NATION

PASSWORD

Should Felons be Allowed to Vote? Florida to Have Referendum

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jan 24, 2018 1:55 am

Neutraligon wrote:Can you source the claim felons skew Democrat?


The issue isn't "felons" so much as it is the groups that are overrepresented as felons. Just like with voter id laws it's not so much people without ID's as it is the fact that the people without ID's tend to be minorities. Most of my experience with the issue is from the perspective of black voters being disenfranchised. I don't believe it's just black voters that can be worry about it's definitely one of the biggies.
So first of all black people like voting democrat. 86% lean or identify as democrat.

Now unfortunately for people who very much like winning elections you can't just say "no blacks" so instead you find a category that black people disproportionately belong to and restrict that category.

The group "felons" overlaps more with black than white voters. By suspending voting rights and making it harder to get them reinstated Florida has successfully disenfranchised almost a quarter of black adults
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Kaschuct
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Feb 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaschuct » Wed Jan 24, 2018 2:01 am

To be honest, yes. Now, I personally know quite a few people with felonies, and they were all fine and decent people. Just made some bad mistakes in the past and trying to be better.

Now, if this post angers anybody for any particular reason, well, sorry 'bout that, but that's your problem.
Kaschuct

We use NS stats

Year: present.

User avatar
Nioya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1310
Founded: Jul 31, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Nioya » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:25 am

Oddly enough the first time I ever heard about politics was when I was, I believe 7? The school had us do a little voting thing, and I had to choose between bush and carry. I chose carry because I thought we might as well change candidates now that we have the chance; my small child brain thought we should change politicians after one term. Then my mom told me to vote for carry because he said felons should be allowed to vote but bush didn’t.

I think the idea that felons can some how lose their rights as citizens is really fucked up. Punish a man, lock him, or kill, but don’t degrade him to being a foreign in his own country. Don’t take away his say in society when he is a member.
I like telegrams
First name: Matt
Gender: male
Sexual Orientation: gay
Nationality: American
Religious Orientation: Episcopalian
Relationship status: Single
Likes: Philosophy, history, world building, anime, audiobooks, aesthetics, coffee
Dislikes: SJWs, atheism, kids being loud
Random fact: I sleep with a body pillow

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:30 am

Indeed. I can understand removing the right to vote from some criminals, like say the really bad violent rapists, big money frauds, child molesters and that sort of people. You know, the kind you really don't want influencing your society. Also people that repeatedly refuse to vote. That kind should lose their rights. But you just do it for everyone which is indeed messed up.
Last edited by Purpelia on Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Exxosia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 603
Founded: May 09, 2008
Anarchy

Postby Exxosia » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:34 am

I think if you are currently in prison, you should not be allowed to vote as it would create warped voting blocks in areas with prisons and that prisoners could easily be forced to vote along certain lines by COs or others.

Once released however, they should be allowed to vote as it would be their right.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35947
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:35 am

Telconi wrote:
Katganistan wrote:
No one is saying that everyone should be absolved; there's a prohibition against murderers and sex offenders in the bill.

Would you like to be judged for one mistake you made for life? Would it be fair for people to bring it up thirty years later? "Oh yes, Telconi -- they don't deserve to have a job because they were an underage video game enthusiast. They played AO games when they shouldn't have been able to!"


Some mistakes are worth permanent consequences.

You're not actually arguing against the Florida bill then. It stipulates that murderers and sex offenders should not get to vote again.

Unless you're asserting that anyone who has ever been in jail for any crime should never vote again?
Last edited by Katganistan on Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7076
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:57 am

If they served their time and have been deemed rehabilitated then yes.

EER OT wrote:voting is a privilege not a right

If you say so.
Last edited by The Greater Ohio Valley on Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:23 am, edited 2 times in total.
Fly me to the moon on an irradiated manhole cover.
- Free speech
- Weapons rights
- Democracy
- LGBTQ+ rights
- Racial equality
- Gender/sexual equality
- Voting rights
- Universal healthcare
- Workers rights
- Drug decriminalization
- Cannabis legalization
- Due process
- Rehabilitative justice
- Religious freedom
- Choice
- Environmental protections
- Secularism
ANTI
- Fascism/Nazism
- Conservatism
- Nationalism
- Authoritarianism/Totalitarianism
- Traditionalism
- Ethnic/racial supremacy
- Racism
- Sexism
- Transphobia
- Homophobia
- Religious extremism
- Laissez-faire capitalism
- Warmongering
- Accelerationism
- Isolationism
- Theocracy
- Anti-intellectualism
- Climate change denialism

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jan 24, 2018 7:44 am

The Black Forrest wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Why? Is being locked in prison and denied a vote going to rehabilitate people where only being locked in prison wouldn't?


*shrugs* How is voting in prison going to rehabilitate them?

It probably isn't. But people have the right to vote before they're convicted. If it isn't going to help society to take their right to vote away then I don't see why we should. Seems obvious to me that we should try to minimise the loss of rights for people we send to prison.


Exxosia wrote:I think if you are currently in prison, you should not be allowed to vote as it would create warped voting blocks in areas with prisons and that prisoners could easily be forced to vote along certain lines by COs or others.

Once released however, they should be allowed to vote as it would be their right.

How do prisoners get forced to vote a specific way when it's a secret ballot?

User avatar
Luziyca
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38036
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Luziyca » Wed Jan 24, 2018 7:56 am

I support it: the only instances where felons should not allowed to vote is if they have committed electoral fraud.
|||The Kingdom of Rwizikuru|||
Your feeble attempts to change the very nature of how time itself has been organized by mankind shall fall on barren ground and bear no fruit
IIwikiFacebookKylaris: the best region for eight years runningAbout meYouTubePolitical compass

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:11 am

Anyone who has served their time should NOT have their rights (any rights) denied. It's wrong to continue to punish them beyond their sentence.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:14 am

Luziyca wrote:I support it: the only instances where felons should not allowed to vote is if they have committed electoral fraud.


