Advertisement
by Valentine Z » Sun Feb 04, 2018 10:07 pm
♪ If you are reading my sig, I want you to have the best day ever ! You are worth it, do not let anyone get you down ! ♪
Glory to De Geweldige Sierlijke Katachtige Utopia en Zijne Autonome Machten ov Valentine Z !
(✿◠‿◠) ☆ \(^_^)/ ☆
♡ Issues Thread ♡ Photography Stuff ♡ Project: Save F7. ♡ Stats Analysis ♡
♡ The Sixty! ♡ Valentian Stories! ♡ Gwen's Adventures! ♡
• Never trouble trouble until trouble troubles you.
• World Map is a cat playing with Australia.
by The Two Jerseys » Sun Feb 04, 2018 10:11 pm
by Chuukango » Sun Feb 04, 2018 10:11 pm
Valentine Z wrote:If it ain't broke, don't fix it? I mean, I don't really hear the grid girls complaining about their jobs, so... why? It creates jobs too.
Or if you want to, why not add grid boys like the others have said?
by Trumptonium » Mon Feb 05, 2018 1:22 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Feb 05, 2018 3:24 am
New haven america wrote:So... we have women being used as sex/rape slaves in the Middle East, and Chess is celebrating and touting absolute mundane shit hat does more harm than good as true progress? Surprised, I am not.
Also, so now there's even less reasons to watch racing then?
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Mon Feb 05, 2018 3:30 am
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Mon Feb 05, 2018 3:37 am
Valentine Z wrote:If it ain't broke, don't fix it? I mean, I don't really hear the grid girls complaining about their jobs, so... why? It creates jobs too.
Or if you want to, why not add grid boys like the others have said?
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Donut section » Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:30 am
by Tule » Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:46 am
The New California Republic wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
Even some Icelandic strippers were.
Gonna go out on a limb here and say that there is nothing wrong with strippers, in that strippers can be either gender, it isn't a gender-specific role. I have been in places that have strippers of both genders, the whole sexist/misogynist/objectifying women argument didn't really apply there as much.
by Donut section » Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:49 am
Tule wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Gonna go out on a limb here and say that there is nothing wrong with strippers, in that strippers can be either gender, it isn't a gender-specific role. I have been in places that have strippers of both genders, the whole sexist/misogynist/objectifying women argument didn't really apply there as much.
The stripper ban in Iceland was put in place because the clubs frequently engaged in illegal procuring and human trafficking. Some women were voluntarily engaging in mere stripping, but coercion was nevertheless rampant in those establishments. Good riddance.
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:52 am
by Trumptonium » Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:12 am
Tule wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Gonna go out on a limb here and say that there is nothing wrong with strippers, in that strippers can be either gender, it isn't a gender-specific role. I have been in places that have strippers of both genders, the whole sexist/misogynist/objectifying women argument didn't really apply there as much.
The stripper ban in Iceland was put in place because the clubs frequently engaged in illegal procuring and human trafficking. Some women were voluntarily engaging in mere stripping, but coercion was nevertheless rampant in those establishments. Good riddance.
by Cassadaigua » Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:18 am
by Tule » Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:19 am
Donut section wrote:Tule wrote:The stripper ban in Iceland was put in place because the clubs frequently engaged in illegal procuring and human trafficking. Some women were voluntarily engaging in mere stripping, but coercion was nevertheless rampant in those establishments. Good riddance.
Did they also see a mouse in a wheat field and ban farming?
I thought liberals were in favour of the "BUT ITS ONLY A MINORITY" argument.
by Ors Might » Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:21 am
Tule wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Gonna go out on a limb here and say that there is nothing wrong with strippers, in that strippers can be either gender, it isn't a gender-specific role. I have been in places that have strippers of both genders, the whole sexist/misogynist/objectifying women argument didn't really apply there as much.
The stripper ban in Iceland was put in place because the clubs frequently engaged in illegal procuring and human trafficking. Some women were voluntarily engaging in mere stripping, but coercion was nevertheless rampant in those establishments. Good riddance.
by Donut section » Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:35 am
Tule wrote:Donut section wrote:
Did they also see a mouse in a wheat field and ban farming?
