Pupil seemingly expelled for reporting illegal immigrant

[Liriena]

And, again, he didn't just snitch. He openly denigrated people of color and fantasized about torturing them.

So you listed "snitching" among the stuff he did. Of all the things he did "snitching" wasn't bad he helped the law

I believe it was bad. Maliciously reporting a fellow high school student to the assholes of ICE because of your explicit racism is not good, even if the student was, in fact, an undocumented immigrant. The law can be unjust, so it's not a bullet-proof excuse for shitty behavior.

[Shikihara]

As awful a human being as the pupil is, I'm not sure he should be deprived of his education for his off-campus antics.

[Liriena]

As awful a human being as the pupil is, I'm not sure he should be deprived of his education for his off-campus antics.

Given the stuff he believes, he was clearly wasting his education.

[Proctopeo]

As awful a human being as the pupil is, I'm not sure he should be deprived of his education for his off-campus antics.

Given the stuff he believes, he was clearly wasting his education.

You could say that for a lot of people...

[Community Values]

you mean... student?
Do other countries commonly call students "pupils"?

[Liriena]

Given the stuff he believes, he was clearly wasting his education.

You could say that for a lot of people...

About 50% of Reddit, at least.

[Liriena]

you mean... student?
Do other countries commonly call students "pupils"?

Over here we generally use alumni (or at least, the Spanish equivalent of it) for primary and secondary students.

[Proctopeo]

You could say that for a lot of people...

About 50% of Reddit, at least.

Most users on most political subs, really.
People on subs about vidya or apolitical hobbies are usually alright.

[Liriena]

About 50% of Reddit, at least.

Most users on most political subs, really.
People on subs about vidya or apolitical hobbies are usually alright.

Except for KiA, agreed.

[Proctopeo]

Most users on most political subs, really.
People on subs about vidya or apolitical hobbies are usually alright.

Except for KiA, agreed.

They're a political vidya sub. Still, from my experience with political subs, they're... far better than most, really. It's not like the bar for being better than most political subs is very high - I think it's actually buried a mile underground.

[The Rich Port]

I support more open immigration, but that immigrant was there illegally. The student was simply reporting a crime.

Do we know that for a fact tho. Cuz the article doesn't say whether the girl was really an immigrant or not.

[The Rich Port]

As awful a human being as the pupil is, I'm not sure he should be deprived of his education for his off-campus antics.

He learned a valuable lesson for when he becomes an adult: the things you do when you're not at work will shit up your life at work.

Especially when it's you being a wannabe Lil' Hitler all over Reddit.

[Proctopeo]

As awful a human being as the pupil is, I'm not sure he should be deprived of his education for his off-campus antics.

He learned a valuable lesson for when he becomes an adult: the things you do when you're not at work will shit up your life at work.

Especially when it's you being a wannabe Lil' Hitler all over Reddit.

He seems closer to the Iron Guard than to the Nazis.

[Sovaal]

About 50% of Reddit, at least.

Most users on most political subs, really.
People on subs about vidya or apolitical hobbies are usually alright.

The r/guns subreddit is pretty alright.

[Trumptonium]

you mean... student?
Do other countries commonly call students "pupils"?

yes

[Aellex]

And, again, he didn't just snitch. He openly denigrated people of color and fantasized about torturing them.

Tbf, snitching imply a form of betrayal which is quite incompatible with how out-spoken he was about his views. Such move is only treacherous and vile when you're breaking bonds of trust or honour and neither existed, quite clearly, in this case meaning that he was indeed right to report a crime.

Tbh, I don't understand how illegal immigrants can get a place into school to begin with since they lack the necessary legal documentation so it's only just righting a wrong.


As for his expelment, if he was dumb enough to get his reddit account traced to him and then to his school, he had it coming tho that still don't mean kicking him out was the best course of action.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

And, again, he didn't just snitch. He openly denigrated people of color and fantasized about torturing them.

Tbf, snitching imply a form of betrayal which is quite incompatible with how out-spoken he was about his views. Such move is only treacherous and vile when you're breaking bonds of trust or honour and neither existed, quite clearly, in this case meaning that he was indeed right to report a crime.

It's a civil violation, not a crime.

[Aellex]

It's a civil violation, not a crime.

In other words, a crime.

[Aillyria]

Tbf, snitching imply a form of betrayal which is quite incompatible with how out-spoken he was about his views. Such move is only treacherous and vile when you're breaking bonds of trust or honour and neither existed, quite clearly, in this case meaning that he was indeed right to report a crime.

It's a civil violation, not a crime.

Illegal entry (or "improper entry") to the US carries criminal penalties (fines and jail or prison time), in addition to civil penalties and immigration consequences (deportation and bars from future entry). - AllLaw.com

It is a crime.

[Central Asian Republics]

Tbf, snitching imply a form of betrayal which is quite incompatible with how out-spoken he was about his views. Such move is only treacherous and vile when you're breaking bonds of trust or honour and neither existed, quite clearly, in this case meaning that he was indeed right to report a crime.

It's a civil violation, not a crime.

Is "civil violation" newspeak for crime?

[Conserative Morality]

It's a civil violation, not a crime.

Illegal entry (or "improper entry") to the US carries criminal penalties (fines and jail or prison time), in addition to civil penalties and immigration consequences (deportation and bars from future entry). - AllLaw.com

It is a crime.

Illegal immigration often involves visa overstay, which is a civil offense and not criminal, not improper entry.

[Altaiire]

It's a civil violation, not a crime.

In other words, a crime.

Not quite. Specifically, "improper entry" (border crossing or any other means of sneaking into the country) is a crime (punishable by incarceration). "Unlawful presence" (ex; remaining in the country past the expiration of a visa) is a civil offense (punishable by deportation).

However, both are illegal, so this distinction is splitting hairs.

[Aillyria]

Illegal entry (or "improper entry") to the US carries criminal penalties (fines and jail or prison time), in addition to civil penalties and immigration consequences (deportation and bars from future entry). - AllLaw.com

It is a crime.

Illegal immigration often involves visa overstay, which is a civil offense and not criminal, not improper entry.

Illegal immigration or overstay = GTFO

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Illegal immigration often involves visa overstay, which is a civil offense and not criminal, not improper entry.

Illegal immigration or overstay = GTFO

Illegal immigration + we'll find a way for you to get legalized without sending you back

[Genivaria]

Illegal immigration often involves visa overstay, which is a civil offense and not criminal, not improper entry.

Illegal immigration or overstay = GTFO

Um, why?
You are creating an issue out of nothing.