NATION

PASSWORD

Sexy Bigotry

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Sexy Bigotry

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:54 pm

There have been--I have seen them-- allegations to the effect that if you aren't attracted to blacks, it's racist, or if you aren't attracted to transsexuals, it's transphobic, etc. I would like to know where everyone stands on that?

Now certainly I will be the first to agree that sex and lust can absolutely be immoral. But bigoted? I don't agree. Let us suppose a woman wants a dominant man (or a man wants a subordinate woman): does this make her a misogynist? Obviously not. And if she isn't attracted to lesbians, does that make her homophobic? By no means. So maybe we shouldn't be too hasty of calling sexualities "racist" or such.
Last edited by The Parkus Empire on Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Aillyria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5026
Founded: Sep 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aillyria » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:18 pm

I don't really think a sexual preference can be bigoted, I mean that's utterly ridiculous.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist

West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

L/R: -5.38 L/A: +2.36 8values: Theocratic Distributist
I am female, Sorelianist, Sufi Muslim, Biracial, Murican
USN Vet, Semper Fortis dirtbags!!!

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:22 pm

I’m not into foot stuff
Doesn’t mean I hate feet
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:24 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m not into foot stuff
Doesn’t mean I hate feet

At least that means you're not a pedophile
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:30 pm

I considered this a bit.
I think they may have a point but have garbled the expression of it.

I used to think I was more attracted to whites than others.
But then I took a step back and realized I was comparing a mental image of whites to a mental image of minorities and deciding whites were more attractive.
Following this, I actually paid attention and noted that when a white wasn't attractive I didn't tally it up, and when a minority was I viewed it as an exception.
I suspect I'm attracted to beautiful people in general, and the problem was my mental image of "Generic black/arab" etc, and "Generic white."

That generic image is probably due to cultural and media depictions.

I also suspect i'm not the only person who "Likes whites" with this tendency.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:31 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m not into foot stuff
Doesn’t mean I hate feet

At least that means you're not a pedophile

Ha
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:33 pm

There have been--I have seen them-- allegations to the effect that if you aren't attracted to blacks, it's racist, or if you aren't attracted to transsexuals, it's transphobic, etc

I don't believe you tbh, nobody actually thinks this.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:38 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m not into foot stuff
Doesn’t mean I hate feet

At least that means you're not a pedophile


>mixing Greek and Latin

-twitch-
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:38 pm

MERIZoC wrote:
There have been--I have seen them-- allegations to the effect that if you aren't attracted to blacks, it's racist, or if you aren't attracted to transsexuals, it's transphobic, etc

I don't believe you tbh, nobody actually thinks this.

As you will
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:39 pm

It's all a part of the idea that our ideas of sexual attraction come more from society than from biology, and therefore, if one doesn't find a certain group attractive then it is because of society deciding those people are undesirable. I don't buy the idea for a second, and think that sexual attraction clearly is more biological than social, as otherwise people wouldn't have socially unacceptable sexual attractions.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Cetacea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6539
Founded: Apr 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cetacea » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:41 pm

'
it's about blanket judgements of whole groups based on your personal preferences - why do you prefer one group over another?

saying "I prefer girls with red hair" is fine, saying "I think Irish girls are sexy" is borderline sexist (is that all Irish girls?) , saying I only like White girls is racist

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:44 pm

MERIZoC wrote:
There have been--I have seen them-- allegations to the effect that if you aren't attracted to blacks, it's racist, or if you aren't attracted to transsexuals, it's transphobic, etc

I don't believe you tbh, nobody actually thinks this.


I've seen it on those "look at the tumblr stupid" compilations and that's about it.

I call Poe on it.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:45 pm

Vassenor wrote:
MERIZoC wrote:I don't believe you tbh, nobody actually thinks this.


I've seen it on those "look at the tumblr stupid" compilations and that's about it.

I call Poe on it.

This is not poe

http://ciscritical-not-cisphobic.tumblr ... e-you-have
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:46 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
I've seen it on those "look at the tumblr stupid" compilations and that's about it.

I call Poe on it.

This is not poe

http://ciscritical-not-cisphobic.tumblr ... e-you-have


So how does one post from five years ago prove it's not someone trolling?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Anywhere Else But Here
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5651
Founded: Mar 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Anywhere Else But Here » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:46 pm

I don't think it's racist to have preferences. And one might certainly say that they find traits that are more common among certain ethnicities unattractive/attractive. But it would be rather odd to insist you're not attracted to any black/white people at all, given that the only trait that all black/white people share is dark/light skin, and I find it hard to believe one might sincerely find a particular skin tone so repulsive that it overrides all other traits.

Basically, if you can make a blanket statement of "I'm not attracted to [race]", I reckon you're either full of shit or asexual.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:47 pm

For the record I want an equal partner who is willing to give off signals/displays of dominance just to be subversive, and also because it'll make me feel safer.
Which is dumb, as the last bunch of women who gave off this kind of signal were uh.

Not great.
I'm sure i'll find my knight in shining armor one day though.

