Putting it on the net made it rather public, don't you think?
Advertisement

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:01 pm

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:09 pm

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:21 pm
Nunavutialand wrote:This kid spent too much time on /pol/ and actually took them seriously.
This is why it has an 18+ warning on it. This stupid imbecile just wanted attention and acted edgy.
I support his expulsion, although NOT FOR reporting the illegal immigrant.
This was indeed a service to the USA, as its wasting taxpayer money on some illegal's education when said illegal doesn't pay tax.
I do support his expulsion for his racist hatred on reddit of all places.

by Des-Bal » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:28 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:30 pm


by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:34 pm

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:42 pm
by Donut section » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:43 pm
Des-Bal wrote:
Rarely. You also have substantially less access to certain services. As a result illegal immigrants as a group put more money into the system than they take out, something that is untrue of citizens without at least some college education.

by Des-Bal » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:44 pm
Des-Bal wrote:
Or you know fucking NSG. I wouldn't flinch if you told me that a post was from a thread here. Every single time there's a thread about a rapist or someone who did something to a child that's the exact kind of thing that gets posted, often without so much as a warning. What was that even in reference to? We don't know because presenting a full picture is not in the interests of media now that every news outlet is basically a blog and the account was deleted.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:44 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:49 pm
The Conez Imperium wrote:Ifreann wrote:Why? Their job is to run schools. Not to check citizenship.
You hate the government doing tihngs, shouldn't you hate giving more power to schools?
I think Americans have lost the plot about schools. Some want teachers armed with pistols, now we're discussing making teachers on the spot immigration officers?

by Des-Bal » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:50 pm
Donut section wrote:The point is they have no right to take anything out. While citizens have every right.
Not only should deportees have to pay back their deportation costs, but if there evidence that they used services paid for by taxes then that should be added to the bill.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:53 pm
Community Values wrote:you mean... student?
Do other countries commonly call students "pupils"?

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:56 pm
Shaggtopia wrote:How does one become a US Citizen these days? It should be a standardized test, we can test it on all natural citizens and deport anyone who fails.
by Donut section » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:56 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Donut section wrote:The point is they have no right to take anything out. While citizens have every right.
Not only should deportees have to pay back their deportation costs, but if there evidence that they used services paid for by taxes then that should be added to the bill.
Why? I'm a college educated man, I'm in an education bracket that puts in more than it takes out. I, like many illegal immigrants am a producer. Why should a poor citizen be entitled to the benefits of my labor when they're not contributing their fair share?
The point is they haven't taken anything out. They aren't eligible for the same services that similarly situated people are but they pay most of the same taxes. You can't say "we're kicking you out now pay for the services you took," they already did: trying to charge them as they leave is double enrichment. If you're trying to balance the books the government should return every penny they received in tax money.
Let's get a few things straight: The government should be permitted to exercise judgement over who may and may not enter the country, illegal immigrants are not leeches sapping us of precious resources or bodily fluids and free speech is a right of paramount importance and this school was more likely than not in the wrong by abrogating it.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:58 pm

https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Neanderthaland » Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:59 pm
by Donut section » Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:01 pm

by Des-Bal » Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:05 pm
Donut section wrote:
Or just make individuals liable for the economic costs when violating immigration laws. Watch sanctuary everything evaporate.
Imagine how well funded they can be when you can reclaim lost funds from criminal migrants.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Katganistan » Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:07 pm
Vassenor wrote:HMS Barham wrote:Of course you need some quantitative sense - it's just in no way obscure. You might not know the exact number of new immigrants since 1990, but everyone knows it's a lot, and it's enough to be noticeable in most places. It's just in no way unreasonable to accept that if this trend continues indefinitely, the British will be a minority in Britain. You might think that it will happen in 5 years or 145 years, and in both cases you'd be wrong because it's somewhere in between, but whether it is 5, 45, or 145 years is far from the key point here.
Vassenor demands sources just to waste the other poster's time and claim some kind of moral ascendancy in that if the other poster doesn't consent to so waste his time, he is supposedly conceding something to Vassenor. It's a tactic that requires no effort or knowledge and can be rolled out in absolutely any discussion against absolutely anything Vassenor finds disagreeable, true or false. It's a totally idiotic practice that proves nothing at all.
"Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Just imagine what you'll know tomorrow."

by Neanderthaland » Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:08 pm
by Donut section » Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:09 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Donut section wrote:
Or just make individuals liable for the economic costs when violating immigration laws. Watch sanctuary everything evaporate.
Imagine how well funded they can be when you can reclaim lost funds from criminal migrants.
They are paying the economic costs, they are paying taxes greater than the benefits they receive. If we conducted an audit the probable result would be realizing we owed them money.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Beyaz Toros, El Lazaro, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Hurdergaryp, Nanatsu no Tsuki, New Temecula, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Republica de Sierra Nevada, Shrillland, The Merry-Men, Worble Grubblo
Advertisement