Mario Kart can get really intense sometimes.
Especially if you're an Italian-American who streams video games on Twitch.
Advertisement

by Petrolheadia » Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:46 pm

by Costa Fierro » Tue Feb 06, 2018 5:01 pm
Wallenburg wrote:People still watch car races?

by Phoenicaea » Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:24 am
/quote]


by Petrolheadia » Wed Feb 07, 2018 2:07 am
Phoenicaea wrote:/quote]Costa Fierro wrote:
a suggestion, not Europeans, if you don t get into, you may try to watch Formula One. it s quite different from your series, you may get loving.
Formula One is different, it is above other series: it is the only true best, ultimate, highest class. not a kind of race, it is the race instead

by The Two Jerseys » Wed Feb 07, 2018 4:22 am
Phoenicaea wrote:/quote]Costa Fierro wrote:
a suggestion, not Europeans, if you don t get into, you may try to watch Formula One. it s quite different from your series, you may get loving.
Formula One is different, it is above other series: it is the only true best, ultimate, highest class. not a kind of race, it is the race instead

by Benuty » Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:21 am

by Salandriagado » Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:27 am
The Two Jerseys wrote:Phoenicaea wrote: /quote]
a suggestion, not Europeans, if you don t get into, you may try to watch Formula One. it s quite different from your series, you may get loving.
Formula One is different, it is above other series: it is the only true best, ultimate, highest class. not a kind of race, it is the race instead
It's a drag race followed by a 70-lap parade.

by SD_Film Artists » Wed Feb 07, 2018 11:22 am
Chessmistress wrote: half-naked and silent women to the enjoyment of the male gaze
Gig em Aggies wrote:What's funny is that I'm tired of people trying to deconstruct gender roles if we were meant to not have genders then why are their males and females. Plus some jobs are simply made for /better suited toward females then males plain and simple.

by Sovaal » Wed Feb 07, 2018 11:43 am

by Chessmistress » Sat Feb 10, 2018 7:19 am
This is an important step, and the pressure to remove grid girls shows shifting corporate and social attitudes to the acceptability of using women as pornified props. No doubt we can thank the rising visibility of feminist activism and movements like #metoo, for highlighting sexual harassment and hurrying this shift along. But there is a startling hypocrisy at the heart of mainstream criticism of the grid girl, and the cheering that has greeted her demise.
Take the Melbourne Grand Prix in Australia. It’s held in the “pimp state” of Victoria, which has one of the most established systems of legalized brothel prostitution anywhere in the world. Indeed, the Grand Prix is frequently reported to be one of the busiest times of year for licensed brothels. It is therefore completely duplicitous for MPs, in this context, to decry the sexual objectification of women in motorsports, whilst continuing to normalize an industry that requires the sexual objectification of women in order to function.
This hypocrisy has been mirrored elsewhere. Some prominent feminist commentators hailing the end of grid girls as a victory for women and girls are the very same people who champion individual women’s choices when it comes to “sex work.” Some who go so far as to claim it is unfeminist to critique stripping, are now saying that women standing around and looking pretty is a passé notion.
They are are so close to joining the dots, and yet, so far.
The reality is, if you can’t extend the logic of grid-girls-as-harmful to prostitution-as-harmful, then you must believe that there is a particular group of women who are somehow different, who thrive under conditions of inequality, enjoy sexual harassment, or deserve abuse.
Those who condemn grid girls, but stay silent on the harms of “sex work,” should stop pretending they care about women’s liberation; all they are really celebrating with this change is the ability of a car race to protect its “family friendly” brand.

by Topoliani » Sat Feb 10, 2018 7:33 am
Chessmistress wrote:A new article that is relevant to the issue we're discussing here
http://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/02/ ... ist-icons/
ExcerptThis is an important step, and the pressure to remove grid girls shows shifting corporate and social attitudes to the acceptability of using women as pornified props. No doubt we can thank the rising visibility of feminist activism and movements like #metoo, for highlighting sexual harassment and hurrying this shift along. But there is a startling hypocrisy at the heart of mainstream criticism of the grid girl, and the cheering that has greeted her demise.
Take the Melbourne Grand Prix in Australia. It’s held in the “pimp state” of Victoria, which has one of the most established systems of legalized brothel prostitution anywhere in the world. Indeed, the Grand Prix is frequently reported to be one of the busiest times of year for licensed brothels. It is therefore completely duplicitous for MPs, in this context, to decry the sexual objectification of women in motorsports, whilst continuing to normalize an industry that requires the sexual objectification of women in order to function.
This hypocrisy has been mirrored elsewhere. Some prominent feminist commentators hailing the end of grid girls as a victory for women and girls are the very same people who champion individual women’s choices when it comes to “sex work.” Some who go so far as to claim it is unfeminist to critique stripping, are now saying that women standing around and looking pretty is a passé notion.
They are are so close to joining the dots, and yet, so far.
The reality is, if you can’t extend the logic of grid-girls-as-harmful to prostitution-as-harmful, then you must believe that there is a particular group of women who are somehow different, who thrive under conditions of inequality, enjoy sexual harassment, or deserve abuse.
Those who condemn grid girls, but stay silent on the harms of “sex work,” should stop pretending they care about women’s liberation; all they are really celebrating with this change is the ability of a car race to protect its “family friendly” brand.