Because the ability to go into an establishment and look at naked women is worth some of them having their passports confiscated, being locked up in a house with 6 other strippers outside work and getting beaten to a pulp when they refuse to engage in prostitution.I thought liberals were in favour of the "BUT ITS ONLY A MINORITY" argument.
When it comes to judging whether or not an entire group of people is entitled to basic human rights, yes.
But behavior, property and establishments? Usually not. Most gun owners never shoot anyone, but that fact is little consolation for the families of those who have lost someone to gun violence. So gun control is frequently advocated.
by Democratic Exodian Territories » Mon Feb 05, 2018 6:35 am
Valentine Z wrote:If it ain't broke, don't fix it? I mean, I don't really hear the grid girls complaining about their jobs, so... why? It creates jobs too.
Or if you want to, why not add grid boys like the others have said?
RBC News Channel, brought to you by Sapphire Systems Ltd:
| US President MacArthur doubles down on internal corruption | Aid sent to Nicaragua after Tropical Storm Marta | Stocks down 2 points |
by The New California Republic » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:29 am
Tule wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Gonna go out on a limb here and say that there is nothing wrong with strippers, in that strippers can be either gender, it isn't a gender-specific role. I have been in places that have strippers of both genders, the whole sexist/misogynist/objectifying women argument didn't really apply there as much.
The stripper ban in Iceland was put in place because the clubs frequently engaged in illegal procuring and human trafficking. Some women were voluntarily engaging in mere stripping, but coercion was nevertheless rampant in those establishments. Good riddance.
The New California Republic wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
Except it's overwhelmingly women who are strippers, due we live in a patriarchy.
That's why the world's most feminist country banned all strip clubs in 2010
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... st-country
Meh. On that point, do you think that male strippers should be banned?
by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:35 am
The New California Republic wrote:Tule wrote:The stripper ban in Iceland was put in place because the clubs frequently engaged in illegal procuring and human trafficking. Some women were voluntarily engaging in mere stripping, but coercion was nevertheless rampant in those establishments. Good riddance.
I like how the ignoring of the fact that male strippers exist is still continuing...
by The New California Republic » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:40 am
by Topoliani » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:45 am
The New California Republic wrote:'Grid kids' to replace 'grid girls' from start of the season: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/42950040
Uhm...replacing scantily-clad women with children...what kind of pervert made that connection?
So it is OK to use children but not women? Probably because they can pay the kids less, if anything at all...
by Ifreann » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:47 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Eh i just dont really see what this achieves, far bigger issues imo to deal with instead of grid girls. And all its done is put some women out of their jobs.
by Democratic Exodian Territories » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:51 am
The New California Republic wrote:'Grid kids' to replace 'grid girls' from start of the season: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/42950040
Uhm...replacing scantily-clad women with children...what kind of pervert made that connection?
So it is OK to use children but not women? Probably because they can pay the kids less, if anything at all...
RBC News Channel, brought to you by Sapphire Systems Ltd:
| US President MacArthur doubles down on internal corruption | Aid sent to Nicaragua after Tropical Storm Marta | Stocks down 2 points |
by Ifreann » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:54 am
Democratic Exodian Territories wrote:The New California Republic wrote:'Grid kids' to replace 'grid girls' from start of the season: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/42950040
Uhm...replacing scantily-clad women with children...what kind of pervert made that connection?
So it is OK to use children but not women? Probably because they can pay the kids less, if anything at all...
Yeah.
I just don’t see the reason to ban or replace them.
Like I said, an amount of sexual suggestiveness is part of racing culture.
Ironically, the only thing they accomplish is preventing these women from getting their salary.
by Ors Might » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:58 am
Ifreann wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:Eh i just dont really see what this achieves, far bigger issues imo to deal with instead of grid girls. And all its done is put some women out of their jobs.
What it's accomplishing is shielding F1 from being criticised over having women that serve no purpose but eye candy, which they're concerned might harm their brand image.
See, people need to remember that this wasn't an action taken by Feminist High Command as Step 139 of their dastardly plot to eliminate all cleavage. Formula 1 did this, for basically the same reason they do anything. They think it'll keep them rich, or get them richer.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anarcopia, Baidu [Spider], Cyptopir, Fartsniffage, Hypron, Keltionialang, Majestic-12 [Bot], Neu California, Rusrunia, The Southern Dependencies, Tungstan
Advertisement