NATION

PASSWORD

F1 to no longer feature "grid girls"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
NeoOasis
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1099
Founded: Apr 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby NeoOasis » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:45 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:They’re still employed, they have other clients. They just don’t have this one. This is also a non-issue.

Meh. Perhaps I should have said "underemployed". But no matter.


They can probably find other gigs to fill in this space. It's not like they have sail along with the contracts they have till retirement. Any underemployment after a point is their own fault and/or their agency's.

I'm still trying to work out what purpose these women serve in the race itself other than having more adverts plastered on them. If we're gonna play the employment card... why not have grid guys serve alongside the grid gals? After all male models also need employment opprotunities.
Eternally salty, quite tired, and perhaps looking for a brighter future.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:46 pm

Kramanica wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:F1 is not a charity, it’s not supporting hard luck women as an act of altruism. It’s a billion dollar organization built almost entirely on reputation. This exaggerated cry about those poor (fairly well off even without this gig) women was never an issue, it was F1s image. You cats are the only ones trying to grab the virtue bouy to save your inflated concerns about a thing you were barely aware of going away.

And goddam is it not entertaining to watch your stretch Armstrong antics to justify it. Including stepping in your own turds.

Was it, like, cutting into their bottom line or something? I don't get it. Besides a handful of virtue Signallers who got their skivvies in a twist about it I don't see much issue.


Yes, it was cutting into their bottom line. In particular: I imagine those women drew precisely zero extra dollars of income, while costing the organisation their wages and salary.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:47 pm

NeoOasis wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Meh. Perhaps I should have said "underemployed". But no matter.


They can probably find other gigs to fill in this space. It's not like they have sail along with the contracts they have till retirement. Any underemployment after a point is their own fault and/or their agency's.

I'm still trying to work out what purpose these women serve in the race itself other than having more adverts plastered on them. If we're gonna play the employment card... why not have grid guys serve alongside the grid gals? After all male models also need employment opprotunities.

I have absolutely no problem with this and it would have been a reasonable thing for the feminists to recommend.
They chose not to.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:47 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:They’re still employed, they have other clients. They just don’t have this one. This is also a non-issue.

Meh. Perhaps I should have said "underemployed". But no matter.


17 days a year less work (assuming they even did all of them) is not in any way significant.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Webus
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 482
Founded: Nov 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Webus » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:49 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
Webus wrote:seems like a non issue

Apart from the now unemployed grid girls, I doubt it is a "non issue" for them...

if you are worried about unemployment there are a few bigger sources of that
They/them

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129552
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:50 pm

I would much rather see the grid girls than the drivers.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:51 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
NeoOasis wrote:
They can probably find other gigs to fill in this space. It's not like they have sail along with the contracts they have till retirement. Any underemployment after a point is their own fault and/or their agency's.

I'm still trying to work out what purpose these women serve in the race itself other than having more adverts plastered on them. If we're gonna play the employment card... why not have grid guys serve alongside the grid gals? After all male models also need employment opprotunities.

I have absolutely no problem with this and it would have been a reasonable thing for the feminists to recommend.
They chose not to.

Mostly because it had nothing to do with a random roving band of mean ol’ feminists and instead was a decision made by the board.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:52 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:I would much rather see the grid girls than the drivers.

There’s a whole industry for that and it’s cheaper than an F1 pit pass.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
NeoOasis
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1099
Founded: Apr 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby NeoOasis » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:53 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:I would much rather see the grid girls than the drivers.


Formula E might be more to your liking in that case.
Eternally salty, quite tired, and perhaps looking for a brighter future.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129552
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:54 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:I would much rather see the grid girls than the drivers.

There’s a whole industry for that and it’s cheaper than an F1 pit pass.

I wouldn't know, I never had a f1 pit pass.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129552
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:57 pm

NeoOasis wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:I would much rather see the grid girls than the drivers.


Formula E might be more to your liking in that case.

I doubt it, tbh, I really do like the sound of a gasoline engine.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:03 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Meh. Perhaps I should have said "underemployed". But no matter.


17 days a year less work (assuming they even did all of them) is not in any way significant.


I'm curious where this 17 days thing came from. There were 20 race meets last years, each at least 3 days long.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:33 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
17 days a year less work (assuming they even did all of them) is not in any way significant.


I'm curious where this 17 days thing came from. There were 20 race meets last years, each at least 3 days long.


20 days a year, then: they only appear on the grid, which only happens on one day for each event.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:36 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
I'm curious where this 17 days thing came from. There were 20 race meets last years, each at least 3 days long.


20 days a year, then: they only appear on the grid, which only happens on one day for each event.


They really don't just appear on the grid. They are involved in various commercial appearances throughout the event.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:37 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
20 days a year, then: they only appear on the grid, which only happens on one day for each event.


They really don't just appear on the grid. They are involved in various commercial appearances throughout the event.


Really? I've never noticed them. Which rather tells you how effective they were, doesn't it?
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:40 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
They really don't just appear on the grid. They are involved in various commercial appearances throughout the event.