by Internationalist Bastard » Sat Feb 10, 2018 7:38 am
Chessmistress wrote:A new article that is relevant to the issue we're discussing here
http://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/02/ ... ist-icons/
ExcerptThis is an important step, and the pressure to remove grid girls shows shifting corporate and social attitudes to the acceptability of using women as pornified props. No doubt we can thank the rising visibility of feminist activism and movements like #metoo, for highlighting sexual harassment and hurrying this shift along. But there is a startling hypocrisy at the heart of mainstream criticism of the grid girl, and the cheering that has greeted her demise.
Take the Melbourne Grand Prix in Australia. It’s held in the “pimp state” of Victoria, which has one of the most established systems of legalized brothel prostitution anywhere in the world. Indeed, the Grand Prix is frequently reported to be one of the busiest times of year for licensed brothels. It is therefore completely duplicitous for MPs, in this context, to decry the sexual objectification of women in motorsports, whilst continuing to normalize an industry that requires the sexual objectification of women in order to function.
This hypocrisy has been mirrored elsewhere. Some prominent feminist commentators hailing the end of grid girls as a victory for women and girls are the very same people who champion individual women’s choices when it comes to “sex work.” Some who go so far as to claim it is unfeminist to critique stripping, are now saying that women standing around and looking pretty is a passé notion.
They are are so close to joining the dots, and yet, so far.
The reality is, if you can’t extend the logic of grid-girls-as-harmful to prostitution-as-harmful, then you must believe that there is a particular group of women who are somehow different, who thrive under conditions of inequality, enjoy sexual harassment, or deserve abuse.
Those who condemn grid girls, but stay silent on the harms of “sex work,” should stop pretending they care about women’s liberation; all they are really celebrating with this change is the ability of a car race to protect its “family friendly” brand.

by Chessmistress » Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:27 am
Topoliani wrote:Chessmistress wrote:A new article that is relevant to the issue we're discussing here
http://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/02/ ... ist-icons/
Excerpt
Relevant? yes. Good, Useful, and logical? No
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m glad you know you write for something

by Petrasylvania » Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:37 am

by Topoliani » Sat Feb 10, 2018 11:48 am
Chessmistress wrote:Dehumanization of women by presenting us as objects meant to reward men (grid girls) and a much worse dehumanization of women by selling our bodies: that is actually the same issue

by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:56 pm
Topoliani wrote:Chessmistress wrote:Dehumanization of women by presenting us as objects meant to reward men (grid girls) and a much worse dehumanization of women by selling our bodies: that is actually the same issue
Again, where does it say in fine print that grid girls are rewards, even figuratively? They are there to build up hype. Just like, oh I don't know, Marching bands? Cheerleaders? The fat drunk guy who runs in the field naked?
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

by Petrasylvania » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:02 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Topoliani wrote:Again, where does it say in fine print that grid girls are rewards, even figuratively? They are there to build up hype. Just like, oh I don't know, Marching bands? Cheerleaders? The fat drunk guy who runs in the field naked?
To be fair, they wouldn't need to be grid "girls" if the vagina wasn't at least somewhat relevant.

by Greed and Death » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:08 pm

by Ors Might » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:10 pm

by Greed and Death » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:12 pm
Topoliani wrote:Chessmistress wrote:Dehumanization of women by presenting us as objects meant to reward men (grid girls) and a much worse dehumanization of women by selling our bodies: that is actually the same issue
Again, where does it say in fine print that grid girls are rewards, even figuratively? They are there to build up hype. Just like, oh I don't know, Marching bands? Cheerleaders? The fat drunk guy who runs in the field naked?

by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:41 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:42 pm

Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Canarsia, Empire of Colia, La Xinga, Neu California, Ryemarch
Advertisement