NATION

PASSWORD

Should Felons be Allowed to Vote? Florida to Have Referendum

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:47 am

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Are you for real? what a stupid argument. what criminal acts are they going to vote to legalize?

Marijuana legalization.

Honestly, maybe this might be what's needed to finally get drug use decriminalized
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:47 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Telconi wrote:I'm not sure we want criminals voting. Seems likely they would just vote to legalize the very criminal acts that put them in prison in the first place.


And? If enough people think they should be legal for that to happen, why shouldn't they be legal?


Because it's a bad idea...
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Aillyria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5026
Founded: Sep 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aillyria » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:47 am

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Are you for real? what a stupid argument. what criminal acts are they going to vote to legalize?

Marijuana legalization.

Alcohol and tobacco are legal, marijuana is much less harmful than either (it isn't at all really, tbh). I don't understand the logic behind it being illegal.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist

West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

L/R: -5.38 L/A: +2.36 8values: Theocratic Distributist
I am female, Sorelianist, Sufi Muslim, Biracial, Murican
USN Vet, Semper Fortis dirtbags!!!

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10326
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:48 am

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Whatever the hell they got incarcerated for in the first place.


Thats a ridiculous argument.

So innmates who are serving a sentence for a marijuana related offense won't vote "yes" on referendums to legalize it?

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87274
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:48 am

Telconi wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And? If enough people think they should be legal for that to happen, why shouldn't they be legal?


Because it's a bad idea...

why is it bad idea? you've failed to give a valid reason.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:48 am

Telconi wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And? If enough people think they should be legal for that to happen, why shouldn't they be legal?


Because it's a bad idea...


Why? Saying "it's bad because I say it is" isn't an argument.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft
Minister
 
Posts: 3373
Founded: Jul 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:48 am

Arlenton wrote:
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:Voting is a human right under international law, not a privilege.

Who's enforcing it?

The UN?

User avatar
Pilarcraft
Senator
 
Posts: 3826
Founded: Dec 19, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilarcraft » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:48 am

Telconi wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
And? If enough people think they should be legal for that to happen, why shouldn't they be legal?


Because it's a bad idea...

"it's a bad idea" is not exactly a good argument though. being a bad idea does not discredit anything that's legally been put to vote.
The Confederal Alliance of Pilarcraft ✺ That world will cease to be
Led by The Triumvirate.
OOC | Military | History |Language | Overview | Parties | Q&A | Factbooks
Proud Civic Persian Nationalist
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:48 am

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Whatever the hell they got incarcerated for in the first place.


Thats a ridiculous argument.


Because people who go to prison will never try to avoid going back right?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:48 am

Arlenton wrote:
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:Voting is a human right under international law, not a privilege.

Who's enforcing it?

No one, because forcing countries to give their citizens rights is terrible /s
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft
Minister
 
Posts: 3373
Founded: Jul 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:49 am

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Arlenton wrote:Who's enforcing it?

No one, because forcing countries to give their citizens rights is terrible /s

Why?

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87274
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:49 am

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Thats a ridiculous argument.

So innmates who are serving a sentence for a marijuana related offense won't vote "yes" on referendums to legalize it?

marijuana shouldnt be illegal. and that's the very point of this. Why should someone be barred from voting permanently for a minor drug offense? And this amendment doesn't give current inmates the right to vote.
Last edited by San Lumen on Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:54 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10326
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:49 am

Aillyria wrote:
Arlenton wrote:Marijuana legalization.

Alcohol and tobacco are legal, marijuana is much less harmful than either (it isn't at all really, tbh). I don't understand the logic behind it being illegal.

Elected officials made it that way. If people don't like it, they elect other representatives who agree with them, which they have in some cases and in many others they have not.

User avatar
Greater Kossackia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 62
Founded: Nov 12, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Kossackia » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:49 am

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Thats a ridiculous argument.