Really? I've never noticed them. Which rather tells you how effective they were, doesn't it?


You've been at the super rich parties and events that go on around F1 meets?

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:50 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
17 days a year less work (assuming they even did all of them) is not in any way significant.


I'm curious where this 17 days thing came from. There were 20 race meets last years, each at least 3 days long.

Me. Because I was the only one even remotely a fan of the sport in the thread but couldn’t remember the number of races because it does change and I didn’t feel like looking it up. Plus there’s a great line in the movie Grand Prix about there only being seventeen people capable of racing competitively or something like that so when I have to toss a number at F1 when it doesn’t really matter it’s 17. And there is usually a handful at the trophy ceremony and any official happening one or two stands around...after a while you just check to see how hard it is to maintain a fake smile as you’ve lost any concept of why they’re there.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:55 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
I'm curious where this 17 days thing came from. There were 20 race meets last years, each at least 3 days long.

Me. Because I was the only one even remotely a fan of the sport in the thread but couldn’t remember the number of races because it does change and I didn’t feel like looking it up. Plus there’s a great line in the movie Grand Prix about there only being seventeen people capable of racing competitively or something like that so when I have to toss a number at F1 when it doesn’t really matter it’s 17. And there is usually a handful at the trophy ceremony and any official happening one or two stands around...after a while you just check to see how hard it is to maintain a fake smile as you’ve lost any concept of why they’re there.


Well the number you were really looking for is 3 days. Each country has their own grid girls but they're involved for at least the 3 days of the meet. Usually a few more.

User avatar
Jadefall
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 50
Founded: Sep 03, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Jadefall » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:20 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
They really don't just appear on the grid. They are involved in various commercial appearances throughout the event.


Really? I've never noticed them. Which rather tells you how effective they were, doesn't it?


I'm not sure how you can make a value judgement without knowing what their role is. They perform a PR function, are very much a valued part of the team, and are often passionate about the sport.

In many ways the women already working for the teams have distinct advantages and are able to use contacts to pursue careers in motorsport from driving to other team and industry roles. It's sad to see that disappear as an avenue to women, especially women who started the job because they had some modelling experience only to discover a talent or passion for motorsport and international travel. At least they'll be saved from the oppression of all expenses paid trips to Monaco.

On a personal note, I hope to see more women in the sport, as F1 cars become easier to drive, any physical male strength advantage diminishes in importance. Female F1 drivers also have the advantage of being lighter than male counterparts. In cars as light as F1 GP cars, driver weight is a significant percentage of overall weight, so lighter drivers are a great asset. I think women will have greater opportunity to participate, and they will do well. You would struggle to find an F1 fan who doesn't agree that Susie Wolff is a great ambassador for the sport and a skilled driver in her own right.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:40 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Me. Because I was the only one even remotely a fan of the sport in the thread but couldn’t remember the number of races because it does change and I didn’t feel like looking it up. Plus there’s a great line in the movie Grand Prix about there only being seventeen people capable of racing competitively or something like that so when I have to toss a number at F1 when it doesn’t really matter it’s 17. And there is usually a handful at the trophy ceremony and any official happening one or two stands around...after a while you just check to see how hard it is to maintain a fake smile as you’ve lost any concept of why they’re there.


Well the number you were really looking for is 3 days. Each country has their own grid girls but they're involved for at least the 3 days of the meet. Usually a few more.

I was trying to be generous.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:42 pm

Eh, the idea itself was sexist, but I think women should be allowed to do that if they want to. Not letting them is actually hurting women's rights and bodily autonomy more than allowing them to. Of course, if no women want to be grid girls, then it's okay to remove them from F1, but that doesn't appear to be the case.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:43 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Well the number you were really looking for is 3 days. Each country has their own grid girls but they're involved for at least the 3 days of the meet. Usually a few more.

I was trying to be generous.


Back in 2013 the girls picked up by RTOA would get a 12 month contract with a salary for the F1 meet. The whole thing is relative. :)

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:54 am

Fartsniffage wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Really? I've never noticed them. Which rather tells you how effective they were, doesn't it?


You've been at the super rich parties and events that go on around F1 meets?


The supposed purpose that people have been claiming for them is drawing in a bigger TV audience.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129552
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:58 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
You've been at the super rich parties and events that go on around F1 meets?


The supposed purpose that people have been claiming for them is drawing in a bigger TV audience.

In the sense that they promote the event, chat up the sponsors and advertisers. But no one watches F1 to see the girls, they are just a pleasant addition.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:06 am

Ethel mermania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
The supposed purpose that people have been claiming for them is drawing in a bigger TV audience.

In the sense that they promote the event, chat up the sponsors and advertisers. But no one watches F1 to see the girls, they are just a pleasant addition.


That people do watch F1 to see the girls is the specific, explicit claim that I am arguing with here.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hidrandia, Likhinia, Republics of the Solar Union, Singaporen Empire, Soul Reapers, Spirit of Hope, The Astral Mandate, Tiami

Advertisement

Remove ads