NATION

PASSWORD

Should Felons be Allowed to Vote? Florida to Have Referendum

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Deads Heads
Attaché
 
Posts: 90
Founded: Feb 12, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Deads Heads » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:29 pm

Telconi wrote:
Deads Heads wrote:Stop hating democracy so much, Telconi. Nobody wants your snobbyass radical centrist aristocracy with apartheid from the deplorables of your choice.


And don't project your own martyrdom onto othersas you find out people don't find any sense in your arguments. It's pathetic.


No.

Okay, but it'll only end up badly for you in the long run not to support democracy. You might piss off the demos.

Telconi wrote:Really? NOBODY? Seems unlikely that you speak for every person.

Unlikely yet not impossible.

Telconi wrote:When has he said he doesn't find sense in my argument? He hasn't even yet registered it as an argument...

Which means I grossly overestimated your arguments by thinking they were arguments. My mistake.
NSG's resident deadheadist. HA! HA!! Beware.
Abraxim wrote:
Deads Heads wrote:Because God is evil, at least according to the standards we, the puny worms beneath him, put up. Not only does he allow evil to exist but propagates evil in his words and actions. Therefore, there really are no good Christians, when you get right down to it. All you find is ignorance-praising tyrant worship out of fear of eternal torture in a lake of fire by a ghost and his minions at the end of the world or hatred towards those upon whom the punishment will be enacted. Or both.

Heavenly Father,

I pray that the person who believes the opinion above comes to know you, and you can take away the blindness in his heart.

In the name of Jesus Christ, our only true Lord.

Amen.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:34 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
No.

Really? NOBODY? Seems unlikely that you speak for every person.

When has he said he doesn't find sense in my argument? He hasn't even yet registered it as an argument...

You don't debate you just give one sentence replies. Saying someone shouldn't serve as mayor or should not vote because they are a felon isn't a answer. What's your basis for that statement?


Go back through the thread and find all the times I'be explained it if you care so much...
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:36 pm

Deads Heads wrote:
Telconi wrote:
No.

Okay, but it'll only end up badly for you in the long run not to support democracy. You might piss off the demos.

Telconi wrote:Really? NOBODY? Seems unlikely that you speak for every person.

Unlikely yet not impossible.

Telconi wrote:When has he said he doesn't find sense in my argument? He hasn't even yet registered it as an argument...

Which means I grossly overestimated your arguments by thinking they were arguments. My mistake.


What? How could this end badly for me?

Actually it is impossible...

:roll:
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81293
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:45 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:You don't debate you just give one sentence replies. Saying someone shouldn't serve as mayor or should not vote because they are a felon isn't a answer. What's your basis for that statement?


Go back through the thread and find all the times I'be explained it if you care so much...

No all you said was someone is felon therefore they should not serve in elected office or be allowed to vote. thats not a argument. That's on the lines of because i said so.

User avatar
Deads Heads
Attaché
 
Posts: 90
Founded: Feb 12, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Deads Heads » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:06 pm

Telconi wrote:What? How could this end badly for me?

Many ways. The demos deciding anti-democratic elements should be removed from it so as not to turn against itself, coming to your house and chopping your head off Robespierre style being one of them. Better keep tabs on what the demos thinks before making a mistake. Besides, in people getting their just desserts land, it ends up in you being alienated from any democracy supporters (most people) and instead socializing with the likes of anarcho-capitalists, monarchists and fascists. You better be ready to assimilate, tolerate or change your ways, cuz otherwise this loop is gonna last forever in people getting their just desserts land. The worst you'll probably get is not being taken seriously with a kind "that's nice" on the side everyone acting as your grandma because they think you don't know any better and that you'll grow out of it some day. Then you join the ancaps and fashies.

Telconi wrote:Actually it is impossible...

Prove it then.

Telconi wrote: :roll:

:p
NSG's resident deadheadist. HA! HA!! Beware.
Abraxim wrote:
Deads Heads wrote:Because God is evil, at least according to the standards we, the puny worms beneath him, put up. Not only does he allow evil to exist but propagates evil in his words and actions. Therefore, there really are no good Christians, when you get right down to it. All you find is ignorance-praising tyrant worship out of fear of eternal torture in a lake of fire by a ghost and his minions at the end of the world or hatred towards those upon whom the punishment will be enacted. Or both.

Heavenly Father,

I pray that the person who believes the opinion above comes to know you, and you can take away the blindness in his heart.