I'm not attracted to subordinate women, they tend to irritate me. I've handled one or two who gave off signals/displays of subordinance while actually being equal, and that was fine.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:48 pm

Anywhere Else But Here wrote:I don't think it's racist to have preferences. And one might certainly say that they find traits that are more common among certain ethnicities unattractive/attractive. But it would be rather odd to insist you're not attracted to any black/white people at all, given that the only trait that all black/white people share is dark/light skin, and I find it hard to believe one might sincerely find a particular skin tone so repulsive that it overrides all other traits.

Basically, if you can make a blanket statement of "I'm not attracted to [race]", I reckon you're either full of shit or asexual.

There's nothing wrong with making generalizations based on statistics. I've only met one Asian I was attracted to and I've only met a few black women I'm attracted to. It would be mostly true for me to say that I'm less attracted to Asians or black women
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:50 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:It's all a part of the idea that our ideas of sexual attraction come more from society than from biology, and therefore, if one doesn't find a certain group attractive then it is because of society deciding those people are undesirable. I don't buy the idea for a second, and think that sexual attraction clearly is more biological than social, as otherwise people wouldn't have socially unacceptable sexual attractions.

It doesn't have to be one or the other.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Anywhere Else But Here
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5651
Founded: Mar 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Anywhere Else But Here » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:51 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:I don't think it's racist to have preferences. And one might certainly say that they find traits that are more common among certain ethnicities unattractive/attractive. But it would be rather odd to insist you're not attracted to any black/white people at all, given that the only trait that all black/white people share is dark/light skin, and I find it hard to believe one might sincerely find a particular skin tone so repulsive that it overrides all other traits.

Basically, if you can make a blanket statement of "I'm not attracted to [race]", I reckon you're either full of shit or asexual.

There's nothing wrong with making generalizations based on statistics. I've only met one Asian I was attracted to and I've only met a few black women I'm attracted to. It would be mostly true for me to say that I'm less attracted to Asians or black women

I agree. I don't see anything wrong with the statement "I'm generally not attracted to [race]".

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:09 pm

Depending on the hows and whys, sexual preferences can be bigoted, but even then one can make a distinction between active, malicious bigotry and mere unconscious bias. We don't really have a lot of control over what arouses us, and sometimes, even if you remove societal racism or societal transphobia from the equation, your preferences may still develop in such a way that you simply won't find, say, a dark skin tone or a sort of eye shape attractive.

A straight man who doesn't feel attracted towards trans women is not necessarily guilty of some sort of moral failing. The problem would be if his lack of attraction came coupled with more active attitudes of disdain or the like, or stereotypes and prejudices about the worth or character of trans women. I would definitely encourage all people to put their preferences through some introspection (over the past couple of years I've come to realize how my preferences have been partially conditioned by my social and cultural circumstances), but I would not outright demand that someone who, say, doesn't find dark-skinned people attractive start dating them.
Last edited by Liriena on Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:12 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
I've seen it on those "look at the tumblr stupid" compilations and that's about it.

I call Poe on it.

This is not poe

http://ciscritical-not-cisphobic.tumblr ... e-you-have

That's peak poe
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18711
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:15 pm

Generally one is attracted to what one is used to and surrounded by, it's not racist per se but can be a result of racial social divisions.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:15 pm

Liriena wrote:Depending on the hows and whys, sexual preferences can be bigoted, but even then one can make a distinction between active, malicious bigotry and mere unconscious bias. We don't really have a lot of control over what arouses us, and sometimes, even if you remove societal racism or societal transphobia from the equation, your preferences may still develop in such a way that you simply won't find, say, a dark skin tone or a sort of eye shape attractive.

A straight man who doesn't feel attracted towards trans women is not necessarily guilty of some sort of moral failing. The problem would be if his lack of attraction came coupled with more active attitudes of disdain or the like. I would definitely encourage all people to put their preferences through some introspection (over the past couple of years I've come to realize how my preferences have been partially conditioned by my social and cultural circumstances), but I would not outright demand that someone who, say, doesn't find dark-skinned people attractive start dating them.

This doesn't provoke enough outrage. The official liberal position will have to be mandated poly relationships involving all races and genders.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:18 pm

Liriena wrote:

That's peak poe

Heh, no it's not, that post received overwhelming likes and reposts, and that account is still active and dead serious
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:19 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Liriena wrote:Depending on the hows and whys, sexual preferences can be bigoted, but even then one can make a distinction between active, malicious bigotry and mere unconscious bias. We don't really have a lot of control over what arouses us, and sometimes, even if you remove societal racism or societal transphobia from the equation, your preferences may still develop in such a way that you simply won't find, say, a dark skin tone or a sort of eye shape attractive.

A straight man who doesn't feel attracted towards trans women is not necessarily guilty of some sort of moral failing. The problem would be if his lack of attraction came coupled with more active attitudes of disdain or the like. I would definitely encourage all people to put their preferences through some introspection (over the past couple of years I've come to realize how my preferences have been partially conditioned by my social and cultural circumstances), but I would not outright demand that someone who, say, doesn't find dark-skinned people attractive start dating them.

This doesn't provoke enough outrage. The official liberal position will have to be mandated poly relationships involving all races and genders.

I'm okay with that policy so long as all of my partners are Olympic swimmers and figure skaters. *nod*
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Google [Bot], Hypron, Infected Mushroom, Keltionialang, Shrillland, Takiv, Tarsonis, Trump Almighty, Vrbo, Zantalio

Advertisement

Remove ads