Agreed, with the exception of those still serving their sentence (including those on probation etc). While serving their sentence they should lose their voting rights.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:17 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Luziyca wrote:I support it: the only instances where felons should not allowed to vote is if they have committed electoral fraud.


Agreed, with the exception of those still serving their sentence (including those on probation etc). While serving their sentence they should lose their voting rights.

Why?

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12369
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:06 am

Ifreann wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Agreed, with the exception of those still serving their sentence (including those on probation etc). While serving their sentence they should lose their voting rights.

Why?

They're still paying their debt to society, and must wait to actually contribute again.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:09 am

Proctopeo wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Why?

They're still paying their debt to society, and must wait to actually contribute again.

Why should paying their debt to society entail losing the right to vote? Doesn't seem to me to accomplish anything.

User avatar
Minoa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5404
Founded: Oct 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Minoa » Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:12 am

Topoliani wrote:Nobody should have their voting rights restricted (except for anyone under 18) tbh.

The only other exception should be those convicted of electoral fraud and corruption in elections, but such bans under those circumstances are not permanent here in the UK.
Mme A. d'Oiseau, B.A. (State of Minoa)

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12369
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:14 am

Ifreann wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:They're still paying their debt to society, and must wait to actually contribute again.

Why should paying their debt to society entail losing the right to vote? Doesn't seem to me to accomplish anything.

Is voting not part of contributing to society?
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19942
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:17 am

Proctopeo wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Why should paying their debt to society entail losing the right to vote? Doesn't seem to me to accomplish anything.

Is voting not part of contributing to society?

Having people pay their debt to society by preventing them from contributing to society seems counter productive
British
Atheist
IT Support
That there is no exception to the rule "There is an exception to every rule" is the exception that proves the rule.
---
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll stop asking you to catch his fish.
That's not happening
That shouldn't be happening
Why is that happening?
That's why it's happening?
How has this ever worked?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:19 am

Proctopeo wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Why should paying their debt to society entail losing the right to vote? Doesn't seem to me to accomplish anything.

Is voting not part of contributing to society?

Sure, you could call it that. What does it matter?

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40533
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:23 am

Truth be told there is only one crime I can think of that I think should remove the right to vote and that is voter fraud of some type or another.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Jan 24, 2018 10:20 am

Purpelia wrote:Indeed. I can understand removing the right to vote from some criminals, like say the really bad violent rapists, big money frauds, child molesters and that sort of people. You know, the kind you really don't want influencing your society. Also people that repeatedly refuse to vote. That kind should lose their rights. But you just do it for everyone which is indeed messed up.

People who dont vote shouldnt be denied the right to vote in the future.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:12 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Im truly sorry to hear that. Voting isn't a ritual its a right.


except it doesn't do anything, we are ruled by capitalist overlords pulling the strings regardless; and from an individual point of view one vote doesn't do anything

Im truly sorry every election doesn't come to one vote. But if over one million people had their voting rights restored it would have massive effect on statewide elections in the state. Im sorry you can't see that no matter how many different ways its explained to you.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:28 am

Exxosia wrote:I think if you are currently in prison, you should not be allowed to vote as it would create warped voting blocks in areas with prisons and that prisoners could easily be forced to vote along certain lines by COs or others.

Once released however, they should be allowed to vote as it would be their right.


"We can't let you vote, we're protecting the integrity of your vote."

Infected Mushroom wrote:
except it doesn't do anything, we are ruled by capitalist overlords pulling the strings regardless; and from an individual point of view one vote doesn't do anything


Your capitalist overlords giggle behind their hands at the vast numbers of people who think they've outsmarted them by not voting.
Last edited by Des-Bal on Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Jan 24, 2018 12:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Exxosia wrote:I think if you are currently in prison, you should not be allowed to vote as it would create warped voting blocks in areas with prisons and that prisoners could easily be forced to vote along certain lines by COs or others.

Once released however, they should be allowed to vote as it would be their right.


"We can't let you vote, we're protecting the integrity of your vote."

Infected Mushroom wrote:
except it doesn't do anything, we are ruled by capitalist overlords pulling the strings regardless; and from an individual point of view one vote doesn't do anything


Your capitalist overlords giggle behind their hands at the vast numbers of people who think they've outsmarted them by not voting.


IM will never understand that. They will just come up with another ridiculous response as to how voting is pointless and therefore this referendum is pointless
Last edited by San Lumen on Wed Jan 24, 2018 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30396
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Wed Jan 24, 2018 12:05 pm

Nioya wrote:Oddly enough the first time I ever heard about politics was when I was, I believe 7? The school had us do a little voting thing, and I had to choose between bush and carry. I chose carry because I thought we might as well change candidates now that we have the chance; my small child brain thought we should change politicians after one term. Then my mom told me to vote for carry because he said felons should be allowed to vote but bush didn’t.

I think the idea that felons can some how lose their rights as citizens is really fucked up. Punish a man, lock him, or kill, but don’t degrade him to being a foreign in his own country. Don’t take away his say in society when he is a member.


I think you mean John Kerry, not Carry. He is the personification of Massachusettan stodginess, but you, me, and him can agree that felons are still members of our society.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Wed Jan 24, 2018 12:23 pm

Civic involvement is a key part of reintegration into general society, voting is an important part of this and allows someone to feel invested in their community. Your constitutional rights should not be withheld after you've already served your sentence and it is wrong to withhold those rights.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Drongonia, Fractalnavel, Google [Bot], Independent Galactic States, Settentrionalia

Advertisement

Remove ads