to America to live the "American Dream" (which is dead, but that's my opinion), why shouldn't they?

Because more likely than not, all they're ever going to amount to is picking strawberries or whatever for at or below minimum wage. We don't need more people like that.

[Post War America]

They are coming to official US border crossings to apply for asylum.

They need to write an essay about why they think they can "make it" in the US but couldn't for whatever reason, in their home country?

Because they'd be killed by the maras. Usually poor people from poor countries don't leave their homes unless they're under imminent danger.

[Washington Resistance Army]

And if they want to come to America to live the "American Dream" (which is dead, but that's my opinion), why shouldn't they?

Because more likely than not, all they're ever going to amount to is picking strawberries or whatever for at or below minimum wage. We don't need more people like that.

Those are actually the people we do need, as much as it must hurt you to acknowledge that.

[Valgora]

And if they want to come to America to live the "American Dream" (which is dead, but that's my opinion), why shouldn't they?

Because more likely than not, all they're ever going to amount to is picking strawberries or whatever for at or below minimum wage. We don't need more people like that.

They ain't going to be doing it for minimum wage.
That would only happen if the gov't didn't know they were being hired.

And we kinda do need people to do that if Americans ain't going to.

[Saiwania]

Those are actually the people we do need, as much as it must hurt you to acknowledge that.

Can't we at least get our prison labor to do that instead? I'd think that a lot of it is fully mechanized at this point anyways. We shouldn't aspire for our economy to consist of just service sector jobs.

[San Lumen]

Those are actually the people we do need, as much as it must hurt you to acknowledge that.

Can't we at least get our prison labor to do that instead? I'd think that a lot of it is fully mechanized at this point anyways. We shouldn't aspire for our economy to consist of just service sector jobs.

Crop picking isn't fully mechanized and what of my question to you?

[Washington Resistance Army]

Those are actually the people we do need, as much as it must hurt you to acknowledge that.

Can't we at least get our prison labor to do that instead? I'd think that a lot of it is fully mechanized at this point anyways. We shouldn't aspire for our economy to consist of just service sector jobs.

Prison labor should be banned and the 13th Amendment changed to remove the punishment clause.

[Valgora]

Those are actually the people we do need, as much as it must hurt you to acknowledge that.

Can't we at least get our prison labor to do that instead? I'd think that a lot of it is fully mechanized at this point anyways. We shouldn't aspire for our economy to consist of just service sector jobs.

And that ain't the fault of immigrants.

[Kubumba Tribe]

They won't.

Jesus Christ
It's like talking to a partisan hack.

You claiming that an Islamic theocracy ain't going to do that, is comparable to me saying that the Soviet Union wouldn't oppress people.

Depends on which one you're talking about.

Again, depends.

Yeah, that's haram.

I'm pretty certain most past Islamic theocracies oppressed other religions.
That's what happens in a theocracy anyways.

And if it they were willing to do something that's against Islamic law, then they clearly wouldn't have a problem with breaking Islamic law in other ways.

I'm talking about Islamic rule according to the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah, not based on people.

[Petrasylvania]

Those are actually the people we do need, as much as it must hurt you to acknowledge that.

Can't we at least get our prison labor to do that instead? I'd think that a lot of it is fully mechanized at this point anyways. We shouldn't aspire for our economy to consist of just service sector jobs.

Hey, even more incentive to keep the school-to-prison pipeline flowing or even make it bigger!

[Kubumba Tribe]

False.

No it's not, and claiming otherwise is a meaningless semantics game because you aren't brave enough to admit you want people whipped a hundred times for being gay. At least own up to the bullshit you believe.

I don't believe in bs.

Ah, so Zoroastrianism and all those polytheistic faiths in areas that Muslims conquered are still going strong?

I never said that.

[Valgora]

Jesus Christ
It's like talking to a partisan hack.

You claiming that an Islamic theocracy ain't going to do that, is comparable to me saying that the Soviet Union wouldn't oppress people.


