Trump MAGAThread XI: Button, Button, Who's Got The Button?

[Petrasylvania]

Gee, all those Preciouss and they can't withstand a barrage of verbal and written criticism. Guess guns can't protect from everything.

I have always believed the number of guns a person has is inversely proportional to the sum of their fears.

With that kind of snowflaking it's little surprise they value the 2nd Amendment over the 1st.

[Ifreann]

So it seems the NRA is whining about all the people criticising them, calling it a "lynch mob".

Grow a backbone you goddamn snowflakes. The internet is not your safe space.

Gee, all those Preciouss and they can't withstand a barrage of verbal and written criticism. Guess guns can't protect from everything.

No amount of guns can make people be polite when they're online and you can't shoot them.

[Ifreann]

Gee, all those Preciouss and they can't withstand a barrage of verbal and written criticism. Guess guns can't protect from everything.

I have always believed the number of guns a person has is inversely proportional to the sum of their fears.

More guns -> fewer/lesser fears?

[Proctopeo]

So it seems the NRA is whining about all the people criticising them, calling it a "lynch mob".

Grow a backbone you goddamn snowflakes. The internet is not your safe space.

tbf they have a point when there's people screeching about them being "tewwowists". That's not criticism.

[Petrasylvania]

I have always believed the number of guns a person has is inversely proportional to the sum of their fears.

More guns -> fewer/lesser fears?

Clearly they don't have enough guns to conquer their fears of criticism.

[Ifreann]

So it seems the NRA is whining about all the people criticising them, calling it a "lynch mob".

Grow a backbone you goddamn snowflakes. The internet is not your safe space.

tbf they have a point when there's people screeching about them being "tewwowists". That's not criticism.

"I'm not whining, you're whining!"
Solid stuff.

[Proctopeo]

tbf they have a point when there's people screeching about them being "tewwowists". That's not criticism.

"I'm not whining, you're whining!"
Solid stuff.

What. Just, what.

[Ifreann]

"I'm not whining, you're whining!"
Solid stuff.

What. Just, what.

screeching

"tewwowists"

"You're the whiners! You talk like babies!"

[Proctopeo]

What. Just, what.

screeching

"tewwowists"

"You're the whiners! You talk like babies!"

The people who say the NRA are terrorists very much act like them. Not too much of a leap to guess that they talk like them too :^)

[Petrasylvania]

"You're the whiners! You talk like babies!"

The people who say the NRA are terrorists very much act like them. Not too much of a leap to guess that they talk like them too :^)

And yet all those guns can't stop the NRA's feefees from getting hurt. :^]

[Proctopeo]

The people who say the NRA are terrorists very much act like them. Not too much of a leap to guess that they talk like them too :^)

And yet all those guns can't stop the NRA's feefees from getting hurt. :^]

At least they have just cause

[Jerzylvania]

I have always believed the number of guns a person has is inversely proportional to the sum of their fears.

More guns -> fewer/lesser fears?

Gimme a break. I said it was a belief of mine, not a law of the universe, though it does have a mathematical maxim sound to it.

It means to me is most of the people I know who have guns talk too much about being inordinately afraid of getting robbed, assaulted etc.. In other words, beyond what I here most folks saying on those issues. People that have lots of guns tend to talk about their guns most of the time and why they have them all. But remember this was stated as being relevant to my experiences.

[Ifreann]

More guns -> fewer/lesser fears?

Gimme a break. I said it was a belief of mine, not a law of the universe, though it does have a mathematical maxim sound to it.

It means to me is most of the people I know who have guns talk too much about being inordinately afraid of getting robbed, assaulted etc.. In other words, beyond what I here most folks saying on those issues. People that have lots of guns tend to talk about their guns most of the time and why they have them all. But remember this was stated as being relevant to my experiences.

If what you're trying to express is that people with guns are afraid, and that people with more guns are more afraid, then the term you want is "directly proportional", not "inversely proportional".

[Jerzylvania]

Gimme a break. I said it was a belief of mine, not a law of the universe, though it does have a mathematical maxim sound to it.