In the name of Jesus Christ, our only true Lord.

Amen.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40542
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:09 pm

Deads Heads wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
So then why isn't China and Russia full of terrorists?

Because they vote in China and Russia too, you know.

Looks at all the independence movements and fights against Chinese authority.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:11 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Go back through the thread and find all the times I'be explained it if you care so much...

No all you said was someone is felon therefore they should not serve in elected office or be allowed to vote. thats not a argument. That's on the lines of because i said so.


It's a subjective opinion, frankly it all boils down to "because I said so" or more accurately "because I think so"
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:15 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Deads Heads wrote:Because they vote in China and Russia too, you know.

Looks at all the independence movements and fights against Chinese authority.

Image
Image
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Deads Heads
Attaché
 
Posts: 90
Founded: Feb 12, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Deads Heads » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:23 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Deads Heads wrote:Because they vote in China and Russia too, you know.

Looks at all the independence movements and fights against Chinese authority.

Thanks, Batman. So to return to the reason of Russia and China not being full of terrorists, they are, IM.
NSG's resident deadheadist. HA! HA!! Beware.
Abraxim wrote:
Deads Heads wrote:Because God is evil, at least according to the standards we, the puny worms beneath him, put up. Not only does he allow evil to exist but propagates evil in his words and actions. Therefore, there really are no good Christians, when you get right down to it. All you find is ignorance-praising tyrant worship out of fear of eternal torture in a lake of fire by a ghost and his minions at the end of the world or hatred towards those upon whom the punishment will be enacted. Or both.

Heavenly Father,

I pray that the person who believes the opinion above comes to know you, and you can take away the blindness in his heart.

In the name of Jesus Christ, our only true Lord.

Amen.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81293
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:14 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:No all you said was someone is felon therefore they should not serve in elected office or be allowed to vote. thats not a argument. That's on the lines of because i said so.


It's a subjective opinion, frankly it all boils down to "because I said so" or more accurately "because I think so"

So all you'd got for anyone argument is I think so therefore it is so. Thats a great argument. You should run for state legislature with that and when someone asks you in debate or public forum to defend your position simply say because I said so.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:02 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Deads Heads wrote:Because they vote in China and Russia too, you know.

Looks at all the independence movements and fights against Chinese authority.


Aside from a few fringe groups, most of the people stand behind Russia and China. Voting not necessary for the people to support their government. It’s just western propaganda.
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40542
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:12 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:Looks at all the independence movements and fights against Chinese authority.


Aside from a few fringe groups, most of the people stand behind Russia and China. Voting not necessary for the people to support their government. It’s just western propaganda.

That is simply factually incorrect when it comes to China. I don't know enough about Russia to say anything about it.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:37 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Aside from a few fringe groups, most of the people stand behind Russia and China. Voting not necessary for the people to support their government. It’s just western propaganda.

That is simply factually incorrect when it comes to China. I don't know enough about Russia to say anything about it.


http://www.inpraiseofchina.com/is-the-c ... t-popular/

The Chinese government is popular with the Chinese, despite not being able to vote. And it shouldn't surprise anyone since their economy is doing so well and the perception is that there is a lot of economic progress.

You don't need to be able to vote for the people to support your government, you just have to do a good job. Also, you don't have a population of "terrorists" just because there isn't a right to vote.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81293
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:40 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:That is simply factually incorrect when it comes to China. I don't know enough about Russia to say anything about it.


http://www.inpraiseofchina.com/is-the-c ... t-popular/

The Chinese government is popular with the Chinese, despite not being able to vote. And it shouldn't surprise anyone since their economy is doing so well and the perception is that there is a lot of economic progress.

You don't need to be able to vote for the people to support your government, you just have to do a good job. Also, you don't have a population of "terrorists" just because there isn't a right to vote.

You've still yet to explain why you think this referendum should be voted down. I support the notion of prisoners not being allowed to vote but why should someone whose served their time and not gone back to prison be barred from elected office or voting?

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:41 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
http://www.inpraiseofchina.com/is-the-c ... t-popular/

The Chinese government is popular with the Chinese, despite not being able to vote. And it shouldn't surprise anyone since their economy is doing so well and the perception is that there is a lot of economic progress.

You don't need to be able to vote for the people to support your government, you just have to do a good job. Also, you don't have a population of "terrorists" just because there isn't a right to vote.