I'm pretty certain most past Islamic theocracies oppressed other religions.
That's what happens in a theocracy anyways.

And if it they were willing to do something that's against Islamic law, then they clearly wouldn't have a problem with breaking Islamic law in other ways.

I'm talking about Islamic rule according to the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah, not based on people.

Who wrote the Qur'an and made the Sunnah?
Men (as in humans)

Who will run the gov't according to the Qur'an and Sunnah?
People

[Genivaria]

No it's not, and claiming otherwise is a meaningless semantics game because you aren't brave enough to admit you want people whipped a hundred times for being gay. At least own up to the bullshit you believe.

I don't believe in bs.

Ah, so Zoroastrianism and all those polytheistic faiths in areas that Muslims conquered are still going strong?

I never said that.

Highly debatable.

[Kubumba Tribe]

I'm talking about Islamic rule according to the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah, not based on people.

Who wrote the Qur'an and made the Sunnah?
Men (as in humans)

Who will run the gov't according to the Qur'an and Sunnah?
People

Duh.

[Valgora]

Who wrote the Qur'an and made the Sunnah?
Men (as in humans)

Who will run the gov't according to the Qur'an and Sunnah?
People

Duh.

You see my point against your argument of "Islamic rule according to the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah, not based on people"?
It will be based on people anyways.

[Kubumba Tribe]

Duh.

You see my point against your argument of "Islamic rule according to the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah, not based on people"?
It will be based on people anyways.

No, I don't get what you're trying to say. A Muslim doing something that goes against Al-Islam is sinning or doing wrong. Just like how someone who breaks the law is doing something wrong.

[Valgora]

You see my point against your argument of "Islamic rule according to the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah, not based on people"?
It will be based on people anyways.

No, I don't get what you're trying to say. A Muslim doing something that goes against Al-Islam is sinning or doing wrong. Just like how someone who breaks the law is doing something wrong.

You act like people will follow all the religious rules, especially when they can gain more power from breaking those rules.
The people in charge of the theocracy are going to know what they can get away with, and how to get away with rule breaking.

And breaking the law ain't doing something wrong in of itself.
Being gay when the law says you can't doesn't mean you're doing anything wrong - for the law is unjust.
Smoking weed when it is illegal ain't doing something wrong - for the law is unjust.

[Washington Resistance Army]

No, I don't get what you're trying to say. A Muslim doing something that goes against Al-Islam is sinning or doing wrong. Just like how someone who breaks the law is doing something wrong.

You act like people will follow all the religious rules, especially when they can gain more power from breaking those rules.
The people in charge of the theocracy are going to know what they can get away with, and how to get away with rule breaking.

And breaking the law ain't doing something wrong in of itself.
Being gay when the law says you can't doesn't mean you're doing anything wrong - for the law is unjust.
Smoking weed when it is illegal ain't doing something wrong - for the law is unjust.

Not to mention people have differing opinions of what the rules are.

[Saiwania]

Crop picking isn't fully mechanized and what of my question to you?

I've answered that a long while ago, when it was about doctors. Yes, they should be allowed if they're eligible and manage to get accepted. I'm racist but I'm still a bit more sensible about it. I know what forms of Apartheid are feasible and which aren't for the most part.

[San Lumen]

Crop picking isn't fully mechanized and what of my question to you?

I've answered that a long while ago, when it was about doctors. Yes, they should be allowed if they're eligible and manage to get accepted. I'm racist but I'm still a bit more sensible about it. I know what forms of Apartheid are feasible and which aren't for the most part.

What do you mean by racist but sensible?

[Valgora]

Crop picking isn't fully mechanized and what of my question to you?

I've answered that a long while ago, when it was about doctors. Yes, they should be allowed if they're eligible and manage to get accepted. I'm racist but I'm still a bit more sensible about it. I know what forms of Apartheid are feasible and which aren't for the most part.

"I'm racist and still a bit more sensible about it"
- Some anti-gun, white nationalist, Hillary vote on the internet

Yea, I'm sure you're sensible.