It means to me is most of the people I know who have guns talk too much about being inordinately afraid of getting robbed, assaulted etc.. In other words, beyond what I here most folks saying on those issues. People that have lots of guns tend to talk about their guns most of the time and why they have them all. But remember this was stated as being relevant to my experiences.

If what you're trying to express is that people with guns are afraid, and that people with more guns are more afraid, then the term you want is "directly proportional", not "inversely proportional".

Now that you mention that, umm, correct. *looks back and forth, shifts weight between feet*
It was a trick question to see who knows any math around here. *eyes dart around room*
Yeah, that's it.

[Shofercia]

So if you think that's the relevant bit, and I technically agreed with you on what you thought was the relevant bit, why the lengthy post? Do you typically provide lengthy posts on issues where NSGers are in technical agreement, before accusing your fellow posters of two-headed monkey attempts?

Yes, especially when said posters say "I technically agree with you, but look over there!!"

Not sure why you felt the need to make the text small, but it's good to see that you gave up on defending CNN. This is the Trump MAGAThread. Trump disses CNN constantly, sometimes rightfully, sometimes not. My point was that even though what they said was technically valid, their actions were still... sad. And that was my point.

In response to said point, you proceeded to launch an attack on the Haab family, whose son acted heroically during the shooting, perhaps as part of his JROTC training. Said attack was nothing but a pathetic attempt to make CNN look good. As amusing as your feeble attempts to make CNN look good were, their viewership numbers tell the real story. Those aren't very good.

Fox News: http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/january- ... ars/356285

Prime time (Mon-Sun): 2,456,000 total viewers
Total Day (Mon-Sun): 1,494,000 total viewers

MSNBC: http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/january- ... wth/356288

Prime time (Mon-Sun): 1,862,000 total viewers
Total Day (Mon-Sun): 1,001,000 total viewers

CNN: http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/january- ... ime/356291

Prime time (Mon-Sun): 927,000 total viewers
Total Day (Mon-Sun): 713,000 total viewers

2.5 mil vs 1.9 mil vs 900k. Maybe if CNN would actually give the people the chance to select the questions they wanted to ask, rather than selecting said question for them, they could stop being in the junior league. Nah. It's also funny how you, Gravlen, continue to ignore the part about Veterans, but then again, I guess that's irrelevant to you.

[Gravlen]

Democrat-written memo from the House Intelligence Committee has been released


And it has footnotes, citing sources.

[Camicon]

Democrat-written memo from the House Intelligence Committee has been released


And it has footnotes, citing sources.

Footnotes? Citations? What is the blasphemy!?

[Ifreann]

Democrat-written memo from the House Intelligence Committee has been released


And it has footnotes, citing sources.

Footnotes? Citations? What is the blasphemy!?

Foulest communism! Convene the HUAC at once!

[Petrasylvania]

Footnotes? Citations? What is the blasphemy!?

Foulest communism! Convene the HUAC at once!

Time to reanimate Joe McCarthy.

[Freezic Vast]

Foulest communism! Convene the HUAC at once!

Time to reanimate Joe McCarthy.

McCarthy did nothing wrong.

[Cekoviu]

Foulest communism! Convene the HUAC at once!

Time to reanimate Joe McCarthy.

Oh, not again. He's been reanimated so many times that he'll probably fall apart if we do it again.

[Northern Davincia]

Time to reanimate Joe McCarthy.

McCarthy did nothing wrong.

You speak the truth of St. McCarthy.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Time to reanimate Joe McCarthy.

Oh, not again. He's been reanimated so many times that he'll probably fall apart if we do it again.

R O B O M C C A R T H Y

[Proctopeo]

Oh, not again. He's been reanimated so many times that he'll probably fall apart if we do it again.

R O B O M C C A R T H Y

We can rebuild him. We have the capability to make the world's first bionic man.
He will be 50% man. 50% robot. 100% raw American hero.

[Kramanica]

R O B O M C C A R T H Y

We can rebuild him. We have the capability to make the world's first bionic man.
He will be 50% man. 50% robot. 100% raw American hero.