Vassenor wrote:How do you nationalise a multinational corporation?
Thankfully, you can't. A good thing about globalism is that dictatorships can't wipe out a big company like Google by nationalizing it. But you can drive a multinational corporation out of your nation, if that's what you desire.
Ostroeuropa wrote:-Ocelot- wrote:
Considering that the moon can easily be argued (an in my opinion, proven) to be a holographic projection of cheddar cheese....
Just because you buy into it doesn't make it true, you know. For starters, there's a schism over whether Misandry is even a thing. If your movement has a sizable contingent that outright argues it's impossible to hate, show contempt, or discriminate against another group, that strikes me as of the same substance as denying, say, anti-semitism is a thing, itself evidence of the problem.
Then you've got the consistent focus on male perpetrators. Not female victims, male perpetrators, as female victims of female perpetrators are often ignored. This extends even into issues like Slut Shaming, where the majority is conducted by straight women against straight women, but the focus still remains on male perpetrators. This reveals that the movement is not interested in helping women, but attacking men. Much like someone who said "We just care about terrorism" but only ever talked about Muslim terrorism could be reasonably called an Islamophobe hiding behind sophistry, most feminists can be concluded to be misandrists.
This all applies to the mainstream. Fringe feminists may differ from these observable trends. You mock my line there because you're in denial over it, and refuse to actually consider whether the things feminism asserts about itself are true.
The conservatives claim they want a strong economy and conflate conservatism with it, despite evidence to the contrary.
So it goes for feminism asserting it means equality. No conspiracy necessary, just ignorance, incompetence, and a refusal to question dogma.
You've got "Manspreading" and "Male tears" as examples of rhetorical misandry from mainstream feminism, which themselves grow out of the "There is no misandry" assertion.
If the evidence contains instances of those terms, he may as well cash the cheque early, as the public isn't going to put up with what many feminists have convinced themselves is normal behavior, as normal.
Not relevant to the discussion but if you expect me to read a 200 paragraph rant about how misandry oppresses you, you are out of luck. I can't do it, sorry. Blame feminism.