You've still yet to explain why you think this referendum should be voted down. I support the notion of prisoners not being allowed to vote but why should someone whose served their time and not gone back to prison be barred from elected office or voting?


because they have a demonstrated record for disrepect for the law and have a statistically increased probability of demonstrating said behaviour again in the future; hence it becomes unfair for society to award them the same power to indirectly create laws that is granted to actual law abiding citizens

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81293
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:43 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
San Lumen wrote:You've still yet to explain why you think this referendum should be voted down. I support the notion of prisoners not being allowed to vote but why should someone whose served their time and not gone back to prison be barred from elected office or voting?


because they have a demonstrated record for disrepect for the law and have a statistically increased probability of demonstrating said behaviour again in the future; hence it becomes unfair for society to award them the same power to indirectly create laws that is granted to actual law abiding citizens

So a person who committed one crime and served their time in prison should be barred from voting for the rest of their days?

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:49 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
because they have a demonstrated record for disrepect for the law and have a statistically increased probability of demonstrating said behaviour again in the future; hence it becomes unfair for society to award them the same power to indirectly create laws that is granted to actual law abiding citizens

So a person who committed one crime and served their time in prison should be barred from voting for the rest of their days?


Yes.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81293
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:50 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So a person who committed one crime and served their time in prison should be barred from voting for the rest of their days?


Yes.

why?

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:51 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Yes.

why?


Because they have demonstrated disrespect for the law. And voting is an indirect way to create laws.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81293
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:53 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
San Lumen wrote:why?


Because they have demonstrated disrespect for the law. And voting is an indirect way to create laws.


So one mistake means you can never vote again? Great logic there. Though you see voting as pointless so you'd be content with no elections at all and just have absolute monarchy.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:53 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Because they have demonstrated disrespect for the law. And voting is an indirect way to create laws.


So one mistake means you can never vote again? Great logic there. Though you see voting as pointless so you'd be content with no elections at all and just have absolute monarchy.


Crime is not a mistake, its a choice.

User avatar
Al-Ismailiyya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 667
Founded: Dec 19, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Al-Ismailiyya » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:56 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
So one mistake means you can never vote again? Great logic there. Though you see voting as pointless so you'd be content with no elections at all and just have absolute monarchy.


Crime is not a mistake, its a choice.

They are not mutually exclusive lol. In fact, the definition of mistake is dependent on a choice being made.

mis·take
məˈstāk
noun
1.
an action or judgment that is misguided or wrong.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40542
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:21 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:That is simply factually incorrect when it comes to China. I don't know enough about Russia to say anything about it.


http://www.inpraiseofchina.com/is-the-c ... t-popular/

The Chinese government is popular with the Chinese, despite not being able to vote. And it shouldn't surprise anyone since their economy is doing so well and the perception is that there is a lot of economic progress.

You don't need to be able to vote for the people to support your government, you just have to do a good job. Also, you don't have a population of "terrorists" just because there isn't a right to vote.


Why should I trust the sight you linked? Also, there are elections in China, you are aware of that right (also in Russia)? And I note once again there are multiple groups actively trying to fight the government one was linked earlier in this very thread. You have shifted your claim which was that China and Russia do not have terrorists.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40542
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:23 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
So one mistake means you can never vote again? Great logic there. Though you see voting as pointless so you'd be content with no elections at all and just have absolute monarchy.


Crime is not a mistake, its a choice.

Funny since I have accidentally committed a crime. Namely I used to study in a book store after school during high school. Once I finished I would read in their cafe. Once I forgot that I had a book with me when I put it with a pile of my own books, and walked out the store with it. I committed the crime of shoplifting accidentally (I realized I had the book 3-4 blocks away and went back to pay for it, but until I returned to pay for it I had committed a crime).
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:34 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Crime is not a mistake, its a choice.

Funny since I have accidentally committed a crime. Namely I used to study in a book store after school during high school. Once I finished I would read in their cafe. Once I forgot that I had a book with me when I put it with a pile of my own books, and walked out the store with it. I committed the crime of shoplifting accidentally (I realized I had the book 3-4 blocks away and went back to pay for it, but until I returned to pay for it I had committed a crime).


If you're not a convicted felon, then I'll give you the benefit of the doubt (and so should the system).

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Elwher, Heavenly Assault, Port Caverton, Tarsonis, Unmet Player, Urkennalaid

Advertisement

Remove ads