Southern nationalist syndicalism eh. I don't think i've ever been an adherent to an ideology as interesting as syndicalism for all its variations. Capitalism maybe.
Advertisement
by Ostroeuropa » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:40 pm
by Liriena » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:40 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Conserative Morality » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:41 pm
Liriena wrote:To be fair, a lot of people on the left also think the whole "Clinton lost because of misogyny" argument is bollocks.
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:41 pm
by Oil exporting People » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:41 pm
Liriena wrote:Whever someone frames their right-wing ideology in terms of "pill taking", I can't help but chuckle at the thought that it all stems from a movie franchise created by two trans women.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:42 pm
Liriena wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... l-the-same
Sure they do. They do only as long as we march in goosestep towards a progressive agenda. Otherwise we don't mean shit and your side is completely willing to throw us under the bus.
To be fair, a lot of people on the left also think the whole "Clinton lost because of misogyny" argument is bollocks.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Ostroeuropa » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:43 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Liriena wrote:To be fair, a lot of people on the left also think the whole "Clinton lost because of misogyny" argument is bollocks.
She lost by such a small margin in a few important states that I find it pretty plausible tbh. It would only have to be a small fraction of voters.
by Liriena » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:43 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Conserative Morality » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:45 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Sorry, had to edit, but yes, not all leftists did, but the American left, as a political bloc, would rather see minorities agree with them 100% politically and vote in the interest of the left than truly reach out to our communities.
by War Gears » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:45 pm
by Liriena » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:45 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Liriena » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:46 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:46 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Sorry, had to edit, but yes, not all leftists did, but the American left, as a political bloc, would rather see minorities agree with them 100% politically and vote in the interest of the left than truly reach out to our communities.
"Political group would rather see the people it believes its policies will help agree with them ideologically rather than having to rely on pork barrel dicksucking to get their way"
Wow what a revelation
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Ostroeuropa » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:46 pm
by War Gears » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:46 pm
by Ostroeuropa » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:47 pm
by Conserative Morality » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:48 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:At least it's a fair criticism, instead of thinking minorities have to suck dick to the political group to survive because "hey, at least they promise you equality, never mind they never deliver". But I guess that's a hard pill to swallow for some.
by Liriena » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:48 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:She lost by such a small margin in a few important states that I find it pretty plausible tbh. It would only have to be a small fraction of voters.
Why not the misandry? Likewise, a small fraction. Studies show that voters don't particularly discriminate against women candidates.
But I bet you she lost enough white males with her comments, and feminism in general alienated enough people over the years. Most republicans believe anti-white racism is prevalent, and men have it tougher than women. Trump also signaled to the MRM during the election a few times, and Betsy did eventually look at campus rape tribunals.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by War Gears » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:49 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:War Gears wrote:
I'm having flash backs to that time I wrote a "Southern national syndicalist manifesto" at 15 and called the South a "proletarian nation" which had fought against the "bourgeois Yankee plutocracy."
I knew there was a reason I liked the south. You've managed to express it beautifully.
by Conserative Morality » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:49 pm
War Gears wrote:I'm having flash backs to that time I wrote a "Southern national syndicalist manifesto" at 15 and called the South a "proletarian nation" which had fought against the "bourgeois Yankee plutocracy."
by Liriena » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:49 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:"Political group would rather see the people it believes its policies will help agree with them ideologically rather than having to rely on pork barrel dicksucking to get their way"
Wow what a revelation
At least it's a fair criticism, instead of thinking minorities have to suck dick to the political group to survive because "hey, at least they promise you equality, never mind they never deliver". But I guess that's a hard pill to swallow for some.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Conserative Morality » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:49 pm
War Gears wrote:There's not really anything more plutocratic than exempting wealthy slave owners from fighting the war they started though.
by Oil exporting People » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:51 pm
Liriena wrote:"""ironic"""
Ostroeuropa wrote:Southern nationalist syndicalism eh. I don't think i've ever been an adherent to an ideology as interesting as syndicalism for all its variations. Capitalism maybe.
War Gears wrote:Took one a few years ago, didn't do anything. Mostly because I realized natsyn's are normally just corporatists pretending to be socialists.
by Ostroeuropa » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:51 pm
Liriena wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Why not the misandry? Likewise, a small fraction. Studies show that voters don't particularly discriminate against women candidates.
But I bet you she lost enough white males with her comments, and feminism in general alienated enough people over the years. Most republicans believe anti-white racism is prevalent, and men have it tougher than women. Trump also signaled to the MRM during the election a few times, and Betsy did eventually look at campus rape tribunals.
It is true that cultural resentment/anxiety played a large role in the 2016 election. And without an inspiring socioeconomic platform to fall back on, Clinton was kind of screwed.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:51 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:At least it's a fair criticism, instead of thinking minorities have to suck dick to the political group to survive because "hey, at least they promise you equality, never mind they never deliver". But I guess that's a hard pill to swallow for some.
That might be more ideologically concerning if they delivered to others instead of just failing all the time.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Kerwa, Neu California, Philjia, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Quasi-Stellar Star Civilizations
Advertisement