So innmates who are serving a sentence for a marijuana related offense won't vote "yes" on referendums to legalize it?

You realize you're talking about something completely different, right? If you are still serving your sentence, then your voting right isn't restored until you sentence is complete.

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:50 am

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Thats a ridiculous argument.

So innmates who are serving a sentence for a marijuana related offense won't vote "yes" on referendums to legalize it?

TBF, a lot of people who've never even touched the shit want it legal. It's like, the great bipartisan issue of America
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10326
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:51 am

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:So innmates who are serving a sentence for a marijuana related offense won't vote "yes" on referendums to legalize it?

marijuana shouldnt be illegal. and that's the very point of this. Why should someone be barred from voting permanently for a minor drug offense.

Because it is illegal.

So how is Telconi's argument ridiculous? You agree they would vote for legalization right?

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:51 am

Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:No one, because forcing countries to give their citizens rights is terrible /s

Why?

Sarcasm, my dude. I worked for the UN for five years
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:51 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Because it's a bad idea...


Why? Saying "it's bad because I say it is" isn't an argument.


As much of an argument as "It's good because I say it is"
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft
Minister
 
Posts: 3373
Founded: Jul 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:51 am

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Arlenton wrote:So innmates who are serving a sentence for a marijuana related offense won't vote "yes" on referendums to legalize it?

TBF, a lot of people who've never even touched the shit want it legal. It's like, the great bipartisan issue of America

Like me (even though I'm British, not American), I don't do weed but I want it legalised

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87274
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:52 am

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:marijuana shouldnt be illegal. and that's the very point of this. Why should someone be barred from voting permanently for a minor drug offense.

Because it is illegal.

So how is Telconi's argument ridiculous? You agree they would vote for legalization right?


If its on the ballot after they served their time why the heck not?

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10326
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:53 am

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:Because it is illegal.

So how is Telconi's argument ridiculous? You agree they would vote for legalization right?


If its on the ballot after they served their time why the heck not?

Thought you meant if they were still in prison.

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:53 am

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:So innmates who are serving a sentence for a marijuana related offense won't vote "yes" on referendums to legalize it?

marijuana shouldnt be illegal. and that's the very point of this. Why should someone be barred from voting permanently for a minor drug offense? And this amendment doesn't give current inmates the right to vote?

Exactly. This isn't going to lead to politicians who want to legalize rape and murder. This is going to lead to politicians who are going to try to legalize minor offenses like drugs, and make the prison system better.
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Greater Kossackia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 62
Founded: Nov 12, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Kossackia » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:54 am

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
If its on the ballot after they served their time why the heck not?

Thought you meant if they were still in prison.

That is not the proposed amendment, as is pointed out in the OP and the cited articles. Why would he mean that?

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:54 am

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:Because it is illegal.

So how is Telconi's argument ridiculous? You agree they would vote for legalization right?


If its on the ballot after they served their time why the heck not?


So lemme get this straight, by your own admission, those who have served jail time will vote to legalize the crime they were jailed for. But if I say they will it's rediculous.

Can you explain this?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Aillyria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5026
Founded: Sep 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aillyria » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:54 am

Arlenton wrote:
Aillyria wrote:Alcohol and tobacco are legal, marijuana is much less harmful than either (it isn't at all really, tbh). I don't understand the logic behind it being illegal.

Elected officials made it that way. If people don't like it, they elect other representatives who agree with them, which they have in some cases and in many others they have not.

Ok.....you do realize elected officials do their own thing right? They don't have to do anything, and sometimes even if they want to they can't.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist

West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

L/R: -5.38 L/A: +2.36 8values: Theocratic Distributist
I am female, Sorelianist, Sufi Muslim, Biracial, Murican
USN Vet, Semper Fortis dirtbags!!!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Ifreann, Maryyanne, Narvatus, Terra Magnifica Gloria, The Jay Republic, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The Mazzars, Tungstan, Western Theram, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads